Introduction

Asymmetric cell division (ACD) gives rise to two daughter cells that possess identical genetic material but distinct cell fates, playing a crucial role in both development and tissue homeostasis (Royall and Jessberger, 2021; Sunchu and Cabernard, 2020; Venkei and Yamashita, 2018; Wooten et al., 2020; Zion et al., 2020). Both extrinsic and intrinsic mechanisms determine distinct daughter cell fates after ACD. While extrinsic mechanisms, such as exposure to signaling cues from the local niche, have been extensively studied and are known to define stem cell fate (Morrison and Spradling, 2008), the intrinsic mechanisms are more complex and largely unresolved, despite several proteins, RNA molecules, and organelles having been implicated in the regulation of some types of ACD (Sunchu and Cabernard, 2020; Zion et al., 2020). Epigenetic mechanisms play a crucial role in guiding the two daughter cells towards establishing differential gene expression profiles, ultimately defining their unique cell identities (Allis and Jenuwein, 2016; Escobar et al., 2021; Stewart-Morgan et al., 2020). During the ACD of Drosophila male germline stem cells (GSCs), pre-existing and newly synthesized histones H3 and H4 are asymmetrically segregated towards the stem daughter cell and the differentiating daughter cell, respectively (Wooten et al., 2020). Nevertheless, the extent to which epigenetic information is asymmetrically inherited through ACD in other organisms and the mechanism by which this process occurs remains elusive.

Caenorhabditis elegans represents a valuable model for investigating ACD, given its invariant cell lineage and conserved mechanisms of ACD. During hermaphrodite development in C. elegans, 131 somatic cells undergo programmed cell death, with the majority produced through ACD that create a large cell programmed for survival and a small cell programmed to die (Sulston and Horvitz, 1977; Sulston et al., 1983a) The opposing cell fates of daughter cells, i.e., to live or die, offer a compelling experimental system for investigating how epigenetic inheritance determines life versus death decisions during ACD. It is noteworthy that 105 of the 131 apoptotic cells (Q.aa and Q.pp), respectively (Figure 1A).

Figure 1:

In the nematode, the classic apoptotic pathway initiates upon activation of the BH3-only protein EGL-1 in the cells that are fated to die. EGL-1 binds to the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2-like protein CED-9, which facilitates the release of the pro-apoptotic protein CED-4, leading to caspase CED-3 activation. Activated caspase promotes the exposure of phosphatidylserine (PS) on the surface of apoptotic cells, which triggers the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells via partially redundant signaling pathways such as the CED-1/CED-6/CED-7 pathway and the CED-2/CED-5/CED-12 pathway. Proper transcriptional regulation of the egl-1 gene is vital for life-versus-death decisions in C. elegans (Conradt and Horvitz, 1998; Nehme and Conradt, 2008). Although the cell-specific transcriptional regulator has been identified in certain cells, including the sexually dimorphic HSN and CEM neurons, M4 motor neuron, NSM neuron, P11.aaap cell, ABpl/rpppapp, and the tail spike cell (Hirose et al., 2010; Jiang and Wu, 2014; Nehme and Conradt, 2008), the general upstream regulators of egl-1 at the chromatin remodeling or epigenetic level are unclear. Two NSM neuroblasts undergo ACDs to each generate a larger NSM cell programed to survive and a smaller NSM sister cell programed to die (Sulston et al., 1983b). The PIG-1 kinase-dependent asymmetric partitioning of the Snail-like transcription factor, CES-1, represses egl-1 transcription in the larger NSM sister cells, thereby preventing their apoptosis (Hatzold and Conradt, 2008; Wei et al., 2020) However, the mechanism underlying the asymmetrical activation of egl-1 in other ACDs remains elusive.

In this study, we demonstrate the enrichment of the NuRD complex in cells that are predetermined to survive, and its role in suppressing the EGL-1-CED-9-CED-4-CED-3 apoptotic pathway through repression of the egl-1 gene. Furthermore, we report the interaction between the NuRD complex and the V-ATPase complex, and reveal that during asymmetric cell division, the localization of the V-ATPase complex and cytoplasmic pH are asymmetrical, thereby contributing to the polarized segregation of the NuRD complex.

Results

NuRD asymmetric segregation during neuroblast ACDs

In order to gain insights into the molecular distinctions between apoptotic and surviving cells in C. elegans embryos, we employed the SPLiT single-cell RNA sequencing platform to compare their transcriptomes (Figure S1A-S1C) (Rosenberg et al., 2018). The expression of the critical somatic apoptosis-inducing gene egl-1 was used to distinguish the apoptotic and surviving cells (Conradt et al., 2016). Intriguingly, we identified transcripts encoding subunits of the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD; also known as Mi-2) complex in cells where egl-1 expression was indiscernible (Figure S1D-S1F, Supplementary Table 1). The NuRD complex represents an evolutionarily conserved protein complex associated with chromatin that couples the activities of chromatin-remodeling ATPases with histone deacetylases (Figure 1B) (Bracken et al., 2019; Lai and Wade, 2011). NuRD-mediated alterations in chromatin structure are vital for appropriate transcriptional regulation during cell fate determination and lineage commitment (Bracken et al., 2019; Lai and Wade, 2011), suggesting that NuRD may serve as a candidate epigenetic factor to specify cell fate between survival and death.

To investigate whether NuRD components are distributed asymmetrically between apoptotic and surviving daughter cells, we expressed GFP-tagged NuRD subunits within the C. elegans Q neuroblast lineages. Q.a neuroblast undergoes ACD to generate a large surviving Q.ap cell and a small apoptotic Q.aa cell (Figure 1A). We found that GFP-tagged NuRD subunits, including the histone deacetylase HDA-1, the histone binding protein LIN-53, the nucleosome remodeling factor CHD-3, and the MEP-1 protein were enriched asymmetrically in the surviving QR.ap cell during QR.a division (Figure S2, Supplementary Movie S1 and S2). Notably, NuRD asymmetric distribution occurred within several minutes after metaphase, while GFP protein translation and chromophore maturation require approximately one hour in vivo (Heim et al., 1995; Iizuka et al., 2011), suggesting that the asymmetric enrichment of NuRD is likely the result of protein redistribution.

