Introduction

Simian immunodeficiency viruses (SIVs) comprise a large group of primate lentiviruses that infect African monkey species (Klatt et al., 2012; Sharp and Hahn, 2011). HIV-1 emerged into humans from this diverse viral reservoir, but was not a spillover of virus directly from monkeys to humans. Instead, a key transition was the spillover of SIVs into great apes, which then set the stage for infection of humans (Figure 1). First, SIV of chimpanzees (SIVcpz) arose following the cross-species transmission and recombination of multiple SIVs from infected monkeys upon which chimpanzees predate (Bailes et al., 2003; Sharp et al., 2005). It is unknown if this virus recombination event occurred in the monkey reservoir before the first chimpanzee was infected, or if it occurred within chimpanzee populations. Subsequently, SIVcpz transmitted to gorillas (giving rise to SIVgor) (Heuverswyn et al., 2006; Takehisa et al., 2009). Chimpanzees and gorillas have been endemically infected with SIVcpz and SIVgor since those spillover events (Sharp and Hahn, 2011). Spillover to humans from both chimpanzees and gorillas subsequently occurred on multiple occasions (Heuverswyn et al., 2006; Keele et al., 2006; Plantier et al., 2009). One of these spillovers yielded HIV-1 “group M” – the pandemic virus that has swept the globe and which has infected over 80 million people. A third great ape species native to Africa, the bonobo, remains uninfected with SIV. Orangutans, the final great ape species, are native to Asia and also remain uninfected.

Figure 1.

CD4 is the main viral entry receptor for primate lentiviruses (SIV and HIV). CD4 is a surface protein expressed on T cells, where it is bound by the viral envelope (Env) glycoprotein to begin viral entry. To understand the role that CD4 plays in dictating the host tropism of SIVs, one must first appreciate the remarkable evolutionary signatures contained in the CD4 gene. CD4 has evolved under positive natural selection over the course of primate evolution (Meyerson et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2008). This type of selection operates in favor of new alleles of CD4 that have better resistance to virus entry (Meyerson and Sawyer, 2011). As such, it has been noted that most of the sequence evolution in CD4 has been concentrated to its D1 domain, the region that contacts HIV and SIV (Meyerson et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2008). Even though natural selection operates at the level of alleles and SNPs circulating within primate populations (Ohainle and Malik, 2021; Russell et al., 2021), the ultimate outcome is fixed CD4 sequence divergence between species. As would be expected because of the selection at play, we have demonstrated that different primate orthologs vary dramatically in the viruses that they will engage (Warren et al., 2019a). Thus, there has been intense selection on CD4 in host species that are endemically infected with SIV.

Here, we focus on a key event in the emergence of HIV into humans – the transition of SIVs from monkeys to apes. First, we reconstructed and tested ancestral forms of CD4 at two important nodes in ape speciation, prior to the infection of chimpanzees and gorillas with these viruses. These ancestral CD4s fully supported entry of diverse SIV isolates representing the virus(es) that made this initial jump to apes. In stark contrast, modern chimpanzee and gorilla CD4s are less supportive of infection by these viruses, consistent with natural selection having shaped CD4 to resist infection. Second, we investigated the subsequent spillover of SIV from chimpanzees to gorillas. We gathered CD4 sequences from 32 gorilla individuals of 2 species, and identified CD4 alleles that encode 8 unique CD4 proteins. We then identified allele-specific CD4 differences in susceptibility to SIVcpz entry (the virus that spilled over to gorillas). By engineering single point mutations from gorilla CD4 alleles into a permissive human CD4 receptor, we demonstrate that these SNPs in CD4 are responsible for resistance to virus entry in gorillas, and provide a population genetic analysis to support the theory the selection is acting in favor of more and more resistant CD4 alleles in gorillas. Taken together, our results show that SIV has placed intense selective pressure on ape CD4, acting to drive the generation of SIV-resistant CD4 alleles and orthologs.

Results

Receptor mediated resistance to SIV entry is a trait acquired during ape speciation

First, we wanted to know what ape CD4 was like before SIVs spilled over to apes and began to exert infection pressure on them. We used an alignment of CD4 from diverse simian primates, and the program PAML (Yang, 2007a), to infer ancestral CD4 sequences at the base of the hominin and hominid clades, at the evolutionary positions shown with red and blue nodes in Fig. 2A. These ancestral nodes yielded CD4 sequences that differ from human CD4 by only 2 (hominin) and 5 (hominid) nonsynonymous substitutions. Only one of these changes mapped to the D1 domain of CD4 (N52S; Fig. 2B). We then synthesized these ancient and extinct CD4 genes. We constructed stable cells lines where Cf2Th (canine) cells were transduced with retroviral vectors that stably integrated each of these CD4 genes (hominin ancestral CD4, hominoid ancestral CD4, human CD4, gorilla CD4, chimp CD4, or an empty vector). All cell lines were also engineered to express human CCR5, a critical co-receptor for SIV and HIV.

