Introduction

Complex behaviors are composed of sequences of simpler motor elements. For example, in human speech, sentences are formed by syllables that are flexibly sequenced according to syntactic rules (Berwick et al., 2011), which define the order of individual elements. Production of motor sequences according to syntactic rules is important not only for speech, but also for most other natural movements. Despite the ubiquity of syntactically organized sequential behaviors, little is known about how the brain produces flexible motor sequences (Lashley, 1951; Tanji, 2001; Aldridge and Berridge, 2003; Wiltschko et al., 2015; Veit et al., 2021).

Birdsong is a learned behavior that is well suited for the study of the neural control of motor sequences. Song is composed of discrete elements, called syllables, that are organized according to syntactic rules. The complexity of song syntax varies widely across different songbird species - from the simple and repetitive songs of owl finches (Wang et al., 2019) and zebra finches (Zann, 1996) to the variable songs of Bengalese finches (Honda and Okanoya, 1999) and canaries (Nottebohm, Stokes and Leonard, 1976; Cohen et al., 2020) up to the immense repertoire of nightingales (Hultsch et al., 2004; Costalunga et al., 2023). The neuronal mechanisms of birdsong production have been primarily studied in the zebra finch, partly by leveraging the structure of zebra finch song, in which syllables are produced in a relatively stereotyped and linear sequence. Consequently, we have a detailed understanding of the neuronal mechanisms for producing individual song syllables in this species, but we know little about how syllables are organized into the more complex and variable sequences that are characteristic of many other species (Ivanitskii and Marova, 2022).

Song production is controlled by neuronal activity in a set of brain nuclei called the song motor pathway, including premotor nucleus HVC (proper name). HVC neurons projecting to primary motor nucleus RA (robust nucleus of the arcopallium) encode syllable identity and have been shown to play a role in controlling syllable timing (Simpson and Vicario, 1990; Vu, Mazurek and Kuo, 1994; Hahnloser, Kozhevnikov and Fee, 2002; Long and Fee, 2008; Aronov et al., 2011; Ölveczky et al., 2011; Lynch et al., 2016; Picardo et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2017). HVC activity in Bengalese finches (Sakata and Brainard, 2008; Fujimoto, Hasegawa and Watanabe, 2011) and canaries (Cohen et al., 2020) has also been shown to encode syllable identity, and can additionally influence sequencing and reflect the sequential context in which syllables are produced (Fujimoto, Hasegawa and Watanabe, 2011; Zhang et al., 2017; Cohen et al., 2020). The nuclei of the motor pathway are essential for song production (Nottebohm, Stokes and Leonard, 1976; Scharff and Nottebohm, 1991), but the extent to which these sequence-selective activity patterns in HVC reflect internal neural dynamics or are shaped by recurrent inputs is poorly understood.

Although HVC is often considered to be at the top of a hierarchy in the song control circuit, it is part of a network of brain nuclei involved in song production and receives multiple inputs that might also contribute to premotor activity (McCasland, 1987; Hosino and Okanoya, 2000; Jin, 2009; Hamaguchi, Tanaka and Mooney, 2016; Vyssotski et al., 2016). One prominent source of input to HVC is mMAN (medial magnocellular nucleus of the anterior nidopallium) which is part of a recurrent loop that bilaterally connects the two hemispheres through RA and bilateral connections from thalamic nucleus DMP (dorsomedial nucleus of the posterior thalamus, Fig. 1E) and could thus be ideally positioned to convey sequence-related activity across hemispheres (Vates, Vicario and Nottebohm, 1997; Schmidt, Ashmore and Vu, 2004; Williams, Nast and Coleman, 2012). A parallel recurrent pathway, which projects to RA through nucleus lMAN (lateral magnocellular nucleus of the anterior nidopallium, Fig. 1E) has been shown to contribute variability to syllable pitch, a parameter that is controlled by RA premotor activity (Kao, Doupe and Brainard, 2005; Sober, Wohlgemuth and Brainard, 2008; Miller, Cheung and Brainard, 2017). lMAN-guided variability can serve as a form of motor exploration which is essential for learning (Sober and Brainard, 2012; Dhawale, Smith and Ölveczky, 2017), regulating social context-dependent changes in pitch variability (Kao and Brainard, 2006; Hampton, Sakata and Brainard, 2009), and biasing pitch in the direction of improved motor performance during learning (Andalman and Fee, 2009; Warren et al., 2012; Tian and Brainard, 2017). This raises the question of whether mMAN, as the output of a parallel recurrent pathway that projects onto HVC, might have a similar role in contributing to premotor activity in its projection target, with the potential to influence syllable identity or sequencing variability (Kubikova, Turner and Jarvis, 2007; Seki and Okanoya, 2008; Ali et al., 2013)

