Introduction

The actin cytoskeleton is a universal feature of eukaryotic cells and plays critical roles in processes such as endocytosis, cytokinesis, and maintenance of cell morphology. Most research has however focused on opisthokonts (principally animals and fungi), and very little is known about the actomyosin system in other branches of the eukaryotic tree, in particular the early-branching ones. Recently, it was shown that trypanosomatids – a family of unicellular parasites – are the most divergent eukaryotes that still retain an actomyosin system with associated regulatory proteins (Kotila et al., 2022). Amongst the trypanosomatids, Trypanosoma brucei is the most tractable for molecular cell biology investigation. T. brucei is an exclusively extracellular pathogen which has evolved mechanisms to resist the harsh conditions within the bloodstream and body fluids of its mammalian hosts and the different but similarly demanding environments within its insect vector, the tsetse fly.

To evade the mammalian host’s immune system, T. brucei bloodstream forms (BSFs) express a surface coat of variable surface glycoproteins (VSGs) consisting of 5 x 10⁶ VSG dimers (Bartossek et al., 2017; Cross, 1975; Jackson et al., 1985). This dense glycoprotein coat hides invariant surface proteins from immune recognition, ensuring that host antibodies are generated against the currently-presented VSG isoform and not against any invariant surface proteins (Cross, 1975; Mugnier et al., 2016). A glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor attached to each VSG monomer confers high mobility to the VSG coat, facilitating a high rate of antibody clearance by the parasite (Bartossek et al., 2017; Borges et al., 2021; Hartel et al., 2016). The directional movement of the trypanosome generates hydrodynamic flow forces on the cell surface that drag VSG-antibody complexes to the posterior region of the cell, where they can be endocytosed, trafficked to the lysosome, and degraded (Engstler et al., 2007; Link et al., 2021; Webster et al., 1990). Thus, T. brucei persistence inside the mammalian host is intrinsically connected to its endocytic trafficking capacity.

All endo-and exocytic processes in T. brucei occur through the flagellar pocket, a small invagination of the plasma membrane located near the posterior pole of the cell (Grünfelder et al., 2002; Grünfelder et al., 2003; Lacomble et al., 2009). Measurements of the kinetics of VSG endocytosis and recycling revealed that the VSG cell surface pool is turned over within 12 minutes (Engstler et al., 2004). Surface-bound antibodies are internalised and colocalise with lysosome markers within 2 minutes (Engstler et al., 2007). These rates are very high, especially considering that exo-and endocytosis are limited to only 5% of the total cell surface area (Engstler et al., 2004). Moreover, not only is the flagellar pocket situated in the posterior part of the cell, but the entire endosomal apparatus responsible for membrane recycling is also localised to that region (Engstler et al., 2004; Field and Carrington, 2009; Grünfelder et al., 2003; Link et al., 2021).

It was recently shown that the endosomal system of T. brucei has a remarkably complex architecture (Link et al., 2023). Rather than being divided into separate compartments, the system forms an interconnected membrane network. Within this network, distinct endosomal functions are grouped into membrane subdomains that are enriched with well-known markers associated with early (TbRab5A), late (TbRab7), and recycling endosomes (TbRab11). While this structure might explain the efficient membrane recycling seen in trypanosomes, the mechanisms responsible for maintaining its stability are not yet understood. One candidate for stabilising and organising this membrane network is the actomyosin system.

The actomyosin system of T. brucei is very reduced, consisting of one actin gene and two myosin genes (Garcia-Salcedo et al., 2004; Spitznagel et al., 2010). This stands in contrast to its elaborate and highly-structured subpellicular microtubule cytoskeleton (Robinson et al., 1995). Although the exact functions of the reduced actomyosin system in T. brucei are not understood, the retention of a minimal system (along with regulatory proteins) suggests an essential function that the microtubule cytoskeleton cannot recapitulate. Previous work on T. brucei actin showed that its depletion resulted in a rapid cell division arrest, loss of endocytic activity, and ultimately cell death (Garcia-Salcedo et al., 2004). Interestingly, T. brucei filamentous actin has not been visualised by phalloidin binding. This suggests that filamentous actin in trypanosomes may be short and dynamic, as is the case in Plasmodium (Schmitz et al., 2005; Schüler et al., 2005), and was recently shown in the related trypanosomatid parasite Leishmania (Kotila et al., 2022).

To date, the only experimental characterisation of trypanosome myosins was reported by Spitznagel and coworkers in 2010 (Spitznagel et al., 2010). That study focused on Tb927.4.3380 (TbMyo1), which belongs to the ubiquitous class I myosin family. Class I myosins are smaller than conventional (class II) myosins, and do not self-associate into dimers or bipolar filaments. The functions of class I myosins vary from the regulation of membrane tension to participation in endo-and exocytosis, intracellular trafficking, and cell migration (reviewed in Diaz-Valencia et al., 2022). The myosin domain structure usually consists of a conserved motor domain with ATP-and actin-binding regions, a variable number of IQ (calmodulin-binding) motifs which activate the protein in a Ca²⁺ dependent manner, and a cargo-binding tail domain (Masters et al., 2017; Trivedi et al., 2020).

In BSF T. brucei cells, TbMyo1 partially colocalised with endocytic cargo, late endosomes, and the lysosome (Spitznagel et al., 2010). In addition, the depletion of TbMyo1 resulted in the inhibition of cargo uptake and an enlargement of the flagellar pocket (Spitznagel et al., 2010). These findings supported a proposed function in endocytic trafficking. Although a direct colocalisation of actin and TbMyo1 was not demonstrated, the depletion or drug-induced disruption of actin resulted in a decreased and more diffuse TbMyo1 signal. It remains unclear however, what kind of motor activity TbMyo1 has and whether it functions primarily as a tether or a transporter.

The other T. brucei myosin (Tb927.11.16310; TbMyo21, sometimes also referred to as Myo13) is part of the kinetoplastida-specific class XXI family (Foth et al., 2006). In Leishmania, knockdown of the class XXI myosin was reported to be lethal, with defects in flagellar assembly and a loss of intracellular trafficking (Katta et al., 2009; Katta et al., 2010). This critical role for Myo21 in Leishmania have led to interest in it as a potential drug target (Trivedi et al., 2020). In contrast, there has been no published work on TbMyo21, making it unclear whether it might also be a target for therapeutic intervention in T. brucei.

Here, a combination of different imaging techniques as well as biochemical and biophysical approaches were used to characterise both myosins in BSF T. brucei and determine their relationship to the endomembrane system and their corresponding marker proteins. As part of this work, an anti-actin chromobody system was established for the first time in trypanosomatids, thereby enabling simultaneous visualisation of actin and myosin. The results suggest that the actomyosin system of T. brucei is involved in post-endocytic membrane trafficking events and maintaining the complex membrane morphology of the endosomal system.

Results

TbMyo1 is distributed across cytosolic, organelle- and cytoskeleton-associated cellular fractions

Characterisation of TbMyo1 and TbMyo21 was initially carried out in parallel. To detect endogenous TbMyo1, two anti-TbMyo1 antibodies were generated against the tail domain (amino acids 729-1168) of the protein. The specificity of these antibodies was validated using two transgenic cell lines (Figure S1 A – F). The two anti-TbMyo1 antibodies were subsequently used as a 2:1 mix.

The same characterisation strategy was followed for the class XXI myosin. TbMyo21 was found to have extremely low expression levels in both BSF and procyclic life cycle stages, however. In addition, the protein could not be confidently localised using widefield microscopy and RNAi experiments showed that it appeared to be non-essential for BSF cell growth (Figure S2 A – D, F). Thus, all further experiments were conducted on TbMyo1.

To determine what proportion of TbMyo1 was associated with the cytoskeleton, a two-step biochemical fractionation was carried out (Figure 1 A). Cells expressing cytosolic green fluorescent protein (GFP) were sequentially fractionated using the non-ionic detergents digitonin and IGEPAL. Digitonin preferentially solubilises the plasma membrane and leads to the release of the cytosolic fraction (SN1), while IGEPAL solubilises the organelle fraction (SN2). Samples were subsequently analysed by immunoblotting with fraction-specific marker proteins. As expected, the cytosolic GFP (∼ 27 kDa) was efficiently extracted by digitonin and partitioned into the SN1 fraction (Figure 1 B, top panel). The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) luminal chaperone BiP (∼ 80 kDa) was not extracted by digitonin and mostly partitioned into the P1 fraction, but was subsequently solubilised by IGEPAL and partitioned into the SN2 fraction (Figure 1 B, middle panel). The cytoskeleton-associated paraflagellar rod proteins TbPFR1 and TbPFR2 (∼ 69 and 72 kDa) were not solubilised by either detergent and partitioned into first the P1 and then subsequently into the P2 fraction (Figure 1 B, bottom panel, magenta). Interestingly, around half of the TbMyo1 (∼ 130 kDa) partitioned into the SN1 fraction, indicating that there is a substantial cytosolic pool. The remaining material (P1) predominantly partitioned into the cytoskeleton-associated P2 fraction (Figure 1 B, bottom panel, green).

Figure 1.

Quantification of multiple independent experiments indicated that 60% of the GFP signal was in the cytosol (Figure 1 C, SN1, arrow). About 70% of the BiP signal was in the organelle-associated fraction (SN2, arrow) and 95 % of TbPFR1,2 were in the cytoskeleton-associated fraction (P2, arrow). 40% of TbMyo1 was found in both the cytosolic (SN1) and the cytoskeleton (P2) fractions. Only 20 % of TbMyo1 was found in the organelle-associated (SN2) fraction.