Figure 2.

We then tested these extinct and modern CD4 proteins for their ability to support viral entry mediated by SIVcpz Env. Since we don’t know the actual genetic sequence of the first SIV(s) to infect chimpanzees, the best alternate strategy is to test a phylogenetically diverse set of extant SIVcpz strains (Fig. 2C). We also tested HIV-1 strains that are embedded within the SIVcpz clade, because these represent the virus spillovers from chimpanzees to humans. To generate pseudoviruses bearing SIVcpz and HIV Env, different SIVcpz and HIV-1 Env expression plasmids were co-transfected into 293T cells along with a plasmid encoding HIV-1ΔEnv-eGFP. The cell lines stably expressing various CD4 proteins and human CCR5 were then infected with each of these pseudoviruses. The percent of GFP+ (infected) cells was measured by flow cytometry and viral titers on the different cell lines were calculated and reported as transducing units per milliliter (TDU/mL). All tested pseudoviruses displayed similar levels of infection on cells bearing human or the ancestral CD4 proteins (Fig. 2D, 2E). This suggests that the ancestral versions of CD4 in apes were susceptible to primate lentivirus entry, just as human CD4 is known to be today. On the other hand, cells bearing chimpanzee and gorilla CD4s were generally less permissive to virus entry (Fig. 2D, 2E). We conclude that CD4 was originally permissive to primate lentiviruses, but that selective pressures exerted by SIVs in the chimpanzee and gorilla lineages have led to the retention of mutations that confer resistance to primate lentivirus infection. This has not happened in humans where selective pressure by HIV-1 is too new.

Gorilla CD4 alleles differentially support entry of SIVcpz

Natural selection operates on individuals within populations, and only over time can the effects of this selection be seen in the divergence of gene orthologs between species. We and others have already shown that SIVcpz has placed selective pressures on chimpanzees such that multiple CD4 alleles circulate in chimpanzees which resist SIVcpz entry better than human CD4 (Bibollet-Ruche et al., 2019; Warren et al., 2019b). We next wanted to know if the same is true in gorilla populations. To similarly analyze gorilla CD4, we used the SNP data from the Great Ape Genome Project (Prado-Martinez et al., 2013) to identify extant CD4 alleles. We analyzed genetic data from 32 gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla [n = 28]; Gorilla gorilla diehli [n = 1]; Gorilla beringei graueri [n = 3]) individuals and found six non-synonymous and five synonymous SNPs separating the individual alleles encoded. Five out of six of the non-synonymous polymorphisms are located within domain 1 of CD4 (two are in the same codon, codon 27) and one in domain 2 (Fig. 3A). A study of over 100 fecal samples from gorillas at field sites in Africa recently identified the same set of SNPs (Russell et al., 2021). Within the gorilla samples, these amino acid differences result in eight distinct allelic CD4 protein haplotypes. The allele frequencies of these protein haplotypes are heterogeneous, where allele 5 is the most common (Fig. 3B). (This, allele 5, was also the gorilla CD4 that was tested in Figure 2D, E and shown in the alignment in Figure 2B.) From looking at the sequences of these different alleles, we noticed a predicted glycosylation site (N-glycosylation tripeptide NXT) at position 15 that is fixed in the gorilla population but absent in the other African apes (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, the gorilla CD4 allele 2 codes for a proline at position 18, immediately after the tripeptide NCT, which strongly reduces the likelihood of glycosylation (Gavel and Heijne, 1990). Since five of the six protein altering polymorphisms are located in domain 1 of gorilla CD4, which directly binds to the lentiviral Env (Fig. 3C) we next wanted to test their functional significance.

Figure 3.

We made stable cell lines expressing each gorilla CD4 allele, along with human CCR5 (Fig. S1). We then infected each of these with GFP pseudoviruses displaying envelopes from different strains of SIVcpz, as described above. We quantified the number of GFP+ cells to measure for the differential usage of each CD4 allele. Again, we don’t know the exact strain of SIVcpz that initially infected gorillas, so instead we have tested a phylogenetic diversity of SIVcpz strains. We found substantial differences in susceptibility to pseudovirus entry between the alleles, varying by up to 2 orders of magnitude in some cases (Figure 4). All gorilla alleles were equal to, or more resistant to infection than, the human CD4. We also tested pseudoviruses displaying a diverse set of Envs from HIV-1 groups M and N, and found similar patterns (Figure S2). These data are consistent with SIV putting selective pressure on gorillas in favor of resistant alleles of CD4. However, as would be expected in a host-virus arms race, the viruses are evolving too. As such, we found considerable differences on the entry phenotype for each SIVcpz strain evaluated, where a single host CD4 allele can be highly restrictive to one strain, while being fully functional for entry of another. As an outlier, SIVcpz TAN2.69 showed a uniformly strong ability to use any of the gorilla CD4 alleles.