To investigate the dynamic distribution of endogenous NuRD during ACD, we generated a GFP knock-in (KI) strain for HDA-1 and an mNeonGreen (NG, green fluorescence) KI line for LIN-53 using CRISPR-Cas9 (Figure 1C). In QR.a cells, nuclear HDA-1 and LIN-53 were released into the cytoplasm and evenly distributed until metaphase (Figure 1D, Supplementary Movie S3 and S4). At anaphase, HDA-1 and LIN-53 became enriched in the posterior part of QR.a but became less detectable in the anterior part (Figure 1D, S3A-B, Supplementary Movie S3 and S4). By quantifying the fluorescence intensity ratio between posterior and anterior chromatids of QR.a or QR.ap and QR.aa nuclei, we found that nuclear HDA-1 or LIN-53 asymmetry gradually increased from 1.1-fold at the onset of anaphase to 1.5 or 1.8-fold at cytokinesis, respectively (Figure 1D-E). We measured the ratios of fluorescence intensities between the posterior and anterior halves of QR.a or between QR.ap and QR.aa (Figure S4A, see Materials and Methods). NuRD asymmetry became evident at ∼4 minutes and reached a plateau at ∼6 minutes after the anaphase onset (time 0 min, the last frame before the sister chromosome separation; Figure 1D, 1F, S3A and S4B). QR.a spent ∼6 minutes from anaphase to the completion of cytokinesis (Chai et al., 2012; Ou et al., 2010) indicating that QR.a cell establishes NuRD asymmetry during ACD.

Similar to QR.a, the dynamic and progressively developing NuRD asymmetry was also observed in the QL.a, QR.p and QL.p cell lineages, which generate apoptotic cells (Figure 1G, S3B and S4B). In contrast, an even distribution of HDA-1 and LIN-53 was observed in two surviving daughters of QR, QL, QL.pa and QR.pa cells, which generate two viable siblings (Figure 1G and S3B). To investigate whether other epigenetic factors are also asymmetrically segregated during Q cell ACDs, we tagged the MYST family histone acetyltransferase (MYS-1 in C. elegans) with GFP. We found that MYS-1::GFP was symmetrically segregated into the apoptotic and surviving daughter cells (Figure 1D-F, S3A and S4B, Supplementary Movie S5), indicating the specificity of the polarized NuRD partition. The total fluorescence of HDA-1, LIN-53, and MYS-1 remained constant during ACDs, suggesting that protein redistribution may establish NuRD asymmetry (Figure S4C). Inhibition of a PAR-1 family kinase PIG-1 led to symmetric Q cell divisions, producing extra neurons derived from some of their apoptotic daughters (Cordes et al., 2006). In pig-1 (gm344) mutants, HDA-1 and LIN-53 were evenly partitioned during ACDs (Figure S5, Supplementary Movie S6 and S7), indicating that asymmetric NuRD segregation depends on the PIG-1 kinase.

NuRD asymmetric segregation in embryonic cell lineages

Given that 113 out of 131 somatic apoptotic events in C. elegans occur during embryonic development (Sulston et al., 1983a), we used live imaging and automated cell lineage tracing algorithms (Du et al., 2014) to track NuRD asymmetry in embryos from the two- or four-cell stage up to the 350-cell stage For example, approximately 200 minutes after the first embryonic division, ABalaappp divides to generate two viable daughters while its sibling ABalaappa divides asymmetrically and produces one daughter that undergoes apoptosis (Figure 2A). Similar to what we observed in the Q lineage, HDA-1 was evenly distributed in the two viable daughters of ABalaappp, while it was asymmetrically segregated during the ACD of ABalaappa (Figure 2B). Overall, we found that HDA-1 and LIN-53 were enriched (average ratio > 1.5) in the surviving daughters from 15 out of 17 embryonic ACDs that produce apoptotic daughter cells (Figure 2C-D and Supplementary Table 2). There were two exceptions, ABaraaaap and MSpppaa, whose two daughter cells received similar amounts of NuRD (Figure 2C-D). While MSpppaa’s apoptotic daughter cell undergoes apoptosis about 400 minutes after its generation (Hsieh et al., 2012; Sulston et al., 1983b), consistent with the idea that a low concentration of NuRD may promote apoptosis, ABaraaaap’s apoptotic daughter cell completes apoptosis within 35 minutes (Sulston et al., 1983a), suggesting that a NuRD-independent mechanism may regulate apoptosis in this cell.

Figure 2:

Loss of the deacetylation activity of NuRD causes ectopic apoptosis

To investigate the role of NuRD in determining cell fate, we reduced the deacetylation activity of NuRD using RNA-mediated interference (RNAi). The hda-1 and lin-53 RNAi efficacy was confirmed by the reduced green fluorescence in the germlines of HDA-1::GFP and LIN-53::mNeonGreen KI animals, as well as the increased acetylation level of histone H3K27 (Figure S6). As reported before, RNAi of either had-1 or lin-53 caused embryonic lethality (Shi and Mello, 1998). RNAi of lin-53 led to embryos arrested at gastrulation stage before the generation of apoptotic cells, preventing us from analyzing its roles in somatic apoptosis. In contrast, hda-1 RNAi embryos arrested between the late gastrulation stage and bean stage, allowing us to tracked some of apoptotic events. To quantify apoptotic events, we used a secreted Annexin V (sAnxV::GFP) sensor to label apoptotic cells with externalized phosphatidylserine (exPS) on the surface of the plasma membrane in ced-1(e1735) mutant embryos which inhibits engulfment of apoptotic cells (Conradt et al., 2016; Mapes et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2001). The sAnxV::GFP labeled an average of 10 cells in ced-1(e1735) mutant embryos treated with control RNAi and an average of 14 cells in ced-1(e1735); hda-1 RNAi embryos (Figure 3A-B). To test whether the upregulated apoptosis in hda-1 RNAi embryos depends on the canonic apoptosis pathway, we introduced cell death-deficient mutations ced-3/ Caspase (n2433), ced-4/ APAF-1-like (n1162), ced-9/ BCL-2-like (n1950), and egl-1/ BH-3 only protein (n1084n3082) into ced-1 mutant, respectively. RNAi of hda-1 in these embryos only generated 0-2 exPS-positive cells (Figure 3A-B and S7A), indicating that the ectopic increase of apoptosis by HDA-1 inhibition requires the EGL-1-CED-9-CED-4-CED-3 pathway.

Figure 3:

NuRD RNAi upregulates the egl-1 expression by increasing its H3K27 acetylation

To understand how NuRD regulates apoptotic cell fates, we performed RNA-Seq analyses on WT, hda-1 RNAi and lin-53 RNAi embryos. In both RNAi conditions, we observed 287 or 575 genes that were upregulated or downregulated (|log₂FD| > 2 and FDR < 0.05) (Supplementary Table 3). Notably, we found that the apoptosis-inducing gene egl-1 was among the upregulated genes (Figure 3C). Our quantitative RT-PCR results further confirmed that egl-1 transcripts were more abundant in hda-1 RNAi and lin-53 RNAi embryos than in control RNAi embryos (Figure 3D). We also used a Pegl-1::NLS::GFP transcriptional reporter to examine the egl-1 transcription activity during embryonic development, which allowed us to detect egl-1 expression while avoiding the adverse effects of egl-1 overexpression on apoptosis. We found that RNAi of hda-1 or lin-53 caused an increased number of Pegl-1::NLS::GFP positive cells (Figure 3E and S7B). These results indicate that the loss of NuRD abnormally activates the egl-1 gene expression.