TbMyo1 translocates filamentous actin at 130 nm/s

The presence of a large cytosolic fraction of the monomeric TbMyo1 implied that it might be quite dynamic in vivo, and potentially functioning as an active motor rather than a tether. To test whether TbMyo1 can translocate actin, full-length recombinant TbMyo1 was purified and in vitro actin filament gliding assays were performed (Figure 2). Based on sequence analysis, TbMyo1 is predicted to consist of a large motor domain (cyan), a single calmodulin-binding IQ motif (yellow) and a membrane-binding FYVE-domain (magenta) (Figure 2 A). The full-length protein was expressed in insect cells and purified, with most of the TbMyo1 eluting as a single peak with associated calmodulin (Figure 2 B and C). For the in vitro gliding assays, the purified TbMyo1 was biotinylated, immobilised via streptavidin onto a glass surface, and incubated with Alexa488-phalloidin-labelled filamentous actin at 2 mM ATP (Figure 2 D). The translocation of the filamentous actin by the immobilised myosins was observed and characterised quantitatively (Figure 2 E, Methods). The actin filaments were found to move smoothly with a mean gliding velocity of 130 nm/s (Video S1, Figure 2 E). This indicated that TbMyo1 can functionally interact with actin, and can translocate it at comparatively high speed.

Figure 2.

TbMyo1 is associated with the endocytic and not the biosynthetic pathway

The ability of TbMyo1 to actively translocate actin suggested that it might be functioning as a motor in vivo. To narrow down which pathways and cargoes it might be associated with, its localisation was examined using light microscopy. Previous studies indicated that TbMyo1 is located in the posterior region of the cell and overlaps with parts of the endosomal system (Spitznagel et al., 2010). These findings had not been made using high-resolution microscopy, however, and a potential localisation to the biosynthetic membrane trafficking pathway remained unexplored. Therefore, the localisation of TbMyo1 was examined using expansion microscopy.

After expansion of wild-type T. brucei cells, endogenous TbMyo1 was mainly detected in the posterior region of the cell between the nucleus (N) and the mitochondrial genome (kinetoplast, K) (Figure 3 A). The fluorescence signal appeared as variable numbers of foci and larger clusters. Although a signal was detected in close proximity to the kinetoplast in some cells, the majority of signals were situated midway between the kinetoplast and the nucleus. These observations were consistent with the localisation described using widefield microscopy (Spitznagel et al., 2010).

Figure 3.

To determine whether the TbMyo1 foci might be associated with biosynthetic pathways, colabelling experiments were carried out using the ER chaperone BiP, the Golgi marker GRASP, and the lysosome marker p67. The fixed, labelled cells were imaged using both widefield and structured illumination microscopy (SIM). No substantial overlap was seen between TbMyo1 and BiP (Figure 3 B, I and II). Accordingly, the correlation between the two proteins in the population was weak (ρ = 0.35) (Figure 3 C). Similarly, TbMyo1 and the Golgi marker GRASP displayed no overlap (Figure 3 B, III and IV) and weak correlation (ρ = 0.30) (Figure 3 C). TbMyo1 and the lysosome marker p67 were frequently observed in close proximity in the posterior region of the cell but did not overlap, despite the TbMyo1 signal being close to and sometimes surrounding the p67 signal (Figure 3 B, V and VI). The correlation between the two proteins was moderate (ρ = 0.43) compared to the ER and Golgi markers and showed a much larger spread of values (Figure 3 C).

To determine the distribution of TbMyo1 relative to endocytic cargo, fluorescent BSA and transferrin were used as markers (Figure 3 D, I and II). TbMyo1 had previously been suggested to overlap with the endosomal system, but this work was conducted using non-physiological cargoes (lectins) as markers (Spitznagel et al., 2010). Here, the physiological cargoes BSA and transferrin were used. The BSA signal was mainly found in a single globular cluster in the posterior region of the cell, which seemed to partially overlap with TbMyo1 (Figure 3 D, I). The transferrin signal was more widely distributed and seemed to have a more substantial overlap with TbMyo1 (Figure 3 D, II). Surprisingly, despite the clear visual overlap of cargo marker and TbMyo1 signals, the correlations were very weak (ρ = 0.17 and 0.20, respectively) (Figure 3 E). This might be because colocalisation can be measured in different ways, and correlation is not the same as co-occurrence (reviewed in Aaron et al., 2018). Correlation measures whether two distinct signals change in a similar manner within an overlapping area, while co-occurrence measures the extent of the overlapping area between the two signals. The results here suggest that although the TbMyo1 distribution overlaps with that of endocytic cargo, the signals are not strongly correlated. The implications are addressed in the Discussion.

In summary, TbMyo1 did not appear to associate with endomembrane organelles along the biosynthetic pathway (ER, Golgi, lysosome), but did overlap with endocytic cargo.

Ultrastructural localisation of TbMyo1

The overlap between TbMyo1 and endocytic cargo strongly suggested that TbMyo1 is associated with the endosomal system, but there are other organelles present in the posterior region of trypanosomes. To test whether endogenous TbMyo1 is indeed primarily associated with the endosomal system, its ultrastructural localisation was investigated using cryo-sectioning and immuno-electron microscopy.

The morphology of the immuno-labelled structures was variable and included both vesicles and cisternae with circular or elongated shapes (Figure 4 A – D). The vesicles were found in different sizes ranging from 30 to 100 nm, while the elongated membrane structures were between 20 and 30 nm thick and up to 1 μm long. Interestingly, glycosomes (readily identifiable because of their electron-dense lumen) were also regularly labelled with the anti-TbMyo1 antibodies (Figure 4 E).

Figure 4.

To test whether the membrane structures represented endosomes, the cells were pulsed with BSA conjugated to 5 nm gold as a marker for endocytic uptake (Figure 4 F – H). The 5 nm gold particles were observed inside the membrane structures, confirming their endosomal identity (Figure 4 F – H). In addition, gold particles were found inside coated vesicles and abundantly in the lysosome (Figure 4 H).

The total number of gold particles associated with the different subcellular structures was quantified. While the majority of TbMyo1 gold signals were found in the cytoplasm (57%), equal proportions (15%) were found at glycosomes and endosomes, with smaller amounts at the flagellar pocket (8%) and on vesicles (5%) (Figure 4 I). The large proportion of cytoplasmic TbMyo1 was consistent with the large cytosolic fraction previously observed in the biochemical fractionation assays (Figure 1).

To determine whether TbMyo1 was associated with a specific subdomain of the endosomal system, further colocalisation experiments were conducted using mNG-TbMyo1 tagged cells and antibodies against TbRab5A, 7, and 11 (Figure S3) (Link et al., 2023). TbRab5A, 7, and 11 are markers of early, late, and recycling endosomal subdomains, respectively (Hall et al., 2004; Hall et al., 2005; Silverman et al., 2011; Umaer et al., 2018). TbRab5A and TbRab7 both partially overlapped with TbMyo1 (Figure S3 A). The corresponding correlation coefficients exhibited large variation, underscoring the dynamic nature of both Rabs and TbMyo1 (Figure S3 B). Immunogold labelling assays further demonstrated colocalisation between TbRab5A and TbRab7 with TbMyo1, highlighting that the proteins are found on the same membranous structures (Figure S3 C). In contrast, the calculated correlation coefficient of 0.1 for the combination of TbMyo1 and TbRab11 reflected that these signals barely overlapped (Figure S3 A and B).

In summary, ultrastructural analysis of TbMyo1 confirmed its association with early and late endosomal subdomains but not with the exocytic arms of the recycling compartment; TbMyo1 was additionally localised it to glycosomes.

TbMyo1 is clustered adjacent to the lysosome

While the immunofluorescence data indicated no consistent overlap between TbMyo1 and the lysosome (Figure 3 B and C), the immuno-electron microscopy data repeatedly showed TbMyo1 close to lysosomal membranes (Figure 4 H and S3 C). To further explore this finding, correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) assays were used (Figure 5), as fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies can better penetrate cryosections than gold-conjugated ones (van der Beek et al., 2022).

Figure 5.

To label the endosomes and lysosome, the cells were incubated with dual-labelled Alexa555-BSA-gold prior to fixation and sample embedding. Anti-VSG antibodies (yellow) were used for cell surface labelling and DAPI (grey) to stain DNA, with both signals serving as fiducials for the correlation (Figure 5, panels I – III). As the BSA-gold was additionally conjugated to a fluorophore (Alexa555), its accumulation at the lysosome was first visualised using widefield microscopy (Figure 5 A and B, cyan). The TbMyo1 signal (magenta) was frequently clustered on one side of the lysosomal signal but did not overlap with it. In addition, the TbMyo1 fluorescence was found to decorate endosomal membranes filled with gold particles, consistent with the earlier experiments (Figure 5 B, arrow). Finally, TbMyo1 was again observed on glycosomes (Figure 5 C and D, asterisks).

In summary, the use of CLEM on cryosections confirmed that TbMyo1 is clustered adjacent to the lysosome and is associated with endosomal membranes and glycosomes. This represents the first use of CLEM on cryosections in trypanosomes, confirming it as a viable experimental approach for T. brucei.

Visualisation of TbMyo1 and actin overlap using an anti-actin chromobody

In previous studies, T. brucei actin was shown to localise to the endosomal system, and TbMyo1 localisation was shown to be dependent on actin (Garcia-Salcedo et al., 2004; Spitznagel et al., 2010). Simultaneous imaging of the two proteins in T. brucei was not shown however, and consequently, the extent of colocalisation remained unknown. Given that fractionation data had indicated only 40 % of TbMyo1 was cytoskeleton-associated, it seemed likely that the overlap between the two was not total.

To visualise actin, an anti-actin chromobody was used. Chromobodies are nanobodies (single-domain antibodies) conjugated to a fluorescent protein and can be expressed intracellularly. The anti-actin chromobody used here was previously used to visualise actin in living Toxoplasma cells (Periz et al., 2017). It was not clear, however, whether it could be used in trypanosomatids.

