Loss of WRNIP1 or its UBZ domain results in DNA damage accumulation and enhanced chromosomal instability upon MRS

(A) Schematic representation of human WRNIP1 protein structure. Western blot analysis shows WRNIP1 protein expression in wild-type cells (shWRNIP1WT), WRNIP1-deficient cells (shWRNIP1) and WRNIP1 ATPase mutant (shWRNIP1T294A) or WRNIP1 UBZ mutant (shWRNIP1D37A) cells. MRC5SV40 fibroblasts were used as a positive control. The membrane was probed with an anti-FLAG or anti-WRNIP1 antibody. GAPDH was used as a loading control.

(B) Analysis of DNA damage accumulation evaluated by alkaline Comet assay. MRC5SV, shWRNIP1, shWRNIP1D37A and shWRNIP1T294A cells were treated or not with 0.4 µM Aph for 24 h, followed by Comet assay. Data are presented as means from three independent experiments. Horizontal black lines represent the mean (ns, not significant; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001; two-tailed Student’s t test). Representative images are provided.

(C) Analysis of chromosomal aberrations in the indicated cell lines treated according to the experimental scheme. Dot plot displays the number of chromosomal aberrations per cell ± SE from three independent experiments. Horizontal black lines represent the mean (ns, not significant; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; two-tailed Student’s t test). Representative images, including insets with enlarged metaphases for better visualization of chromosomal aberrations, are included.

(D) Evaluation of DNA damage accumulation by alkaline Comet assay. Cells were treated according to the experimental scheme and subjected to Comet assay. Dot plot presents as means from three independent experiments. Horizontal black lines represent the mean (ns, not significant; ****, P < 0.0001; two-tailed Student’s t test). Representative images are provided.

Loss of WRNIP1 or its UBZ domain results in R-loop accumulation upon MRS

(A) Evaluation of R-loop accumulation by immunofluorescence analysis in shWRNIP1WT and shWRNIP1 cells, following treatment as reported in the experimental design post-transfection with GFP-tagged RNase H1 or empty vector. Cells were fixed, stained with anti-RNA-DNA hybrid S9.6 antibody, and DNA counterstained with DAPI. Representative images are provided for each single color channel. Box plot displays nuclear S9.6 fluorescence intensity, with boxes and whiskers representing 20-75 and 10-90 percentiles, respectively. The line represents the median value. Data are presented as means from three independent experiments. Horizontal black lines represent the mean. Error bars represent standard error (***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; two-tailed Student’s t test).

(B) Dot blot to confirm R-loop accumulation. Genomic DNA isolated from shWRNIP1WT and shWRNIP1 cells, treated as reported in the experimental design, was spotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membranes was probed with anti-RNA-DNA hybrid S9.6 and anti-dsDNA antibodies. Treatment with RNase H was used as a negative control. Representative gel images of at least three replicates are shown(* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; two-tailed Student’s t test).

Loss of WRNIP1 or its UBZ domain leads to R-loop-dependent accumulation upon MRS

(A) Analysis of DNA damage accumulation by alkaline Comet assay. MRC5SV and shWRNIP1 cells, post-transfection with GFP-tagged RNaseH1 or empty vector (-), were treated or not with Aph or HU, following the experimental scheme. Subsequently, they were subjected to Comet assay. Dot plot shows data from three independent experiments (ns, not significant; **** P < 0.0001; two-tailed Student’s t test). Representative images are provided.

(B) Immunofluorescence analysis to determine R-loop levels in shWRNIP1WT, shWRNIP1, shWRNIP1D37A and shWRNIP1T294A cells, treated or not with 0.4 µM Aph for 24 h. After fixing, cells were subjected or not to RNase III digestion and stained with anti-RNA-DNA hybrid S9.6 antibody. Representative images are provided for each single color channel. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Box plot displays nuclear S9.6 fluorescence intensity, with boxes and whiskers representing 20-75 and 10-90 percentiles, respectively. The line represents the median value. Horizontal black lines represent the mean. Error bars represent SE (ns, not significant; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001; two-tailed Student’s t test).

(C) Analysis of the effect of R-loop resolution on DNA damage accumulation using alkaline Comet assay. Cells, post-transfection with GFP-tagged RNase H1 or empty vector, were treated as reported in the experimental scheme and subjected to Comet assay. Dot plot represents data from three independent experiments. Horizontal black lines represent the mean (ns, not significant; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001; two-tailed Student’s t test). Representative images are provided.

Loss of WRNIP1 or its UBZ domain promotes R-loop-dependent TRCs accumulation

(A) Detection of TRCs by fluorescence-based PLA assay in MRC5SV, shWRNIP1 and shWRNIP1D37A cells. Post-transfection with GFP-tagged RNase H1 or empty vector, cells treated according to the experimental scheme. After fixing, cells were stained with antibodies against PCNA and RNA pol II. Representative images are provided for each single color channel. Each red spot represents a single interaction between proteins. No spots were observed in cells stained with each single antibody (negative control). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Dot plot shows the number of PLA spots per nucleus. Data are presented as means from three independent experiments. Horizontal black lines represent the mean ± SE (ns, not significant; ****, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA test).

