Schematic representation of “the phenology and energy limitation hypothesis” and “the phenology and life-history balance hypothesis” and their predictions. Energetic limitation in the environment refers to variation over time of the energetic balance (mainly for endotherms) and the thermal window favorable to activity (mainly for ectotherms). Hypothesis H1 assumes that dormancy phenology occurs at the time of transition between favorable and unfavorable energetic conditions or vice versa. It predicts that the sex difference in dormancy phenology is explained by differences in energy limitation, and reproductive investment should be independent of this sex difference in phenology. In contrast, hypothesis H2 predicts that a phenology that would occur before or after this energetic transition may be associated with benefits to survival or reproduction. It predicts that the sex difference in dormancy phenology is associated with a sex difference in reproductive investment. This pattern is expected for species without paternal effort. But the concept can be applied to other types of mating strategies. The hibernation phenology presented for prediction (H1) are those expected for hibernating mammals. Note that the magnitude and order of sex differences in phenology is not an expected general trend, because it is assumed to vary between species according to energy demand (prediction H1) and reproductive investment (prediction H2). Nevertheless, the sex difference is assumed to be smaller with the H1 prediction because there is less sex difference in energy demand than in reproductive investment. Black, grey and dark blue horizontal arrows represent respectively time over the year, reproductive investment in males and reproductive investment in females.