The anti-actin chromobody was first subcloned into a trypanosome tetracycline-inducible expression vector and a stable cell line was generated. The correct insertion of the gene into the genome was validated using PCR (Figure S4 A). Tight and inducible expression of the anti-actin chromobody at the population level was confirmed by immunoblotting (Figure S4 B). At the single-cell level, a fluorescent chromobody signal was only detectable in the presence of tetracycline and was restricted to the posterior region of cells between the nucleus and kinetoplast (Figure 6 A). This matched the previously reported localisation of actin in trypanosomes (Garcia-Salcedo et al., 2004). Although there was cell-to-cell variation in the expression level of the chromobody, the distribution pattern was consistent (Figure S4 C and Figure 6 B).

Figure 6.

To confirm that the chromobody signal was genuinely reporting on the distribution of filamentous actin, the cells were treated with latrunculin A (LatA) (Figure 6 C). LatA binds actin monomers and prevents them from polymerising to filamentous actin, ultimately resulting in cell death. While low concentrations (0.2 μM) of LatA showed a slight delocalisation of the chromobody signal, high concentrations (2 μM) resulted in a strong delocalisation or even loss of the chromobody signal. This strongly suggested that the chromobody was faithfully reporting on the distribution of filamentous actin in the trypanosome cells.

Next, the extent of overlap between TbMyo1 and actin was assessed. The signals strongly overlapped in the posterior part of the cell (Figure 6 D). This was reflected in strong correlation between the signals in the population (ρ = 0.63) (Figure 6 E). Importantly, the TbMyo1 distribution was the same in uninduced and induced cells, indicating that its localisation was not affected by the expression of the chromobody. Of note, the colocalising area was often up to 1 μm away from the kinetoplast/flagellar pocket region (Figure 6 F) and only a minority of cells showed a signal for either TbMyo1, actin, or both adjacent to the kinetoplast (Figure 6 F, I and II). These observations suggested that the actomyosin system is not constitutively present at the flagellar pocket.

Actin maintains the morphology of the endosomal system

Lastly, the role of the actin cytoskeleton in stabilising the endosomal system was tested. Endosomes were labelled using ectopic expression of the marker protein EP1, which has previously been shown to label the entire endosomal system and flagellar pocket of BSF trypanosomes (Engstler and Boshart, 2004; Link et al., 2023). EP1, a cell surface protein found in insect-stage trypanosomes, is mostly excluded from the VSG coat of BSF trypanosomes.

To test whether the actomyosin system maintains endosomal morphology, the EP1-GFP-expressing cells were treated with 2 μM latrunculin A (LatA) for varying incubation times (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Control cells, harvested and fixed after 0 hours of LatA incubation, mostly (∼ 85%) exhibited normal morphology. The EP1-GFP fluorescence in the controls was concentrated in the posterior region of the cell and revealed a variable number of high-intensity signals, surrounded and connected by weaker signals. In contrast, the effects of LatA incubation on the EP1-GFP signal mirrored its effects on the chromobody (Figure 7 A). After 1 hour of LatA incubation, 50% of the cells displayed morphological changes, including swelling of the cell body in the posterior part and even complete rounding of the cell (Figure 7 B). After a 2-hour incubation with LatA, only 10% of the cells exhibited a typical morphology. At longer incubation times no cells displaying a normal morphology were observed. These morphological changes were accompanied by a redistribution of the EP1-GFP fluorescence signals. Instead of being confined to the posterior region, the EP1-GFP signals increasingly spread throughout the entire cytoplasm. Examination of the ultrastructure of the endosomal system at early timepoints (≤ 60 min LatA incubation) revealed a complete loss of endosomal integrity, resulting in large membrane vesicles filling the space between the flagellar pocket and the lysosome (Figure 7 C). The preservation of the Golgi complex structure in its entirety, as well as the continuing invagination of clathrin-coated pits and presence of clathrin-coated vesicles at the flagellar pocket, underscored the specificity of this phenotype (Figure 7 C). It is noteworthy that even after 30 to 60 minutes of LatA incubation, which led to the complete disruption of the endosomal system, the parasites remained motile. Moreover, an enlargement of the flagellar pocket was not observed in most cells during this period. The data therefore specifically suggest that the complex architecture of the endosomal system in trypanosomes is maintained by the actomyosin cytoskeleton.

Discussion

Despite the considerable research focused on the microtubule cytoskeleton of T. brucei, its actomyosin system has received relatively little attention. The polarised distribution of actomyosin system proteins to the posterior part of T. brucei, and the recent discovery that the endosomal system of this organism is a three-dimensional network rather than isolated compartments, make the actomyosin system a plausible candidate for maintaining endosomal organisation (Link et al., 2023). In this study, the arrangement of myosins and actin in BSF T. brucei was revisited using a combination of imaging and biophysical techniques.

Initially, both the class I (TbMyo1) and trypanosomatid-specific class XXI (TbMyo21) proteins were investigated. TbMyo21 exhibited minimal expression in both BSF and procyclic form cells however, and no detrimental growth effects were apparent upon depleting TbMyo21 in BSF cells (Figure S1), consistent with previously-published high-throughput data (Alsford et al., 2011). It remains possible that TbMyo21 might be important only in cell cycle stages that cannot be cultivated in vitro, such as epimastigotes. Due to its exceedingly low expression levels and non-essential role in BSF T. brucei, TbMyo21 is unlikely to be a viable drug target, in contrast to its homologue in Leishmania (Trivedi et al., 2020). Subsequent efforts in this study focused on the characterisation of TbMyo1. Of note, TbMyo1 expression was also downregulated in the procyclic life cycle stage (Figure S2 E), confirming earlier proteomic experiments (Tinti and Ferguson, 2022). This finding conflicts with the previous study, where no change in TbMyo1 expression levels was observed after differentiation (Spitznagel et al., 2010). The discrepancy is most likely due to the stronger signal obtained in the present study with the new anti-TbMyo1 antibodies. This suggests that the actomyosin system is not as critical for the viability of procyclic cells, which have a much lower rate of membrane trafficking than the BSF life cycle stage.

The biochemical fractionation data indicated that around half of the TbMyo1 was in the cytosolic fraction, while the remaining portion exhibited a strong association with the cytoskeleton fraction (Figure 1). The substantial cytosolic fraction of TbMyo1 could potentially indicate the molecules adopting an auto-inhibited "foldback" configuration, which could be tested in future in vitro assays (Yang et al., 2009). The existence of a large cytosolic fraction at steady state might also suggest that TbMyo1 is very dynamic, with a high turnover on the organelles it associates with and a low duty ratio.

The in vitro motility assays indicated that TbMyo1 can translocate filamentous actin with a mean translocation velocity of 130 nm/s, which is significantly faster than the approximately 10–50 nm/s measured for some mammalian class I myosins (Giese et al., 2021; Pyrpassopoulos et al., 2012). This relatively high velocity might indicate that TbMyo1 is participating in intracellular trafficking of BSF T. brucei and functioning as an active motor rather than a static tether.

Earlier studies examining the localisation of TbMyo1 primarily concentrated on the endocytic pathway (Spitznagel et al., 2010), with little attention given to its potential association with the biosynthetic route. Nevertheless, neither widefield microscopy nor structured illumination microscopy (SIM) displayed any notable overlap between TbMyo1 and markers of the biosynthetic pathway (Figure 3 B and C). The close juxtaposition of endoplasmic reticulum exit sites (ERES) and the Golgi apparatus in T. brucei could provide a rationale for why a motor protein like TbMyo1 might be dispensable for mediating transport between these organelles (Sealey-Cardona et al., 2014). While myosins have often been localised to the Golgi in other systems (Avisar et al., 2008; Buss et al., 1998; Perico et al., 2021), these cell types typically have multiple Golgi apparatuses and a more intricate coordination of secretory pathways.

Recently, a potential mechanism was discussed in which secretory material in T. brucei might move in bulk from the Golgi to the endosomal system (Link et al., 2023). The secretory material would subsequently travel alongside recycled endocytic cargo from the endosomal system to the flagellar pocket and from there to the surface plasma membrane. In this model, it is the endosomal network that serves as a central sorting hub for both secretory and endocytic cargo. Maintenance of its complex three-dimensional morphology might therefore be critical to efficient function.

The actomyosin system has often been associated with membrane manipulation in different organisms (Costa et al., 2020; Eitzen, 2003; Khatibzadeh et al., 2013; Lamichhane et al., 2019). Interestingly, it has recently been shown that in Drosophila endosomes can organise F-actin and that endosomal actin can affect subcellular tube growth and integrity (Ríos-Barrera and Leptin, 2022). Thus, it could be that the actomyosin system either generates or helps maintain the architecture of the trypanosome endosomal system. Furthermore, the predicted FYVE domain in the TbMyo1 tail domain is predicted to mediate binding to PI(3)P lipids, which are enriched in endosomal membranes in other organisms (Marat and Haucke, 2016). Preliminary data indicate that this FYVE domain can indeed specifically bind to PI(3)P (C. Veigel and F. Zierhut, unpublished observations). So far, nothing is known about the lipid composition of endosomal membranes in trypanosomes, but the presence of a FYVE domain and the enrichment of TbMyo1 at endosomal membranes suggests PI(3)P lipids in the endosomes of trypanosomes too. If so, the expression of the FYVE domain conjugated to GFP might be a useful tool to visualise PI(3)P-enriched membranes in T. brucei.

In contrast to the results with the biosynthetic markers, physiological endocytic cargo (BSA, transferrin) visually colocalised with TbMyo1, but the correlations were weak (ρ = 0.17 and 0.20, respectively) (Figure 3 E). This highlights a potentially important point which is often glossed over in colocalisation analyses - correlation and co-occurrence are different concepts, although both are measures of colocalisation (Aaron et al., 2018). Thus, it is possible for two signals to be strongly correlated even if they do not exhibit much spatial overlap/co-occurrence. Conversely, and as here, two signals can exhibit strong overlap/co-occurrence but low correlation. A possible explanation for the low correlation between TbMyo1 and endocytic cargo might be due to topological differences in the signal origin. While TbMyo1 binds to the endosomal membranes from "outside" (the cytosolic side), the cargo is located in the endosome lumen. The overlap between TbMyo1 and endocytic cargo was further dissected by immuno- electron microscopy, which confirmed the presence of TbMyo1 on cargo-containing endosomal membranes (Figure 4).

