T cell-intrinsic role of IL-6 signaling in primary and memory responses

  1. Simone A Nish
  2. Dominik Schenten
  3. Thomas Wunderlich
  4. Scott D Pope
  5. Yan Gao
  6. Namiko Hoshi
  7. Shuang Yu
  8. Xiting Yan
  9. Heung Kyu Lee
  10. Lesley Pasman
  11. Igor Brodsky
  12. Brian Yordy
  13. Hongyu Zhao
  14. Jens Brüning
  15. Ruslan Medzhitov  Is a corresponding author
  1. Yale University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research Cologne, Germany
  3. Yale School of Public Health, United States

Abstract

Innate immune recognition is critical for the induction of adaptive immune responses; however the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Here, we demonstrate that T cell-specific deletion of the IL-6 receptor α chain (IL-6Rα) results in impaired Th1 and Th17 T cell responses in vivo, and a defect in the Tfh function. Depletion of Tregs in these mice rescued the Th1 but not the Th17 response. Our data suggest that IL-6 signaling in effector T cells is required to overcome Treg-mediated suppression in vivo. We show that IL-6 cooperates with IL-1β to block the suppressive effect of Tregs on CD4+ T cells, at least in part by controlling their responsiveness to IL-2. In addition, although IL-6Rα-deficient T cells mount normal primary Th1 responses in the absence of Tregs, they fail to mature into functional memory cells, demonstrating a key role for IL-6 in CD4+ T cell memory formation.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Simone A Nish

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Dominik Schenten

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Thomas Wunderlich

    Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research Cologne, Cologne, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Scott D Pope

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Yan Gao

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Namiko Hoshi

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Shuang Yu

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Xiting Yan

    Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Heung Kyu Lee

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Lesley Pasman

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Igor Brodsky

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Brian Yordy

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Hongyu Zhao

    Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Jens Brüning

    Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research Cologne, Cologne, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Ruslan Medzhitov

    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    ruslan.medzhitov@yale.edu
    Competing interests
    Ruslan Medzhitov, Reviewing editor, eLife.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#2011-08006) of the Yale University.

Copyright

© 2014, Nish et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,868
    views
  • 963
    downloads
  • 117
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Simone A Nish
  2. Dominik Schenten
  3. Thomas Wunderlich
  4. Scott D Pope
  5. Yan Gao
  6. Namiko Hoshi
  7. Shuang Yu
  8. Xiting Yan
  9. Heung Kyu Lee
  10. Lesley Pasman
  11. Igor Brodsky
  12. Brian Yordy
  13. Hongyu Zhao
  14. Jens Brüning
  15. Ruslan Medzhitov
(2014)
T cell-intrinsic role of IL-6 signaling in primary and memory responses
eLife 3:e01949.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01949

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01949

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Benita Martin-Castaño, Patricia Diez-Echave ... Julio Galvez
    Research Article

    Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that displays great variability in clinical phenotype. Many factors have been described to be correlated with its severity, and microbiota could play a key role in the infection, progression, and outcome of the disease. SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with nasopharyngeal and gut dysbiosis and higher abundance of opportunistic pathogens. To identify new prognostic markers for the disease, a multicentre prospective observational cohort study was carried out in COVID-19 patients divided into three cohorts based on symptomatology: mild (n = 24), moderate (n = 51), and severe/critical (n = 31). Faecal and nasopharyngeal samples were taken, and the microbiota was analysed. Linear discriminant analysis identified Mycoplasma salivarium, Prevotella dentalis, and Haemophilus parainfluenzae as biomarkers of severe COVID-19 in nasopharyngeal microbiota, while Prevotella bivia and Prevotella timonensis were defined in faecal microbiota. Additionally, a connection between faecal and nasopharyngeal microbiota was identified, with a significant ratio between P. timonensis (faeces) and P. dentalis and M. salivarium (nasopharyngeal) abundances found in critically ill patients. This ratio could serve as a novel prognostic tool for identifying severe COVID-19 cases.

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Yan Zhao, Hanshuo Zhu ... Li Sun
    Research Article

    Type III secretion system (T3SS) is a virulence apparatus existing in many bacterial pathogens. Structurally, T3SS consists of the base, needle, tip, and translocon. The NLRC4 inflammasome is the major receptor for T3SS needle and basal rod proteins. Whether other T3SS components are recognized by NLRC4 is unclear. In this study, using Edwardsiella tarda as a model intracellular pathogen, we examined T3SS−inflammasome interaction and its effect on cell death. E. tarda induced pyroptosis in a manner that required the bacterial translocon and the host inflammasome proteins of NLRC4, NLRP3, ASC, and caspase 1/4. The translocon protein EseB triggered NLRC4/NAIP-mediated pyroptosis by binding NAIP via its C-terminal region, particularly the terminal 6 residues (T6R). EseB homologs exist widely in T3SS-positive bacteria and share high identities in T6R. Like E. tarda EseB, all of the representatives of the EseB homologs exhibited T6R-dependent NLRC4 activation ability. Together these results revealed the function and molecular mechanism of EseB to induce host cell pyroptosis and suggested a highly conserved inflammasome-activation mechanism of T3SS translocon in bacterial pathogens.