GV curves for KCNQ1 mutants. A-H) GV curves in control (black) and after perfusion of 20 μM of Lin-Gly (red) for A) KCNQ1_WT/KCNE1, B) KCNQ1_Y315F/KCNE1, C) KCNQ1_D301E/KCNE1, D) KCNQ1_P320L /KCNE1, E) KCNQ1_T309S/KCNE1, F) KCNQ1_D317E/KCNE1, and G) KCNQ1_I313S/KCNE1, and H) KCNQ1_T312S/KCNE1. Taken together, our results suggest that the binding of PUFA to Site II increases Gmax by promoting a series of interactions that stabilize the channel pore in the conductive state. For instance, we speculate that in the conductive state, hydrogen bonds between W304-D317 and W305-Y315, which are likely absent in the non-conductive conformation of KCNQ1, are created and that PUFA binding to K326 and D301 at Site II favors the transition towards the conductive state of the channel (Figure 7).