Apart from its endosomal localisation, another intriguing observation stemming from the electron microscopy data was the predominant presence of TbMyo1 signals within the cytoplasm (Figure 4). This agrees with the fractionation results (Figure 1) and reaffirms that TbMyo1 has a substantial cytosolic portion under steady-state conditions. However, it is important to note that the actin filaments of trypanosomes have not yet been observed by electron microscopy. Recently, advanced techniques like cryo-transmission electron microscopy and cryo-electron tomography have been applied to explore and visualise actin in other cell types (reviewed in Jung et al., 2020). It would be intriguing to test these techniques for visualising actin in trypanosomes.

Interestingly, there was also a clear glycosomal localisation of TbMyo1, which was further confirmed by CLEM (Figure 5, C and D). TbMyo1 was previously found in a glycosomal proteome obtained by mass spectrometry (Vertommen et al., 2008; Supplementary material, Table S2, proteins only detected in bloodstream forms), providing independent validation of the ultrastructural localisation observed here. Glycosomes are related to peroxisomes, and are used to compartmentalise glycolysis in kinetoplastids (Crowe and Morris, 2021). While a connection to the cytoskeleton has been described as a requirement for peroxisome function, inheritance, and maintenance in plants, yeast, and mammalian cells (Neuhaus et al., 2016), nothing has been reported regarding a connection to the cytoskeleton for glycosomes in trypanosomatids. This link between glycosomes and TbMyo1 was unexpected and merits further investigation.

The results from the CLEM experiments underscored the proximity between TbMyo1 and the lysosome (Figure 5 A and B). The consistent localisation of TbMyo1 at or close to the endosomal network and lysosomes, coupled with the fact that neither TbMyo1 nor actin accumulated near the flagellar pocket, suggests that the actomyosin system in trypanosomes primarily functions in post-endocytic trafficking events. This encompasses activities related to trafficking within the endosomal system, movement to and from it, or transport to the lysosome. Further support for this interpretation comes from the colocalisation studies using antibodies against the endosomal marker proteins TbRab5A, TbRab7, and TbRab11. TbMyo1 exhibited partial overlap with TbRab5A (early endosomes) and TbRab7 (late endosomes), while no overlap was observed with TbRab11 (recycling endosomes). These results support the idea that TbMyo1 is implicated in post-endocytic processes rather than engaging in recycling events.

Actin and TbMyo1 were both previously localised to the posterior region of T. brucei, but until now, they had not been imaged together. Here, the actin cytoskeleton was visualised using an inducible anti-actin chromobody, which enabled colabelling with TbMyo1 (Figure 6). The ability to observe actin distributions in living cells will undoubtedly be invaluable for future studies of its intracellular dynamics. As TbMyo1 is a motor protein, the strong overlap with actin was expected and suggests that actin is highly decorated with TbMyo1. Nevertheless, the number and intensity of signal spots varied from cell to cell. Coupled with the relatively high velocity measured of TbMyo1 on actin, this suggests that the actomyosin system in T. brucei is highly dynamic. The obvious next step would be the acquisition of the dynamics of the different endosomal marker proteins and the cytoskeleton in vivo.

After confirming TbMyo1’s capability to translocate actin and characterising its localisation and overlap with actin, the final question was whether the actomyosin system played a role in maintaining the intricate and continuous nature of the endosomal network. EP1-GFP-expressing cells have previously served as a reliable tool for endosomal system analysis (Engstler and Boshart, 2004; Link et al., 2023). In this study, the response of these cells to LatA treatment was analysed to test the actomyosin system’s contribution to maintaining the integrity of endosomal membranes. Prolonged treatment led to an increasing proportion of cells exhibiting anomalous morphologies, including swelling of the endosomal membranes, and eventually culminating in a rounded cellular form.. The continued invagination of clathrin-coated vesicles at the flagellar pocket as well as the preserved Golgi ultrastructure in the experiment suggest a very precise role for the actomyosin system in T. brucei. This role is likely directly involved in maintaining the integrity of the endosomal system in BSF cells.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and cell lines

Trypanosoma brucei monomorphic BSF parasites (Lister strain 427, antigenic type MITat 1.2, clone 221) were cultured in HMI-9 medium (Hirumi and Hirumi, 1989) supplemented with 10 % foetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin. The single marker (SM) cells (Wirtz et al., 1999) were cultivated in the presence of G418 (2.5 μg/ml). For the fractionation experiments, the GFP^ESPro-221^ES.121^tet cell line was used (Batram et al., 2014). This cell line was cultured in the presence of blasticidin (5 μg/ml). Blasticidin was also used for growing the mNG-tagged TbMyo1 and TbMyo21 cells. The TbMyo1 and TbMyo21 RNAi cells were cultivated in the presence of G418 (2.5 μg/ml) and hygromycin (5 μg/ml). The 13-90 cells (Wirtz et al., 1999) used for immunogold experiments were cultivated using hygromycin (5 μg/ml) and G418 (2.5 μg/ml). The transgenic EP1::GFP cells were based on MITat1.2 expressing wild type cells and cultivated in the presence of hygromycin (5 μg/ml) and G418 (15 μg/ml) (Engstler and Boshart, 2004). The cells were maintained at 37 °C and 5 % CO₂ in cell culture flasks with filter lids (Greiner). The cells were split at regular intervals to keep the population density below 1×10⁶ cells/ml. Population density was monitored using a Z2 Coulter Counter (Beckman Coulter).

Generation of transgenic cell lines

mNG-tagged cells

The 3xTy1-mNG-3xTy1-tagged TbMyo1 and TbMyo21 cell lines were generated via endogenous replacement using a PCR tagging method in the wildtype strain 427 (Dean et al., 2015). For this, the pPOTv6-mNG-blast plasmid was used as the template DNA (Dean et al., 2015). This plasmid contains the sequences of the 3xTy1-mNG-3xTy1-tag and a blasticidin resistance gene. The forward primer contained the last 80 bp of the 3’ end of the 5’UTR and followed by 20 bp of the sequence just upstream of the blasticidin resistance gene start codon in the SK473 plasmid (from Susanne Kramer, University of Würzburg, based on the pPOTv6-mNG-blast plasmid). The reverse primer contained the first 80 bp of the target gene ORF of the TbMyo1 or TbMyo21 excluding the ATG in reverse complement and the last 18 bp of the 2nd 3xTy1-tag also in reverse complement.

RNAi cells

These cells were generated in the SM parental cell line (Wirtz et al., 1999) using the p2T7_TAblue plasmid (Alibu et al., 2005) as a vector. The RNAi target sequences were selected by entering the target gene ORF into the RNAit online tool (Redmond et al., 2003). The selected primer pairs flanked the base pairs 286 – 750 (TbMyo1) or 2137 – 2603 (TbMyo21) and also encoded homology arms for ligation into p2T7_TAblue. The RNAi target fragments were amplified by PCR from synthesised copies of TbMYO1 and TbMYO21 in a pUC57 plasmid (Eurogentec). The fragments were ligated into Eam1105I-cut p2T7_TAblue using in vivo assembly (IVA) (Watson and Garcia-Nafria, 2019). DNA sequencing was used to confirm correct incorporation of the inserts.

Actin chromobody cells

For the subcloning of the actin chromobody sequence from the pAC-TagRFP plasmid (ChromoTek, Germany) into the pLew100_v5_Hyg plasmid (Wirtz et al., 1999), primers were designed with complementary overhangs for in vivo assembly (Watson and Garcia-Nafria, 2019). The forward primer overhang sequence was homologous to bases upstream of the HindIII restriction site in the pLew100 plasmid, and the reverse primer overhang was homologous to bases downstream of the BamHI restriction site in the pLew100 plasmid. The second segment of the primers exhibited homology regions with the beginning and end of the actin chromobody sequence, respectively.

RNAi growth curves

RNAi cells were seeded at 5×10³ cells/ml in a volume of 22 ml and divided into two 10 ml aliquots in separate flasks. Tetracycline was added to a final concentration of 1 μg/ml in one flask to induce RNAi and refreshed every 24 h. The cells were split and reseeded after 48 h of induction. The population density of the control and induced TbMyo21 RNAi cells was measured every 24 h over a time course of 96 h using a Z2 Coulter Counter (Beckman Coulter).

Differentiation of BSF cells to PCF cells

2×10⁷ cells were grown to a high density (> 2×10⁶ cell/ml) and harvested by centrifugation (1,000 x g, 10 min, RT). The supernatant was discarded, and the cell pellet was resuspended in 5 ml DTM (Vassella and Boshart, 1996). One litre DTM medium contains 6.8 g NaCl, 0.4 g KCl, 0.2 g CaCl₂, 0.14 g NaH₂PO₄, 0.2 g MgSO₄, 7.94 g HEPES, 2.2 g NaHCO₃, 1 ml phenol red (10 mg/ml), 20 ml MEM amino acids solution 50x (ThermoFisher, ref.no. 11130036), 10 ml MEM non-essential amino acids solution 100x (ThermoFisher, ref.no. 11140035), 1.63 g L-glutamine, 0.293 g L-glutamic acid hydrochloride, 730 μl glycerol, 10 ml MEM vitamin solution 100x (ThermoFisher, ref.no. 11120037), 14 μl β-mercaptoethanol, 114 mg Na-pyruvate, 14 mg hypoxanthine, 28.2 mg bathocuproin, 7.5 mg hemin, 640 mg proline and 182 mg cysteine. The medium was prepared using ddH₂O and adjusted to pH 7.5. Afterwards, 150 ml heat-inactivated (1 hour, 56 °C) foetal calf serum (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was added, and the medium was sterilised by filtration. After the addition of cis-aconitate to a final concentration of 6 mM the cells were transferred into cell culture flasks and incubated overnight at 27 °C. Most cells had PCF morphology the next morning and could be cultivated in SDM79 media (Brun and Schonenberger, 1979) from that point onwards.

