Changes in the proteome of RPS26-deficient cells are not robust.
(A) The volcano plot represents a stable isotope labeling using amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)-based quantitative proteomic analysis identifying proteins sensitive to RPS26 insufficiency. It shows the magnitude of protein-level changes (log2 fold change) vs. the statistical significance (−log P-value) 48h post siRPS26 treatment. Data were collected from three independent biological replicates for each group. Grey dots indicate proteins non-responding to RPS26 depletion (N = 1506). Red dots indicate proteins responding to RPS26 insufficiency (P < 0.05); EIF5 and PDCD4 are examples of Negative (N = 223; green) and Positive (N = 158; orange) responders, respectively. Protein groups were further analyzed in B, C, and D.
(B) Gene ontology (GO) analysis performed for positive responders of RPS26 insufficiency from the proteomic experiment shown in A. The graph presents significantly enriched GO terms (P < 0.05); statistical significance was calculated using Fisher’s Exact test with the Bonferroni correction. Note that for negative responders, no GO terms were significantly enriched.
(C) Data validation from the proteomic experiment described in A. Western blot analyses of PDCD4, ILF3, FMRP, and EIF5 proteins normalized to Vinculin for HEK293 cells treated with siRPS26. The graphs present means from N = 4 biologically independent samples with SDs. An unpaired Student’s t-test was used to calculate statistical significance: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns, non-significant.
(D) The percentage of GC content in 5’UTRs and coding sequences across extending sequence windows initiated from the start codon within three groups of transcripts: Negative responders (green), Positive responders (orange), and Background (BG) understood as the total transcriptome (red). To avoid biases in the GC-content mean, transcripts with 5’UTR sequences shorter than 20 nucleotides were excluded from the analysis, yielding the following sample sizes: Negative responders (N = 213), Positive responders (N = 147), and BG (N = 20,862). For example, position −6 in 5’ UTR sequences corresponds to a 6-nucleotide fragment (window from −6 to −1 positions upstream of ATG), while position −7 corresponds to a 7-nucleotide fragment (window from −7 to −1 positions). The solid line shows the mean GC content at a given position (i.e., within the window), and the shade indicates the standard error of the mean. P-values < 0.01 are denoted by green or yellow dots. These reflect pairwise comparisons of GC content between transcript groups (compared to BG) and were determined using a two-tailed paired t-test with Bonferroni correction.