We tested the hypothesis that mMAN contributes to syllable sequencing by studying the effect of bilateral mMAN lesions on song production in adult Bengalese finches. We found that lesions had little effect on the acoustic structure of individual syllables but led to an increase in the variability of multiple aspects of syllable sequencing. These results highlight the potential importance of recurrent inputs such as mMAN in shaping the syntactical structure of adult birdsongs.

Figure 1:

Methods

Subjects and sound recordings

Experiments were carried out on seven adult male Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata domestica) obtained from the Brainard lab’s breeding colony at University of California, San Francisco (median age 640 days post-hatch, range 149-1049 at start of experiment). Birds were raised with their parents and then housed in same-sex group cages. For the experiments, birds were placed in individual sound-attenuating boxes (Acoustic Systems, Austin, TX) and maintained on a 14:10 hour light: dark period. Song was recorded using an omnidirectional microphone above the cage using custom LabView software for continuous monitoring of song output (Tumer and Brainard, 2007). All procedures were performed in accordance with animal care protocols approved by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

mMAN lesions

After several days of sound recording, birds were anesthetized using ketamine and midazolam with isoflurane. mMAN was localized using stereotaxic coordinates and was destroyed bilaterally using current injections of 100uA current for 80s at four sites per hemisphere. After conclusion of the study, birds were deeply anesthetized and perfused with paraformaldehyde. 40um sections were cut on a microtome and processed with either Nissl stain (cresyl violet) or calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) (Hampton, Sakata and Brainard, 2009). mMAN lesion size was estimated by experienced observers and estimated to be either complete (bird 1, birds 3-6) or greater than 75% (bird 2 and 7) for all birds used in this analysis (Sup. Fig. 3).

Data analysis

Bengalese finch songs were recorded for several days before and after lesions. Singing activity resumed on average 3.8 days post lesions (range 2-6 days, Sup. Fig. 1), and we analyzed songs starting on average 5.3 days post lesions (range 3-11 days) up to 7.4 days post lesions (range 5-12 days). We analyzed at least two days pre and post lesions, and subsampled the larger of the two datasets pooled over all days such that the pre and post datasets were equal in size for each bird (average of 299 song bouts, range 102-601, for all analyses). Sup. Figure 1 includes additional song bouts which were excluded by the subsampling procedure.

Annotation

We annotated the entire syllable sequence in an automated way. We first used a subset of the data to generate a training set for classification. Separate classifiers were trained for each bird. In the training data, syllable onsets and offsets were determined by amplitude thresholding. We then performed dimensionality-reduction and unsupervised clustering of the spectrograms of detected syllables using UMAP (McInnes et al., 2018; Sainburg, Thielk and Gentner, 2020), in order to determine the number of different syllables in an objective way (mean 13, range 11-14). On average, we used 181 files (range 70-505) for creating this training dataset, which was then used to train a deep neural network (TweetyNet) for the annotation of birdsong (Cohen et al., 2022). TweetyNet was used to segment and annotate all songs, followed by semi-automated hand-checking using custom-written software in MATLAB R2021b to ensure quality annotation.