Expression and purification of full-length TbMyo1

Full-length TbMyo1 was cloned into the pFastBac1 expression vector, flanked by a N-terminal 6xHIS-tag for affinity purification and a C-terminal AviTag to allow biotinylation of the protein. The myosin heavy chain was co-expressed in the presence of human calmodulin using a baculoviral/Sf21 system (Batters et al., 2014). All remaining steps were performed at 4 °C. The pellet of 500 ml Sf21 cells was resuspended in lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 300 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM DTT, 2 mM ATP, 2 µM calmodulin, and EDTA-free protease inhibitor tablets (Roche)) and lysed by sonication (sonicator probe Bandelin HD 2070, 5 min total, at 50 % maximal power). The cell extract was centrifuged at 20,000 rpm in a JA 25.50 (Beckman) rotor for 30 min. The filtered lysate was then incubated for 30 min with 1 ml of equilibrated HIS-Select HF Ni-affinity gel (Sigma) and loaded onto a gravity flow column. The resin was washed 5 times with 3 ml of wash buffer (20 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM DTT, pH 7.4). Subsequently, myosin was eluted with 150 mM imidazole in wash buffer. All elution fractions were pooled, concentrated in a spin concentrator (50k MWOC Amicon) and biotinylated using the BirA enzyme (Gautier and Hinner, 2015). As a final purification step the biotinylated myosin sample was loaded onto a Superdex^® 200 10/300 column to perform size exclusion chromatography. Peak fractions were analysed using SDS-PAGE, pure fractions were pooled and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. The protein was stored at -80 °C.

Anti-TbMyo1 antibodies

Anti-TbMyo1 antibodies were generated by immunisation of two rabbits with purified recombinant TbMyo1 (amino acids 729–1,168) (Eurogentec). For recombinant protein expression the TbMyo1 tail was cloned into a pET-28a(+) vector including an N-terminal 6xHIS-tag. The protein was expressed in BL21 (DE3) E. coli cells for 4 h at 27 °C. Expression was induced with 1 mM of IPTG. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and dissolved in 30 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 40 mM imidazole, 1 mM DTT) and lysed by sonication (sonicator probe Bandeline HD 2070) for 5 min at 50% maximal power. The lysate was centrifuged at 20,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C in a JA 25.50 rotor (Beckman) and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.45 µm syringe filter. Subsequently, the supernatant was loaded onto an equilibrated 5 ml HisTrapFF column (GE healthcare) using an ÄKTA pure. After washing the column with lysis buffer, proteins were eluted using 200 mM imidazole in lysis buffer. Pure samples were pooled and concentrated using a spin concentrator (10K MWOC Amicon). As a final step, size exclusion chromatography was conducted. The protein sample was applied to a Superdex^® 200 10/300 GL column which was equilibrated in PBS, pure elution fractions were pooled, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C. After validation of specificity, the antisera were mixed in a 2:1 ratio and used as a cocktail in further experiments.

Previously published and commercial antibodies

The following primary antibodies have been described previously: mouse anti-Ty1 (“BB2”) (Bastin et al., 1996), mouse anti-PFR1,2 (“L13D6”) (Kohl et al., 1999), rabbit anti-GFP (Pelletier et al., 2002), rabbit anti-TbBiP (Bangs et al., 1993), mouse anti-p67 (Alexander et al., 2002), rabbit anti-GRASP (He et al., 2004), rat anti-TbRab5A, guinea pig anti-TbRab7 and guinea pig anti-TbRab11(Link et al., 2023)

The following antibodies came from commercial sources: goat anti-rabbit (IRDye800CW, LI-COR), goat anti-mouse (IRDye680LT, LI-COR), goat anti-rabbit and anti-mouse antibodies conjugated to AlexaFluor dyes (Molecular Probes).

Biochemical fractionation

The cell concentration of the GFP^ESPro-221^ES.121^tet and SM cell lines was measured using a Z2 Coulter Counter (Beckman Coulter). The two cell lines were used in a 2:1 ratio to dilute the GFP signal and transferred to 50 ml Falcon tubes and pelleted by centrifugation (1,000 x g, 10 min, RT). The supernatant was removed, and each cell pellet was resuspended in 500 μl vPBS and pooled into one single microfuge tube. The washed cells were pelleted again by centrifugation (1,000 x g, 2 min, RT). A second wash step with 1 ml vPBS was then carried out. After the second wash, the cell pellet was resuspended in 400 μl of 40 μg/ml ultra-pure digitonin (Merck, CAS 11024-24-1) in vPBS and incubated (25 min, RT). A 5 % (20 μl) input (I) sample was then taken. The mixture was then separated by centrifugation (750 x g, 5 min, RT) and 320 μl of the cytosolic fraction (SN1) was transferred to a fresh microfuge tube where a 5 % sample was taken. The cell pellet was then resuspended with 1 ml vPBS, and the extracted cells were again pelleted by centrifugation (750 x g, 5 min, RT). Afterwards, the extracted cells were resuspended in 400 μl lysis buffer (1 % IGEPAL, 0.1 M PIPES-NaOH pH 6.9, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgCl₂, 0.1 mM EDTA, EDTA-free protease inhibitor) and incubated 15 min at RT with 500 rpm agitation. Afterwards, a 5 % sample (P1) was taken, and the lysed cells were pelleted by centrifugation (3,400 x g, 2 min, RT). Next, 320 μl of the supernatant (SN2) was transferred to a fresh microfuge tube where a 5 % sample was taken. The cytoskeletal pellet was resuspended in 1 ml vPBS containing EDTA-free protease inhibitors (Roche) and centrifuged again (3,400 x g, 2 min, RT). The pellet (P2) was resuspended in 400 μl extraction buffer and a 5% sample was taken. SDS loading buffer was added to the 5% samples (I, SN1, P1, SN2, P2) to a final volume of 40 μl. The samples were boiled at 100 °C for 10 min and stored at – 20 °C prior to use.

Immunoblotting

For the preparation of whole cell lysates (WCL), cells were harvested by centrifugation (1,000 x g, 10 min) and the cell pellet was resuspended in 1 ml vPBS containing EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Roche). The cells were pelleted again by centrifugation (750 x g, 3 min, RT) and the supernatant was removed. SDS loading buffer was then added to a final concentration of 2 x 10⁵ cells/μl. The samples were further denatured by boiling (100 °C, 10 min) and stored at - 20 °C until use. SDS-PAGE was carried out using a Mini-PROTEAN® Tetra cell (Bio-Rad), and transfer to nitrocellulose membranes was done using a mini-Trans blot cell (Bio-Rad), both according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Protein transfer and equal loading were confirmed using a REVERT total protein stain (LI-COR) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Membranes were blocked using blocking buffer (PBS, 0.3 % (v/v) Tween 20, 10 % (w/v) milk) (30 min, RT, rocker). The membranes were then incubated in primary antibodies diluted in blocking buffer (1 h, RT, roller). After three washes in immunoblot buffer (PBS, 0.3 % Tween 20) the membranes were incubated with IRDye-conjugated secondary antibodies diluted in immunoblot buffer (1 h, RT, roller). After another three washes in immunoblot buffer, the membranes were visualised using an Odyssey CLx (LI-COR).

Actin filament gliding assay

Motility assay procedures were adapted from those described by (Kron et al., 1991). Clean glass coverslips 24 x 50 mm (VWR) were functionalised with a mixture of mPEG-silane MW 2,000 and biotin-PEG-silane MW 3400 (Laysan Bio). In brief, both were dissolved in 80 % ethanol pH 2.0 and mixed in a 20:1 ratio. 100 µl of the PEG-biotin solution was spread on each coverslip and incubated for 30 min at 70 °C. Afterwards the coverslips were washed with ethanol, dried under an air stream, and flow chambers were assembled. C-terminal biotinylated myosin was specifically bound via streptavidin to the functionalised glass surface. Subsequently, the surface of the experimental chamber was blocked with 0.5 mg/ml BSA in assay buffer (25 mM imidazole, 25 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM EGTA, pH 7.4) for 3 min. After washing the chamber with assay buffer, Alexa488-phalloidin-labelled rabbit skeletal actin filaments were introduced into the flow cell. The assay was started by adding 2 mM ATP in the assay buffer containing a scavenger system (10 mM DTT, 0.01 mg/ml catalase, 0.05 mg/ml glucose oxidase, 1.5 mg/ml glucose) to prevent photobleaching of the fluorescent actin filaments. Actin filaments were recorded by fluorescence imaging using a 488 nm laser (40 mW) and images were taken every 1 s with an EMCCD (Andor iXon3) camera using a Nikon Ti-Eclipse microscope in TIRF mode. Moving filaments were tracked and analysed using the ImageJ plugin MTrackJ and Origin.

