Introduction

The maintenance of protein homeostasis is essential for cell viability, but protein often misfolds during the life of the cell as a result of destabilizing mutations, environmental stress, or metabolic challenges. Protein misfolding is a common theme in human neurodegenerative disorders, among a growing list of “conformational diseases”, which often manifest with pathologies of proteinaceous inclusions in the affected tissues (Prusiner 2012). These neurodegenerative disorders include Alzheimer’s (AD), Parkinson’s (PD), Huntington’s (HD) diseases, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) (Ross and Poirier 2004). For instance, protein inclusions containing TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) are a pathological hallmark of several neurodegenerative diseases, including the majority of ALS cases and significant subsets of FTD and AD cases (Neumann et al. 2006; Cairns et al. 2007; Lagier-Tourenne et al. 2010). The accumulation of misfolded proteins can overwhelm the protein quality control systems in the cell and lead to functional impairment or cell death (Tyedmers et al. 2010). Therefore, the proteotoxicity is considered a critical step in the pathogenesis of relevant neurodegenerative diseases. However, the mechanisms through which the cell organizes its protein quality control systems to alleviate proteotoxicity are not fully understood.

To guard against proteotoxicity, the cell has evolved elaborate machinery that can detect and degrade abnormal proteins to maintain the health of its proteome. The protein degradation machinery, including the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and autophagy (Varshavsky 2017), play a critical role in removing the misfolded or aggregated proteins. The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), a selective proteolytic system based on the tagging of substrate proteins with ubiquitin molecules, plays a pivotal role in protein quality control (Glickman and Ciechanover 2002). Autophagy is another major pathway for protein quality control, which mediates bulk or selective protein degradation or removal of protein aggregates in the cell (Yamamoto and Yue 2014). Impairment of both the UPS and autophagic systems has been extensively implicated in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases (Ciechanover and Brundin 2003; Wong and Cuervo 2010). Although proteotoxicity is known to be counteracted by the quality control systems including UPS and autophagy (Pohl and Dikic 2019), how these systems are regulated in a coordinated manner to mount an effective defense against proteotoxic stress remains poorly understood.

Here, in search of critical regulators of proteotoxicity and protein quality control, we conducted an unbiased genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screen for suppressors of proteotoxicity as a result of proteasomal impairment, and then identified dihydrolipoamide branched chain transacylase E2 (DBT) as a major regulator of protein quality control. We found that loss of DBT robustly enhanced survival of cells under stress induced by proteasomal impairment. The mechanisms through which loss of DBT conferred resistance to the proteasomal inhibition was through an AMPK-dependent signaling that retained autophagic activities when the proteasomal activity was diminished. Loss of DBT also protected against proteotoxicity in neurodegenerative models. Abnormal upregulation of DBT in ALS patient tissues suggests that the DBT-dependent protein quality control pathways are dysregulated in the human disease conditions. These results have revealed a previously unknown mechanism of maintaining proteostasis that has implications for understanding the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases.

Result

Genome-wide screening identifies DBT as a potent suppressor of proteasomal inhibition-induced cytotoxicity

To identify critical regulators of proteotoxicity as a result of proteasomal impairment, we designed a CRISPR-Cas9 screen to search for suppressors that confer resistance to toxicity induced by proteasomal inhibition in mammalian cells (Fig. 1A). The screen was performed on human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE1) cells, a genomically stable diploid cell line, through infection with single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) from the human GeCKO (Genome-Scale CRISPR Knock-out) lentiviral pooled library (Sanjana et al. 2014). A potent and reversible proteasome inhibitor, MG132 (Kisselev and Goldberg 2001), which is a peptide aldehyde and analog of proteasomal substrates, was applied to induced proteotoxicity. The sensitivity of RPE1 cells to proteasome inhibition was tested with MG132 treatment at a range of concentrations, with 2 μM of MG132 observed to cause lethality in most of the cells within 6 days (Fig. 1B). The CRISPR screen was then performed with 2 μM of MG132 as the optimized concentration for selecting suppressors that would confer resistance to the proteasomal inhibition-induced toxicity. The RPE1 cells were infected with the GeCKO pooled lentiviral sgRNAs and cultured in the presence of 2 μM of MG132 for 6 days, and the surviving cells were allowed to recover without MG132 and grow into single cell-derived colonies. These colonies were then harvested and sequenced for further analysis.

Figure 1.

The single cell-derived colonies were expanded and analyzed for their resistance to the proteasomal inhibition-induced cell toxicity. The cell line that had the most potent resistance phenotype was found to harbor a specific sgRNA against the DBT gene. Sanger sequencing of the genomic locus targeted by the sgRNA revealed a homozygous mutation, where a 1-bp insertion in exon 2 resulted in a premature stop codon in exon 3 (Supplemental Fig. S1A). The loss of the C-terminal 77 amino acids from the 482 a.a. full-length protein suggests that this is a null mutant of DBT (Supplemental Fig. S1A). The phenotype of the DBT knockout (KO) cell line was verified through a series of cell survival experiments, in which the cells were subjected to MG132 treatment at a range of concentrations or over a period of time, and the DBT KO cells exhibited the robust phenotype of resisting MG132-induced cytotoxicity when compared to the wild-type (WT) control cells (Fig. 1B). Additionally, the resistance of DBT KO cells to proteasome inhibition-induced cytotoxicity was confirmed using another proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. The results from the bortezomib assay were consistent with those of MG132, as the DBT KO cells consistently demonstrated better survival rates than the WT control cells (Supplemental Fig. S1C and D). To further confirm the role of DBT in the cell survival phenotype through an independent approach of removing DBT protein, we knocked down DBT in RPE1 cells by using a small hairpin RNA (shRNA) against the gene and observed a similar phenotype, indicating that DBT deficiency indeed underlies the resistance of the cells to MG132-induced cell toxicity (Fig. 1F).