Simplification of the syllable sequence

Song bouts were defined as continuous sequences of syllables separated by at least 2s of silence. The syllable sequence was then simplified by merging introductory notes into a single introductory state, i.e., a single node ‘I’ in the transition diagram (Fig. 1A,F). Introductory notes were defined as up to three syllable types occurring at the start of bouts which were quieter, and more variable in timing and structure than other syllable types (Rajan and Doupe, 2013; Veit et al., 2021). Similarly, syllables which were repeated a variable number of at least two times were reduced to a single state (e.g. ‘bbbbbbbbb’ to ‘B’, Fig. 1A,F) in the syllable sequence, and the number of repetitions within these repeat phrases was analyzed separately (Hampton, Sakata and Brainard, 2009; Zhang et al., 2017; Jaffe and Brainard, 2020). Only repeat phrases with variable numbers of syllable repetitions were analyzed in this way, therefore, cases in which a syllable was repeated an exact number of times on each occurrence (occurring with repeat numbers of 2 or 3 in our dataset, see Fig. 3A) were not considered a variable repeat phrase.

Figure 2:

Figure 3:

Separating different syllable states based on sequential context

Transition probabilities between syllables in Bengalese finch song can depend not only on the identity of the syllable, but on the identity of at least one preceding syllable (Jin and Kozhevnikov, 2011; Katahira et al., 2011; Morita et al., 2021). In order to consider this sequential context-dependency of transition probabilities, we followed the procedure of Katahira et al. 2011 to classify spectrally similar syllables (i.e., with the same labels) into different ‘states’ based on the identity of the preceding syllable. For example, in Figure 1A, the syllable ‘g’ is preceded by ‘I’ or ‘f’ and is followed by ‘h’ or ‘a’. If ‘g’ is preceded by ‘I’ it is always followed by ‘h’ and if it is preceded by ’f’, it can be followed by ‘h’ or ‘a’. We would therefore like to introduce two separate states g1 and g2 in the transition diagram representing this sequential context. The input for this analysis was the syllable sequence with introductory and repeat phrases already condensed into single states. We compared the distribution of transition probabilities from these syllables by themselves (e.g., syllable ‘g’) to the distribution of transition probabilities from these syllables considering the context of one preceding syllable (e.g., syllable ‘f-g’) using the chi-square goodness of fit test. We split the syllable into a new state (e.g. ‘g1’) if p < 0.01/n where n is the number of comparisons made (Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons) (Jin, 2009; Katahira et al., 2013). After completing this for all syllables of a given type (e.g., ‘g1’, ‘g2’, ‘g3’), we compared the different output states to each other using chi-square goodness of fit test and merged them back together if p > 0.01/n (mean 15, range 6-21 additional states/bird).

Determining chunks and branchpoints

To determine chunks (Suge and Okanoya, 2010), we used the modified syllable sequence after chi-square analysis. We calculated a syllable-to-syllable transition diagram, while eliminating any syllables occurring with less than a threshold frequency of 0.9% and omitting branches with a probability of less than 5%. From the resultant graph, we merged all non-overlapping linear sequences (which consisted of nodes with only a single input and output branch) into chunks. The transition probabilities within resultant chunks were typically higher than 90% (range 87-100%). Values smaller than 100% for non-branching paths result from the omission of one or several small branches of less than 5%. We then re-calculate the transition probabilities between chunked nodes. We defined branchpoints as the set of single syllables that are retained after this processing and the end syllables of the newly defined chunks. To simplify diagrams for visualization, we eliminated any syllables which occurred less than once per bout and branches with transition probabilities of less than 5%.

Transition entropy

Transition entropy is a measure of uncertainty of sequence at a given syllable (Sakata and Brainard, 2006). With c different outputs from the given syllable ‘a’ and P(i) the probability of the i^th outcome, we calculate the entropy Ha, as:

We call this value ‘transition entropy per branchpoint’ in Figure 3A.

To determine the overall variability of song before and after mMAN lesions, we calculated total transition entropy TE, over all syllables b as:

where Hb is the transition entropy at b and P(b) is the frequency of syllable b (Chatfield and Lemon, 1970; Katahira et al., 2013).