Next, we investigated whether the loss of histone deacetylase activity in NuRD increased the H3K27ac level at the egl-1 locus, as the histone H3K27ac level is associated with transcription activation (Heinz et al., 2015). To test this, we performed ChIP-Seq experiments with the anti-H3K27ac antibody and found that the transcription start site (TSS) and the gene body region of egl-1 had higher levels of H3K27ac in hda-1 or lin-53 RNAi embryos compared to WT (Figure 3F). This was validated by ChIP-qPCR in hda-1 RNAi embryos (Figure 3G). Therefore, inhibiting NuRD increased the H3K27ac level at the egl-1 locus, leading to its upregulation and subsequent activation of apoptosis.

V-ATPase regulates asymmetric segregation of NuRD during somatic ACDs

To investigate how NuRD is asymmetrically segregated during ACD, we used affinity purification with an anti-GFP antibody and mass spectrometry (MS) to isolate NuRD binding partners from the lysate of HDA-1::GFP KI animals. Our analysis revealed all the previously known NuRD subunits from HDA-1::GFP KI animals (Figure S8, Supplementary Table 4) (Bracken et al., 2019; Lai and Wade, 2011), validating our experimental method. Interestingly, our co-immunoprecipitation and MS with HDA-1::GFP identified 12 subunits of the vacuolar-type H⁺-ATPase (V-ATPase) (Figure 4A-B), consistent with a previous report that used FLAG-tagged LIN-53 to identify 4 V-ATPase subunits (Muthel et al., 2019). We further confirmed the binding of HDA-1 to V-ATPase subunits in C. elegans by co-immunoprecipitation and western blot analysis with anti-V1A/VHA-13 antibodies (Figure 4C). V-ATPase is a proton pump that comprises a transmembrane domain (V0) responsible for proton transport across membranes and a peripheral ATP-hydrolytic domain (V1) that catalyzes ATP hydrolysis (Figure 4B). V-ATPases play a critical role in intracellular pH homeostasis and regulate numerous physiological processes, including apoptosis (Abbas et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2022; Ernstrom et al., 2012; Vasanthakumar and Rubinstein, 2020). However, the role of V-ATPase in the asymmetric segregation of epigenetic factors during ACD remains unknown.

Figure 4:

To investigate the role of V-ATPase in NuRD asymmetric segregation in Q neuroblast, we used a pharmacologic inhibitor, bafilomycin A1 (Baf A1), to inhibit V-ATPase proton pumping activity (Furuchi et al., 1993; Wang et al., 2021; Yoshimori et al., 1991). To assess the inhibitory effect of Baf A1 on the proton translocation activity of V-ATPase in Q neuroblast, we monitored the cytosolic pH dynamics in dividing QR.a using the super-ecliptic pHluorin. The pHluorin is a pH-sensitive GFP reporter whose fluorescence can be quenched by the acidic pH (Miesenbock et al., 1998; Sankaranarayanan et al., 2000). In DMSO-treated animals, the pHlourin fluorescence intensity remained constant in the posterior portion that forms QR.ap but was significantly reduced in the anterior portion that forms QR.aa, indicating that the cytoplasm of the future apoptotic cell became more acidic (Figure 5A-B and Supplementary Movie S8). This observation is consistent with the recognition that cytosolic acidification is a common feature of both death receptor-mediated and mitochondria-dependent apoptosis (Lagadic-Gossmann et al., 2004; Matsuyama et al., 2000; Matsuyama and Reed, 2000). Notably, Baf A1 treatment reduced the pHluorin fluorescence intensity ratio between QR.ap and QR.aa from 1.6-fold to 1.3-fold (Figure 5A-B and Supplementary Movie S8), suggesting that Baf A1 may disrupt the cytosolic pH asymmetry in dividing QR.a cells by inhibiting V-ATPase activity.

Figure 5:

We observed that treatment with Baf A1 resulted in the symmetric segregation of HDA-1 during QR.a division (Figure 5C-D and Supplementary Movie S9). Notably, neither DMSO nor Baf A1 treatment affected the asymmetry in daughter cell size (Figure 5C-D and Supplementary Movie S9), suggesting that intracellular acidification, regulated by V-ATPase activity, specifically affects NuRD asymmetric segregation without influencing daughter cell size asymmetry. We also investigated whether the small QR.aa cell carrying ectopic NuRD could escape apoptosis. In DMSO-treated animals, QR.aa cells underwent apoptosis, and 12 out of 13 QR.aa cells were engulfed and degraded by a neighboring epithelial cell within 120 min after birth. However, in Baf A1-treated animals, QR.aa inherited similar levels of HDA-1::GFP as its sister cell, and 11 out of 12 QR.aa cells carrying ectopic NuRD survived for over 120 min and formed a short neurite-like outgrowth (Figure 5E). To confirm whether the long-lived QR.aa was a consequence of ectopic gain of NuRD, we depleted HDA-1 within Q cell lineages using the auxin-inducible protein degradation (AID) system (Zhang et al., 2015). By introducing the degron sequence into the hda-1 locus and expressing the TIR1 F-box protein under the Q cell-specific egl-17 promoter, we showed that HDA-1::GFP fluorescence in Q cells was substantially decreased under auxin treatment (Figure 5E). Administration of auxin restored QR.aa apoptosis in Baf A1-treated animals (Figure 5E). These results suggest that V-ATPase activity-dependent NuRD asymmetric segregation contributes to the specification of the live-death fate.

To understand how V-ATPase regulates NuRD asymmetric segregation, we generated a transgenic strain expressing wrmScarlet-tagged VHA-17, which is the e subunit of the V0 domain. Using this strain, we were able to examine the dynamic distribution of V-ATPase during QR.a cell division. Like HDA-1, V-ATPase was also asymmetrically enriched in the surviving QR.ap portion (Figure 6A-B and Supplementary Movie S10). This observation suggests that V-ATPase and NuRD may co-segregate asymmetrically during ACD. We also found that Baf A1 treatment disrupted V-ATPase asymmetric distribution (Figure 6A-B and Supplementary Movie S10), indicating the importance of the proton-pumping activity of V-ATPase in its asymmetric segregation. Therefore, our results suggest that V-ATPase may facilitate the asymmetric distribution of NuRD through its proton pumping activity.