Next, we asked whether the resistance of the DBT KO cells to MG132-induced cell toxicity could be rescued by exogenous DBT. We engineered a DBT cDNA (DBT’) harboring seven synonymous point mutations in the gRNA-targeted region, which render the cDNA resistant to the Cas9 cleavage in the DBT KO cell line (Fig. 1C and Supplemental Fig. S1B). The expression of DBT’ in the DBT KO cells completely restored the cell lethality phenotype induced by MG132 treatment, as measured by the fluorescence signals from Calcein AM (Fig. 1D and E), a cell-permeant dye that stains live cells. Moreover, the MG132-induced cell death can be measured by the cleavage of marker proteins such as PARP1 and Caspase 3 through immunoblotting analysis. While WT RPE1 cells exhibited pronounced cell death as indicated by the increase in cleaved PARP1 and Caspase 3 after treatment with 2 μM MG132 for 48 h, the loss of DBT markedly suppressed the cleavage of these cell death marker proteins (Fig. 1G and H). Together, these results demonstrate that loss of DBT robustly suppresses cell toxicity induced by the proteasome inhibitor MG132.

Loss of DBT prevents accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins

Next, we sought to identify the underlying mechanism through which DBT regulates MG132-induced cytotoxicity. The primary action of MG132 is to block the proteolytic activity of the 26S proteasome complex, which is responsible for the degradation of most ubiquitinated proteins. To assess the effect of MG132-induced proteasomal inhibition on protein ubiquitination in WT and DBT KO RPE1 cells, we performed immunoblotting analysis of ubiquitinated proteins, which showed an accumulation of poly-ubiquitinated proteins in the WT cells upon the MG132 treatment, whereas the MG132-induced changes in the levels of poly-ubiquitinated proteins in the DBT KO cells were significantly reduced (Fig. 2A). Moreover, the relative reduction in the accumulation of poly-ubiquitinated proteins in the DBT KO cells compared with those in the WT cells was observed over a period of 3 days of the MG132 treatment (Supplemental Fig. S2A), when more than half of the WT cells had died, Furthermore, we performed immunofluorescence staining analysis on these cells using a ubiquitin-specific antibody. Although the ubiquitin signal was very low without MG132 treatment, there was a substantial accumulation of ubiquitin-positive proteins in the WT cells upon treatment with 2 μM of MG132 for 48 h. However, the MG132-induced increase in ubiquitin immunofluorescence signals was greatly diminished in the DBT KO cells when compared with the WT cells (Fig. 2B), suggesting that the loss of DBT suppressed the MG132-induced cell death by preventing the accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins.

Figure 2.

The ubiquitin modification is a universal feature of pathological protein aggregates observed in neurodegenerative diseases (Alves-Rodrigues et al. 1998). To measure the levels of aggregated proteins in WT or DBT KO RPE1 cells, we employed a fluorescent dye, ProteoStat, that detects protein aggregates by selectively intercalating into the cross-beta spine of quaternary structures typically found in misfolded and aggregated proteins (Lesire et al. 2020). The fluorescence staining indicated that the MG132 treatment triggered substantial accumulation of aggregated proteins in the WT cells; however, the levels of the protein aggregates were significantly reduced in the DBT KO cells under the MG132 treatment (Fig. 2C), consistent with the changes in the levels of poly-ubiquitinated proteins. These results demonstrate that the loss of DBT prevents the accumulation of protein aggregates as a result of MG132-induced proteasomal inhibition.

Loss of DBT preserves autophagy under proteasomal inhibition

Next, we asked whether loss of DBT suppressed the MG132-induced cell toxicity by enhancing the proteasomal activity. Using a luminogenic Proteasome-Glo substrate, we measured the chymotrypsin-like proteolytic activity of the proteasome in WT and DBT KO RPE1 cells. The DBT KO cells had similar proteasomal activity to that of WT cells under resting states. Notably, the MG132 treatment decreased the proteasomal activity in both WT and DBT KO cells but to the same degree (Supplemental Fig. S2B). Furthermore, the protein levels of proteasomal core subunits, such as PSMD1, PSMD5, and PSMD11, were unchanged between the WT and DBT KO cells before or after the MG132 treatment (Supplemental Fig. S2C-F). These results show that loss of DBT does not promote proteasomal activity but prevents the accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins through a proteasome-independent mechanism.

The autophagy-lysosome pathway is an alternative mechanism for degradation of ubiquitinated proteins (Kraft et al. 2010). Thus, we examined the status of autophagy in the WT and DBT KO RPE1 cells by measuring the levels of LC3II, a lipidated form of LC3 protein that serves as a maker for the autophagosome. In the absence of MG132 treatment, the LC3II levels were similar between WT and DBT KO cells. Treatment with the lysosome inhibitor Bafilomycin A1 blocks the degradation of LC3II, and the Bafilomycin A1-induced increase in LC3II were comparable between WT and DBT KO cells, indicating that the DBT KO cells had normal autophagy flux levels similar to those of WT cells under the resting condition (Fig. 3A-C) (Loos et al. 2014). Upon the treatment with 2 μM of MG132 for 48 h, there was a significant increase in LC3II levels in WT cells; however, the Bafilomycin A1-induced inhibition of lysosomal degradation did not further increase the LC3II levels in the WT cells, indicating that the autophagy flux was severely impaired, thereby leading to the accumulation of LC3II in these cells (Fig. 3A-C). By contrast, the DBT KO cells exhibited lower levels of LC3II than the WT cells upon the MG132 treatment, and unlike the WT cells, these DBT KO cells showed further increase in LC3II levels after the Bafilomycin A1-induced inhibition of lysosomal degradation, indicating that the DBT KO cells had a functioning autophagy flux under the MG132-treated condition (Fig. 3A-C). These results suggest that loss of DBT enhances the function of the autophagy-lysosome pathway under the stress induced by proteasomal inhibition.

Figure 3.

P62 is the autophagy receptor for ubiquitinated proteins (Katsuragi et al. 2015). Since p62 is degraded by the autophagy-lysosome pathway, its protein level is typically enhanced when the function of the autophagy-lysosome pathway is impaired. In the absence of MG132 treatment, the p62 levels were comparable between WT and DBT KO cells and were increased to similar levels upon the treatment with the lysosome inhibitor Bafilomycin A1, confirming that the DBT KO cells had normal autophagy functions under the resting condition (Fig. 3D-F). However, under the MG132-induced proteotoxic condition, the WT cells showed a heightened level of p62 and there was no further increase in p62 after the Bafilomycin A1-induced inhibition of lysosomal degradation (Fig. 3D-F). By contrast, with the MG132 treatment, the DBT KO cells exhibited lower levels of p62 than the WT cells and showed further increase in p62 after the lysosomal inhibition, confirming that the DBT KO cells had preserved the autophagic functions under the MG132-treated condition (Fig. 3D-F).

