The topography of frequency and time representation in primate auditory cortices

  1. Simon Baumann  Is a corresponding author
  2. Olivier Joly
  3. Adrian Rees
  4. Christopher I Petkov
  5. Li Sun
  6. Alexander Thiele
  7. Timothy D Griffiths
  1. Newcastle University, United Kingdom
  2. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
4 figures, 1 table and 2 additional files

Figures

Representation of amplitude modulation rates in the auditory cortex.

Top panels: map showing contrast of low vs high rates (rate contrast map) projected on rendered surfaces of the superior temporal planes in three animals (M1-3). Green arrows indicate mean gradient …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03256.003
Representation of spectral frequency in the auditory cortex.

Top panels: map of contrast of low vs high frequency band (frequency-contrast map) projected on rendered surfaces of the superior temporal planes in three animals (M1-3). Green arrows indicate mean …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03256.004
Representation of spectral frequency in the auditory cortex derived from ‘phase-encoded’ experiment.

Top panels: map of preferred response to nine different frequencies between 0.5–8 KHz projected on rendered surfaces of the superior temporal planes in two animals (M1, M2). Approximate border …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03256.005
Schematic representation of amplitude-modulation-rate organisation in macaque auditory cortex.

Model of modulation rate organisation in context of functional-field borders and frequency reversals (left side). Schematic organisation of tonotopy with indication of main gradients for tonotopy …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03256.006

Tables

Table 1

Directions and relative orientations of amplitude modulation rate and frequency gradients in selected auditory fields

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03256.007
AnimalHemis-phereFieldRel. angle (α) (degrees)Frequency (degrees)R2p-valueRate (degrees)R2p-valueN (vertices)
M1LA11371620.796<1E-16250.636<1E-1684
R731550.546<1E-16820.696<1E-16101
M2L1201750.927<1E-16560.884<1E-16154
R1331600.803<1E-16660.750<1E-16103
M3L1211640.824<1E-16430.699<1E-16156
R1281750.722<1E-16470.675<1E-1687
Average118.7165.20.7753.20.72114.2
Std dev23.38.20.1319.70.0932.5
M1LR81380.1061.40E-021200.782<1E-1688
R140230.3912.89E-111170.600<1E-16107
M2L51290.697<1E-16800.4202.00E-09102
R103440.4412.50E-101470.660<1E-1693
M3L180810.4761.40E-101000.2554.20E-0687
R14890.6114.20E-151570.691<1E-1673
Average117.237.30.45120.20.5791.7
Std dev47.624.60.2028.70.2012.1
M1LCL161130.5772.80E-041480.5871.70E-0633
R1131090.5163.30E-071380.2641.90E-0344
M2L163420.5633.30E-071550.5822.00E-1240
R102140.5525.70E-101160.559<1E-1658
M3L168270.7953.30E-161650.7512.60E-1448
R15820.7064.20E-111560.7684.20E-1342
Average144.234.50.62146.30.5944.2
Std dev28.839.00.1117.40.188.4
  1. Main gradient directions (relative to anterior-posterior axis) and the resulting relative angle (α) between the orientations of the amplitude modulation rate (Rate) and spectral frequency (Frequency) gradients in auditory fields A1, R and CL are listed for two hemispheres (L, R) in three animals (M1-3). Additionally, R2 values, p-values and number of data points (n) from the respective 2D regression analysis are included.

Additional files

Supplementary file 1

Directions and relative orientations of amplitude modulation rate and frequency gradients in selected auditory field (based on best rate/frequency maps). Main gradient directions (relative to anterior-posterior axis) and the resulting relative angle (α) between the orientations of the amplitude modulation rate (Rate) and spectral frequency (Frequency) gradients in auditory fields A1, R and CL are listed for two hemispheres (L, R) in three animals (M1-3). Additionally, R2 values, p-values and number of data points (n) from the respective 2D regression analysis are included. * No defined gradient direction due to single best frequency in field.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03256.008
Source code 1

Custom matlab code.

This file includes a collection of custom matlab scripts that were used for analysis and data representation of the manuscript. It is highly recommended to contact the corresponding author for detailed instructions in the use of these scripts and attempts to recreate analysis procedures described in the manuscript.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03256.011

Download links