Figure 4.

Human CD4 engineered to encode gorilla SNPs supports less SIVcpz entry

We next sought to evaluate if CD4 polymorphisms found in gorilla individuals are protective when engineered in the human version of CD4, a widely susceptible receptor for primate lentiviruses. First, we investigated gorilla CD4 allele 2, which encodes a proline at position 18 that is predicted to prevent an otherwise fixed N-glycosylation at position 15 (Fig. 3A). We noticed that gorilla allele 2 CD4 is highly susceptible to most of the SIVcpz strains tested in this study (Fig. 4). Allele 3, which differs from allele 2 only by this proline, supported less entry by SIVcpz TAN1.910 presumably due to this change in glycosylation status (Fig. 5A). To explore the effects of this gorilla specific glycan at residue 15, we generated cell lines stably expressing a mutated version of human CD4 that encodes for the gorilla specific glycosylation motif. We then challenged these cells with pseudoviruses displaying the envelope of different SIVcpz strains and consistently found a decrease in susceptibility to entry compared to wild type human CD4 (Fig. 5B). To confirm the glycosylation status of CD4, we performed CD4 western blotting on lysates from cells stably expressing each of the different versions of CD4. As expected, human T15N CD4, as well as gorilla allele 3, migrated at a higher molecular weight compared to human wild type CD4 and gorilla allele 2, corresponding to the predicted number of glycans on CD4 domain 1 (Fig. 5C). We then treated the lysates with PNGase F, an N-linked glycosidase, and found that all CD4 versions migrated at the same rate, confirming that the mobility shift is due to the glycosylation status of CD4. Thus, most gorilla CD4 alleles have gained a glycan at position 15 that reduces entry of SIV as compared to human CD4. It seems that allele 2, which doesn’t have this glycan, would be at a fitness disadvantage. In support of this, allele 2 is one of the least frequent alleles in the gorilla population that we surveyed (Figure 3B).

Figure 5.

We proceeded to test the amino acid residues at the other 3 polymorphic positions in domain 1 of gorilla CD4. We infected cells individually expressing mutant forms of human CD4 that coded for the gorilla specific residues at positions 27, 31, and 34. We found that in all cases, the mutant form of human CD4 encoding the gorilla specific amino acid was significantly more restrictive to at least two of the four SIVcpz strains when compared to human wild type CD4 (Fig. 5D). In several cases, such as H27R CD4 expressing cells infected with SIVcpz MB897, we found drastic changes rendering a fully supportive receptor now highly refractory to infection by a single amino acid substitution. We found that the protective role of these gorilla specific substitutions was SIVcpz strain specific, demonstrating that collectively, the diversity found in gorilla individuals can confer relative protection to all the SIV strains we tested, but that SIVs are counter-evolving as well. These results suggest that single amino acid changes in domain 1 can drastically modify the interaction between CD4 and the lentivirus envelope, directly influencing virus entry.

To evaluate the reverse - if gorilla CD4 mutated to recapitulate the amino acids encoded in human CD4 may render the CD4 a better receptor for SIVcpz - we made and constructed cells expressing those CD4s and quantified the level of infection. We did not observe a full gain-of-function phenotype here and instead found only minimal increases in entry of SIVcpz through these receptors (Fig. 5E). These results imply that the resistance to SIVcpz found in gorilla individuals is not dependent on single amino acids, but rather the cumulative effect of multiple SNPs. Overall, our data suggest that population-level diversity of CD4 in SIV-endemic gorillas confers some level of protection against multiple SIVcpz strains.

Positive selection has shaped the evolutionary trajectory of CD4 SNPs in SIV endemic host species

Natural selection influences the frequency of SNPs within populations. SNPs with deleterious effects will be kept at low frequency by purifying selection. On the other hand, mutations that confer a selective advantage will reach higher frequencies and/or be maintained in a population longer than expected due to different forms of positive selection (i.e., selective sweeps or frequency dependent selection). We next tested how polymorphism in CD4 has been shaped in ape species, with comparison made between apes that have been endemically infected with SIV (chimpanzees and gorillas) and those that have not (bonobos and orangutans).