To further test whether the resistance of the DBT KO cells to the MG132-induced cytotoxicity was a result of the preserved autophagic activities, we treated the WT and DBT KO cells with Bafilomycin A1 and analyzed the cell survival. As mentioned above, the loss of DBT protected cells from MG132-induced cell death; however, the inhibition of the autophagy-lysosome pathway with Bafilomycin A1 completely abolished the enhanced cell survival associated with the loss of DBT (Fig. 3G), indicating that the autophagy-lysosome pathway is required for the DBT-dependent regulation of proteotoxicity under proteasomal inhibition.

DBT is a metabolic switch regulating proteotoxicity-dependent activation of AMPK

DBT is a core component of the branched-chain α-keto acid dehydrogenase (BCKD) enzyme complex, which functions in inner mitochondria to break down the essential branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), leucine, isoleucine, and valine (Brosnan and Brosnan 2006). The BCKD-mediated reaction is the rate-limiting and irreversible step in the catabolism of BCAAs into acetyl-CoA or succinyl-CoA, which can be used for energy production by the citric acid cycle (Holecek 2018). To understand the mechanism through which DBT regulates MG132-induced proteotoxicity, we examined the metabolic and energetic status of WT and DBT KO RPE1 cells under the proteotoxic stress. First, BCAA levels were analyzed in the WT and DBT KO cells using a colorimetric assay. The DBT KO cells exhibited significantly increased levels of BCAAs, in line with the notion that DBT is essential for BCAA catabolism (Fig. 4A, left). Although MG132 treatment led to a decrease in the BCAA levels in the WT cells, the BCAA levels in the DBT KO cells remained elevated and showed no change upon the MG132 treatment (Fig. 4A), confirming that the BCAA catabolism was completely blocked in the absence of DBT. Then we asked whether the accumulation of BCAAs played a role in the resistance of DBT KO cells to MG132 toxicity. When the BCAA levels were increased by 6-8 folds in the culture media of WT RPE1 cells, we did not observe any protection against MG132 toxicity (Supplemental Fig. S3B), indicating that the BCAA accumulation alone was not sufficient to protect the cells from proteotoxicity associated with the proteasomal impairment.

Figure 4.

The catabolism of BCAAs consists of two main steps (Supplemental Fig. S3A). The first step is mediated by BCAT, which is that enzyme converting BCAAs and α-ketoglutarate into branched-chain α-keto acids and glutamate. The second step is mediated by the BCKD enzyme complex, with DBT as one of its components. As DBT deficiency was found to protect cells from proteotoxicity, we further asked how deficiency in other components of the BCAA catabolism affects cell survival under proteotoxic stress. We generated knockout RPE1 cells lacking BCAT or BCKDHA, the latter being a component of the BCKD enzyme complex, disrupting the first and second steps of the BCAA catabolism, respectively. Depletion of BCAT or BCKDHA did not affect cell survival under normal conditions. However, the BCAT or BCKDHA knockout cells exhibited significant resistance to MG132-induced cytotoxicity (Supplemental Fig. S3C), similar to DBT knockout cells. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that it is not the accumulation of BCAAs but the blockade of the BCAA catabolism that leads to resistance to MG132-induced toxicity.

Since both the proteasome-mediated proteolysis and the BCAA catabolism can influence energy metabolism (Ye et al. 2020; Szczepanowska and Trifunovic 2021), we examined the energetic status of WT and DBT KO RPE1 cells. Under normal conditions, the DBT KO cells showed ATP/ADP ratios comparable to those of WT cells. The MG132 treatment slightly decreased the ATP/ADP ratios in the WT cells; however, the MG132-treated DBT KO cells exhibited significantly decreased ATP/ADP ratios compared to the untreated DBT KO cells or the WT cells with or without the MG132 treatment (Fig. 4B). Given that glucose is the primary source of ATP production in the cell, we sought to analyze the effects of increasing glucose concentrations on the sensitivity of DBT KO cells to MG132-induced toxicity. When WT cells were examined, increasing the glucose concentrations in the media from 17.5 mM to 70 mM or 140 mM did not affect the sensitivity of the WT cells to MG132 toxicity (Supplemental Fig. S3D). In contrast, when the cell survival of DBT KO cells were examined, the increased glucose levels significantly decreased the survival of DBT KO cells under MG132 treatment in a glucose concentration dependent manner (Supplemental Fig. S3D), in accordance with the notion that reduction in ATP levels contributed to the resistance of DBT KO cells to MG132 toxicity.

Together, these results indicate that loss of DBT combined with proteasomal inhibition led to a significant decrease in the ATP/ADP ratios, which correlated with the preservation of autophagic activities and the resistance to cell death induced by the proteasomal inhibition. AMPK is a highly conserved sensor of cellular energy changes and is activated by increasing levels of AMP or ADP coupled with falling ATP (Mihaylova and Shaw 2011). To assess the effect of DBT on AMPK signaling, we examined the activation of AMPK, as measured by the phosphorylation of its threonine 172 (T¹⁷²) (Hardie 2011), in WT and DBT KO RPE1 cells. The levels of phosphorylated AMPK-T¹⁷² were not significantly changed in the DBT KO cells under the resting condition; however, upon the MG132 treatment, the DBT KO cells exhibited significantly higher levels of phosphorylated AMPK-T¹⁷² than the WT cells (Fig. 4C). The total level of AMPK was not changed by the loss of DBT or the MG132 treatment alone (Fig. 4C). These data indicated that AMPK was activated in cells under the MG132-induced proteotoxic stress in the absence of DBT.

