Ochrobactrum species and P. lurida MYb11 divergently modulate Orsay virus transmission and infection rates.
(A) Schematic representation of the transmission and susceptibility assays: Transmission can be assessed by combining infected spreader individuals (green nematode), uninfected reporter individuals (white nematodes), and various bacteria. Susceptibility can be assessed by combining uninfected reporter individuals with exogenous Orsay virus, and various bacteria. 24 h later, infection is assessed. This schematic was made using Biorender. (B) Representative images of pals-5p::GFP expression among individuals exposed to spreaders or no spreaders in the presence of O. vermis MYb71, E. coli OP50, or P. lurida MYb11. (C) Incidence proportion, calculated as indicated, of Orsay virus transmission quantified on different bacteria from the environment of C. elegans. Data shown are from three experiments combined, each dot represents the incidence proportion from a single plate, and letters denote statistical significance. Treatments with the same letter are not significantly different from one another. (n=19694 in total and n > 42 for all dots). (D) Dose response curves of C. elegans to exogenous Orsay virus. The dashed line indicates the calculated dose at which 50% of the population was infected, the ID50, the exact value which is given above the x-axis for each bacterium. The solid curves represent the 95% confidence interval of the modeled log-logistic function while in the presence of each bacterium. Data are from a single representative experiment and replicates can be found in Supp. Fig. 3, Dots represent individual plates. ((a.u.), arbitrary units, see Methods) (n=8334 in total and n > 32 for all dots). (E) Ratios of the ID50 calculated on the indicated bacteria as compared to the ID50 calculated on E. coli OP50 from three separate experiments as in (D) and Supp. Fig. 3. (F) The fraction of individuals with staining as assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization targeting the RNA1 segment of Orsay virus. Data shown are from three experiments combined, each dot represents three pooled technical replicate plates from the susceptibility assays in (D) and Supp. Fig. 3. (n=3446 in total and n > 61 for all dots). For all plots the black bar is the mean and error bars are the 95% confidence interval (C.I.). p-values determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test (NS non-significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001).
© 2024, BioRender Inc. Any parts of this image created with BioRender are not made available under the same license as the Reviewed Preprint, and are © 2024, BioRender Inc.