Formal methods to detect the influence of selection on population-level nucleotide variation exist (Fay and Wu, 2000; Fu and Li, 1993; Tajima, 1989), but their statistical power is decreased in non-human ape species due to their small sample sizes and lower levels of variation (Prado-Martinez et al., 2013). Thus, we use a comparative approach to detect the signature of natural selection. To do this, we compare patterns of population level diversity between CD4 verus its neighboring genes. We compared SIV endemic apes (chimpanzee and gorillas) to apes uninfected (bonobos and orangutans) or recently infected on an evolutionary timescale (humans). This was performed for both nonsynonymous (protein altering) and synonymous (not protein altering) polymorphisms. Polymorphism data for chimpanzee, gorilla, bonobo, and two orangutan species were obtained from the Great Ape Genome Project (Prado-Martinez et al., 2013) for CD4 and 11 neighboring genes spanning 250 kb of the X-chromosome. For these same genes, human variation was obtained from the 1000 Genomes project. We calculated nucleotide diversity either based on the number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; Watterson’s 𝜭_ω(Watterson, 1975)) or mean pairwise difference between individuals (𝜭_ν (Tajima, 1983)). The mutation rate at CD4 does not appear to be elevated given similar levels of variation between CD4 and its neighboring loci when based on the number of SNPs (𝜭_ω) (Table S1 and Fig. S2).

However, within the endemically infected species, nonsynonymous SNPs in CD4 are at a significantly higher frequency compared to neighboring loci, represented by 𝜭ν, (Fig. 6A) (Tajima, 1983). This difference is not observed for synonymous variation. This discordance between nonsynonymous and synonymous variation suggests that the higher frequency of nonsynonymous variants at CD4 in the endemically infected species is not explained by neutral or demographic evolutionary forces. In addition, the higher frequency of segregating nonsynonymous variation is restricted to the endemically infected species. Taken together, these patterns are consistent with positive selection increasing the frequency of and/or maintaining nonsynonymous polymorphisms at CD4 within the endemically infected species only. Also, in support of this, we find that gorilla and chimpanzee nonsynonymous polymorphic sites are significantly concentrated on the domain 1 of CD4 when compared to the un/recently infected species (Fig. 6B). This difference is statistically significant (Fig. 6C). This data suggests that long-term endemic infection of SIV in ape populations may be driving nonsynonymous SNPs to higher frequency in CD4, particularly on the domain 1, the region that directly interacts with the primate lentivirus Env glycoprotein.

Figure 6.

Discussion

Pathogens are strong selective drivers of host gene evolution. We and others have previously shown that the CD4 gene has evolved under strong positive selection throughout the evolution and speciation of simian primates (Meyerson et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2008). Selection on CD4 is thought to be driven by its direct interaction with the lentiviral envelope (Env), which mediates viral entry. Indeed, most of the sequence evolution in CD4 has occurred in the D1 domain that contacts the lentivirus Env (Meyerson et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2008). We performed an updated analysis of positive selection in CD4 including new CD4 orthologs that have become available (Figure S4). We found that removing the D1 sequence from the analysis renders the gene no longer under positive selection. This sets the stage for the current study, which focuses on selection on CD4 within ape populations.

Within populations of animals, when alleles of CD4 arise that can resist SIV, they would be predicted to rise in frequency. We and others have demonstrated that many alleles circulating in chimpanzees convey an increased ability to restrict viral entry by SIVs (Bibollet-Ruche et al., 2019; Warren et al., 2019b). This is also observed for many other African primate species, where amino acid polymorphisms in CD4 resist viral entry (Russell et al., 2021). It is important to note that many African primate species still harbor lentiviruses endemically, meaning that CD4 remains functional for viral entry of at least some viruses despite the selective pressure to resist it. Therefore, we understand CD4 to be evolving to convey natural tolerance to primates. "Natural tolerance" refers to a species’ ability to resist or tolerate a virus to an acceptable level for peaceful co-existence of the virus and host. It is obtained by evolutionary adaptations that occur over time, allowing the species to develop mechanisms to reduce the negative effects of the virus (Pagán and García-Arenal, 2018). For example, some species may evolve barriers (like resistant forms of CD4) that reduce the titers that a virus can achieve in their body. Natural tolerance is often required before a virus can establish itself long- term in a host reservoir, and thus understanding it is key to understanding virus reservoirs in nature.