Next, we tested the role of AMPK in the resistance of DBT KO cells to MG132-induced proteotoxicity. We knocked down AMPK by using specific shRNAs and examined the cell survival in the DBT KO cells with the MG132 treatment. The AMPK knockdown abolished the resistance of the DBT KO cells to the MG132-induced proteotoxicity. Under the MG132-treated conditions, the AMPK knockdown did not affect the survival of WT RPE1 cells; however, it significantly decreased the survival of DBT KO cells to the level comparable to that of WT cells (Fig. 4D). To confirm the role of the AMPK signaling in the cell survival phenotype of DBT KO cells, we applied an AMPK inhibitor, Compound C (Zhou et al. 2001), and found that it also abolished the protective effects of loss of DBT and rendered the DBT KO cells sensitive to the MG132 treatment (Supplemental Fig. S4A and B). These results indicate that AMPK is a key player in the resistance of DBT KO cells against the MG132-induced proteotoxicity.

Loss of DBT activates autophagy under proteotoxic stress via AMPK effectors

Since AMPK is a principal regulator of autophagy, we tested the role of AMPK in the autophagy activation in the DBT KO cells under MG132-induced proteotoxic stress. The knockdown of AMPK via shRNAs significantly reduced the LC3 protein levels, and quantification of LC3II levels before and after Bafilomycin A1-medicated inhibition of lysosomal degradation indicated that the autophagy flux was significantly reduced by the downregulation of AMPK (Fig. 5A), consistent with the increased vulnerability of the DBT KO cells to the MG132-induced proteotoxic stress (Fig. 4D).

Figure 5.

The activation of AMPK promotes autophagy through several downstream effectors, including serine/threonine-protein kinase ULK1 and mTOR signaling (Mihaylova and Shaw 2011). ULK1 is an important regulator of autophagosome biogenesis and can be activated by AMPK signaling (Kim et al. 2011). In the absence of MG132 treatment, there was no difference in the levels of total ULK1 protein or its activity, as measured by the phosphorylation at its serine 371 (S³⁷¹) site (Fig. 5B). Upon the treatment with 2 μM of MG132 for 48 h, there was little change in the ULK1 activity in WT RPE1 cells; however, the DBT KO cells exhibited a significant increase in the phosphorylation of ULK1-S³⁷¹ (Fig. 5B), indicating that loss of DBT specifically induced the activation of ULK1 under the MG132 treatment, concomitant with the AMPK activation under this condition (Fig. 4C).

Activated AMPK also inhibits the mTOR signaling, which negatively regulate autophagy. AMPK is reported to regulate the mTOR signaling by phosphorylating TSC2 on serine 1387 (S¹³⁸⁷) (Mihaylova and Shaw 2011). Phosphorylation of TSC2-S¹³⁸⁷ enhances the activity of TSC2 as a Rheb GAP, leading to the inhibition of mTOR. We found that the changes in the phosphorylation of TSC2-S¹³⁸⁷ were in accordance with that of AMPK-T¹⁷² in the WT and DBT KO cells under the MG132-induced proteotoxic stress. There was little difference in the phosphorylation levels of TSC2 between the WT and DBT KO cells in the absence of MG132 treatment; however, under the treatment of 2 μM of MG132 for 48 h, the DBT KO cells exhibited significantly higher levels of phosphorylated TSC2-S¹³⁸⁷, while the WT cells did not show any change in the phosphorylation levels of TSC2 (Fig. 5B). These results suggest that the AMPK-TSC2-mTOR signaling is another mechanism through which loss of DBT leads to autophagic activation under the stress induced the proteasomal inhibition.

Next, we modulated the activity of the mTOR signaling in the DBT KO cells to test its roles in the observed phenotypes of autophagic activation and resistance of MG132-induced cell toxicity. Since inhibition of mTOR signaling is associated with autophagic activation, as observed in the DBT KO cells, we targeted TSC1, a negative regulator of mTOR, via shRNAs to increase the mTOR signaling in the DBT KO cells. The increase in the mTOR activity as a result of TSC1 knockdown, as confirmed by the upregulated S6K phosphorylation (Fig. 5C), led to significant reduction in LC3II protein levels as well as in the autophagy flux measured by the LC3II ratios before and after Bafilomycin treatment, confirming that the autophagic activation in the DBT KO cells was dependent on the inhibition of mTOR signaling (Fig. 5D). Furthermore, in accordance with the changes in autophagic activities, the knockdown of TSC1 abolished the enhanced survival phenotype of the DBT KO cells under the MG132 treatment (Fig. 5E). To confirm the role of the mTOR signaling in the cell survival phenotype of DBT KO cells, we applied an mTOR agonist, MHY1485 (Choi et al. 2012), and found that it also abolished the protective effects of loss of DBT and rendered the DBT KO cells sensitive to the MG132 treatment (Supplemental Fig. S4C and D). These results demonstrate that the mTOR signaling plays a key role in the resistance of DBT KO cells to the proteasomal inhibition-induced toxicity.

Loss of DBT suppresses the toxicity of mutant TDP-43 by promoting its clearance

Neurodegeneration-associated protein misfolding and aggregation often lead to impairment of the proteasome (Ciechanover and Brundin 2003). ALS-linked mutant TDP-43 proteins, including the M337V variant, are prone to misfolding and aggregation, providing a disease-related molecular model for studying proteotoxicity (Johnson et al. 2009). We asked whether loss of DBT protects cells from mutant TDP-43-associated proteotoxicity. TDP-43^M337 or a GFP-like control protein Dendra2 was expressed in RPE1 cells for 48 h, and the number of live cells were quantified by Calcein-AM staining. The WT cells expressing TDP-43^M337 showed significantly lower cell viability than those expressing the control protein, indicating that the WT cells were highly sensitive to TDP-43^M337-induced proteotoxicity (Fig. 6A). However, the DBT KO cells exhibited significantly higher levels of cell survival than the WT cells when expressing TDP-43^M337, indicating a strong protection by the loss of DBT. Furthermore, we asked whether loss of DBT would alleviate TDP-43^M337-induced proteotoxicity in mammalian neurons. We employed motor neurons differentiated from mouse embryonic stem cells (Zhang et al. 2020), which showed marked sensitivity to virally expressed TDP-43^M337 when compared to the control GFP protein, as shown by the significant neuronal loss with the TDP-43^M337 expression (Fig. 6B). Importantly, knockdown of DBT by specific shRNAs significantly rescued the neuronal loss with the TDP-43^M337 expression, as compared to the non-targeting control shRNAs (Fig. 6B). These results demonstrate that loss of DBT resulted in a robust protection against TDP-43-associated proteotoxicity.

Figure 6.

