Rice phenotypes across host-mediated selection generations. (A) Representative images of Rice Field selection line plants in the first (SG1) and last (SG6) selection generations at 1, 5, and 10 days after drought. NDVI values are shown in the bottom left corner of each image. (B) Drought tolerance, quantified as the area under the curve of NDVI values (AUC NDVI), significantly improved for all soil treatments except Serpentine Seep. Here, we show data for all selection lines combined (gray bars) and assessed the response of AUC NDVI to generation via linear mixed effects models (formula = AUC NDVI ∼ generation + (1|selection line); Rice Field: β=0.17, t = 28.8, p < 2e-16; Desert: β=0.19, t = 14.1, p < 2e-16; Serpentine Seep: β=-0.003, t = - 0.3, p = NS; Calcined Clay: β=0.17, t = 8.7, p < 0.001). Filled bars represent the mean AUC NDVI value of all selection line (SL) plants +/- one standard error; white, unfilled bars are data for sterile-inoculated (SI) plants. Because selection lines were independent of one another, we also tested them individually via OLS regression: all selection lines of Rice Field (6/6), Desert (6/6), and Calcined Clay (3/3) significantly improved over time; Serpentine Seep included selection lines that both significantly improved (2/6) and worsened (2/6) (Supplemental Figure 3). (C) Shoot dry weight biomass also significantly increased across selection generations for all soil treatments, except Serpentine Seep (Rice Field: β=0.02, t =7.0, p < 2e-16; Desert: β=0.06, t =11.6, p < 2e-16; Serpentine Seep: β=0.006, t =1.2, p = NS; Calcined Clay: β=0.05, t =10.3, p < 2e-16). Tested individually, all selection lines of Rice Field (6/6) and Calcined Clay (3/3) significantly improved over time; most Desert selection lines (5/6) significantly improved; Serpentine Seep included one selection line that significantly increased (1/6) and one that significantly decreased (1/6) (Supplemental Figure 3).