Effects of Ser-938 phosphorylation on the spatiotemporal dynamics of FLS2 at the plasma membrane.
(A) VA-TIRFM images of a FLS2-expressing hypocotyl cell was analyzed. The 5-day-old transgenic Arabidopsis plant cells were observed under VA-TIRFM. The red balls indicate the positions of the identified points that appeared. Trajectories represent the track length of the identified points. Bar = 10μm. (B) Time-lapse images of FLS, FLS2S938A, and FLS2S938D. Bar = 2 μm. The fluorescence intensity changes among different 3D luminance plots. (C) The trajectories of representative individual FLS2, FLS2S938A and FLS2S938D under 30 min for 10 μM flg22 processing. (D) Diffusion coefficients of FLS (control, n = 42 spots; flg22, n = 24 spots), FLS2S938A (control, n = 44 spots; flg22, n = 25 spots) and FLS2S938D (control, n = 27 spots; flg22, n = 23 spots) under different environments. Statistical significance was assessed using the Student’s t-test (***p < 0.001). Error bars represent the SD. (E) Frequency of long- and short-range motions for FLS, FLS2S938A, and FLS2S938D under different environments. Statistical significance assessed with the Student’s t-test (***p < 0.001). Error bars represent the SD. (F) UMAP visualization of FLS2S938D samples under different conditions (control, n = 32 spots; flg22, n = 21 spots). Dots represent the individual images, and are colored according to the reaction conditions. (G) Fluorescence recovery curves of the photobleached areas with or without the flg22 treatment. Three biological replicates were performed. (H) The single-molecule trajectories of FLS2 analyzed by Imaris could be faithfully tracked for 4 s under control and flg22 treatments. (I) Dwell times were analyzed for FLS2 (control, n = 18 spots; flg22, n = 16 spots), FLS2S938A (control, n = 19 spots; flg22, n = 24 spots), and FLS2S938D (control, n = 11 spots; flg22, n = 14 spots) under the control and flg22 treatments. Statistical significance assessed with Student’s t-test (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01). Error bars represent the SD.