Next, we asked whether the resistance of DBT KO cells to TDP-43^M337V-induced proteotoxicity was associated with any change in the turnover of the mutant protein. In immunoblotting analysis, TDP-43^M337V transiently expressed in the DBT KO RPE1 cells showed substantially lower protein levels than that expressed in the WT cells (Fig. 6C). To determine whether the decrease in the steady-state levels of TDP-43^M337V protein was a consequence of increased protein degradation, we performed the cycloheximide chase assay to measure the turnover rate of the TDP-43^M337V protein. As analyzed by immunoblotting of TDP-43^M337V over a period of time after cycloheximide-induced inhibition of protein synthesis, the degradation of TDP-43^M337V took place at a much faster rate in the DBT KO cells than in the WT cells (Fig. 6D). The half-life of TDP-43^M337V was estimated to be over 24 h in the WT cells but only ∼4.5 h in the DBT KO cells. Furthermore, consistent with the faster turnover rate of TDP-43^M337V, the DBT KO cells exhibited a higher degree of autophagy flux than the WT cells, as measured by LC3II levels before and after the Bafilomycin treatment (Fig. 6E). These data indicate that loss of DBT promoted the clearance of TDP-43^M337V and reduced its proteotoxicity through enhanced autophagic functions.

To study the TDP-43-associated proteotoxicity in an in vivo system, we employed a Drosophila model, which expresses the ALS-associated human mutant TDP-43^M337V under the GMR-GAL4 driver and develops a rough-eye phenotype as a result of the loss of photoreceptors and retinal degeneration in adult eyes (Ritson et al. 2010). By crossing with a transgenic strain with stable RNAi-induced reduction of the Drosophila homolog of human DBT, CG5599 (St Pierre et al. 2014), we found that the knockdown of the DBT homolog produced a significant rescue of the TDP-43^M337V-induced rough eye phenotype, resulting in a smoother eye appearance and increased pigmentation (Fig. 6F). To confirm the observation, we generated a DBT KO Drosophila strain by mating Cas9 flies with DBT sgRNA flies and obtained a homozygous mutant with a 1-bp deletion in exon 2 of the Drosophila DBT gene, which yielded a null allele with a premature stop codon in exon 2 (Supplemental Fig. S1E). When we crossed the DBT KO flies with TDP-43^M337V transgenic flies, and a similar protection against the rough eye phenotype was observed (Fig. 6F), indicating that loss of DBT protects against TDP-43-associated neurodegeneration.

To extend the analysis of DBT-dependent proteotoxicity from TDP-43 to another disease-associated protein, we focused on the polyglutamine (polyQ) repeat, which is a misfoled protein domain associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as Huntington’s disease (HD) and spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) (Ross and Poirier 2004). In cell survival assays, we found that WT RPE1 cells expressing polyQ showed significantly lower cell viability than DBT KO cells, indicating that loss of DBT protects against polyQ-induced proteotoxicity (Supplemental Fig. S5A-B). In immunoblotting analysis, we found that polyQ transiently expressed in the DBT KO cells exhibited substantially lower protein levels than those in WT cells (Supplemental Fig. S5C-D), suggesting that the resistance of the DBT KO cells to polyQ-induced proteotoxicity was associated with enhanced turnover of the polyQ protein. Additionally, we utilized a Drosophila model to confirm the protective effects of loss of DBT polyQ-induced toxicity in an in vivo system. Based on the analysis of the rough eye phenotype in the polyQ transgenic fly model, we observed significant protection against the eye degeneration in either DBT RNAi or KO flies (Supplemental Fig. S5E-F). Together, these results demonstrate that the evolutionarily conserved regulatory effects of DBT on proteotoxicity are likely broad-spectrum.

DBT is dysregulated in ALS patients

To understand whether the DBT-dependent regulation of proteotoxicity is relevant to human patients, we analyzed the spinal cord tissues from a cohort of ALS patients, most of whom have been observed to harbor TDP-43 proteinopathy in their postmortem exams of central nervous systems (Supplemental Table S1). First, we carried out the immunoblotting analysis of spinal cord tissue extracts from 24 ALS patients and 8 non-neurological controls. Although the immunoblot signals showed variability among the individuals, we found that DBT protein levels were significantly elevated in the majority of ALS cases (Fig. 7 A and Supplemental Fig. S6). Next, we performed immunofluorescence staining to analyze the quantity and distribution of DBT proteins in the human spinal cord tissue sections. In the control cases, DBT could be seen clearly expressed in motor neurons, which are characterized by their large soma and unique nuclear morphologies (Fig. 7B). Compared with the controls, the DBT immunofluorescence signals showed much higher intensity and broader distribution across the spinal cord sections, suggesting elevated levels of DBT in neuronal soma and neurites (Fig. 7B). Indeed, stronger signals of DBT immunofluorescence could be detected in large neuronal cell bodies in the ALS cases (Fig. 7B). These observations suggest that the DBT-mediated regulation of protein quality control is compromised in the disease-relevant tissues of ALS patients.

Figure 7.

Discussion

The present study uncovers a major regulator of protein quality control through an unbiased genetic screen and demonstrated the signaling pathway through which DBT regulates autophagic activation under stress induced by proteasomal inhibition (Supplemental Fig. S7). The observations of DBT’s robust regulatory effects on the proteotoxicity in models of neurodegenerative diseases and the upregulation of DBT in ALS patient tissues suggest that DBT is an important player in the pathogenesis of the disease. The findings could contribute to our better understanding of the regulation of protein quality control systems under stress or disease conditions.

DBT is a core component of the BCKD enzyme complex, which functions to break down BCAAs and provide acetyl-CoA or succinyl-CoA that can be used for energy production (Brosnan and Brosnan 2006). Recent studies in C. elegans suggested that BCAA metabolism play complicated roles in the regulation of the ubiquitin-proteasome system, with deficiency in components of the BCKD complex negatively impacting the ubiquitin-proteasome activity (Ravanelli et al. 2022). Surprisingly, we found in the present study that mammalian cells deficient in DBT exhibited a remarkable degree of resistance to cell death from proteotoxicity induced by the proteasomal inhibition. In accordance with the enhanced cellular survival under the proteotoxic stress induced by proteasomal inhibition in cells lacking DBT, the DBT-deficient cells exhibited a remarkable capacity to prevent accumulation of poly-ubiquitinated proteins as a result of the proteasomal inhibition. The efficient clearance of the poly-ubiquitinated proteins despite the proteasomal inhibition was attributable to the preservation of autophagic activities in the DBT-deficient cells, unlike the WT cells where the autophagic activities were diminished due to the overloaded burden of proteotoxicity as a consequence of the proteasomal inhibition.

