Post-transcriptional regulation of satellite cell quiescence by TTP-mediated mRNA decay

  1. Melissa A Hausburg
  2. Jason D Doles
  3. Sandra L Clement
  4. Adam B Cadwallader
  5. Monica N Hall
  6. Perry J Blackshear
  7. Jens Lykke-Andersen
  8. Bradley B Olwin  Is a corresponding author
  1. Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., United States
  2. University of Colorado, United States
  3. University of Colorado Boulder, United States

Abstract

Skeletal muscle satellite cells in their niche are quiescent and upon muscle injury, exit quiescence, proliferate to repair muscle tissue, and self-renew to replenish the satellite cell population. To understand the mechanisms involved in maintaining satellite cell quiescence, we identified gene transcripts that were differentially expressed during satellite cell activation following muscle injury. Transcripts encoding RNA binding proteins were among the most significantly changed and included the mRNA decay factor Tristetraprolin. Tristetraprolin promotes the decay of MyoD mRNA, which encodes a transcriptional regulator of myogenic commitment, via binding to the MyoD mRNA 3' untranslated region. Upon satellite cell activation, p38α/β MAPK phosphorylates MAPKAP2 and inactivates Tristetraprolin, stabilizing MyoD mRNA. Satellite cell specific knockdown of Tristetraprolin precociously activates satellite cells in vivo, enabling MyoD accumulation, differentiation and cell fusion into myofibers. Regulation of mRNAs by Tristetraprolin appears to function as one of several critical post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms controlling satellite cell homeostasis.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Melissa A Hausburg

    Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Englewood, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jason D Doles

    Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sandra L Clement

    Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Adam B Cadwallader

    Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Monica N Hall

    Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Perry J Blackshear

    Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jens Lykke-Andersen

    Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Bradley B Olwin

    Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States
    For correspondence
    olwin@colorado.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#1012.01, #1104.08) of the University of Colorado-Boulder.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 2,876
    views
  • 776
    downloads
  • 122
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Melissa A Hausburg
  2. Jason D Doles
  3. Sandra L Clement
  4. Adam B Cadwallader
  5. Monica N Hall
  6. Perry J Blackshear
  7. Jens Lykke-Andersen
  8. Bradley B Olwin
(2015)
Post-transcriptional regulation of satellite cell quiescence by TTP-mediated mRNA decay
eLife 4:e03390.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03390

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03390

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Eric R Brooks, Andrew R Moorman ... Jennifer A Zallen
    Tools and Resources

    The formation of the mammalian brain requires regionalization and morphogenesis of the cranial neural plate, which transforms from an epithelial sheet into a closed tube that provides the structural foundation for neural patterning and circuit formation. Sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling is important for cranial neural plate patterning and closure, but the transcriptional changes that give rise to the spatially regulated cell fates and behaviors that build the cranial neural tube have not been systematically analyzed. Here, we used single-cell RNA sequencing to generate an atlas of gene expression at six consecutive stages of cranial neural tube closure in the mouse embryo. Ordering transcriptional profiles relative to the major axes of gene expression predicted spatially regulated expression of 870 genes along the anterior-posterior and mediolateral axes of the cranial neural plate and reproduced known expression patterns with over 85% accuracy. Single-cell RNA sequencing of embryos with activated SHH signaling revealed distinct SHH-regulated transcriptional programs in the developing forebrain, midbrain, and hindbrain, suggesting a complex interplay between anterior-posterior and mediolateral patterning systems. These results define a spatiotemporally resolved map of gene expression during cranial neural tube closure and provide a resource for investigating the transcriptional events that drive early mammalian brain development.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Mehmet Mahsum Kaplan, Erika Hudacova ... Ondrej Machon
    Research Article

    Hair follicle development is initiated by reciprocal molecular interactions between the placode-forming epithelium and the underlying mesenchyme. Cell fate transformation in dermal fibroblasts generates a cell niche for placode induction by activation of signaling pathways WNT, EDA, and FGF in the epithelium. These successive paracrine epithelial signals initiate dermal condensation in the underlying mesenchyme. Although epithelial signaling from the placode to mesenchyme is better described, little is known about primary mesenchymal signals resulting in placode induction. Using genetic approach in mice, we show that Meis2 expression in cells derived from the neural crest is critical for whisker formation and also for branching of trigeminal nerves. While whisker formation is independent of the trigeminal sensory innervation, MEIS2 in mesenchymal dermal cells orchestrates the initial steps of epithelial placode formation and subsequent dermal condensation. MEIS2 regulates the expression of transcription factor Foxd1, which is typical of pre-dermal condensation. However, deletion of Foxd1 does not affect whisker development. Overall, our data suggest an early role of mesenchymal MEIS2 during whisker formation and provide evidence that whiskers can normally develop in the absence of sensory innervation or Foxd1 expression.