ANGPTL4 mediates shuttling of lipid fuel to brown adipose tissue during sustained cold exposure

  1. Wieneke Dijk
  2. Markus Heine
  3. Laurent Vergnes
  4. Mariëtte R Boon
  5. Gert Schaart
  6. Matthijs KC Hesselink
  7. Karen Reue
  8. Wouter D van Marken Lichtenbelt
  9. Gunilla Olivecrona
  10. Patrick CN Rensen
  11. Joerg Heeren
  12. Sander Kersten  Is a corresponding author
  1. Wageningen University, Netherlands
  2. University of Hamburg, Germany
  3. University of California, Los Angeles, United States
  4. Leiden University, Netherlands
  5. Maastricht University, Netherlands
  6. European Society for Medical Oncology, Netherlands
  7. Umeå University, Sweden
  8. Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands

Abstract

Brown adipose tissue (BAT) activation via cold exposure is increasingly scrutinized as a potential approach to ameliorate cardio-metabolic risk. Transition to cold temperatures requires changes in the partitioning of energy substrates, re-routing fatty acids to BAT to fuel non-shivering thermogenesis. However, the mechanisms behind the redistribution of energy substrates to BAT remain largely unknown. Angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4), a protein that inhibits lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity, is highly expressed in BAT. Here, we demonstrate that ANGPTL4 is part of a shuttling mechanism that directs fatty acids derived from circulating triglyceride-rich lipoproteins to BAT during cold. Specifically, we show that cold markedly down-regulates ANGPTL4 in BAT, likely via activation of AMPK, enhancing LPL activity and uptake of plasma triglyceride-derived fatty acids. In contrast, cold up-regulates ANGPTL4 in WAT, abolishing a cold-induced increase in LPL activity. Together, our data indicate that ANGPTL4 is an important regulator of plasma lipid partitioning during sustained cold.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Wieneke Dijk

    Nutrition, Metabolism and Genomics group, Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Markus Heine

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Laurent Vergnes

    Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Mariëtte R Boon

    Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Einthoven Laboratory for Experimental Vascular Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Gert Schaart

    Department of Human Movement Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Matthijs KC Hesselink

    Department of Human Movement Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Karen Reue

    Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Wouter D van Marken Lichtenbelt

    Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, European Society for Medical Oncology, Maastricht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Gunilla Olivecrona

    Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Patrick CN Rensen

    Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Einthoven Laboratory for Experimental Vascular Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Joerg Heeren

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Sander Kersten

    Nutrition, Metabolism and Genomics group, Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    sander.kersten@wur.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in accordance with Directive 2010/63/EU from the European Union. All of the animals were handled according to protocols approved by the Animal Ethics Committees of Wageningen University and Hamburg University (2013007.d, 2013100.b and 34/12).

Human subjects: All subjects signed an informed consent for the study protocol, which was approved by the institutional review board of Maastricht University Medical Centre.

Copyright

© 2015, Dijk et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,071
    views
  • 1,022
    downloads
  • 110
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08428

Further reading

    1. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Sujeethkumar Prithiviraj, Alejandro Garcia Garcia ... Paul E Bourgine
    Research Article

    Tissue engineering strategies predominantly rely on the production of living substitutes, whereby implanted cells actively participate in the regenerative process. Beyond cost and delayed graft availability, the patient-specific performance of engineered tissues poses serious concerns on their clinical translation ability. A more exciting paradigm consists in exploiting cell-laid, engineered extracellular matrices (eECMs), which can be used as off-the-shelf materials. Here, the regenerative capacity solely relies on the preservation of the eECM structure and embedded signals to instruct an endogenous repair. We recently described the possibility to exploit custom human stem cell lines for eECM manufacturing. In addition to the conferred standardization, the availability of such cell lines opened avenues for the design of tailored eECMs by applying dedicated genetic tools. In this study, we demonstrated the exploitation of CRISPR/Cas9 as a high precision system for editing the composition and function of eECMs. Human mesenchymal stromal/stem cell (hMSC) lines were modified to knock out vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) and assessed for their capacity to generate osteoinductive cartilage matrices. We report the successful editing of hMSCs, subsequently leading to targeted VEGF and RUNX2-knockout cartilage eECMs. Despite the absence of VEGF, eECMs retained full capacity to instruct ectopic endochondral ossification. Conversely, RUNX2-edited eECMs exhibited impaired hypertrophy, reduced ectopic ossification, and superior cartilage repair in a rat osteochondral defect. In summary, our approach can be harnessed to identify the necessary eECM factors driving endogenous repair. Our work paves the road toward the compositional eECMs editing and their exploitation in broad regenerative contexts.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Joshua G Medina-Feliciano, Griselle Valentín-Tirado ... José E Garcia-Arraras
    Research Article

    In holothurians, the regenerative process following evisceration involves the development of a ‘rudiment’ or ‘anlage’ at the injured end of the mesentery. This regenerating anlage plays a pivotal role in the formation of a new intestine. Despite its significance, our understanding of the molecular characteristics inherent to the constituent cells of this structure has remained limited. To address this gap, we employed state-of-the-art scRNA-seq and hybridization chain reaction fluorescent in situ hybridization analyses to discern the distinct cellular populations associated with the regeneration anlage. Through this approach, we successfully identified 13 distinct cell clusters. Among these, two clusters exhibit characteristics consistent with putative mesenchymal cells, while another four show features akin to coelomocyte cell populations. The remaining seven cell clusters collectively form a large group encompassing the coelomic epithelium of the regenerating anlage and mesentery. Within this large group of clusters, we recognized previously documented cell populations such as muscle precursors, neuroepithelial cells, and actively proliferating cells. Strikingly, our analysis provides data for identifying at least four other cellular populations that we define as the precursor cells of the growing anlage. Consequently, our findings strengthen the hypothesis that the coelomic epithelium of the anlage is a pluripotent tissue that gives rise to diverse cell types of the regenerating intestinal organ. Moreover, our results provide the initial view into the transcriptomic analysis of cell populations responsible for the amazing regenerative capabilities of echinoderms.