Conventionally, elevated levels of BCAAs are associated with inhibition of autophagy due to their ability to activate mTORC1 (Zhenyukh et al. 2017), the nutrient sensor that negatively regulates autophagy (Dunlop and Tee 2014). While the expected increase in BCAAs was observed following the loss of DBT, our findings indicate that additional factors beyond BCAAs play a role in the regulation of autophagy, since DBT-deficient cells exhibited improved preservation of autophagic activities under the conditions of proteasomal inhibition compared to WT cells. Consistent with the preservation of autophagic activities, the DBT-deficient cells showed a significant activation of AMPK signaling under the conditions of proteasomal inhibition. The activation of AMPK only under the combined conditions of proteasomal inhibition and DBT deficiency but not under each of the conditions alone is driven by the depletion of intracellular ATP under the combined conditions. The ATP-producing OXPHOS complexes are sensitive to regulation of protein quality control, as its many components are regulated by proteasomal degradation (Szczepanowska and Trifunovic 2021), consistent with our observation of lower ATP levels upon treatment with the proteasome inhibitor. We also found that the DBT deficiency decreased the intracellular ATP levels under the condition of proteasomal inhibition, suggesting that DBT-dependent BCAA catabolism is critical source of energy production under the condition of proteasomal inhibition. Furthermore, the net outcome of better preservation of autophagic activities, upon inhibition of both proteasomal degradation and BCAA catabolism, underlies the important roles of the energy metabolism and the cognate AMPK signaling, which regulates autophagy regulators including mTOR and ULK1 (Alers et al. 2012), as the driving force for the autophagic activation under these conditions. Although cells have complicated networks that regulate metabolism and proteostasis, the present study has revealed the pivotal role of DBT as a master switch for protein quality control and cell survival under proteotoxic stress such as that induced by the proteasomal inhibition.

The newly recognized function of DBT in regulating proteotoxicity is further demonstrated through the protective effects of DBT deficiency in cellular and Drosophila models of TDP-43 proteotoxicity. Together with the observations that DBT exhibits aberrant accumulation in ALS patients’ spinal cord tissues, these results suggest that DBT may modulate proteotoxicity in the neurodegenerative diseases. Both DBT and BCAAs play important roles in metabolism important for physiology and diseases. Defective BCAA catabolism is associated with metabolic disorders, such as maple syrup urine disease, insulin resistance, and diabetes (Yoon 2016; Holecek 2018). Abnormal regulation of the levels and metabolism of BCAAs has been implicated in a variety of other human pathological conditions, including Alzheimer’s disease, cancer, and liver diseases (Dimou et al. 2022). The role of DBT as a critical regulator of protein quality control through metabolic and energetic controls under proteotoxic stress, as revealed in the present study, open a new avenue for understanding the complex regulation of protein homeostasis in human health and pathologies.

Methods

DNA plasmids

The human DBT cDNA plasmid was obtained from the Ultimate ORF collection (Thermo Fisher). Synonymous mutations in the DBT cDNA were generated with Q5-site direct mutagenesis (NEB, E0554S) by replacing CACTTCCTGAAAACAACTGC with CATTTTTTAAAGACGACCGC in exon 1. The resulting variant DBT’ was subcloned into the pDEST plasmid using the Gateway system (ThermoFisher). For mammalian expression, human TDP-43^M337V has subcloned into the pLenti CMV Puro DEST (W118-1, Addgene) plasmid as previously described (Zhang et al. 2014).

Viruses

For lentivirus production, HEK293T cells were cultured under standard conditions and co-transfected overnight with a lentiviral transfer plasmid containing the insert of interest, the psPAX2 packaging plasmid (Addgene #12260), and the pMD2.G envelope plasmid (Addgene #12259) using Lipofectamine 2000 (ThermoFisher #11668019). The lentiviral particle-containing medium was collected 72 h after transfection, filtered through a 0.45-μm PVDF membrane (Millipore Sigma HVHP02500), mixed with PEG8000 at a 3:1 ratio, incubated with constant rocking at 60 rpm for 4 h at 4°C, and centrifuged at 1600 × g at 4°C for 1 h. The supernatant was removed, and the viral pellet was resuspended in PBS, aliquoted, and stored at −80°C. The TDP-43^M337V and GFP HSVs were obtained from Gene Delivery Technology Core, Massachusetts General Hospital.

Mammalian Cell lines, transfections, and drug treatments

Human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE1, hTERT-RPE1, ATCC CRL-4000) cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12 (DMEM/F12, Life Technologies, 10565-018) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 10 μg/mL hygromycin B (Corning, 30-240-CR) at 37°C with 5% CO₂. DBT knockout in RPE1 was achieved by infecting cells with viruses derived from pLenti-CRISPR v2 harboring the DBT-specific gRNA (5’- CACTTCCTGAAAACAACTGC-3’), and a population of puromycin-selected cells were used. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) and human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells (ATCC, CRL-3216) were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. Transfection of mammalian cells were performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Briefly, 2 μg of the DNA plasmids and 4 μl of Lipofectamine 2000 were mixed in 500 μl Opti-MEM I (Invitrogen) and applied to RPE1 cell in 2 ml DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. After two days post transfection, cells were lysed for analysis. MG132 was dissolved at 20 mM in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), bortezomib at 2 mM in DMSO, MHY1485 at 5mM in DMSO, and SC79 was dissolved at 14mM in DMSO. All drugs were diluted in DMEM/F12 before the cell treatments. DBT knockdown in MEFs was achieved by infecting cells with viruses derived from pLKO-1 harboring the DBT shRNAs (TRCN0000099376, TRCN0000099377, and TRCN0000099378, Dharmacon) and a population of puromycin-selected cells were used. TSC1 or AMPK knockdown in RPE1 cells were achieved by infecting cells with viruses derived from pLKO-1 harboring the shRNAs against TSC1 (TRCN0000010453 and TRCN0000039734, Sigma) or AMPK (TRCN00000196482 and TRCN00000219690, Sigma), respectively, and a population of puromycin-selected cells were used.

CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing and genome-wide screening

The specific gRNA sequences were selected by using the CRISPR design tool from Benchling, Inc. The gRNAs were cloned into the gRNA/Cas9-expressing vector pLenti-CRISPR v2, conferring resistance to puromycin (Addgene 52961). After cell transduction with the lentiviruses expressing the Cas9/gRNAs, single cell colonies were isolated based on puromycin resistance. The resulting cell lines were verified for their genotypes by sequencing the targeted locus or probing the targeted protein through immunoblot analysis.

The genomic CRISPR/Cas9 library with six sgRNA per gene was packaged into lentivirus and infected into RPE1 cells. Briefly, 6 × 10⁷ RPE1 cells were infected with the human sgRNA library (Human GeCKO v2 Library Cat#1000000048, Addgene) at an MOI of ∼0.3. The infected cells were selected with 10 μg/ml puromycin for 7 days. After the puromycin selection, the infected RPE1cells were treated with MG132 at a concentration of 2 µM for 4 days, followed by recovery for another 4 days. After 3 rounds of treatments and recovery, the surviving resistant colonies were harvested, with the genomic DNA isolated followed by PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing of the sgRNA cassette.

Cell viability assay using crystal violet or Calcein-AM

Cell viability was measured using crystal violet staining. Briefly, 5 × 10⁴ RPE1 cells were seeded into a 24-well plate and treated with different concentrations of MG132 or bortezomib, or with the same volume of DMSO as a solvent control. Cells were washed with 1x PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min, and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 20 min at room temperature. For quantification, the crystal violet dye was extracted with 0.5 ml 10% acetic acid at room temperature for 20 min and the optical densities were measured at 570 nm using a Synergy H1 Hybrid Reader (BioTek).

Live-cell staining probe Calcein-AM (Invitrogen) was used for determining cell viability where the fluorescence intensity is proportional to the number of viable cells. Following various experimental treatments, 5 × 10⁴ RPE1 cells were seeded into a 24-well plate and treated with MG132 (2μM, 72hr) or bortezomib (0.25μM, 72hr), or with the same volume of DMSO as a solvent control. Cells were washed with PBS and incubated with 1μM Calcein-AM for 30 min in the dark at 37°C under 5% CO₂. The fluorescent image was viewed with a Nikon TS100 fluorescence microscope, and a Synergy H1 Hybrid Reader (BioTek) with a custom filter (485nm and 535nm) was used to record the Relative Florescence Intensity (RFI). RFI from the plate reader was used to calculate the ratios or fold changes of drug-treated groups over the control condition.

Proteasome activity assay

The proteasome activity assay was performed using a Proteasome-Glo Chymotrypsin-Like Cell-Based Assay kit (Promega). Briefly, 1 × 10⁴ cells were seeded into a 96-well culture plate. After 24 h of MG132 or bortezomib treatment, a pre-mixed assay buffer containing substrates and luciferin detection reagents was added in equal volume to the sample and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The supernatant was transferred to optiplate-96 (white; PerkinElmer) and luminescence was recorded using a fluorescent plate reader (Synergy H1, BioTek).

Immunoblotting

Cells were washed twice with 1X PBS and then lysed and harvested on ice in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6; 150 mM NaCl; 1% NP-40; 1% SDS; 100 mM sodium fluoride; 17.5 mM β-glycerophosphate; 0.5% sodium deoxycholate; and 10% glycerol). The RIPA buffer was supplemented with EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche): phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche), 1 μM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, and 2 μM sodium orthovanadate. Cell lysates were kept cold on ice, pulse-sonicated for 10 min, and then centrifuged at 12,000 g at 4 °C for 10 min. The protein concentrations were determined using the bicinchonic acid (BCA) assay.

Equal amounts of proteins from total cell lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Millipore). The blots were blocked with 5% w/v BSA and 0.05% NaN₃ in TBST and incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight, then finally incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies. The primary antibodies included anti-DBT (ab151991, Abcam); anti-β-actin (sc-47778, Santa Cruz); anti-PARP (9542, Cell Signaling); anti-Cleaved Caspase3 (9664, Cell Signaling); anti-LC3B (3868, Cell Signaling and L7543, Sigma); anti-SQSTM1/p62 (5114, Cell Signaling); anti-GAPDH (5174, Cell Signaling); anti-AMPK (5832, Cell Signaling); anti-p-AMPK (Thr172) (2535, Cell Signaling); anti-TSC2 (2880, Cell Signaling); anti-TSC2 (Ser1387) (5584, Cell Signaling); anti-ULK1 (8054, Cell Signaling); anti-ULK1 (Ser317) (37762, Cell Signaling); anti-mTOR (2983, Cell Signaling); anti-mTOR (Ser2448) (5536, Cell Signaling); anti-P70S6K (5707, Cell Signaling); anti-P70S6K (Thr389) (9205, Cell Signaling); anti-TDP-43 (10782-2-AP, ProteinTech); and anti-Flag (F3165, Sigma). Proteins were visualized using Li-COR anti-mouse and anti-rabbit 680 and 800 fluorescent antibodies, and the images were captured with an Odyssey imager and analyzed with the Image Studio software (Licor).

Immunofluorescence staining and detection of protein aggregates

For immunofluorescence staining, 8 x 10⁴ cells were grown on polyethylenimine (PEI)-coated coverslips. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, and incubated in blocking solution (5% normal goat serum, 0.1% Triton-X 100 in 1X PBS) for 1 h at room temperature. The coverslips were incubated with primary antibodies (anti-Ubiquitin ab7780, Abcam) at 4°C overnight, and then washed three times with PBS before being incubated with fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibodies (anti-rabbit, Alexa Fluor 594; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, 1:400) for 2 h at room temperature. After 3-5 times of washes with PBS, the coverslips were mounted onto microscope slides using mounting medium containing DAPI (P36931, ThermoFisher).