Herein, we strengthen the insight into lentiviral tolerance via CD4 evolution in three ways. 1) We reconstruct extinct ancestral forms of ape CD4 that pre-date SIV, and find that they were highly vulnerable to SIV entry. We then show that CD4 became less permissive to SIV in species that experienced long-term endemic infection. This resistant phenotype is associated with the accumulation of specific amino acid substitutions in the D1 domain of CD4. 2) We show that gorillas harbor a diversity of CD4 alleles, all of which are more resistant to SIV entry than is human CD4. Again, we show that these alleles are gaining resistance by accumulating amino acid substitutions in the D1 domain, one of which creates a new motif for post- translational addition of a glycan to the CD4 protein. Protective (to the host) glycosylation of CD4 has recently also been observed by us and others in chimpanzees (Bibollet-Ruche et al., 2019; Warren et al., 2019b), and in another population sample of gorillas (Russell et al., 2021). Indeed, the evolutionary acquisition of a glycan shield on CD4 may be a recurring theme in the evolution of primate species that are plagued with SIVs (Russell et al., 2021). 3) Using population genetics analysis, we show that nonsynonymous SNPs are enriched within ape species that are endemically infected with SIV (chimpanzees and gorillas) relative to those that have not (bonobos and orangutans) or which have been infected for less than 100 years (humans). This increased population level diversity is observed only for CD4, and not shared by other genes neighboring the CD4 loci.

Collectively, it is now clear that the sequence diversity (within species) and divergence (between species) of primate CD4 is strongly driven by infection pressure from lentiviruses. There is a surprising outcome of virus-driven host evolution in that the divergence and diversity of these host genes ultimately comes at a detriment to the very viruses that drove this evolution. When host genes like CD4 become highly diverse within species, a given virus strain may only be able to infect a small number of individuals within the population. For instance, gorilla CD4 allele 1 is highly resistant to most of the SIVs we tested (Fig. 4). In fact, we only found one SIV isolate, SIVcpz “TAN2.69,” that could enter cells through the receptor encoded by allele 1. That suggests that gorillas that are homozygous for allele 1 would largely be protected from most circulating SIV strains. Taking this example further, if allele 1 were to become high frequency within gorilla populations, many strains of SIV in gorillas could go extinct.

In the long-term, the virus-driven evolution of genes like CD4 also mean that virus spillover between species – including the zoonotic spillovers that yield new human viruses - are less likely to happen. Indeed, a prevailing theme that has emerged in recent years is that receptor sequence divergence serves as a potent barrier to the movement of viruses between species. Likewise, this study suggests that SIV entry is blocked by the CD4 receptor of some primate species, and some individuals, that it might encounter.

Therefore, spillover of lentiviruses between species will only happen when virus is transmitted between key individuals of two different species. The donor individual would need to have CD4 alleles that yield high titers of SIV in its body, and the recipient individual would need to have CD4 alleles that make it receptive to infection by this new virus.

Materials and Methods

Ancestral reconstruction of the CD4 sequence at the base of the hominin and hominid clades

The ancestral state of CD4 was determined using the PAML software package as previously described (Yang, 2007a, 2007b; Yang et al., 1995). As input, we used an alignment of CD4 sequences from the following species: human (Homo sapiens; NM_000616.4), common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes; NM_001009043.1), western lowland gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla; XM_004052582.2), bonobo (Pan paniscus; XM_008973678.1), northern white-cheeked gibbon (Nomascus leucogenys; XM_004092147.1), Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii; XM_024256502.1), rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta; NM_001042662.1), green monkey (Chlorocebus sabaeus; XM_007967413.1), sooty mangabey (Cercocebus atys; NM_001319342.1), pig-tailed macaque (NM_001305921.1), crab-eating macaque (Macaca nemestrena; XM_005569956.2), gelada (Theropithecus gelada; XM_025401282.1), black snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus bieti; XM_017891844.1), drill (Mandrillus leucophaeus; XM_011982990.1), Angolan colobus (Colobus angolensis palliatus; XM_011952091.1), golden snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana; XM_010385914.1), and olive baboon (Papio anubis; XM_003905871.3).

Genotype and allele determination of CD4 from gorillas

Short-read data available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information’s (NCBI) Short Read Archive (BioProject PRJNA189439) were mapped onto the G. gorilla genome using BWA-MEM (Li, 2013). We applied GATK base quality score recalibration, indel realignment, duplicate removal, and SNP discovery and genotyping in each individual separately (McKenna et al., 2010). Joint genotyping and variant recalibration was performed in a species-specific manner and in accordance to the GATK best practices recommendations (Auwera et al., 2013; DePristo et al., 2011). Variant recalibration was performed using SNPs called by the neighbor quality score method of ssahaSNP on capillary sequencing runs from NCBI’s Trace Read Archive (Ning et al., 2001), dbSNP (if available), and high-quality SNPs called on the hg18 genome lifted over to the assembly used for mapping (Prado-Martinez et al., 2013). Processing was performed using custom scrips written in Python. Nucleotide sequence data reported are available in the Third Party Annotation Section of the DDBJ/ENA/GenBank databases under the accession numbers TPA: BK063765-BK063795.