Preparation of samples for immunofluorescence microscopy

Coverslips were washed in 70 % ethanol and then coated with 0.01 % poly-L-lysine in a 24-well plate (> 20 min, RT) and left to dry. 2×10⁶ cells were taken per coverslip and transferred to 15 ml Falcon tubes. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation (1000 x g, 1 min per ml of liquid, RT) in a swing-bucket centrifuge. The supernatant was removed, and the cell pellet was gently resuspended in 1 ml ice-cold vPBS containing EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Roche). The cells were again pelleted by centrifugation (1000 x g, 2 min, RT) and subsequently resuspended in 0.5 ml ice-cold vPBS containing EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Roche). 0.5 ml ice-cold 8 % (v/v) paraformaldehyde solution in vPBS containing EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Roche) or ice-cold 8% (v/v) paraformaldehyde solution/ 0.2% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in vPBS containing EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Roche) was added to the resuspended cells. Glutaraldehyde was omitted if a subsequent antibody labelling was performed. The suspension was mixed 1-2 times by inversion and was placed on ice for 10 min. The cells were then moved to RT and were incubated for a further 30 min. Afterwards, the fixed cells were centrifuged at 1000 x g for 2 min at RT. The supernatant was removed, and the fixed cells were then resuspended in 1 ml RT vPBS containing EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Roche). The cells were attached to the coverslips by centrifugation (1000 x g, 1 min, RT); attachment was confirmed visually. If the cells were fixed with 4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde solution and 0.1% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in vPBS containing EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Roche), the coverslips were directly mounted on glass slides after cell attachment. Cells which were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde solution in vPBS containing EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Roche) were first incubated with 0.25 % (v/v) TritonX-100 in PBS for 5 min at RT to permeabilise the cells. The coverslips were blocked in 1 ml 3 % (w/v) BSA in PBS (30 min, RT), and sequentially incubated with clarified primary and secondary antibodies diluted in PBS (1 h, RT, humidified chamber for each) with three PBS washing steps (3 x 5 min, RT, rocker) after each incubation. After the final wash, glass slides were cleaned with 70 % ethanol and a spot of DAPI-Fluoromount (Southern Biotech) was placed on the surface. The coverslips were rinsed in ddH₂O, carefully dried, and then mounted. For preparation of samples for SIM imaging, different coverslips (high precision, No. 1.5 H) were used. Cells were harvested as above, washed, and fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde solution (10 min, ice then 30 min, RT). The fixed cells were washed, attached to coverslips, permeabilised (0.25 % Triton X-100 in PBS; 5 min, RT), and then labelled and mounted as described above.

Expansion microscopy

Cells were initially prepared in the same way as for immunofluorescence microscopy. After the incubation with secondary antibodies and washing, 1 ml 25 mM MA-NHS (bifunctional cross-linker, prepared immediately prior to use) was added to the coverslips (Truckenbrodt et al., 2019). The coverslips were then incubated on a rocker (30 min, RT). MA-NHS was removed, and the coverslips were washed with 1 ml PBS. To allow cells to equilibrate in the monomer solution (8.625 % (w/v) sodium acrylate, 20 % (w/v) acrylamide, 0.075 % (w/v) bisacrylamide, 2 M NaCl in PBS), 1 ml was added and incubated for 5 min at RT. 100 μl of monomer solution, supplemented with 2 μl 10 % (v/v) APS and 2 μl 10 % (v/v) TEMED, was briefly vortexed and a 70 μl drop was placed on a piece of parafilm. Coverslips were transferred with cells facing down onto the drop. The polymerisation was allowed to proceed for 20 minutes at RT in the dark. The resulting gel was peeled off the parafilm and transferred into a 12-well plate, with the coverslip at the bottom. For digestion, 1 ml digestion buffer (0.8 M guanidine HCl, 0.5 % (v/v) Triton X-100, 1 x TAE buffer) was mixed with 10 μl proteinase K (6 U/ ml) and added to gels. Digestion was carried out at 37 °C overnight in the dark. Gels were transferred into 10 cm petri dishes. For expansion, ddH₂O (∼ 50 ml) was added until the gels were completely covered. The gels were incubated in the dark at RT for 3 h. The water was changed every hour. To stain nucleic acids, gels were placed in water containing DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 5 mg/ml) at a 1:1000 dilution and incubated for 30 minutes in the dark. Water was removed as much as possible, and the diameters of the gels were measured with a ruler to estimate expansion. Gels were cut into rectangular pieces using a razor blade (∼ 1 cm²) and transferred into an imaging chamber. A 35 mm glass bottom dish was used as an imaging chamber (Glass Bottom Dish, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The dish was first cleaned with 100 % EtOH. The bottom was covered with 1 ml 0.1 % (v/v) Poly-L-Lysine and incubated for 1 h. Chambers were allowed to air-dry after the lysine was removed.

Fluorescence microscopy

Images were acquired using a DMI6000B widefield microscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany) with a HCX PL APO CS objective (100x, NA = 1.4, Leica Microsystems, Germany) and Type F Immersion Oil (refractive index = 1.518, Leica Microsystems, Germany). The microscope was controlled using LAS-X software (Leica). Samples were illuminated with an EL6000 light source (Leica) containing a mercury short-arc reflector lamp (HXP-R120W/45C VIS, OSRAM, Germany). Excitation light was selected by using Y3 (545/25 nm), GFP (470/40 nm), and A4 (360/40 nm) bandpass filter cubes (Leica Microsystems, Germany). The power density, measured at the objective focal plane with a thermal sensor head (S175C, Thorlabs), was respectively 0.749 ± 0.086, 0.557 ± 0.069, 0.278 ± 0.076 W/cm2 for the three filters. Emitted light was collected at ranges of 605/70 (Y3), 525/50 nm (GFP), and 470/40 nm (DAPI). The individual exposure times and camera gains were adjusted according to the different samples. The mNG-tagged samples required extremely long exposure times (2 s per z-section). RNAi samples (induced and control) were imaged using identical settings. Differential interference contrast (DIC) was used to visualise cell morphology. 3D recordings of each field of view were obtained using 40 Z-slices (step size = 0.21 μm). Fields of view were selected in the DIC channel in order to blind the user to the fluorescence signal and subjectively select for cells with optimum morphology. Images were captured using a DFC365 FX monochrome CCD camera (Leica, 6.45 μm pixel size). Structured illumination microscopy (SIM) images were acquired using an Elyra S.1 SIM microscope (63x oil objective, NA = 1.4, Zeiss, Germany) controlled by ZEN software (Zeiss, Germany). The microscope was equipped with a sCMOS camera PCO Edge 5.5 (Excelitas PCO GmbH, Germany).

Cargo uptake assays

BSA uptake

Cells (2×10⁶ cells per coverslip for widefield microscopy, 1×10⁸ for electron microscopy) were harvested by centrifugation (1000 x g, 10 min, 4 °C) and washed in 1 ml ice-cold Voorheis’ modified PBS (vPBS; PBS, 46 mM sucrose, 10 mM glucose). The washed cells were pelleted by centrifugation (750 x g, 2 min, 4 °C), and resuspended in 100 μl ice-cold vPBS. The cells were then incubated at low temperature (10 min, ice) to block endocytosis. During this incubation, the labelled BSA (AlexaFluor555 conjugate, Molecular Probes; Alexa555-BSA-Au, UMC Utrecht) was clarified by centrifugation (750 x g, 1 min, RT) and kept on ice in the dark. While for widefield microscopy experiments Alexa555-BSA was added to a final concentration of 600 μg/ml, for electron microscopy experiments Alexa555-BSA-5nm-gold conjugate was added to a final OD = 5. Afterwards, the samples were incubated at low temperature (15 min, on ice, in the dark) to allow the BSA to enter the flagellar pocket. The following temperature shift and additional incubation allowed the endocytosis of BSA (15 min or 30 min, 37 °C, in the dark). To quench the reaction, 1 ml ice-cold vPBS was added. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation (750 x g, 2 min, 4 °C) and resuspended in 50 μl vPBS containing EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Roche). The cells were fixed by addition of 0.5 ml ice-cold fixation solution (4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde solution and 0.1% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in vPBS for widefield microscopy, 2% (v/v) paraformaldehyde solution and 0.2% (v/v) glutaraldehyde for electron microscopy) (20 min, on ice, in the dark), followed by a 30 min (widefield microscopy) or 2 h (electron microscopy) incubation at RT (in the dark). Afterwards, the cells were pelleted by centrifugation (750 x g, 2 min, RT) and washed in 4 ml vPBS containing EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Roche). The washed cells were again pelleted by centrifugation (750 x g, 4 min, RT), resuspended in 1 ml vPBS containing EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Roche) and – for widefield microscopy - attached to the poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips by centrifugation (750 x g, 1 min, RT). The coverslips were then mounted on glass slides using DAPI-Fluoromount (Southern Biotech) and imaged immediately. For electron microscopy, the cells were further treated as explained in the sample embedding and immuno-electron microscopy section.

Transferrin uptake

In general, most preparation steps were performed in the same way as for BSA uptake (see above). After the first washing step, however, the cells were resuspended in 1 ml RT vPBS and incubated (15 min, 37 °C) to allow the internalisation of surface-bound transferrin from the cell culture media. Afterwards, the cells were pelleted by centrifugation (1,000 x g, 2 min, 4 °C) and resuspended in 50 μl ice-cold vPBS, then incubated at low temperature (10 min, on ice) to block endocytosis. After this incubation time, 0.5 μl of 5 mg/ml transferrin (Tetramethylrhodamine conjugate, ThermoFisher Scientific) was added, mixed by flicking, and incubated (15 min, on ice, in the dark) to allow the transferrin to enter the flagellar pocket. The subsequent temperature shift (30 min, 37 °C, in the dark), fixation, washing step, attachment to the coverslips and mounting onto the glass slides were performed as described in the BSA uptake method (see above). The samples were imaged immediately.