Figure 6

Discussion

Our findings indicate that the asymmetric segregation of the NuRD complex during ACD is regulated in a V-ATPase-dependent manner, and is critical for the differential expression of apoptosis activator egl-1 and the life-versus-death fate decision (Figure 6C). Specifically, we have provided evidence that the reduced level of NuRD in the apoptotic daughter cell leads to an increased level of H3K27ac, an epigenetic modification known to be associated with active gene expression, at the egl-1 locus, resulting in the upregulation of egl-1 expression and subsequent induction of apoptosis. Based on our results, we propose a dual-function model of V-ATPase in NuRD asymmetric segregation: (i) V-ATPase interacts with NuRD, both of which are asymmetrically segregated into the surviving cell; (ii) the asymmetrical activity of V-ATPase generates a more acidic cytoplasmic environment in the future apoptotic cell portion compared to the surviving portion, which might contribute to the asymmetric segregation of V-ATPase and NuRD. This model sheds light on the mechanisms underlying the regulation of apoptosis during ACD, and opens up new avenues for further investigation into the intricate interplay between V-ATPase, NuRD, and epigenetic modifications in the context of cell fate decisions.

The intrinsic mechanisms governing binary cell fate decisions involve asymmetric cortical localization of cell fate determinants, polarized partitioning of RNA species, unequal segregation of organelles, and biased distribution of damaged proteins or protein aggregates (Sunchu and Cabernard, 2020; Venkei and Yamashita, 2018). Despite this, little is known about the asymmetric segregation of epigenetic modification enzymes during ACDs, nor the functions of polarized V-ATPase distribution and cytoplasmic proton asymmetry during this process. Our findings provide new insights into the asymmetric segregation of cell-intrinsic factors and the previously unrecognized roles of V-ATPase and cytosolic acidification in this process.

Two mechanisms have been proposed to explain the V-ATPase-dependent asymmetric segregation of NuRD. Firstly, a polarized intracellular transportation system could selectively deliver NuRD-V-ATPase-containing organelles to the surviving daughter cell. Although V-ATPase is primarily known for its localization and function in the late endosome and lysosome, recent evidence suggests that V-ATPase subunits are synthesized and assembled on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Abbas et al., 2020; Graham et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2020). Our findings demonstrate that V-ATPase colocalizes with the ER marker during ACDs, suggesting that NuRD-V-ATPase may be delivered as cargo on the ER or ER-derived vesicles (Figure S9). As reported in previous studies, a polarized microtubule transportation system, governed by specific motor proteins and the microtubule tracks, is responsible for the asymmetric segregation of signaling endosomes during ACDs of Drosophila sensory organ precursors (Derivery et al., 2015). It is possible that a similar biased transportation system plays a role in the asymmetric segregation of NuRD-V-ATPase-containing organelles.

Secondly, the surviving daughter cell chromatids may have a greater ability to recruit NuRD than their apoptotic sister. This could be due to a higher number of yet unknown NuRD recruiting factors on chromatids or specific posttranslational modifications of chromosomal proteins that enhance the chromosomal recruitment of NuRD. Despite having an identical DNA sequence, sister chromatids can be distinguished by chromosomal proteins or modifications (Ranjan et al., 2019; Tran et al., 2012), which likely provides the specific molecular cues for asymmetric NuRD recruitment. The NuRD asymmetry on chromosomes (1.5∼1.8-fold between QR.ap and QR.aa nuclei) is greater than that between the two daughter cells (approximately 1.3-fold) (Figure 1D-1F), suggesting that polarized NuRD-V-ATPase transportation and distinct NuRD affinity from sister chromatids may act in concert to establish NuRD asymmetry.

The observation of asymmetric segregation of the NuRD complex during cell divisions suggests that the mother cell may play a role in initiating the fate specification of its daughter cells. This notion is supported by studies conducted on Drosophila male germline stem cells (GSCs) which demonstrated that the old and new histone H3-H4 or unequal amounts of histone H3 variant CENP-A were incorporated into sister chromatids prior to cell division (Ranjan et al., 2019; Tran et al., 2012). Although these patterns were not observed in cell types other than GSCs, asymmetric NuRD segregation was found to be common in C. elegans (Figure 1D-G, Figure 2, and Figure S3). Among the 395 cell lineages that were tracked in C. elegans embryos and generated two surviving daughter cells, NuRD was equally distributed to both daughters in 390 instances (Figure 2C-2D, Supplementary Table 2). However, in the remaining five cell divisions, both HDA-1 and LIN-53 exhibited >1.5-fold differences between the two surviving siblings (Figure 2C-2D, Supplementary Table 2). This observation suggests that biased NuRD segregation may contribute to binary cell fate decisions beyond apoptosis. In the embryonic cerebral cortex of mammals, approximately 30% of newborn cells undergo programmed cell death (Voiculescu et al., 2000), which is a significantly higher rate than observed in C. elegans where only 12% of somatically born cells undergo apoptosis (131 apoptotic cells among 1090 somatically born cells). Thus, it is worth exploring whether brain stem cell divisions employ asymmetric NuRD segregation to specify daughter cell fates. Further studies on polarity establishment hold promise in elucidating the mechanisms underlying the asymmetric inheritance of epigenetic information.

Materials and Methods Worm strains and culture

C. elegans were maintained as described in the standard protocol (Brenner, 1974). All strains were cultivated at 20 °C on nematode growth medium (NGM) agar plates seeded with Escherichia coli OP50 or HT115 (feeding RNAi assay). The wild-type strain was Bristol N2. Some strains were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC), funded by the NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). The strains used in this study were listed in Extended Data Table 1.

Molecular biology

We performed genome editing experiments in C. elegans following the established methods (Dickinson et al., 2013; Friedland et al., 2013). We used the CRISPR design tool (https://zlab.bio/guide-design-resources) to select the target sites. The sgRNA sequences (Extended Data Table 2) were inserted into the pDD162 vector (Addgene #47549) by linearizing the vector with 15 base pairs (bp) overlapped primers using Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, cat. no. MO531L). PCR products were digested using Dpn I (Takara, cat. no. 1235A) for 2 hours at 37°C and transformed into Trans5 α bacterial chemically competent cells (TransGen Biotech, Cat no. CD201-01). The linearized PCR products with 15 bp overlapping ends were cyclized to generate plasmids by spontaneous recombination in bacteria. Homology recombination (HR) templates were constructed by cloning the 1.5 kb upstream and downstream homology arms into the pPD95.77 plasmid using the In-Fusion Advantage PCR cloning kit (Clontech, Cat. #639621). Fluorescence tags were inserted into the constructs with a flexible linker before the stop codons. Synonymous mutations were introduced to Cas9 target sites to avoid the cleavage of the homologous repair template by Cas9. The plasmids were listed in Extended Data Table 3.