Receptor expression constructs and site directed mutagenesis

Human (Genbank ID# MK170450) and chimpanzee (Genbank ID# NM_001009043.1) CD4 expression plasmids were constructed in a previous study (Warren et al., 2019a). The chimpanzee CD4 allele tested here is “allele 6” as defined by us previously (Warren et al., 2019b), and has 2 glycans that impede virus binding to the receptor. Gorilla CD4 alleles and ancestral CD4s were commercially synthesized (IDT GeneBlocks) and gateway cloned into the pLPCX retroviral packaging vector (Clontech). Mutant versions of human and gorilla CD4 were constructed by standard site-directed mutagenesis methods using overlapping PCR primers encoding the modification. Both wild-type and mutant CD4 constructs were analyzed by Sanger sequencing prior to use.

Generation of stable cell lines expressing CD4

HEK293T (ATCC CRL-11268) were cultured in DMEM (Invitrogen) with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 1X penicillin-streptomycin (complete medium) at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Cf2Th (ATCC CRL-1430) cells stably expressing human CCR5 (from (Warren et al., 2019a)) were cultured in complete medium supplemented with 250 μg/mL hygromycin. To produce retroviruses for transduction, HEK293T cells plated in antibiotic free media (1x10⁶ cells per well in a six well plate) were transfected with 2 μg of pLPCX transfer vector containing the CD4 gene of interest (or empty), 1 μg of pCS2-mGP (MLV gag/pol), and 0.2 μg of pC-VSV-G (VSV-G envelope) using a 3:1 ratio of TransIT-293 (Mirus) transfection reagent to DNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Forty-eight hours post transfection, supernatant was collected, filtered through 0.22 μm cellulose acetate filters, and retrovirus stored at -80 °C in single-use aliquots. Cf2Th cells stably expressing human CCR5 were plated at 2x10⁴ cells per well of a 12-well dish (15% confluent) and 24-h later, transduced with 500 μL of retroviral supernatant by spinoculation at 1,200 xg for 75 min in the presence of 5 μg/mL polybrene. Forty-eight hours post transduction, the cells were placed in complete medium containing selection antibiotics (250 μg/mL hygromycin and 3 μg/mL puromycin) and cultured until stable outgrowth was noted (>1 week). Stable cell lines were maintained indefinitely in selection media. To confirm expression of CD4, cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (Fig. S3). Briefly, cells were harvested from culture plates, washed two times with PBS, fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde, and washed 2 times in flow buffer (1X PBS, 2% FBS, 1mM EDTA). Fixed cells were stained for 30 min at 4° C with PerCP-Cy5.5 mouse anti-human CD195 (CCR5, BD Biosciences 560635) and AlexaFluor647 mouse anti-human CD4 (BD Biosciences, 566681), and analyzed using a BD Accuri C6 Plus flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).

HIV/SIV Envelope clones used in this study

Envelope clones for HIV-1 and SIVcpz EK505 and MB897 were constructed in a previous study (Warren et al., 2019b). SIVcpz MT145, TAN1.910, and TAN2.69 molecular clones were a gift from Brandon Keele, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD and used as template for PCR amplification. The RevEnv cassettes of SIVcpz were amplified by PCR using the following primer pairs, where the lowercase sequence corresponds to an added Kozak sequence for enhanced translation: MT145 (JN835462) forward 5’-tcgccaccATGGCAGGAAGAAGCGAGGGAGACG-3’, reverse 5’- TTAAAGCAAAGCTCTTTCTAAGCCTTGT-3’; TAN1.910 (AF447763.1) forward 5’- tcgccaccATGGCAGGAAGAGAAGAGGACGC-3’, reverse 5’- TTAATTTAAGGCTAGTTCCAGACCC-3’; TAN2.69 (DQ374657.1) forward 5’-tcgccaccATGGCAGGAAGAGAAGAGGACGC-3’, reverse 5’-TTAATTTAAGGCTATTTCTAGACCCTGT-3’. PCR products were cloned into the pCR8/GW/TOPO TA plasmid (Thermo Fisher) and then shuttled into a Gateway-converted pCDNA3.1 mammalian expression vector (Invitrogen).

