Prediction and characterization of enzymatic activities guided by sequence similarity and genome neighborhood networks

  1. Suwen Zhao
  2. Ayano Sakai
  3. Xinshuai Zhang
  4. Matthew W Vetting
  5. Ritesh Kumar
  6. Brandan Hillerich
  7. Brian San Francisco
  8. Jose Solbiati
  9. Adam Steves
  10. Shoshana Brown
  11. Eyal Akiva
  12. Alan Barber
  13. Ronald D Seidel
  14. Patricia C Babbitt
  15. Steven C Almo
  16. John A Gerlt  Is a corresponding author
  17. Matthew P Jacobson
  1. University of California, San Francisco, United States
  2. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States
  3. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Metabolic pathways in eubacteria and archaea often are encoded by operons and/or gene clusters (genome neighborhoods) that provide important clues for assignment of both enzyme functions and metabolic pathways. We describe a bioinformatic approach (genome neighborhood network; GNN) that enables large scale prediction of the in vitro enzymatic activities and in vivo physiological functions (metabolic pathways) of uncharacterized enzymes in protein families. We demonstrate the utility of the GNN approach by predicting in vitro activities and in vivo functions in the proline racemase superfamily (PRS; InterPro IPR008794). The predictions were verified by measuring in vitro activities for 51 proteins in 12 families in the PRS that represent ~85% of the sequences; in vitro activities of pathway enzymes, carbon/nitrogen source phenotypes, and/or transcriptomic studies confirmed the predicted pathways. The synergistic use of sequence similarity networks3 and GNNs will facilitate the discovery of the components of novel, uncharacterized metabolic pathways in sequenced genomes.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Suwen Zhao

    University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ayano Sakai

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Xinshuai Zhang

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Matthew W Vetting

    Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Ritesh Kumar

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Brandan Hillerich

    Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Brian San Francisco

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jose Solbiati

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Adam Steves

    University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Shoshana Brown

    University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Eyal Akiva

    University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Alan Barber

    University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Ronald D Seidel

    Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Patricia C Babbitt

    University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Steven C Almo

    Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. John A Gerlt

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    For correspondence
    j-gerlt@illinois.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Matthew P Jacobson

    University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jon Clardy, Harvard Medical School, United States

Version history

  1. Received: May 5, 2014
  2. Accepted: June 26, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 30, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 30, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Zhao et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,876
    Page views
  • 703
    Downloads
  • 74
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Suwen Zhao
  2. Ayano Sakai
  3. Xinshuai Zhang
  4. Matthew W Vetting
  5. Ritesh Kumar
  6. Brandan Hillerich
  7. Brian San Francisco
  8. Jose Solbiati
  9. Adam Steves
  10. Shoshana Brown
  11. Eyal Akiva
  12. Alan Barber
  13. Ronald D Seidel
  14. Patricia C Babbitt
  15. Steven C Almo
  16. John A Gerlt
  17. Matthew P Jacobson
(2014)
Prediction and characterization of enzymatic activities guided by sequence similarity and genome neighborhood networks
eLife 3:e03275.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03275

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03275

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Jake W Anderson, David Vaisar ... Natalie G Ahn
    Research Article

    Activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase-2 (ERK2) by phosphorylation has been shown to involve changes in protein dynamics, as determined by hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) and NMR relaxation dispersion measurements. These can be described by a global exchange between two conformational states of the active kinase, named ‘L’ and ‘R,’ where R is associated with a catalytically productive ATP-binding mode. An ATP-competitive ERK1/2 inhibitor, Vertex-11e, has properties of conformation selection for the R-state, revealing movements of the activation loop that are allosterically coupled to the kinase active site. However, the features of inhibitors important for R-state selection are unknown. Here, we survey a panel of ATP-competitive ERK inhibitors using HDX-MS and NMR and identify 14 new molecules with properties of R-state selection. They reveal effects propagated to distal regions in the P+1 and helix αF segments surrounding the activation loop, as well as helix αL16. Crystal structures of inhibitor complexes with ERK2 reveal systematic shifts in the Gly loop and helix αC, mediated by a Tyr-Tyr ring stacking interaction and the conserved Lys-Glu salt bridge. The findings suggest a model for the R-state involving small movements in the N-lobe that promote compactness within the kinase active site and alter mobility surrounding the activation loop. Such properties of conformation selection might be exploited to modulate the protein docking interface used by ERK substrates and effectors.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Anne E Hultgren, Nicole MF Patras, Jenna Hicks
    Feature Article

    Organizations that fund research are keen to ensure that their grant selection processes are fair and equitable for all applicants. In 2020, the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation introduced blinding to the first stage of the process used to review applications for Beckman Young Investigator (BYI) awards: applicants were instructed to blind the technical proposal in their initial Letter of Intent by omitting their name, gender, gender-identifying pronouns, and institutional information. Here we examine the impact of this change by comparing the data on gender and institutional prestige of the applicants in the first four years of the new policy (BYI award years 2021–2024) with data on the last four years of the old policy (2017–2020). We find that under the new policy, the distribution of applicants invited to submit a full application shifted from those affiliated with institutions regarded as more prestigious to those outside of this group, and that this trend continued through to the final program awards. We did not find evidence of a shift in the distribution of applicants with respect to gender.