Constructs that express GFP-tagged NuRD components were generated using the PCR SOEing method(Hobert, 2002). N2 genomic sequences (1.5-2 kb promoter plus coding region) were linked with gfp::unc-54 3’ UTR DNA fragments. Constructs that express wrmScarlet-tagged V-ATPase components with gfp::unc-54 3’ UTR were generated using the In-Fusion Advantage PCR cloning kit (Clontech, Cat. #639621). The primers were listed in Extended Data Table 3.

Genome editing and transgenesis

To generate a knock-in strain, we purified the sgRNA construct and the repair template plasmids with the PureLink Quick PCR purification Kit (Invitrogen, #K310001) and co-injected them into N2 animals with the pRF4 [rol-6 (su1006)] and Podr-1::dsRed selection markers. The F1 transgenic progenies were singled and screened by PCR and Sanger sequencing. Transgenic C. elegans was generated by the germline microinjection of DNA plasmids or PCR products into N2 with Podr-1::gfp or Pegl-17::myri-mCherry and Pegl-17::mCherry::his-24 plasmids. We maintained at least two independent transgenic lines with a constant transmission rate (>50%). Concentrations of DNA constructs used for generating knock-in were 50 ng/µl, and for transgenesis were 20 ng/µl. All the strains, primers, plasmids, and PCR products were listed in Extended Data Table 1-3, respectively.

Live-Cell Imaging and quantification

Live imaging of C. elegans embryos, larvae, or young adults followed our established protocols (Chai et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2017). L1 larvae or young-adult worms were anesthetized with 0.1 mmol/L levamisole in M9 buffer, mounted on 3% (wt/vol) agarose pads maintained at 20°C. Our imaging system includes an Axio Observer Z1 microscope (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging) equipped with a Zeiss 100×/1.46 numerical aperture (NA) objective, an Andor iXon+ EM-CCD camera, and 488 and 561-nm lines of a Sapphire CW CDRH USB Laser System attached to a spinning disk confocal scan head (Yokogawa CSU-X1 Spinning Disk Unit). Images were acquired by μManager (https://www.micro-manager.org). Time-lapse images of Q cell divisions were acquired with an exposure time of 200 msec every 1 min. To follow the cell fate of QR.aa in WT, Baf A1- or Baf A1 and IAA-treated worms, time-lapse images were acquired with 300 msec for 561 nm and 100 msec for 488 nm exposure time at 5min intervals. To image NuRD dynamics during oocyte meiosis, we used an exposure time of 300 msec every 30 sec. To image Phsp-16.41::sAnxV::GFP positive cells in WT, mutant, or RNAi animals, we incubated the eggs at 33 °C for 30 min to induce the reporter expression 3 hours post-egg-laying. After we kept the eggs at 20 °C for 2 hours, we imaged them with an exposure time of 200 msec. To acquire time-lapse images of Pegl-1::NLS::GFP positive cells during embryonic development, we dissected 2-4 cell-stage embryos from gravid adults and imaged them with an exposure time of 300 msec every 5 min. ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) was used to perform image analysis and measurement. Image stacks were z-projected using the average projection for quantification and using the maximum projection for display.

The quantifications of cellular fluorescence intensity ratios in Q cell lineages were described in Figure S4A. We used the mCherry-labeled plasma membrane to circumscribe Q cells (Region of Interest). To determine the ratios of fluorescence intensities in the posterior to anterior half (P/A) of Q.a lineages or A/P of Q.p lineages, the cell in the mean intensity projection was divided into posterior and anterior halves. ImageJ software was used to measure the fluorescence intensities of two halves with the background subtracted. The background-subtracted mean fluorescence intensities in the two halves were then normalized by the area and the two resulting values were divided. The same procedure was used to determine the ratios of fluorescence intensities between two daughter cells. Total fluorescence intensity was the sum of the posterior and anterior fluorescence intensities or the sum of fluorescence intensities from two daughter cells without area normalization. The ROIs used in the measurement and calculation of the nuclear intensity ratios were determined as regions with mCherry-tagged histone in each cell.

Feeding RNAi

RNAi bacteria were grown in LB media containing carbenicillin (50 µg/mL) and tetracycline hydrochloride (12.5 µg/mL) at 37°C overnight. RNAi bacteria were then seeded on NGM plates supplemented with 50 µg/mL carbenicillin and 1 mM Isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). We grew the seeded RNAi plates for 2 days at room temperature, allowing double-stranded RNA expression. To score phenotypes during embryogenesis or meiosis, we transferred the synchronized young adult worms to the culture plate containing the induced E. coli HT115 strains expressing the control (luciferase) or specific gene-targeted dsRNAs. We incubated them for 16-24 hours at 20°C and then scored the phenotypes. As for RT-qPCR and RNA-Seq experiments, parental animals of RNAi were used for laying eggs, and the progeny was collected 5 hours post-egg-laying. In ChIP-Seq experiments, we used worms of mixed stages under RNAi treatment for 24-36 hours. RNAi bacterial strains were from the Vidal library.

Immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry

GFP transgenic or knock-in worms were raised on one hundred 90-mm NGM plates. Animals were collected and washed with M9 buffer three times. For each replicate, the lysate was made from 1∼2 ml packed worms with 3∼4 ml of 0.5-mm diameter glass beads using FastPrep-24 (MP Biomedicals) in lysis buffer [pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl, 10% glycerol, 1% NP-40, 1x cocktail of protease inhibitors from Roche (Complete, EDTA free), 40 mM NaF, 5 mM Na₃VO₄]. Worm lysates were then cleared by centrifugation at 14,000g for 30 min at 4 °C. For anti-GFP immunoprecipitation (IP), the supernatant was incubated with GFP-Trap A beads (Chromoteck, GTA20) for 1 hr. Beads were then washed three times with lysis buffer. Proteins were eluted with 300 μl 0.1 M glycine-HCl (pH 2.5) into 15 μl 1.5 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), samples were further processed for SDS–PAGE and western blot, or followed by precipitation by 100 μl trichloroacetic acid and re-dissolution in 60 μl 8 M Urea, 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5) for MS. MS Samples were then reduced in 5 mM TCEP, alkylated by 10 mM iodoacetamide, and diluted four-fold with 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5). The 0.2 μg trypsin was used to digest 10 μg protein in 1 mM CaCl₂ and 20 mM methylamine overnight at 37°C. The resultant peptides were desalted by ZipTip pipette tips (Merck Millipore). For liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis, peptides were separated by an EASY-nLCII integrated nano-HPLC system (Proxeon, Odense, Denmark) directly interfaced to a Thermo Scientific Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were loaded on an analytical fused-silica capillary column (150 mm in length, 75 mm in internal diameter; Upchurch) packed with 5 mm, 300 Å C-18 resin (Varian). Mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% formic acid, while mobile phase B consisted of 0.1% formic acid and 100% acetonitrile. The Q Exactive mass spectrometer was operated through Xcalibur 2.1.2 software in data-dependent acquisition mode. A single full-scan mass spectrum was used in the orbitrap (400–1,800 m/z in mass range, 60,000 in resolution) followed by ten data-dependent tandem mass spectrometry scans at 27% normalized collision energy (HCD). The tandem mass spectrometry spectra results were searched against the C. elegans proteome database by the Proteome Discoverer (version PD1.4; Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Generation of C. elegans embryonic cell suspensions for SPLiT-Seq

