TET catalytic activity is largely dispensable in drosophila. (a, b) Schematic representation of tet locus (a) and main protein isoforms (b). (a) tet is transcribed from two alternative promoters giving rise to tet-long (tet-l) and tet-short (tet-s) isoforms. Filled boxes represent exons; non-coding exons (UTR) are depicted in green, and coding exons in black or according to their domain-associated color. Introns are represented as grey lines (not to scale). The tet null, DMAD1, DMAD2 and catalytic dead (CD) alleles are depicted in red. The location of the GFP insertion generated by CRISRP/Cas9-mediated knock-in is also indicated. (b) The conserved domains of TET are colored; pink: CXXC DNA binding domain, orange: Cystein-rich domain, blue: double-stranded ß helix (DSBH) domain, red: HxD (iron binding motif). Amino acid positions are indicated according to the longest TET-l and TET-s isoforms. (c-h) Expression pattern of the wild type and catalytic-dead versions of TET in the larval CNS. tet-GFP (c-e) and tetCD-GFP (f-h) knock-in lines were used to detect TET proteins by confocal imaging after immunostaining against GFP (green). Nuclei were labelled with DAPI (blue). (c, f): stitched images showing dorsal views of the entire CNS. Scale bar: 100 µm. (d, e, g, h): high-magnification views of TET expression in the ventral nerve cord (d, g) or the central brain (e, h). DAPI-only and GFP-only channels are presented in the middle (‘) and lower (‘’) panels, respectively. Scale bar: 10 µm. (i) Percentage of adult flies of the indicated genotypes hatching from their pupal case. Means and standard deviations from 4 independent experiments. (j-l) Wing positioning (j), ovaries (k) and mushroom bodies (l) of wild type adult flies (ctr: tet-GFP) as compared to flies lacking TET expression (tet1/2: tetDMAD1/DMAD2 adult escapers) or TET enzymatic activity (tetCD). (l-l”) Immunostaining against Fas2 on adult brains was used to label mushroom body a, b and g lobes. (k-k”) Scale bar 500µm. (l-l”) Scale bar 50µm.