Single-cycle HIV and SIV pseudovirus infections

To produce HIV-1Λ1Env-eGFP reporter viruses, 13x10⁶ HEK293T cells were seeded into a 15-cm dishes in antibiotic free media and 24 h later transfected with 13.25 μg of Q23Λ1Env-GFP (group M backbone; (Humes and Overbaugh, 2011)) and 6.75 μg of envelope plasmid. Forty-eight hours post transfection, the cell supernatant was harvested, concentrated (∼100-fold) using Amicon Ultracel 100K filters (Millipore), and stored at -80 °C in single use aliquots. Cf2Th cells stably expressing CD4 and CCR5 were plated at 3x10⁴ cells/well of a 48-well plate 24 h before infection. The cells (∼80% confluent) were then infected with HIV-1 pseudoviruses in three different volumes (Fig 2 and 4), or a volume corresponding to 10-20% infection of cells expressing human CD4 (Fig 5). Infections were carried by spinoculation at 1,200 xg for 75 min in the presence of 5 μg/mL of polybrene. Forty-eight hours post infection, the cells were harvested from the plate and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde. Fixed cells were washed three times with PBS and resuspended in 50 μL flow buffer (1X PBX buffer containing 2% FBS and 1 mM EDTA) and stained for 30 min at 4 °C with the following antibody mixture: PerCP-Cy5.5 mouse anti-human CD195 (CCR5, BD Biosciences 560635) and AlexaFluor647 mouse anti-human CD4 (BD Biosciences, 566681), and analyzed using a BD Accuri C6 Plus flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Following singlet cell discrimination, gates were drawn to capture double-positive cells expressing CD4 and CCR5, and then the percent GFP+ cells was enumerated within that population. The data from ∼2x10⁴ cells per technical replicate were analyzed using FlowJo v10. To calculate virus titers (Fig 2 and 4), the linear range of the infectivity curve was determined, and two points within the linear range were selected to calculate the mean virus titer in TDU/mL. The limit of detection for the titer calculation corresponds to a value of 0.2 % GFP positive cells. TDU/mL mean values were normalized to the titer of infection in cells expressing human CD4, and data used to construct a heat map using the Morpheus server (https://software.broadinstitute.org/morpheus); rows and columns were hierarchically clustered by Euclidian distance.

Statistical comparisons were performed between percentages of infected cells in some cases. Values of technical replicates of each biological replicate were compared between mutant and wild type CD4 versions by one-way ANOVA. If a statistically significant difference was found (p < 0.05) in both independent biological replicates, an asterisk was added to the mutant column in the dot plot.

Glycosylation state of CD4 by western blotting

Cf2Th cells stably expressing CD4 cells were lysed in Nonidet P-40 buffer [150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris·HCl pH 7.4, 1% Nonidet P-40 substitute, 1 mM DTT, 1 μL/mL Benzonase (Sigma-Aldrich #E1014), and protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma- Aldrich, #11873580001)] by resuspending the cell pellet and rocking at 4° C for 30 min. Cell lysate was cleared by centrifugation at maximum speed for 15 min. Whole-cell extracts were quantified using the BCA assay and 10 μg was subjected to PNGase F treatment according to the manufacturer’s protocol, including a paired sample with no glycosidase as control (New England Biolabs, #P0705S). Treated whole cell extracts (5 μg per lane) were resolved on a 12% TGX Stain-free polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad, #1610185) by applying 180V until loading dye ran off the gel. Protein was transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore Sigma, #IPVH07850) using a wet transfer apparatus set at 100V for 60 min. The membrane was incubated with blocking buffer (tris-buffered saline 1X, Tween-20 0.1%, 5% milk) for 60 min at room temperature. Primary antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer and incubated with the membrane overnight at 4° C (1:1,000 anti-CD4, Abcam #ab133616). After primary Ab incubation, membrane was washed 4 x 5 min in TBST (0.1% Tween-20). Secondary antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer and incubated with the membrane for 60 min at room temperature (1:10,000 anti-rabbit-HRP, Promega #W401B). After secondary Ab incubation, membrane was washed 4 x 5 min in TBST (0.1% Tween-20) and developed using ECL reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, #GERPN2232), and imaged on a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc Imaging System. As loading control, membranes were reblotted to detect β-acting using a primary (Cell Signal #3700) and secondary (Promega #W402B) antibodies and developed as described.

Analysis of population-level selection acting on CD4

To compare the pattern of molecular evolution at CD4 relative to neighboring loci we pulled population level re-sequencing data for loci located within 100 kb downstream and upstream of CD4. Primate sequences were obtained from the Great Ape Genome project (Prado-Martinez et al., 2013) and size-matched human sequences were selected to represent diverse ethnic groups from Human 1000 Genomes project.

