Post-transcriptional regulation of satellite cell quiescence by TTP-mediated mRNA decay

  1. Melissa A Hausburg
  2. Jason D Doles
  3. Sandra L Clement
  4. Adam B Cadwallader
  5. Monica N Hall
  6. Perry J Blackshear
  7. Jens Lykke-Andersen
  8. Bradley B Olwin  Is a corresponding author
  1. Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., United States
  2. University of Colorado, United States
  3. University of Colorado Boulder, United States

Abstract

Skeletal muscle satellite cells in their niche are quiescent and upon muscle injury, exit quiescence, proliferate to repair muscle tissue, and self-renew to replenish the satellite cell population. To understand the mechanisms involved in maintaining satellite cell quiescence, we identified gene transcripts that were differentially expressed during satellite cell activation following muscle injury. Transcripts encoding RNA binding proteins were among the most significantly changed and included the mRNA decay factor Tristetraprolin. Tristetraprolin promotes the decay of MyoD mRNA, which encodes a transcriptional regulator of myogenic commitment, via binding to the MyoD mRNA 3' untranslated region. Upon satellite cell activation, p38α/β MAPK phosphorylates MAPKAP2 and inactivates Tristetraprolin, stabilizing MyoD mRNA. Satellite cell specific knockdown of Tristetraprolin precociously activates satellite cells in vivo, enabling MyoD accumulation, differentiation and cell fusion into myofibers. Regulation of mRNAs by Tristetraprolin appears to function as one of several critical post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms controlling satellite cell homeostasis.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Melissa A Hausburg

    Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Englewood, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jason D Doles

    Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sandra L Clement

    Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Adam B Cadwallader

    Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Monica N Hall

    Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Perry J Blackshear

    Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jens Lykke-Andersen

    Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Bradley B Olwin

    Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States
    For correspondence
    olwin@colorado.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Margaret Buckingham, Institut Pasteur, France

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#1012.01, #1104.08) of the University of Colorado-Boulder.

Version history

  1. Received: May 16, 2014
  2. Accepted: March 26, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 27, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 30, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 2,868
    views
  • 762
    downloads
  • 114
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Melissa A Hausburg
  2. Jason D Doles
  3. Sandra L Clement
  4. Adam B Cadwallader
  5. Monica N Hall
  6. Perry J Blackshear
  7. Jens Lykke-Andersen
  8. Bradley B Olwin
(2015)
Post-transcriptional regulation of satellite cell quiescence by TTP-mediated mRNA decay
eLife 4:e03390.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03390

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03390

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Zhimin Xu, Zhao Wang ... Yingchuan B Qi
    Research Article

    Precise developmental timing control is essential for organism formation and function, but its mechanisms are unclear. In C. elegans, the microRNA lin-4 critically regulates developmental timing by post-transcriptionally downregulating the larval-stage-fate controller LIN-14. However, the mechanisms triggering the activation of lin-4 expression toward the end of the first larval stage remain unknown. We demonstrate that the transmembrane transcription factor MYRF-1 is necessary for lin-4 activation. MYRF-1 is initially localized on the cell membrane, and its increased cleavage and nuclear accumulation coincide with lin-4 expression timing. MYRF-1 regulates lin-4 expression cell-autonomously and hyperactive MYRF-1 can prematurely drive lin-4 expression in embryos and young first-stage larvae. The tandem lin-4 promoter DNA recruits MYRF-1GFP to form visible loci in the nucleus, suggesting that MYRF-1 directly binds to the lin-4 promoter. Our findings identify a crucial link in understanding developmental timing regulation and establish MYRF-1 as a key regulator of lin-4 expression.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Samuel C Griffiths, Jia Tan ... Hsin-Yi Henry Ho
    Research Article Updated

    The receptor tyrosine kinase ROR2 mediates noncanonical WNT5A signaling to orchestrate tissue morphogenetic processes, and dysfunction of the pathway causes Robinow syndrome, brachydactyly B, and metastatic diseases. The domain(s) and mechanisms required for ROR2 function, however, remain unclear. We solved the crystal structure of the extracellular cysteine-rich (CRD) and Kringle (Kr) domains of ROR2 and found that, unlike other CRDs, the ROR2 CRD lacks the signature hydrophobic pocket that binds lipids/lipid-modified proteins, such as WNTs, suggesting a novel mechanism of ligand reception. Functionally, we showed that the ROR2 CRD, but not other domains, is required and minimally sufficient to promote WNT5A signaling, and Robinow mutations in the CRD and the adjacent Kr impair ROR2 secretion and function. Moreover, using function-activating and -perturbing antibodies against the Frizzled (FZ) family of WNT receptors, we demonstrate the involvement of FZ in WNT5A-ROR signaling. Thus, ROR2 acts via its CRD to potentiate the function of a receptor super-complex that includes FZ to transduce WNT5A signals.