History dependence

History dependence is a previously established metric that measures the extent to which the most common transition at a given syllable is influenced by the transition at the last occurrence of this syllable (Warren et al., 2012). It has been used to characterize instances of apparent sequence variability, where seemingly variable transitions are always strictly alternating. For example, if the possible transitions from syllable ‘a’ are ‘ab’ or ‘ac’ but these strictly alternated (ab…ac…ab…ac, and so on) then the seemingly variable branchpoint ‘a’ is perfectly predictable based on its history (Warren et al., 2012). Such apparent variability should be largely eliminated in our sequence analysis by the introduction of context dependent states (i.e., in this example, the ’a’ would be re-labelled as a1 or a2 depending on the context in which it occurs) and identification of chunks. However, if higher-order dependencies in the song determine the order of chunks, we might still expect some variable transitions to be governed by history dependence. If ab is the most frequently occurring transition from a, and ac is the collection of all other transitions from a, we define history dependence D of a as:

where P(ab_n|ab_n-1) is the conditional probability of ab transition given that ab transition occurred at the previous instance of a and P(ab_n|ac_n-1) is the conditional probability of ab transition given that ac transition occurred at the previous instance of a.

Chunk consistency

As defined above, a chunk is defined by a single dominant sequence, but may have a small amount of variability across different instances. To quantify the stereotypy of chunks, we used a measure based on sequence consistency previously defined for relatively stereotyped zebra finch songs (Scharff and Nottebohm, 1991). Across all instances of a given chunk, we identified the syllable sequence that occurred most often as the ‘dominant sequence’. We then defined ‘n_dominant’ as the number of instances of the dominant sequence, and ‘n_other’ as the number of instances of other sequence variants for the chunk.

We quantified chunk consistency C as the proportion of total instances that were the dominant sequence:

To compare a chunk before and after mMAN lesions, the dominant sequence for the pre lesion chunk was used as a reference, regardless of whether the same sequence qualified as a chunk post lesion. To quantify chunk consistency post lesion, the most dominant sequence post lesion was used (even if that was not the same as the most dominant sequence pre lesion).

Repeat number variability

To study the influence of mMAN on repeat phrases, we examined the distribution of repeat numbers before and after lesions. We quantified the variability of these distributions as their coefficient of variation (CV = standard deviation/mean).

Results

Structure of Bengalese finch song

Bengalese finch songs are composed of a fixed number of syllable types, which are arranged into variable sequences following syntactical rules. In this study, we sought to first characterize the different features of Bengalese finch song, before investigating their change following mMAN lesions. For each bird, we first annotated all songs with labels for each of the syllable types, and then defined a transition diagram for analysis according to the following procedure (see Methods):

1. We identified introductory notes (Rajan and Doupe, 2013; Veit et al., 2021) and grouped them together into a single introductory state ‘I’ in the transition diagram. This reduced the overall transition entropy of song for 7 birds from 0.95 to 0.85 (Fig. 1A).

2. Repeat phrases, in which the same syllable is repeated a variable number of times, were also reduced to a single state in the transition diagram (indicated by capital letters) and the distribution of repeat numbers was analyzed separately (Hampton, Sakata and Brainard, 2009; Zhang et al., 2017; Jaffe and Brainard, 2020) (Fig. 1D).

3. In Bengalese finch song a single spectrally defined and labelled syllable can occur in different fixed sequences (for example, syllable ‘b’ in the sequences a-b-c and d-b-e) and therefore reflects distinct states in the song sequence (Wohlgemuth, Sober and Brainard, 2010; Katahira et al., 2011). We followed the procedure of Katahira et al. to determine if any initially identified syllable types corresponded to more than one state based on whether the preceding syllable carried information on transition probabilities (see Methods, Katahira et al., 2013). After identifying and splitting these ‘hidden states’ (for example b1, b2) for each bird, overall transition entropy was further reduced from 0.85 to 0.54 (Fig. 1F).

4. In the new syllable sequence, we identified ‘chunks’ (Suge and Okanoya, 2010), sub-sequences of high-probability transitions. We defined these as paths of continuous, non-branching sequences in the transition diagram, after omitting branches that occurred with probability < 5% (Fig. 1C). Lastly, we identified branch points in the transition diagram as the set of single syllables and endpoints of chunks, i.e., all states where the syllable sequence proceeds in a probabilistic manner (Fig. 1B,F).