To identify the individual-specific SNPs within the selected loci, genotype data in variant call format (VCF) was directly downloaded from International Genome Sample Resources (internationalgenome.org/) and the Great Ape Genome Project (biologiaevolutiva.org/greatape/). For human variants, the variant calls were made based on human reference genome annotation hg38, and individual-specific haplotypes were extracted by altering the reference sequence with the alternative SNPs annotated in the VCF files via custom Perl script. For non-human primate variants, the primate genome short read sequences were mapped to human reference genome hg19 to generate the VCF files, as previously described(Prado-Martinez et al., 2013). The SNPs in the VCF files were further filtered by the variant call quality (GQ ζ 15). Like the human sequences, the individual-specific haplotype sequences are re-constructed by correcting the reference sequence with VCF annotations.

In total we obtained population level variation for CD4 plus 15 other loci (six upstream and nine downstream). Four loci were removed from analysis because they have previously been shown to directly interact with a viral protein (USP5 and SPSB2; (Jia et al., 2020; Rathore et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2021)) or non-human primate sequencing reads did not map well with the human reference due to repetitive sequence (LAG3 and P3H3). Coding loci included in this study (in order 5’ to 3’) are: ZNF384, PIANP, COPS7A, MLF2, PTMS, CD4, GPR162, GNB3, CDCA3, TPI1, LRRC23 and ENO2. This was done for great ape species endemically infected with immunodeficiency viruses (chimpanzee and gorilla) and those newly or not infected (human, bonobo, Sumatran and Bornean orangutans).

Sequences were aligned for each species individually using the Muscle alignment program (Edgar, 2004). DnaSP (Rozas et al., 2017) was used to haplotype-phase the downloaded sequences and to calculate levels of nucleotide diversity for each locus. Rarely we would observe an internal stop codon within a locus’ reading frame. In these cases, both haplotypes for that individual were removed from analysis. We analyzed the subspecies of gorilla and chimpanzee together. While there is evidence of genetic differentiation between these subspecies (Prado-Martinez et al., 2013) this should not affect our comparisons as the differentiation is expected to be similar across all loci.

Analysis of positive selection of CD4 in primates

Sequence alignments

CD4 sequences were aligned to the longest human isoform in MEGA X for macOS (Stecher et al., 2020) using the ClustalW alignment tool. Multiple sequence alignments were visually inspected, duplicate gene sequences were removed, and the gene isoform from each species that best aligned to the human reference was retained for further analysis. The terminal stop codon was removed and aligned DNA and protein sequences were exported as fasta files. Codon alignments were generated using PAL2NAL (Suyama et al., 2006). Species cladograms for use in PAML were constructed following the species-level phylogenetic relatedness of primates (Perelman et al., 2011). Cladograms were generated using Newick formatted files and viewed with Njplot version 2.3.

Evolutionary analysis

Codon alignments and unrooted species cladograms were used as input files for analysis of positive selection using the PAML4.8 software package (Yang, 2007a). To detect selection, multiple sequence alignments were fit to the NSites models M7 (neutral model, codon values of dN/dS fit to a beta distribution bounded between 0 and 1), M8a (neutral model, similar to M7 but with an extra codon class fixed at dN/dS = 1) and M8 (positive selection model, similar to M8a but with the extra codon class allowed to have a dN/dS > 1). A likelihood ratio test was performed to assess whether the model of positive selection (M8) yielded a significantly better fit to the data compared to null models (model comparisons M7 vs. M8 and M8a vs M8). Posterior probabilities (Bayes Empirical Bayes analysis) were assigned to individual codons with dN/dS values > 1. To calculate the posterior mean of ω over a sliding window, the per-site ω value was extracted from the M8 model, and the average ω value within the designated window size (80 amino acids) was calculated across the open reading frame in a sliding manner. With the window slide 1 amino acid each time to calculate the smoothed mean ω values.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the NIH (DP1-DO-33547, DP1-DA-046108, R01-AI-137011, R01-OD-034046 to

SLS; T32 A1007447-25, F32 GM125442, and K99 Al151256 to CJW). The flow cytometry work was performed at the BioFrontiers Institute Flow Cytometry Core supported by NIH Grant S10ODO21601.

Supplemental Figures and Table

Figure S1.

Figure S2.

Figure S3.

Figure S4.

Table S1 Levels for nonsynonymous and synonymous variation at CD4 and 11 genomically neighboring loci. For each locus we list the sample size and number of segregating nonsynonymous and synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for each species included in this study. We also include two measurements of nucleotide variability. One based on the number of SNPs (𝜭_w) and the other based on the frequency of each SNP (𝜭_π).

(this will be an extra excel file, it is too big for a word table)