Chemical and nanometric analysis of isolated cell walls shows higher amounts of PG in the absence of VirR.
(A) Glycosyl composition analysis of isolated cell walls from the indicated strains. Acid hydrolysis prior to GC-MS analysis of isolated cell walls was performed to determine the total amounts of galactose (G), arabinose (A), rhamnose (R), and N-acetylglucosamine (NAGc). The ratio between different sugars is shown to indicate: (i) the relative levels of arabinogalactan (A/G); (ii) the length of the AG polysaccharide chain (G/R); (iii) the amount of PG (NAGc/Rham). Individual measurements are shown from three biological replicates. Data are mean and standard errors. **P < 0.01 after applying a Tukeýs multiple comparison test. (B) Quantification of diaminopimelic acid (DAP) on isolated cell walls from the indicated strains. Data are mean and standard errors from three biological replicates; **** denotes P<0.0001, * denotes P=0.0119 after applying a Tukeýs multiple comparison test. (C) Atomic force microscopy high resolution images taken in liquid from the external surface of purified peptidoglycan from different samples, left to right: WT, virRmut, virRmut-C, the structure of external peptidoglycan layer shows a mesh with pores of different sizes, (D) Graph showing the pore diameter from n = 8 AFM images similar to (C) (each point represent an image) of different samples; black triangles: WT, blue circles: virRmut, red squares: virRmut-C. The pore diameter was calculated from the binary slice from each image containing the greatest number of pores, according to (Pasquina-Lemonche, 2024). (E) The number of pores per surface area from different samples; white triangles: WT, red circles: virRmut, blue squares: virRmut-C, this was calculated from the slice containing the maximum number of pores where the pore size was analyzed, following the method from (Pasquina-Lemonche, 2024). (F) Graph showing the peptidoglycan thickness manually measured using the 1D statistic tools from the open-source program Gwyddion (Nečas and Klapetek, 2012) from AFM images in air containing several fragments of cell wall, each point represents a different peptidoglycan fragment from a different cell. There were three samples analyzed: black WT n=23 peptidoglycan fragments, blue virRmut n=36 and red virRmut-C n=25. Statistics: D) Using a two-tailed t test with Welch’s correction the statistical comparison are: (***) pWT-virRmut = 4.1 10-4 with t = 6.1, df = 7.5, (**) p virRmut -virRmut-C = 0.007 with t = 3.2, df = 13.2, E) Using a two-tailed t test with Welch’s correction the statistical comparison are: (****) pWT-virRmut = 6.6 10-10 with t = 16.3, df = 12.7, (**) p virRmut - virRmut -C = 0.01 with t = 3.0, df = 13.2., F) Using a two-tailed t test with Welch’s correction the statistical comparison are: (****) pWT-virRmut= 2.8 10-18 with t = 17.8, df = 32.3, (****) virRmut - virRmut -C = 3.9 10-17 with t = 16.4, df = 31.8. (G) List of muropeptides identified in the cell walls of Mtb. Features including retention time (RT), observed and expected mass as well as the best match for each peak are shown. Those deacetylated muropeptides are indicated in red. (H) Relative abundance of deacetylated muropeptides in the indicated strains.