(B and C) Analysis of the localization of WRNIP1 near/at the transcription and replication machineries by PLA. Cells were treated or not with 0.4 µM Aph for 24 h, fixed, and stained with antibodies against WRNIP1 and RNA pol II (B) or WRNIP1 and PCNA (C) to visualize the interaction between WRNIP1 and replication or transcription machinery, respectively. Each red spot represents a single interaction between proteins. Representative images are provided for each single color channel. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Dot plots show the number of PLA spots per nucleus. Data are presented as means from three independent experiments. Horizontal black lines represent the mean ± SE (****, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA test).

(D and E) Detection of physical interaction between WRNIP1 and R-loops (D) or R-loops and RAD51(E). Cells were treated or not with 0.4 µM Aph for 24 h, followed by RNase III digestion and the PLA assay. Cells were stained with antibodies against RNA-DNA hybrid (anti-S9.6) and WRNIP1 (D) or RNA-DNA hybrid (anti-S9.6) and RAD51 (E). Representative images are provided for each individual color channel. Each red spot represents a single interaction between R-loops and the respective proteins (WRNIP1 or RAD51). No spots were observed in cells stained with each single antibody (negative control). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Dot plot shows the number of PLA spots per nucleus. Horizontal black lines represent the mean ± SE (ns, not significant; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA test).

R-loops affects DNA replication in cells lacking WRNIP1 or its UBZ domain upon MRS

Experimental scheme for dual labelling of DNA fibers in MRC5SV, shWRNIP1 and shWRNIP1D37A cells under unperturbed conditions (A) or upon MRS (B). After transfection with GFP-tagged RNaseH1 or empty vector (-), cells were pulse-labelled with CldU, treated or not with 0.4 µM Aph, then subjected to a pulse-labelling with IdU. Representative DNA fiber images are provided. Graphs display the analysis of replication fork velocity (fork speed) in the cells. The length of the green tracks was measured. Mean values are represented as horizontal black lines (ns, not significant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; Mann-Whitney test). (C and D) Graphs represent the percentage of red (CldU) tracts (stalled forks) or green (IdU) tracts (restarting forks) in the cells. Error bars represent standard error (ns, not significant; *, P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; two tailed Student t-test).

FANCD2 pathway activation in cells lacking WRNIP1 or its UBZ domain upon MRS

(A) Western blot analysis showing FANCD2 ubiquitination in MRC5SV, shWRNIP1 and shWRNIP1D37A cells. The membrane was probed with an anti-FANCD2 antibody. LAMIN B1 was used as a loading control.

(B) Detection of the physical interaction between FANCD2 and R-loops by PLA. shWRNIP1WT, shWRNIP1 and shWRNIP1D37A cells were treated or not with 0.4 µM Aph for 24 h and subjected to RNase III digestion. Cells were stained with antibodies against RNA-DNA hybrid (anti-S9.6) and FANCD2. Representative images are provided. Each red spot represents a single interaction between R-loops and FANCD2. No spots were revealed in cells stained with each single antibody (negative control). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Dot plot shows the number of PLA spots per nucleus. Data are presented as means from three independent experiments. Horizontal black lines represent the mean ± SE (ns, not significant; ***, P < 0.001;****, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA test).

(C) Evaluation of DNA damage accumulation by alkaline Comet assay in MRC5SV, shWRNIP1 and shWRNIP1D37A transfected with control siRNAs (siCTRL) or siRNAs targeting FANCD2 (siFANCD2). After 48 h, cells were treated or not with 0.4 µM Aph for 24 h, then subjected to Comet assay. Dot plot shows data presented as means from three independent experiments. Horizontal black lines represent the mean (ns, not significant; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001; two-tailed Student’s t test). Representative images are provided. Western blot shows FANCD2 depletion in the cells. The membrane was probed with an anti-FANCD2, and LAMIN B1 was used as a loading control.

(D) Immunofluorescence analysis to determine R-loop levels in shWRNIP1WT, shWRNIP1 and shWRNIP1D37A cells depleted or not of FANCD2 under untreated conditions or after MRS. Cells were fixed, subjected or not to RNase III digestion, and stained with anti-RNA-DNA hybrid S9.6 antibody. Representative images are provided. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Dot plot shows nuclear S9.6 fluorescence intensity. Boxes and whiskers represent 20-75 and 10-90 percentiles, respectively. The line represents the median value. Data are presented as means from three independent experiments. Horizontal black lines represent the mean. Error bars represent SE (ns, not significant; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001; two-tailed Student’s t test).

(E) Experimental scheme of dual labelling of DNA fibers in shWRNIP1WT, shWRNIP1 and shWRNIP1D37A cells upon MRS (B). After transfection with control siRNAs (siCTRL) or targeting FANCD2 (siFANCD2), cells were pulse-labelled with CldU, treated or not with 0.4 µM Aph, then subjected to a pulse-labelling with IdU. Representative DNA fiber images are provided. Graphs represent the percentage of red (CldU) tracts (stalled forks) or green (IdU) tracts (restarting forks) in the cells. Error bars represent standard error (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; two-tailed Student’s t test).

(F) Working model for the potential role of WRNIP1 in R-loop accumulation. Upon replication fork stalling, WRNIP1 binds to R-loops and protects stalled forks, promoting genomic integrity. In the absence of WRNIP1, R-loops accumulate, and TRCs are enhanced, leading to genome instability. In case of WRNIP1 UBZ mutation, the protein binds to R-loops but they accumulate, increasing TRCs and, thus, contributing to genomic instability.