Transition entropy increased after bilateral mMAN lesions

After bilateral mMAN lesions, all syllable types were preserved (Sup. Fig. 2), but the sequencing of syllables became more variable. In the example in Figure 2B,C, we show the transition diagrams of one example bird before and after mMAN lesions. We observed a change in transition probabilities at existing branch points, as well as the appearance of novel branches. We quantified changes in sequencing variability for all syllables using transition entropy (Sakata and Brainard, 2006; Katahira et al., 2013). Total transition entropy increased significantly after mMAN lesions, indicating that song syntax overall became more variable (Fig. 2D). These effects appeared as soon as the bird resumed singing after the lesions and were stable for the time which the birds were followed (Sup. Fig. 1).

An analysis of changes at individual branch points revealed that transition entropy increased for most branchpoints after mMAN lesions (Sup. Fig. 4A). To investigate the source of differences in the magnitude of changes across branch points, we considered the history-dependence of each of these branchpoints. History-dependence captures apparent variability governed by long-range dependencies in the sequence and history-dependent transitions previously have been found to be difficult to modify in a sequence modification training protocol (Warren et al., 2012). They might therefore be less affected by lesions as well. Alternatively, we might expect lesion effects to be stronger for these transitions, if mMAN contributes specifically to long-range dependencies. Consistent with the first possibility, we observed that transitions that had high history dependence tended to show smaller changes in transition entropy while transitions that had low history dependence tended to show larger changes after mMAN lesions (Sup. Fig. 4B).

Chunks became more variable after bilateral mMAN lesions

Bengalese finch songs contain short, relatively stereotyped sequences of syllables, here called ‘chunks’ (Okanoya and Yamaguchi, 1997; Suge and Okanoya, 2010; Isola, Vochin and Sakata, 2020; Veit et al., 2021). We speculated that transitions within chunks might be differently affected by mMAN lesions, if for example the relatively fixed sequences within chunks are determined within premotor song nucleus HVC and inputs to HVC are only relevant at variable branch points. We found that the relatively fixed sequences within chunks were altered after mMAN lesions. An example bird (Fig. 3A-C) exhibited one prominent chunk which was occasionally observed to ‘break’ after lesions, i.e., branching within the chunk increased to a degree where it would no longer be considered a chunk after the lesions. The branching increased most noticeably in the ‘l-f’ transition (Fig. 3C), which is characterized by a longer gap than other transitions within the chunk (Fig. 3A). We therefore wondered whether sequencing changes were related to gap durations and found that indeed gap durations within chunks were weakly correlated with the increase in transition entropy at the corresponding transitions (Sup. Fig. 5A). Overall, we found that changes within chunks were approximately the same magnitude as changes at branch points (Sup. Fig. 5B).

We quantified changes in within-chunk transitions using sequence consistency (Scharff and Nottebohm, 1991), a measure previously used to describe the relatively consistent sequence of zebra finch song. Sequence consistency measures how consistently the most probable sequence is followed (see Methods). Sequence consistency within chunks significantly decreased across 23 chunks from all birds, indicating that this aspect of song structure was affected by mMAN lesions (Fig. 3D).

Repeat numbers became more variable after mMAN lesions

We next tested how mMAN lesions affected repeat phrases. Repeat phrases might be governed by separate neural mechanisms than branch points (Fujimoto, Hasegawa and Watanabe, 2011; Jin and Kozhevnikov, 2011; Wittenbach et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2017).

In the example bird in Figure 4A,B, the average repeat number for the indicated syllable increased after mMAN lesions. Across birds, the mean repeat number did not change consistently, although individual birds could exhibit quite dramatic effects on repeat number, (Fig. 4B,C), (p>0.05, n=6, Wilcoxon signed rank test). The distributions of repeat numbers became wider and the coefficient of variation for repeat numbers increased significantly after mMAN lesions (Fig. 4D), (* p<0.05, n=6, Wilcoxon signed rank test).