We prepared single cells from a C. elegans strain (smIs89) that expressed a Pegl-1::NLS::GFP reporter using the established protocols with minor modifications(Bianchi and Driscoll, 2006; Zhang et al., 2011). Synchronized gravid adults were transferred to NGM plates to lay eggs for 1 hour, and about 50 μl eggs pellet were collected 3 hours post laid. We washed eggs three times with 1 ml sterile egg buffer [118 mM NaCl, 48 mM KCl, 3 mM CaCl₂, 3 mM MgCl₂, 5 mM HEPES (pH 7.2)]. We rinsed the pellet with 250 μl 1 U/ml Chitinase three times. Eggshells were digested with 250 μl of 1 U/ml chitinase for 45 min on a rotter. We stopped the reaction by adding 750 µl of L-15/FBS (L-15 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum). Eggs were pelleted by centrifugation at 900 g for 3 min. The supernatant was displaced with 500 µl L-15/FBS. Embryos were dissociated by gently pipetting up and down 60 times using an insulin syringe (29 G needle). The dissociated cells were separated from undissociated cell clumps by filtering through a 5 µm mesh filter, and we washed the filter with 500 µl L-15/FBS. Cells were collected by centrifuging 1 ml filtered suspension at 3220 g for 3 min at 4°C. We removed the supernatant and gently resuspended cells with 2 ml 1X PBS containing 5 μl SUPERaseIn RNase Inhibitor (Invitrogen) and 2.5 μl RiboLock RNase Inhibitor (Thermo Scientific).

SPLiT-Seq library preparation and sequencing

We performed SPLiT-Seq as previously described (Rosenberg et al., 2018) with minor modifications. After cell fixation, centrifugations were performed at 3220 g for 3 min according to the C. elegans cell size. The RT primers were poly-dT and random hexamer mixture with UMIs (Unique Molecular Identifiers). All the barcodes used in this study were described in the published protocol(Rosenberg et al., 2018). The first 24 barcodes were used in the first round of barcoding, named “Round1_01” to “Round1_24”, and 48 barcodes were used in the third round of barcoding, called “Round3_49” to “Round3_96”. Each cell barcode came from three rounds of barcoding. TruePrep DNA Library Prep Kit V2 constructed the sequencing library for Illumina (Vazyme Biotech #TD502) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The library was sequenced on HiSeq systems (Illumina) using 150 nucleotides (nts) kits and paired-end sequencing.

SPLiT-Seq data processing

According to the results of FastQC, adaptors or low-quality nucleotides were trimmed by Trim Galore (v0.5.2) using the default parameters. For each paired-end sequencing read, a 10-bp UMI sequence and a 24-bp cell barcode were extracted from the Read 2 file by the tool “preprocess_splitseq.pl” of zUMIs (v0.0.6). The Read 1 was split by different cell barcodes in Read 2 and mapped to the modified C. elegans genome (WS263 with an artificial chromosome containing the C. elegans version of the GFP sequence) by zUMIs (v0.0.6) and STAR (v2.6.0c). Unique mapping reads were kept. The duplicated reads from the same transcript were excluded based on the UMI information in Read 2. Low-quality transcriptomes were removed from the analysis, yielding 442 single-cell transcriptomes, including transcript counts from 8629 genes. Among these transcriptomes, 41 transcriptomes were assigned to the putative apoptotic cell based on the expression of egl-1 or gfp. Among the total 8624 genes detected in SPLiT-seq, transcripts from 6487 genes were not detected in the putative apoptotic cell population. Enriched GO terms of those 6487 genes were identified using Gene Ontology knowledgebase (Ashburner et al., 2000; Gene Ontology, 2021) (http://geneontology.org/).

Cell lineage tracing and quantification of reporter expression

Embryo mounting, live imaging, lineage tracing, and expression quantification were performed according to a previously described procedure with minor modifications (Bao and Murray, 2011; Du et al., 2014; Murray et al., 2008). Two-to four-cell stage embryos were collected from young adult worms and mounted between two coverslips in the egg buffer containing 20-30 20-μm polystyrene microspheres and sealed with melted Vaseline (Bao and Murray, 2011). 3D time-lapse imaging was performed at 20 °C ambient temperature using a spinning disk confocal microscope (Revolution XD) for 300-time points at a 75-second interval. For each time point, embryos were scanned for 30 Z focal planes with 1 µm spacing. 3D tiff stack images were processed with the StarryNite software for automated cell identification and tracing to reconstruct embryonic cell lineages using the ubiquitously–expressed mCherry fluorescence. The raw results of cell identification and tracing were subjected to extensive manual inspection and editing using the AceTree program to ensure high accuracy (Du et al., 2014). For each mentioned strain, the cell lineage was traced from the two- or four-cell stage to the 350-cell stage for three or four embryos (experimental replicates). Regions of the chromatids or nuclei are determined by the H2B::mCherry signal. The fluorescent intensity of HDA-1::GFP or LIN-53::mNeonGreen in each traced nucleus at each time point was measured as the average fluorescent intensity of all the pixels within each nucleus and then with the average fluorescent intensity of the local background subtracted (Murray et al., 2008).

RNA sequencing

Synchronized young adult worms were cultured on RNAi plates for 24 hours. Gravid adults were transferred to new RNAi plates to lay eggs for 1 hour. Eggs were harvested 5 hours post-laid and then lysed with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). We extracted the total RNA following the manufacturer’s protocol. The Qubit RNA High Sensitivity Assay Kit (Invitrogen) was used to quantify RNA concentration. The Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer system was used for the assessment of RNA quality. We used samples with an RNA integrity number (RIN) above 6.0 for sequencing library construction. We used identical input total RNA (50 ng to 500 ng) between control and samples for library preparation using the KAPA RNA HyperPrep Kit (KAPA Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA). Libraries were analyzed by Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer system for quality control. The library samples were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform. Approximately 5 GB of raw data were generated from each sample with 150 bp paired-end read lengths.

RNA-Seq data analysis

FastQC assessed the quality score, adaptor content, and duplication rates of sequencing reads. Trim_galore (v0.6.0) was used to remove the low-quality bases and adaptor sequences with default parameters. After trimming, paired-end reads with at least 20 nucleotides in length were aligned to the C. elegans reference genome (WS263) using STAR (2.5.4b) with default parameters. Read counts representing gene expression levels were calculated with HTSeq (version 0.9.1) using default parameters. Uniquely mapped reads were included. Gene names were annotated on the Wormbase website (https://wormbase.org/tools/mine/simplemine.cgi). DESeq2 package in R programming language was used for differential expression analysis.

