Contacts-based prediction of binding affinity in protein-protein complexes

  1. Anna Vangone
  2. Alexandre M J J Bonvin  Is a corresponding author
  1. Utrecht University, Netherlands

Abstract

Almost all critical functions in cells rely on specific protein-protein interactions. Understanding these is therefore crucial in the investigation of biological systems. Despite all past efforts, we still lack a thorough understanding of the energetics of association of proteins. Here, we introduce a new and simple approach to predict binding affinity based on functional and structural features of the biological system, namely the network of interfacial contacts. We assess its performance against a protein-protein binding affinity benchmark and show that both experimental methods used for affinity measurements and conformational changes have a strong impact on prediction accuracy. Using a subset of complexes with reliable experimental binding affinities and combining our contacts- and contact types-based model with recent observations on the role of the non-interacting surface in protein-protein interactions, we reach a high prediction accuracy for such a diverse dataset outperforming all other tested methods.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Anna Vangone

    Computational Structural Biology group, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Alexandre M J J Bonvin

    Computational Structural Biology group, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    a.m.j.j.bonvin@uu.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Michael Levitt, Stanford University, United States

Version history

  1. Received: March 12, 2015
  2. Accepted: July 8, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 20, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: July 22, 2015 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: August 4, 2015 (version 3)
  6. Version of Record updated: April 21, 2017 (version 4)

Copyright

© 2015, Vangone & Bonvin

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,617
    views
  • 1,803
    downloads
  • 391
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Anna Vangone
  2. Alexandre M J J Bonvin
(2015)
Contacts-based prediction of binding affinity in protein-protein complexes
eLife 4:e07454.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07454

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07454

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Hitendra Negi, Aravind Ravichandran ... Ranabir Das
    Research Article

    The proteasome controls levels of most cellular proteins, and its activity is regulated under stress, quiescence, and inflammation. However, factors determining the proteasomal degradation rate remain poorly understood. Proteasome substrates are conjugated with small proteins (tags) like ubiquitin and Fat10 to target them to the proteasome. It is unclear if the structural plasticity of proteasome-targeting tags can influence substrate degradation. Fat10 is upregulated during inflammation, and its substrates undergo rapid proteasomal degradation. We report that the degradation rate of Fat10 substrates critically depends on the structural plasticity of Fat10. While the ubiquitin tag is recycled at the proteasome, Fat10 is degraded with the substrate. Our results suggest significantly lower thermodynamic stability and faster mechanical unfolding in Fat10 compared to ubiquitin. Long-range salt bridges are absent in the Fat10 structure, creating a plastic protein with partially unstructured regions suitable for proteasome engagement. Fat10 plasticity destabilizes substrates significantly and creates partially unstructured regions in the substrate to enhance degradation. NMR-relaxation-derived order parameters and temperature dependence of chemical shifts identify the Fat10-induced partially unstructured regions in the substrate, which correlated excellently to Fat10-substrate contacts, suggesting that the tag-substrate collision destabilizes the substrate. These results highlight a strong dependence of proteasomal degradation on the structural plasticity and thermodynamic properties of the proteasome-targeting tags.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Amy H Andreotti, Volker Dötsch
    Editorial

    The articles in this special issue highlight how modern cellular, biochemical, biophysical and computational techniques are allowing deeper and more detailed studies of allosteric kinase regulation.