Protein aggregates were detected using the ProteoStat Aggresome detection kit (ENZ-51035, Enzo) with modifications. Briefly, 8 x 10⁴ cells were grown on polyethylenimine (PEI)-coated coverslips and treated with MG132 (2 μM, 72 h) or the same volume of DMSO as a solvent control. Cells were washed twice with 1X PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, and incubated with permeabilizing solution (0.5% Triton X-100, 3mM EDTA, pH8.0) for 30 min at room temperature. After being fixed and permeabilized, cells were then labelled with the ProteoStat reagent for 30 min at room temperature. After 3-5 times of washes with PBS, the coverslips were mounted onto microscope slides using mounting medium containing DAPI (P36931, ThermoFisher).

BCAA measurement

Intracellular levels of BCAAs were analyzed using the BCAA Assay Kit (ab83374, Abcam) based on a colorimetric assay measuring the concentrations of molecules specifically derived from BCAAs in the assay. Briefly, 1 × 10⁶ cells were seeded into a 6-well plate and treated with MG132 or the solvent control DMSO. Following overnight incubation, the cells were washed carefully with PBS, and then lysed with 100 μl BCAA assay buffer. Following centrifugation at 15,000 x g for 10 min to remove cell debris and other insoluble materials, the samples were transferred into a 96-well assay plate and mixed with the reaction buffer, and then the OD at 450 nm were measured in a microplate reader (BioTek, Synergy H1).

ATP/ADP measurement

The ATP/ADP ratio was analyzed using an ADP/ATP Ratio Assay Kit (MAK135, Sigma), which converts ATP and ADP into their respective intermediates and measure their concentrations in a bioluminescent assay. Cells were directly cultured in the assay microplate. Following overnight incubation, culture medium in the assay microplate was replaced with the ATP reagent, and after an additional 1-min incubation, the ATP signal was measured on a plate reader (BioTek, Synergy H1). In a second step, ADP was converted into ATP through an enzyme reaction and its signal was then measured. The ATP/ADP ratio was calculated according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Mouse motor neuron differentiation

mES cell were cultured and differentiated into motor neurons as previously described (McCreedy et al. 2014). Briefly, 2 × 10⁶ mES cells were cultured in suspension in 10 ml DFK5 medium for 2 days, followed by incubation in DFK5 medium containing 2 μM retinoic acid and 0.6 μM smoothened agonist for 4 days. Differentiating embryonic bodies were dissociated, plated into a laminin-coated 12-well plate (5 × 10⁵) and incubated in DFK5 medium with GDNF, BDNF, and NT-3 (5 ng/ml each) for 24 h. After 24 h, the medium was replaced with DFKNB medium supplemented with 1X B27, GDNF, BDNF and NT-3.

Before changing the medium, cells were infected with a lentivirus construct expressing DBT shRNAs for 6 h in 4 μg/ml polybrene. After a 6-h infection, the medium was replaced with DFKNB supplemented with 1X B27, GDNF, BDNF, and NT-3 for 48 h. After 48 h, cells were infected with herpes simplex viruses expressing TDP-43^M337V or GFP in 4 μg/ml polybrene for 6 h, as previously described (Gupta et al. 2017). After infection, motor neurons were incubated in DFKNB medium supplemented with 1X B27, GDNF, BDNF and NT-3 for an additional 48 h. On the last day, motor neurons were subjected to cell survival assay using the Calcein AM method as described above.

Drosophila strains and assays

Flies were reared and crossed on standard yeast agar cornmeal medium at 25 °C. The Drosophila transgenic strain carrying GAL4-inducible human TDP-43^M337V (hTDP-43^M337V) (Ritson et al. 2010) was recombined with GMR-GAL4. The GMR-GAL4, hTDP-43^M337V/TM3 fly strains were then crossed to RNAi transgenic strains. The following Drosophila strains were obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center or Vienna Stock Center: RNAi strains including Luc (y1 v1; P{TRiP. JF01355}attP2); DBT (P{TRiP.HMS00663}attP2) and DBT (P{KK102355}VIE-260B); CRISPR knockout strains including Cas9 (y[1] sc[*] v[1] sev[21]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=nos-Cas9.R}attP40) and DBT sgRNA (y[1] sc[*] v[1] sev[21]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TKO.GS01842}attP40). They were transferred to freshly made food every 2–3 d. Flies were aged for 21 d, and their eye morphology was examined. Changes in pigmentation, ommatidial structure and glossiness phenotypes were monitored for enhancement or suppression. The pigment content was detected at 488 nm and background corrected at 600 nm using fly head protein extracts as previously described (Periz et al. 2015; Lu et al. 2019). For generation of CRISPR knockout flies, DBT sgRNA flies were crossed with Cas9 flies, then the filial generation flies were analyzed with Sanger sequencing of the genomic locus targeted by the sgRNA. A homozygous mutation was confirmed, where a 1-bp deletion in exon 2 resulted in a premature stop codon in exon 2 (Supplemental Fig. S1E).

Statistical analysis

The statistical analyses were performed with Student’s t-tests for two-group comparisons and one-way ANOVA with the Tukey post hoc test for multiple group comparisons using the Graphpad Prism software. The sample size “n” represents biological replicates unless otherwise indicated. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from NIH (NS089616, NS110098, NS074324, and NS128494), Walder Foundation Endowment, Packard Center for ALS Research at Johns Hopkins, Target ALS Foundation, and ALS Association. We would like to thank Robert Kalb and Rachael Neve for viral expression vectors, Ian Robey at the VA Biorepository Brain Bank (VA merit review BX002466), Lyle Ostrow, Kathleen Wilsbach, and Kathyrn Gallo at the Johns Hopkins ALS Postmortem Tissue Core, and the Target ALS Multicenter Postmortem Tissue Core for providing patient tissues, and the members of Wang lab for discussion.

Author Contributions

R.H., Y.Lu, and J.W. designed the studies. R.H. and Y.Lu performed most of the experiments. Q.T. and Y.Lu performed the mESC culturing and neuronal differentiation. G.Periz and Y.Lu performed the Drosophila experiments. G.Park performed the BCAA analysis. Y.Liu performed the IHC staining. X.L. performed the proteasome immunoblot analysis. All authors analyzed the results. Y.Lu, R.H. and J.W. wrote the manuscript with inputs from G.Periz and T.Z.

Declaration of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.