Sample embedding for electron microscopy

For Tokuyasu immuno-EM, sample preparation and sectioning were performed as previously described (Link et al., 2023). In brief, 1×10⁸ cells were harvested by centrifugation (1500 x g, 10 min, 37 °C) and washed with 1 ml trypanosome dilution buffer (TDB; 5 mM KCl, 80 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgSO₄, 20 mM Na₂HPO₄, 2 mM NaH₂PO₄, 20 mM glucose). Cells were fixed by adding 4 % (v/v) formaldehyde and 0.4 % (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M PHEM buffer (120 mM PIPES, 50 mM HEPES, 4 mM MgCl₂, 20 mM EGTA, adjusted to pH 6.9 with 1 M NaOH) 1:1 to TDB. After 5 min the fixatives were replaced with 2 % (v/v) formaldehyde and 0.2 % (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PHEM for 2 hours at RT. Fixatives were removed by washing and quenched with PBS + 0.15 % (w/v) glycine. Cells were pelleted and resuspended in 200 μl 12 % gelatine (Rousselot 250 LP30) in 0.1 M PHEM at 37 °C and pelleted again. The pellets were frozen on ice, cut into smaller blocks, and infused with 2.3 M sucrose overnight at 4 °C. The infused blocks were mounted on metal pins and stored in liquid nitrogen. The gelatine-embedded cells were cryosectioned to 55 nm or 100 nm thick sections at -120 °C or -100 °C, respectively, using a DiATOME diamond knife in a Leica ultracut cryomicrotome (UC7). Sections were picked up and deposited on formvar- and carbon-coated grids using 2.3 M sucrose and 1.8 % (v/v) methylcellulose (MC, Sigma M6385 25 centipoises) mixed 1:1.

For high pressure freezing, cells were grown to a density of 1×10⁶ cells/ml in 50 ml, incubated with LatA for 30 – 60 min and harvested by centrifugation (1000 x g, 10 min, RT). The supernatant was removed to 4 ml, and 4 ml foetal bovine serum was added. The cells were pelleted again (1000 x g, 10 min, RT) and the supernatant was removed to 200 μl. The cells were resuspended in the supernatant, and the suspension was then transferred to a PCR tube and the cells pelleted by centrifugation (1,600 x g, 10 s, RT). The cells were then transferred into a carrier with a closed lid to avoid air inclusions. High pressure freezing (HPF) was started immediately using a Leica EM HPM100. After HPF the samples were transferred to an advanced freeze substitution machine (Leica EM AFS2). Low temperature embedding and polymerisation of Epon raisin (DDSA, MNA, Epon812, 2,4,6 Tris(dimethylaminomethyl(phenol))) were then carried out. Ultra-thin cuts (60 nm) were obtained with an ultramicrotome (Leica EM UC7/FC7) and were placed on slotted grids. For contrasting, the slices were incubated in 2 % uranyl acetate for 10 min. Afterwards the grids were washed 3x in ddH₂O (boiled to remove CO2) and incubated for 5 min on 50 % Reynold’s lead citrate in a petri dish with NaOH tablets. The grids were again washed 2 x in ddH₂O, dried and stored at RT until imaging.

Immuno-electron microscopy

Grids with sections facing down were incubated in a 24-well plate with 2 ml PBS at 37 °C for 30 – 60 min to remove gelatine, 2.3 M sucrose and 1.8 % (v/v) MC mixture. Afterwards, the grids were washed on ∼ 100 μl drops of PBS + 0.15 % (w/v) glycine and PBS on parafilm at RT (both 3 x 5 min). 100 μl drops represent the standard volume for all non-antibody related steps. Next, blocking was performed in PBS + 0.1 % (v/v) acetylated BSA (BSA-c) + 0.5 % (w/v) cold fish-skin gelatine (FSG) for 30 min. The following primary antibody incubation was done for 1 – 2 hours in PBS + 0.1 % BSA-c + 0.5 % FSG. Afterwards, grids were washed 5 x 5 min with PBS + 0.1 % BSA-c + 0.5 % FSG and incubated with corresponding gold or fluorophore-coupled secondary antibodies for 1 – 2 hours. Further washing steps with PBS + 0.1 % BSA-c + 0.5 % FSG (3 x 5 min) and PBS (3 x 5 min) followed before all remaining antibodies were fixed with 1.25 % glutaraldehyde for 5 min at RT. After three washing steps with ddH₂O to remove phosphate from the grids, the grids were differently treated if an immunogold or a CLEM assay was performed. For CLEM assays the grids were mounted with ProLong™ Diamond Antifade with DAPI (Life Technologies) between a coverslip and glass slide and imaged using a DMI6000B widefield microscope as described above. Afterwards, the grids were unmounted and washed five times with ddH₂O. Then (for immunogold and CLEM assay), the sample contrast was increased by 5 min incubation on 2 % (v/v) uranyl acetate (UA) in water (pH 7) and 7 min incubation on 1.8 % (v/v) methyl cellulose (MC)/0.3 % (v/v) UA in water (pH 4) (both on ice). Grids were looped out with a metal ring and excess MC/UA was removed with filter paper. Grids were dried for at least 30 min at RT in the metal ring. Grids treated in this way can be stored indefinitely and imaged on an electron microscope when desired.

Electron Microscope

A JEOL JEM-1400 Flash scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) was operated at 120 kV with camera system: Matataki Flash 2k x 2k.

Flow cytometry

Tetracycline-induced and -uninduced cells (1×10⁶ per sample) were harvested (1500 x g, 3 min, RT), resuspended in 1 ml filtered vPBS, and stored on ice until usage. The fluorescence intensity measurements were carried out with FACSCalibur (BD Bioscience). For the measurement of the fluorescence intensity of the samples the fluorescence channel FL2-H (filter range 564-601 nm) was selected to detect the fluorescence intensity of anti-actin TagRFP signal (detection wavelength 588 nm). The data was visualised using the flow cytometry software BD CellQuest™ Pro.

Latrunculin A treatment

Uninduced and induced samples were treated with either 0.2 μM or 2 μM Latrunculin A in DMSO (Sigma, CAS 76343-93-6) up to 4 h at 37 °C. After the Latrunculin treatment, untreated and treated cells were fixed using 4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde solution and 0.1% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in vPBS, attached to coverslips and mounted onto the glass slides as described in the preparation for immunofluorescence microscopy section. The samples were imaged immediately.

Data analysis

Image processing

The microscopy images were processed using FiJi (Schindelin et al., 2012) and a macro was used to generate maximum-intensity projections is a semi-automated workflow (Tim Krüger, University of Würzburg).

Quantification analysis

The immunoblotting results were qualitatively analysed using Image Studio Lite (LI-COR Biosciences). Background subtraction and signal measurement were carried out using Empiria Studio (LI-COR Biosciences). Normalisation against the Total Protein Stain and quantification were completed using Microsoft Excel. Dot plots were created using the web app PlotsOfData (Postma and Goedhart, 2019).

Correlation analysis

The correlation analysis was done using FiJi (Schindelin et al., 2012) and a macro for pre-processing the raw data. For this, single cells were selected by using the raw data. Only 1K1N cells were chosen by using the DIC and the blue channel which shows the nucleus and the kinetoplast. The cells were cropped by a square of 130×130 pixels and saved as .tif files. Afterwards, a standardised background noise reduction of the red and green channel using the BioVoxxel ‘Convoluted Background Subtraction’ plugin was performed. Macros used for opening Bio-Format files were modified from Dr. Jan Brocher/BioVoxxel. Firstly, sum slices projections were prepared and converted to 8-bit images. For the subtraction, the median convolution filter with specific radii was chosen, the radius was selected so that only the signal with the highest intensity was visible. The two channels (green and red) were saved in separate folders. A 2D colocalisation macro was carried out on these images. This macro was adapted from one designed by Zhang & Cordelières (Zhang and Cordelières, 2016). Based on the cytofluorograms generated by this macro, the correlation method was chosen as the Spearman’s rank. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient of each image and marker was copied into an Excel spreadsheet. A dot plot of the results was generated using GraphPad Prism.

CLEM analysis

The ec-CLEM plug-in in Icy was used for the initial correlation (Paul-Gilloteaux et al., 2017). Adobe Photoshop was used to generate the final overlay of the images.

Acknowledgements

Thanks go to the Cell Microscopy Core of UMC Utrecht for their workshop “Cryosectioning and immuno-electron microscopy” and training Fabian Link in the Tokuyasu technique. Katy Schmidt (University of Vienna) provided feedback regarding electron microscopy techniques. Elisabeth Meyer-Natus, Daniela Bunsen, Claudia Gehring-Höhn and Christian Stigloher provided help with the electron microscopy benchwork and assistance with the electron microscope. Nicolas Hagedorn assisted with the flow cytometry experiments. Chris de Graffenried (Brown University) provided protocols and advice on expansion microscopy. Derek Nolan (Trinity College, Dublin) very generously shared unpublished data on TbMyo21 and provided feedback and advice. Thanks also go to Tom Beneke, Nicola Jones, and Susanne Kramer for proofreading and providing feedback on the manuscript.

Non-commercial antibodies were obtained from the following sources: Cynthia He (National University of Singapore) provided the anti-Ty1 (BB2) antibodies; Keith Gull (University of Oxford) provided the anti-PFR1,2 (L13D6) antibodies, James Bangs (University of Buffalo) provided the anti-p67 and anti-BiP antibodies.

Funding

Alyssa Borges was supported by the Brazilian agency CAPES (program: CAPES/DAAD—Call No. 22/2018; process 88881.199683/2018-01). Markus Engstler was supported by DFG grants EN305, SPP1726 (Microswimmers—From Single Particle Motion to Collective Behaviour), GIF grant I-473-416.13/2018 (Effect of extracellular Trypanosoma brucei vesicles on collective and social parasite motility and development in the tsetse fly) and GRK2157 (3D Tissue Models to Study Microbial Infections by Obligate Human Pathogens), the EU ITN Physics of Motility, and the BMBF NUM Organo-Strat. Markus Engstler is a member of the Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen Center for Complex Material Systems (RCCM). Claudia Veigel was supported by DFG grants SFB 863 (B6), SFB 1032 (B1) and Friedrich Baur Stiftung. The transmission electron microscope was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – 426173797 (INST 93/1003-1 FUGG). This work was funded by remaining money from DFG grant MO 3188/2-1 to Brooke Morriswood.