Differentially expressed genes were defined as upregulated genes (log2-transformed fold change greater than 1) or downregulated genes (log2-transformed fold change less than -1) with a false discovery rate (FDR) less than 0.05. We used the ggplot2 package of R to plot figures.

Reverse transcription and quantitative real-time PCR

Young adult worms were cultured on RNAi plates for 24 hours. We transferred the gravid adults to new RNAi plates to lay eggs for 1 hour. Eggs were harvested 5 hours post-laid and then lysed with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). The RNeasy Mini kit (QIAGEN) prepared the total RNA from ∼20 μl egg pellets for each biological replicate. cDNA from the same amount of RNA between RNAi and control samples were synthesized in a 20 μl reaction volume by the PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TAKARA, Code No. RR047A). One μl of cDNA was used as the template in a 10 μl reaction volume of the PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) with four technical replicates. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed in two independent experiments with three biological replicates each time using the Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 1 Real-Time PCR System and normalized to the cell division cycle-related GTPase encoding gene cdc-42. Data were analyzed using the standard curve method. Primers used in real-time PCR assays were listed in Extended Data Table 3.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation

For ChIP assays, chromatin immunoprecipitation was performed as previously described(Mukhopadhyay et al., 2008) with modifications. Mixture stage worms on RNAi plates were harvested and washed three times with M9 buffer. 0.4 ml of packed worms were obtained and frozen into small balls with liquid nitrogen for each ChIP replicate. We quickly ground the little worm balls into powders in liquid nitrogen. Worm powder was crosslinked in 4 ml crosslinking buffer (1.1% formaldehyde in PBS with protease and phosphatase inhibitors) with constant rotation for 15 min at room temperature. Fixed worm samples were quenched by incubation with 0.125 M glycine for 5 min and then washed in cold PBS-PIC (PBS buffer with protease inhibitor cocktail) three times. The tissue pellet resuspended in PBS-PIC was homogenized by 2-3 strokes in a Dounce homogenizer. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 2,000 g for 5 min at 4°C, and we removed the supernatant.

We performed nuclei preparation, chromatin digestion, chromatin immunoprecipitation, and DNA Purification using SimpleChIP® Enzymatic Chromatin IP Kit (Magnetic Beads) (Cell Signaling Technology, #9003). Samples were sonicated using a Qsonica sonicator (Qsonica Q800R) at 70% amplitude for 5 cycles of 30 sec on and 30 sec off with 4 repeats. The chromatin was digested using 6 μl of micrococcal nuclease (MNase) (CST catalog number 10011S) in 300 μl of buffer B (CST catalog number 7007) containing 0.5 mM DTT for 8 min at 37 °C. The quality of chromatin digestion was analyzed by Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer system. Before IP, the chromatin sample concentration was assessed by the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Tiangen, cat no. PA115-02). 1 μg H3K27ac antibody (Abcam ab4729) or 2 μg IgG was used per IP with 0.5-1 mg input chromatin protein.

According to the manufacturer, we used 200 ng purified DNA samples to construct the ChIP–seq library using the VAHTS Universal DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina V3 (Vazyme ND607). DNA libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform, with 150-bp paired-end sequencing. Three biological replicates were collected for two independent ChIP–seq experiments. For ChIP–qPCR analysis of H3K27ac enrichment in the egl-1 locus, the same volume of cDNA from the IP experiment described above was used for qPCR analysis. Extended Data Table 3 listed the primers.

ChIP-Seq data processing

150-bp double-end reads were aligned to the C. elegans genome version WBcel235 using Bwa-mem2 version 2.1 with default parameters. Only uniquely mapped reads were kept. Samples were normalized by bins per million mapped reads (BPM) and averaged, and then treated samples were subtracted by input samples to calculate enrichment using deepTools2 (Ramirez et al., 2016). Data were visualized using IGV(Robinson et al., 2011).

Immunofluorescence

We performed immunofluorescence of C. elegans eggs using the freeze-cracking method. In brief, eggs were washed with M9 buffer three times and dripped onto poly-L-lysine coated slides. After freezing in liquid nitrogen for 5 minutes, the coverslip was swiftly removed, and embryos were fixed in methanol at -20 °C for 15 min. We washed the slides twice with PBST (PBS+ 0.05% Tween 20). We incubated slides with 1% BSA in PBST for 30 min at room temperature to block the unspecific bindings. The primary and secondary antibodies were diluted in PBST plus 1% BSA by 1:500-1:2,000 for primary antibodies (ab10799 for histone H3 and ab4729 for H3K27ac) and 1:5,000 for the secondary antibodies (Alexa-488 anti-mouse and Alexa546 anti-rabbit from Invitrogen). The primary antibody was incubated overnight at 4°C in a moisture chamber, and the secondary antibody was incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. After washing with PBST, we applied 1-2 drops of the Fluoroshield Mounting Medium containing DAPI (Abcam, ab104139) and coverslips to the samples.

Pharmacological and chemical treatments

To block V-ATPase proton pump activity in the L1-L2 larvae, which have cuticle layers that may compromise agent penetration, the Bafilomycin A1 treatment was designed based on the published protocols (Kumsta et al., 2017; Papandreou and Tavernarakis, 2017; Pivtoraiko et al., 2010). Briefly, gravid worms were placed in 1 drop of ddH₂O containing 3% (v/v) pelleted OP50 and 100 μM bafilomycin A1 (Abcam, dissolved in DMSO) for 16 h at 20 ℃. After incubation, L1 larvae were washed with M9 buffer and recovered for 5 h on NG agar plates before imaging.

To achieve Q cell conditional HDA-1 depletion, the auxin-inducible degradation (AID) was performed as described previously (Zhang et al., 2015). The natural auxin (indole-3-acetic acid, IAA) was purchased from Alfa Aesar (#A10556). A 400 mM solution in ethanol was stored at 4°C as stock. Before imaging, L1 larvae were transferred to the S basal buffer supplemented with 3% (v/v) pelleted OP50 and 4 mM of auxin for a 1.5 h treatment.

