Prediction and characterization of enzymatic activities guided by sequence similarity and genome neighborhood networks

  1. Suwen Zhao
  2. Ayano Sakai
  3. Xinshuai Zhang
  4. Matthew W Vetting
  5. Ritesh Kumar
  6. Brandan Hillerich
  7. Brian San Francisco
  8. Jose Solbiati
  9. Adam Steves
  10. Shoshana Brown
  11. Eyal Akiva
  12. Alan Barber
  13. Ronald D Seidel
  14. Patricia C Babbitt
  15. Steven C Almo
  16. John A Gerlt  Is a corresponding author
  17. Matthew P Jacobson
  1. University of California, San Francisco, United States
  2. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States
  3. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Metabolic pathways in eubacteria and archaea often are encoded by operons and/or gene clusters (genome neighborhoods) that provide important clues for assignment of both enzyme functions and metabolic pathways. We describe a bioinformatic approach (genome neighborhood network; GNN) that enables large scale prediction of the in vitro enzymatic activities and in vivo physiological functions (metabolic pathways) of uncharacterized enzymes in protein families. We demonstrate the utility of the GNN approach by predicting in vitro activities and in vivo functions in the proline racemase superfamily (PRS; InterPro IPR008794). The predictions were verified by measuring in vitro activities for 51 proteins in 12 families in the PRS that represent ~85% of the sequences; in vitro activities of pathway enzymes, carbon/nitrogen source phenotypes, and/or transcriptomic studies confirmed the predicted pathways. The synergistic use of sequence similarity networks3 and GNNs will facilitate the discovery of the components of novel, uncharacterized metabolic pathways in sequenced genomes.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Suwen Zhao

    University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ayano Sakai

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Xinshuai Zhang

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Matthew W Vetting

    Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Ritesh Kumar

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Brandan Hillerich

    Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Brian San Francisco

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jose Solbiati

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Adam Steves

    University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Shoshana Brown

    University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Eyal Akiva

    University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Alan Barber

    University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Ronald D Seidel

    Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Patricia C Babbitt

    University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Steven C Almo

    Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. John A Gerlt

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    For correspondence
    j-gerlt@illinois.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Matthew P Jacobson

    University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jon Clardy, Harvard Medical School, United States

Version history

  1. Received: May 5, 2014
  2. Accepted: June 26, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 30, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 30, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Zhao et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,889
    views
  • 715
    downloads
  • 79
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Suwen Zhao
  2. Ayano Sakai
  3. Xinshuai Zhang
  4. Matthew W Vetting
  5. Ritesh Kumar
  6. Brandan Hillerich
  7. Brian San Francisco
  8. Jose Solbiati
  9. Adam Steves
  10. Shoshana Brown
  11. Eyal Akiva
  12. Alan Barber
  13. Ronald D Seidel
  14. Patricia C Babbitt
  15. Steven C Almo
  16. John A Gerlt
  17. Matthew P Jacobson
(2014)
Prediction and characterization of enzymatic activities guided by sequence similarity and genome neighborhood networks
eLife 3:e03275.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03275

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03275

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Boglarka Zambo, Evelina Edelweiss ... Gergo Gogl
    Research Article

    Truncation of the protein-protein interaction SH3 domain of the membrane remodeling Bridging Integrator 1 (BIN1, Amphiphysin 2) protein leads to centronuclear myopathy. Here, we assessed the impact of a set of naturally observed, previously uncharacterized BIN1 SH3 domain variants using conventional in vitro and cell-based assays monitoring the BIN1 interaction with dynamin 2 (DNM2) and identified potentially harmful ones that can be also tentatively connected to neuromuscular disorders. However, SH3 domains are typically promiscuous and it is expected that other, so far unknown partners of BIN1 exist besides DNM2, that also participate in the development of centronuclear myopathy. In order to shed light on these other relevant interaction partners and to get a holistic picture of the pathomechanism behind BIN1 SH3 domain variants, we used affinity interactomics. We identified hundreds of new BIN1 interaction partners proteome-wide, among which many appear to participate in cell division, suggesting a critical role of BIN1 in the regulation of mitosis. Finally, we show that the identified BIN1 mutations indeed cause proteome-wide affinity perturbation, signifying the importance of employing unbiased affinity interactomic approaches.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Ramona Weber, Chung-Te Chang
    Research Article

    Recent findings indicate that the translation elongation rate influences mRNA stability. One of the factors that has been implicated in this link between mRNA decay and translation speed is the yeast DEAD-box helicase Dhh1p. Here, we demonstrated that the human ortholog of Dhh1p, DDX6, triggers the deadenylation-dependent decay of inefficiently translated mRNAs in human cells. DDX6 interacts with the ribosome through the Phe-Asp-Phe (FDF) motif in its RecA2 domain. Furthermore, RecA2-mediated interactions and ATPase activity are both required for DDX6 to destabilize inefficiently translated mRNAs. Using ribosome profiling and RNA sequencing, we identified two classes of endogenous mRNAs that are regulated in a DDX6-dependent manner. The identified targets are either translationally regulated or regulated at the steady-state-level and either exhibit signatures of poor overall translation or of locally reduced ribosome translocation rates. Transferring the identified sequence stretches into a reporter mRNA caused translation- and DDX6-dependent degradation of the reporter mRNA. In summary, these results identify DDX6 as a crucial regulator of mRNA translation and decay triggered by slow ribosome movement and provide insights into the mechanism by which DDX6 destabilizes inefficiently translated mRNAs.