Supplementary information

Figure S1. Generation and validation of TbMyo1 antibodies and cell lines. (A) Schematic of the TbMyo1 in situ tagging construct integrated into the genome. The construct encoded the 3’ end of the TbMYO1 5’ UTR, a blasticidin (BlaR) resistance gene, the alpha/beta tubulin intergenic region (IR), the mNG gene flanked by two 3xTy1 epitope tags, and the 5’ end of the TbMYO1 ORF. The sizes of the various elements are shown in the schematic. The 83 bp labels indicate the homology arms that drive homologous recombination at the MYO1 locus. The annealing sites of the two primers used to confirm integration at the endogenous MYO1 locus (Bla-F, Myo1-R) are indicated with arrows. Note that the schematic elements are not shown to scale. (B) Correct integration of the TbMyo1 tagging construct at the endogenous locus. The gDNA of wild-type (427) and 3 candidate mNG-TbMyo1 clones (C1 - C3) was purified and analysed by PCR. The annealing sites of the PCR primers are shown in panel A above. No product was observed for the wild-type control. An ∼ 1700 bp product was obtained from the three mNG-TbMyo1 candidates, indicating correct integration. (C) Expression of mNG- TbMyo1. Whole-cell lysates from the three mNG-TbMyo1 clones and a wild-type control were prepared and analysed by immunoblotting. Anti-TbMyo1(2411) was used as a primary antibody; anti-TbPFR1,2 (L13D6) antibodies were used to detect the housekeeping proteins PFR1,2. The endogenous TbMyo1 signal (green) was visible in all lanes at ∼130 kDa; C1, C2 and C3 additionally expressed an ∼ 170 kDa protein, matching the size of the mNG-TbMyo1. (D) Validation of anti-TbMyo1 specificity. Whole cell lysates from four different cell lines (wild-type (427), single marker (SM), mNG-TbMyo1 (mNG), TbMyo1 RNAi) were immunoblotted with two anti-TbMyo1 antisera (2411, 2412). The TbMyo1 RNAi lysates were obtained from uninduced (-Tet) and tetracycline-induced (+Tet) samples. TbPFR1,2 was used as a loading control. Both antisera were able to detect the endogenous TbMyo1 protein at ∼ 130 kDa. The signal intensities of the 427 cells and the single marker (SM) ones were almost equal, independent of which antiserum was used. An additional band at ∼ 170 kDa was observed in the mNG-TbMyo1 samples. This upper band could also be detected using anti-Ty1 antibodies (right-hand image). In the RNAi-induced (+ Tet) cells, the signal from both antisera was weaker. (E) Strong overlap between endogenous and mNG-tagged TbMyo1. The mNG-TbMyo1 clones were fixed, labelled with anti-TbMyo1 antibodies (magenta), and imaged using widefield microscopy. DNA (cyan) was stained using DAPI. Both the mNG-TbMyo1 (green) and the endogenous protein were exclusively localised to the posterior region of the cells. Identical results were obtained using anti-Ty1 antibodies to label the mNG-TbMyo1. The same pattern was observed in all three clones; an exemplary image is shown. (F) Depletion of TbMyo1 results in a loss of signal and morphological changes. TbMyo1 RNAi cells were induced for 48h, fixed, and labelled with anti-TbMyo1 antibodies (magenta). DNA was stained with DAPI (cyan). Control cells showed an intense signal of TbMyo1 (magenta) between the nucleus and the kinetoplast. Induced cells showed a nearly complete loss of the signal, with a small degree of clone-to-clone variation. The morphology of the TbMyo1-depleted cells changed dramatically, with some cells developing a ‘Big Eye’ phenotype. The same results were obtained with three separate clones; an exemplary image is shown.

Figure S2. TbMyo21 is expressed at an extremely low level. (A) Generation of mNG-tagged TbMyo21 cell line. Schematic of the TbMyo21 in situ tagging construct integrated into the genome. The construct encoded the 3’ end of the TbMYO21 5’ UTR, a blasticidin (BlaR) resistance gene, the alpha/beta tubulin intergenic region (IR), the mNG gene flanked by two 3xTy1 epitope tags, and the 5’ end of the TbMYO21 ORF. The sizes of the various elements are shown in the schematic. The 83 bp labels indicate the homology arms that drive homologous recombination at the MYO21 locus. The annealing sites of the primers used to confirm integration at the endogenous MYO21 locus (Bla-F, Myo21-R) are indicated with arrows. Note that the schematic elements are not shown to scale. (B) Correct integration of the TbMyo21 tagging construct at the endogenous locus. The gDNA of wild-type (427) and 3 candidate mNG-TbMyo1 clones (C1 - C3) was purified and analysed by PCR. The annealing sites of the PCR primers are shown in panel A. No product was observed for the wild-type control (427). An ∼ 2000 bp product was obtained from the three mNG-TbMyo21 candidates, indicating correct integration. (C) mNG-TbMyo21 is expressed at a very low level relative to TbMyo1. Whole-cell lysates from a wild-type control, the mNG-TbMyo1 cell line, and the mNG-TbMyo21 cell line were prepared and analysed by immunoblotting. The endogenous TbMyo1 signal (green) was visible at ∼130 kDa; the mNG-TbMyo1 cell line additionally expressed an ∼ 170 kDa protein, corresponding to mNG-TbMyo1. The anti-Ty1 antibody signal (magenta) required an overexposure (right hand image) to visualise the mNG-TbMyo21 band at ∼ 160 kDa (boxed area). (D) TbMyo21 expression levels are equally low in bloodstream form (BSF) and procyclic form (PCF) cells. Whole-cell lysates from the mNG-TbMyo21 cell line and a wild-type control were prepared before and after differentiation to PCF cells and analysed by immunoblotting. A whole-cell lysate from BSF mNG-TbMyo1 cells served as a positive control. The anti-Ty1 antibody signal (magenta) was only visible in the mNG-TbMyo1 cell line at ∼ 170 kDa (left-hand image). The anti-Ty1 signal required an overexposure to visualise an mNG-TbMyo21 band at ∼ 160 kDa (right-hand image). (E) TbMyo1 expression is downregulated after differentiation to PCF cells. The whole-cell lysates from BSF mNG-TbMyo1 cells and both BSF and PCF wild-type cells were analysed by immunoblotting. The endogenous TbMyo1 signal (green) was visible in all lanes at ∼130 kDa; the mNG-TbMyo1 cell line additionally expressed an ∼ 170 kDa protein, matching the size of the mNG-TbMyo1. The TbMyo1 signal in PCF cells showed less than 50% signal intensity compared to BSF cells. (F) TbMyo21 does not appear to be essential for growth in vitro. The cell population density of TbMyo21 RNAi cells was measured for 96 hours in tetracycline uninduced (-Tet) and induced (+Tet) conditions. The cells were diluted after 48 hours to ensure logarithmical growth. Results from three independent experiments using three separate clones are shown; data points are mean +/-standard deviation.

Figure S3. TbMyo1 is associated with early and late endosomes. (A) TbMyo1 signals partially overlap with TbRab5A and TbRab7 signals, but not with TbRab11 signals. Colocalisation experiments were conducted using chemically fixed mNG-TbMyo1 cells, labelled with antibodies against TbRab5A, 7, or 11 and imaged using widefield microscopy. The fluorescence signals for TbRab5A (I, magenta), TbRab7 (II, magenta), TbRab11 (III, magenta) and TbMyo1 (I – III, green) were localised between the kinetoplast (K) and the nucleus (N) of the cells. DNA was stained using DAPI (I – III, cyan). Exemplary cells from four independent experiments are shown. (B) Quantification of correlation between TbMyo1 and TbRab signals. Correlation was estimated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (TbRab5A/TbMyo1, n = 66; TbRab7/TbMyo1, n = 73; TbRab11/TbMyo1, n = 86). Red bars indicate the median R; median R values for each pair are shown above the dot plot. (C) Electron micrographs of cryosections colabelled with anti-TbMyo1 and anti-TbRab5A or anti-TbRab7 antibodies. For each panel a raw and a pseudocoloured version of the image are presented. Endosomal membranes are coloured green. The lysosome is coloured brown. Gold particles corresponding to TbMyo1 signals are outlined in green. Gold particles corresponding to TbRab5A or TbRab7 signals are outlined in magenta. Exemplary cells from a single labelling experiment are shown.

Figure S4. Generation and validation of the anti-actin chromobody cell line. (A) Integration of the anti-actin TagRFP chromobody construct. The gDNA of wild-type (SM) and 3 candidate clones (C1, C2, C4) was purified and analysed by PCR using primers specific for the chromobody. No product was observed for the wild-type control. An ∼ 1200 bp product was obtained from the three candidates, indicating integration into the genome. (B) Tight and inducible expression of the anti-actin TagRFP chromobody. Whole-cell lysates from the three clones (tetracycline-induced and -uninduced) and a wild-type control (SM) were prepared and analysed by immunoblotting, using anti-RFP antibodies. No signal was detected in the control sample and in the uninduced (-) chromobody clones. In the induced (+) samples, a protein band at ∼40 kDa was detected in all three clones. The expected size of the anti-actin chromobody is 41.5 kDa. (C) Varying anti-actin TagRFP chromobody expression levels in the three clones. The three clones (C1, C2, C4) were analysed 24 hours after induction with tetracycline and RFP signal was measured using flow cytometry. Wild-type cells (SM) served as a control. All clones showed a significant increase in fluorescence counts in the RFP channel relative to control cells, with some clone-to-clone variation in expression levels.

Video S1. TbMyo1 translocate filamentous actin in vitro. Rhodamine-phalloidin-stained actin filaments gliding over a coverslip decorated with full-length TbMyo1 molecules. Buffer contained 2 mM ATP. Images were acquired at a rate of 1 frame/s. Playback rate 50 frames/s. Scale bar 5 μm.