Coimmunoprecipitation and Western blot

For immunoprecipitation of endogenous V-ATPase A subunit with HDA-1, HDA-1-GFP knock-in worms were lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer [pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl, 10% glycerol, 1% NP-40, 2x cocktail of protease inhibitors from Roche (Complete, EDTA free), 40 mM NaF, 5 mM Na₃VO₄]. The soluble fractions from worm lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP GFP-Trap A beads (Chromoteck, GTA20) for 1 hr at 4 °C. Immunoprecipitates were washed three times with lysis buffer containing 1x cocktail of protease inhibitors from Roche (Complete, EDTA free) and were then transferred to new tubes. Beads were washed again with 100 mM PB (pH 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, or 7.5) and boiled in 1X SDS loading buffer under 95 ℃ for 5min. The protein samples were analyzed by Western blotting.

Protein samples were resolved by SDS–PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. Each membrane was divided into two parts to be incubated with GFP (Abcam ab290, 1:4,000) or ATP6V1A (Abcam ab199326, 1:2,000) primary antibodies, followed by HRP-conjugated Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H&L) (Easybio, 1:5,000) secondary antibodies. Quantification of the endogenous V-ATPase A subunit interacting with HDA-1 was performed using HDA-1::GFP bands as a calibration standard. Quantitative densitometry of chemiluminescent bands was performed using ImageJ software.

Data availability

The data sets generated and analyzed in this study are available in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) under accession number GSE167379 with the secure token uxwleayqnjkvnkf.

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. W. Zhong, G. Garriga, D. Xue, G. Li, Y. Li and for discussion. This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China to W.L. and G.O. (2022YFA1302700, 2017YFA0102900, 2019YFA0508401, 2017YFA0503501), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China to W.L., G.O. and Y.C. (grants 32270773, 32070706, 31991190, 31730052, 31525015, 31861143042, 31561130153, 31671451).

Author Contributions

W. Li, Y. Chai and G. Ou conceived the project. Z. Xie and Y. Chai performed the experiments, collected and analyzed the data with M. Li, Z. Shen, X. Jiang. Z. Zhu. Z. Zhao, L. Xiao, and Z. Du performed the embryonic cell lineage tracing experiment. W. Li, G. Ou and Z. Xie wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figure S1:

Figure S2:

Figure S3:

Figure S4:

Figure S5

Figure S6:

Figure S7:

Figure S8:

Figure S9:

Extended Data Table 1.

Extended Data Table 2.

Extended Data Table 3.

Supplementary Table 1. Single-cell SPLiT-Seq expression matrix and genes that were not detected from the Pegl-1-NLS-gfp-positive cells.

Supplementary Table 2. The fluorescence intensity ratio of each cell pair and normalized fluorescence intensity of each cell in embryonic lineage tracing assay.

Supplementary Table 3. Differential expression of RNA-Seq under control, hda-1, or lin-53 RNAi.

Supplementary Table 4. Anti-GFP IP-MS results of HDA-1::GFP KI worms and ACT-4::GFP transgenic worms.

Supplementary Movie S1. Dynamics of CHD-3 during QR.a division.

Fluorescence time-lapse movies of CHD-3::GFP (green) and mCherry labeled plasma membrane and histone (magenta) in QR.a. Frames were taken every 1 min. The display rate is 3 frames per second. CHD-3 was asymmetrically segregated into the future surviving QR.ap. Scale bar: 2 μm.

Supplementary Movie S2. Dynamics of MEP-1 during QR.a division.

Fluorescence time-lapse movies of MEP-1::GFP (green) and mCherry labeled plasma membrane and histone (magenta) in QR.a. Frames were taken every 1 min. The display rate is 3 frames per second. MEP-1 was asymmetrically segregated into the future surviving QR.ap. Scale bar: 2 μm.

Supplementary Movie S3. Dynamics of HDA-1 during QR.a division.

Fluorescence time-lapse movies of HDA-1::GFP (KI; green) and mCherry labeled plasma membrane and histone (magenta) in QR.a. Frames were taken every 1 min.

The display rate is 3 frames per second. HDA-1 was asymmetrically segregated into the future surviving QR.ap. Scale bar: 2 μm.

Supplementary Movie S4. Dynamics of LIN-53 during QR.a division.

Fluorescence time-lapse movies of LIN-53::mNeonGreen (KI; green) and mCherry labeled plasma membrane and histone (magenta) in QR.a. Frames were taken every 1 min. The display rate is 3 frames per second. LIN-53 was asymmetrically segregated into the future surviving QR.ap. Scale bar: 2 μm.

Supplementary Movie S5. Dynamics of MYS-1 during QR.a division.

Fluorescence time-lapse movies of MYS-1::GFP (green) and mCherry labeled plasma membrane and histone (magenta) in QR.a. Frames were taken every 1 min. The display rate is 3 frames per second. Anterior, left. MYS-1 was asymmetrically segregated into the future surviving QR.ap. Scale bar: 2 μm.

Supplementary Movie S6. Dynamics of HDA-1 during QR.a division in the pig-1 mutant.

Fluorescence time-lapse movies of HDA-1::GFP (KI; green) and mCherry labeled plasma membrane and histone (magenta) during QR.a division in the pig-1 mutant. Frames were taken every 1 min. The display rate is 3 frames per second. Anterior, left. HDA-1 was evenly segregated into two daughter cells. Scale bar: 2 μm.

Supplementary Movie S7. Dynamics of LIN-53 during QR.a division in the pig-1 mutant.

Fluorescence time-lapse movies of LIN-53::mNeonGreen (KI; green) and mCherry labeled plasma membrane and histone (magenta) during QR.a division in the pig-1 mutant. Frames were taken every 1 min. The display rate is 3 frames per second. Anterior, left. LIN-53 was evenly segregated into two daughter cells. Scale bar, 2 μm.

Supplementary Movie S8. Dynamics of super-ecliptic PHluorin during QR.a division.

Fluorescence time-lapse movies of super-ecliptic PHluorin (green) and mCherry labeled plasma membrane and histone (magenta) during QR.a division in DMSO and Baf A1-treated animals. Frames were taken every 1 min. The display rate is 3 frames per second. Anterior, left. Scale bar, 2 μm.

Supplementary Movie S9. Baf A1 treatment disrupts HDA-1 asymmetry during QR.a division.

Fluorescence time-lapse movies of HDA-1::GFP (KI; green) and mCherry labeled plasma membrane and histone (magenta) during QR.a division in DMSO and Baf A1 treated animals. Inverted fluorescence movie of HDA-1::GFP was shown below the merged movie. Frames were taken every 1 min. The display rate is 3 frames per second. Anterior, left. Scale bar: 2 μm.

Supplementary Movie S10. Dynamics of VHA-17 during QR.a division.

Fluorescence time-lapse movies of wrmScarlet-tagged VHA-17 (magenta) and HDA-1::GFP (KI; green) during QR.a division after DMSO or Baf A1 treatments. Inverted fluorescence movie of VHA-17::wrmScarlet was shown below the merged movie. Frames were taken every 1 min. The display rate is 3 frames per second. Anterior, left. Scale bar: 2 μm.