Local GABA concentration is related to network-level resting functional connectivity
Figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ca22/2ca2237e6d27fcd4e7ef8d69bd4bc2e26ac51e00" alt=""
Representative MR spectra.
(A) A subject with a high GABA:NAA ratio. (B) A subject with a low GABA:NAA ratio.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c107/1c1079b057fb2edab475c3406aa4691d0df2691b" alt=""
(A) Group mean motor resting state network. (B) Group mean default mode network. (C–E) Experiment 1: a significant relationship was demonstrated between M1-GABA and functional connectivity within the motor RSN (r = −0.71, p=0.01; C) but not between M1-Glx and motor network functional connectivity (D) nor between M1-GABA and functional connectivity within the DMN (E).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b15bd/b15bdc8b99f061655215d73bbb1f527cf5d04fac" alt=""
Experiment 2 replicated the findings of experiment 1 in a separate group of 16 young, healthy subjects.
(A) A significant inverse relationship between M1-GABA and functional connectivity within the motor RSN was again demonstrated (r = −0.569, p=0.02). This was both anatomically and neurochemically specific (anatomical specificity: M1-GABA-DMN correlation r = 0.23, p=0.37; M1-GABA-motor vs M1-GABA-DMN: Z = 2.61; p=0.01; neurochemical specificity: M1-Glx-motor RSN correlation: r = −0.406, p=0.11; M1-GABA-motor correlation with Glx covaried out: r = −0.45; p<0.05). (B) As in experiment 1, a significant inverse relationship between the degree of M1-M1 correlation and M1-GABA was found (r = −0.49, p=0.05).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bec8e/bec8ef49d357581c275dba81b18ba305e42e2255" alt=""
(A) Experiment 3 found that the relationship between M1-GABA and the strength of functional connectivity within the motor RSN was maintained in healthy older adults (r = −0.69, p=0.037). Similarly to experiments 1 and 2 this relationship was both anatomically and neurochemically specific (anatomical specificity: M1-GABA-DMN correlation: r = 0.41, p=0.26; M1-GABA-motor vs M1-GABA-DMN: Z = 2.22; p=0.03; neurochemical specificity: M1-Glx-motor RSN correlation r = 0.13, p=0.73; M1-GABA-motor correlation with Glx covaried out: r = −0.79; p=0.04). (B) A significant relationship between the degree of M1-M1 correlation and M1-GABA was again found (r = −0.62, p=0.035).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f72/41f72506eab57fc53c2c7dc8aaa343ff88b65c1b" alt=""
The degree of correlation between the left and right primary motor cortices (M1s) was significantly related to M1 GABA levels.
Values shown are raw Pearson’s correlation coefficients for ease of display. As these are not normally distributed all statistical analyses were performed on log-transformed data (see ‘Materials and methods’). (A) Experiment 1 (r = −0.60, p=0.047). (B) Experiment 4: the correlation between left and right M1s was significantly increased after anodal tDCS (t(9) = 1.94, p=0.04).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07001/07001c3f98c6a21d4d6eab6d339e44a3bf104125" alt=""
There was a trend towards a relationship between the degree of correlation between the left M1 and the left dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) and M1 GABA levels.
(A) Experiment 1 (r = −0.49, p=0.12). (B) Experiment 2 (r = −0.40, p=0.11). (C) Experiment 3 (r = −0.67, p=0.02). (D) Experiment 4: the correlation between left and right M1s showed a trend towards an increase after anodal tDCS (t(9) = 1.87, p=0.09).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddb23/ddb236a83722ed9ca857b5375d264b634ff4e08e" alt=""