Figure 4:

Discussion

Bird songs are vocal sequences composed of individual syllables which appear in sequential order dictated by syntactic rules, but the neuronal control of song syntax is largely unknown. Previous studies in zebra finches showed that mMAN lesions in juveniles disrupt normal song learning, while lesions in adults affected song initiation, but not subsequent production of song (Foster and Bottjer, 2001; Horita, Wada and Jarvis, 2008; Ali et al., 2013). We speculated that the modest effect of lesions in adult zebra finches might be due to the relatively stereotyped nature of zebra finch song. Consistent with this possibility, our results demonstrate that lesions of pallial nucleus mMAN affect the more complex and variable song syntax in Bengalese finches. We showed that while mMAN lesions did not abolish the production of song itself or grossly disrupt the acoustic structure of individual syllables, they increased the variability of syllable sequencing; the transition probabilities between syllables became less predictable (increased transition entropy), new branches were introduced into previously stereotyped chunks, and the number of repetitions of repeated syllables (repeat number) became more variable. These results indicate that mMAN is involved in controlling aspects of song syntax in a songbird species that exhibits complex syllable sequencing and suggest that mMAN might play a similar or prominent role in additional species with even greater song complexity, such as canaries or nightingales.

Song in passerine birds relies on a network of recurrently connected nuclei, with different pathways for song production and learning. The song motor pathway consists of primary motor nucleus RA, which projects directly to vocal motor nuclei in the brainstem, and is involved in the moment-by-moment control of the structure of individual syllables (Vu, Mazurek and Kuo, 1994; Sober, Wohlgemuth and Brainard, 2008; Miller, Cheung and Brainard, 2017). Neurons in premotor song nucleus HVC that project to RA have been shown to encode syllable identity and contribute to syllable timing (Simpson and Vicario, 1990; Vu, Mazurek and Kuo, 1994; Hahnloser, Kozhevnikov and Fee, 2002; Long and Fee, 2008; Aronov et al., 2011; Ölveczky et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2017). Consistent with a possible role of HVC in also controlling variable syllable sequencing, cooling HVC influences syntax in Bengalese finches (Zhang et al., 2017). However, lesions of one input to HVC – the nucleus Nif (nucleus interfacialis of the anterior nidopallium) – can also influence syllable sequencing in the Bengalese finch by making the sequence more stereotyped (Hosino and Okanoya, 2000; Cardin, Raksin and Schmidt, 2005; Otchy et al., 2015) raising the question of how much of the control of syntax relies on the internal dynamics of HVC, versus activity relayed to HVC by its inputs (Okanoya and Yamaguchi, 1997).

In this study, we were especially interested in the possibility that mMAN’s inputs to HVC might play an analogous role in modulating syllable sequencing to the role of lMAN’s inputs to RA in modulating syllable acoustic structure. In adult birds, lMAN’s inputs to RA have been shown to contribute variability to the pitch of individual syllables (Kao, Doupe and Brainard, 2005; Kao and Brainard, 2006; Stepanek and Doupe, 2010), regulate changes to pitch variability between different social contexts (Kao and Brainard, 2006; Hampton, Sakata and Brainard, 2009), and bias pitch in the direction of improved performance during learning experiments (Andalman and Fee, 2009; Warren et al., 2011; Tian and Brainard, 2017). The variability contributed by lMAN may facilitate motor exploration which forms the basis of pitch adaptations during learning (Andalman and Fee, 2009; Sober and Brainard, 2012; Dhawale, Smith and Ölveczky, 2017). These effects are mediated by top-down influences of lMAN on RA via a recurrent loop that passes through the songbird basal ganglia (Kao, Doupe and Brainard, 2005; Andalman and Fee, 2009; Kojima et al., 2018; Tian, Warren and Brainard, 2022), and are consistent with a role of RA in controlling aspects of syllable acoustic structure. In contrast to these effects on syllable structure, lesions of lMAN in adults have not been found to appreciably influence syllable sequencing (Hampton, Sakata and Brainard, 2009). However, because mMAN forms the output of a parallel recurrent loop that passes through the basal ganglia and projects to HVC, we hypothesized that analogous modulation of syllable sequencing during production and learning of song might be mediated by mMAN. Our finding that lesions of mMAN alter multiple aspects of syllable sequencing are consistent with such an influence on song syntax.

