Neuropilin-1 functions as a VEGFR2 co-receptor to guide developmental angiogenesis independent of ligand binding

  1. Maria V Gelfand
  2. Nellwyn Hagan
  3. Aleksandra Tata
  4. Won-Jong Oh
  5. Baptiste Lacoste
  6. Kyu-Tae Kang
  7. Justyna Kopycinska
  8. Joyce Bischoff
  9. Jia-Huai Wang
  10. Chenghua Gu  Is a corresponding author
  1. Harvard Medical School, United States
  2. Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States
  3. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, United States

Abstract

During development, tissue repair, and tumor growth, most blood vessel networks are generated through angiogenesis. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key regulator of this process and currently, both VEGF and its receptors, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, and Neuropilin1 (NRP1), are targeted in therapeutic strategies for vascular disease and cancer. NRP1 is essential for vascular morphogenesis, but how NRP1 functions to guide vascular development has not been completely elucidated. Here, we generated a mouse line harboring a point mutation in the endogenous Nrp1 locus that selectively abolishes VEGF-NRP1 binding (Nrp1VEGF-). Nrp1VEGF- mutants survive to adulthood with normal vasculature revealing that NRP1 functions independent of VEGF-NRP1 binding during developmental angiogenesis. Moreover, we found that Nrp1-deficient vessels have reduced VEGFR2 surface expression in vivo demonstrating that NRP1 regulates its co-receptor, VEGFR2. Given the resources invested in NRP1 targeted anti-angiogenesis therapies, our results will be integral for developing strategies to re-build vasculature in disease.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maria V Gelfand

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Nellwyn Hagan

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Aleksandra Tata

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Won-Jong Oh

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Baptiste Lacoste

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Kyu-Tae Kang

    Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Justyna Kopycinska

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Joyce Bischoff

    Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jia-Huai Wang

    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Chenghua Gu

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    Chenghua_Gu@hms.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols at Harvard Medical School (IACUC Study ID: IS00000045).

Copyright

© 2014, Gelfand et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,417
    views
  • 635
    downloads
  • 116
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Maria V Gelfand
  2. Nellwyn Hagan
  3. Aleksandra Tata
  4. Won-Jong Oh
  5. Baptiste Lacoste
  6. Kyu-Tae Kang
  7. Justyna Kopycinska
  8. Joyce Bischoff
  9. Jia-Huai Wang
  10. Chenghua Gu
(2014)
Neuropilin-1 functions as a VEGFR2 co-receptor to guide developmental angiogenesis independent of ligand binding
eLife 3:e03720.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03720

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03720

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Nathaniel C Nelson, Matthias C Kugler
    Insight

    Cells called alveolar myofibroblasts, which have a central role in the development of the lung after birth, receive an orchestrated input from a range of different signaling pathways.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Imran S Khan, Christopher Molina ... Dean Sheppard
    Research Article

    Premature infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) have impaired alveolar gas exchange due to alveolar simplification and dysmorphic pulmonary vasculature. Advances in clinical care have improved survival for infants with BPD, but the overall incidence of BPD remains unchanged because we lack specific therapies to prevent this disease. Recent work has suggested a role for increased transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) signaling and myofibroblast populations in BPD pathogenesis, but the functional significance of each remains unclear. Here, we utilize multiple murine models of alveolar simplification and comparative single-cell RNA sequencing to identify shared mechanisms that could contribute to BPD pathogenesis. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals a profound loss of myofibroblasts in two models of BPD and identifies gene expression signatures of increased TGFβ signaling, cell cycle arrest, and impaired proliferation in myofibroblasts. Using pharmacologic and genetic approaches, we find no evidence that increased TGFβ signaling in the lung mesenchyme contributes to alveolar simplification. In contrast, this is likely a failed compensatory response, since none of our approaches to inhibit TGFβ signaling protect mice from alveolar simplification due to hyperoxia while several make simplification worse. In contrast, we find that impaired myofibroblast proliferation is a central feature in several murine models of BPD, and we show that inhibiting myofibroblast proliferation is sufficient to cause pathologic alveolar simplification. Our results underscore the importance of impaired myofibroblast proliferation as a central feature of alveolar simplification and suggest that efforts to reverse this process could have therapeutic value in BPD.