The finding that mMAN can influence song syntax raises the question of whether and how this pathway modulates syllable sequencing in the service of motor exploration, contextual modulation, and learning, in a fashion that is analogous to lMAN’s modulation of syllable acoustic structure. That mMAN lesions consistently altered sequence variability indicates a possible role in regulating variability for motor exploration. However, whereas lMAN lesions consistently decrease the variability of acoustic structure, we found that mMAN lesions generally increase the variability of syllable sequencing, suggesting that top-down contributions to the control of syntax may be different or more distributed than for a syllable feature such as pitch. One possibility is that several inputs to HVC could work synergistically to modulate the syntactical structure of Bengalese finch songs. Consistent with this view, a prior study in Bengalese finches found that lesions of Nif decreased sequence variability (Hosino and Okanoya, 2000), suggesting that Nif and mMAN could be playing opposing roles in regulating variability. Our findings also raise the question of whether the medial anterior forebrain pathway including mMAN, plays a similar role also in the social-context dependent regulation of sequence variability (Hampton, Sakata and Brainard, 2009; Jaffe and Brainard, 2020) and in learning to change syllable sequences during development (Foster and Bottjer, 2001; Lipkind et al., 2013) or adulthood (Warren et al., 2012; Veit et al., 2021). Further studies with careful manipulations of the basal ganglia-mMAN-HVC circuit will be required to elucidate the mechanism with which this circuit affects sequencing in Bengalese finch song and contributes to these behaviors.

Bengalese finch syllable sequences contain structure at multiple levels, mainly the organization of individual stereotyped chunks, resembling the stereotyped motifs of zebra finch song, and the variable branch points between chunks, repeat phrases, and other individual syllables. One possibility to reconcile findings that both dynamics within HVC and its recurrent inputs affect sequencing could be that the sequence within chunks is encoded predominantly in the synaptic connections of HVC neurons (Jin, 2009), while the branching transitions found in Bengalese finch song are influenced by input from other nuclei (Hosino and Okanoya, 2000). We here show that mMAN lesions affect both transition entropy at previously variable branch points and transitions within previously stereotyped chunks, indicating that such a simple split of function between mMAN and HVC is not the case.

Besides these, other parts of the song circuit have been shown to affect syllable sequencing. The basal ganglia are involved in selection and sequencing of motor elements in mammals, and manipulations of songbird basal ganglia Area X have previously been shown to affect syllable repetitions in zebra finches and Bengalese finches (Kobayashi, Uno and Okanoya, 2001; Kubikova et al., 2014; Tanaka et al., 2016; Xiao et al., 2021). These effects might be partly mediated via connections through mMAN to HVC (Kubikova, Turner and Jarvis, 2007). Additionally, the control of syllable sequencing must include bilateral coordination of the motor pathways in the two hemispheres (Schmidt, Ashmore and Vu, 2004; Wang et al., 2008). As the two hemispheres in birds are not connected by a corpus callosum, the only pathways mediating interhemispheric synchronization of the two HVCs are by bilateral connections through thalamic nuclei. One such pathway involves a projection from thalamic nucleus Uva to HVC (Coleman and Vu, 2005; Hamaguchi, Tanaka and Mooney, 2016; Moll et al., 2023), which is required for song production and contributes to syllable initiation and timing. Another is through thalamic nucleus DMP, which projects bilaterally through mMAN to HVC (Schmidt, Ashmore and Vu, 2004; Seki and Okanoya, 2008). mMAN might therefore be well situated to coordinate syllable sequencing in the two hemispheres. Future studies will need to determine whether the effects we observed are the results of removing neuronal processing within mMAN itself, or whether mMAN is conveying signals to HVC from other brain areas, including the contralateral hemisphere, which contribute to the control of song syntax.

Acknowledgements

We thank Jacqueline Göbl, Yarden Cohen, Tim Gardner, Felix Moll for helpful discussions and comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. We thank David Nicholson and Peter Pilz for help with technical questions. Michael Brainard was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Lena Veit was supported as a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Fellow of the Life Sciences Research Foundation and by a Daimler Benz postdoctoral fellowship. Avani Koparkar was supported by the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes and International Max Planck Research School for Mechanisms of Mental Function and Dysfunction (IMPRS-MMFD). Jonathan Charlesworth and Timothy Warren were supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship. We acknowledge support from the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Tübingen.

Author contributions

T.L.W., J.C., S.S. and L.V. gathered the data. A.K. and L.V. analyzed the data, A.K., L.V. and M.S.B. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.