A pain-mediated neural signal induces relapse in murine autoimmune encephalomyelitis, a multiple sclerosis model

  1. Yasunobu Arima
  2. Daisuke Kamimura
  3. Toru Atsumi
  4. Masaya Harada
  5. Tadafumi Kawamoto
  6. Naoki Nishikawa
  7. Andrea Stofkova
  8. Takuto Ohki
  9. Kotaro Higuchi
  10. Yuji Morimoto
  11. Peter Wieghofer
  12. Yuka Okada
  13. Yuki Mori
  14. Saburo Sakoda
  15. Shizuya Saika
  16. Yoshichika Yoshioka
  17. Issei Komuro
  18. Toshihide Yamashita
  19. Toshio Hirano
  20. Marco Prinz
  21. Masaaki Murakami  Is a corresponding author
  1. Hokkaido University, Japan
  2. Tsurumi University, Japan
  3. University of Freiburg, Germany
  4. Wakayama Medical University, Japan
  5. Osaka University, Japan
  6. National Hospital Organization Toneyama Hospital, Japan
  7. University of Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

Although pain is a common symptom of various diseases and disorders, its contribution to disease pathogenesis is not well understood. Here we show using murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a model for multiple sclerosis (MS), that pain induces EAE relapse. Mechanistic analysis showed that pain induction activates a sensory-sympathetic signal followed by a chemokine-mediated accumulation of MHC class II+CD11b+ cells that showed antigen-presentation activity at specific ventral vessels in the fifth lumbar cord of EAE-recovered mice. Following this accumulation, various immune cells including pathogenic CD4+ T cells recruited in the spinal cord in a manner dependent on a local chemokine inducer in endothelial cells, resulting in EAE relapse. Our results demonstrate that a pain-mediated neural signal can be transformed into an inflammation reaction at specific vessels to induce disease relapse, thus making this signal a potential therapeutic target.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yasunobu Arima

    Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Daisuke Kamimura

    Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Toru Atsumi

    Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Masaya Harada

    Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Tadafumi Kawamoto

    Department of Dentistry, Tsurumi University, Yokohama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Naoki Nishikawa

    Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Andrea Stofkova

    Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Takuto Ohki

    Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Kotaro Higuchi

    Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Yuji Morimoto

    Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Peter Wieghofer

    Institute of Neuropathology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yuka Okada

    Department of Ophthalmology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Yuki Mori

    Laboratory of Biofunctional Imaging, WPI Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Saburo Sakoda

    Department of Neurology, National Hospital Organization Toneyama Hospital, Osaka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Shizuya Saika

    Department of Ophthalmology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Yoshichika Yoshioka

    Laboratory of Biofunctional Imaging, WPI Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Issei Komuro

    Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Toshihide Yamashita

    Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine, Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Toshio Hirano

    Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Marco Prinz

    BIOSS Centre for Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Masaaki Murakami

    Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    For correspondence
    murakami@igm.hokudai.ac.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Satyajit Rath, National Institute of Immunology, India

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were performed following the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the Institute for Genetic Medicine, the Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University and the Graduate School of Frontier Bioscience and Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University with protocol numbers 2014-0083 and 2014-0026.

Version history

  1. Received: May 14, 2015
  2. Accepted: July 14, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 20, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 11, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Arima et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,803
    views
  • 986
    downloads
  • 54
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yasunobu Arima
  2. Daisuke Kamimura
  3. Toru Atsumi
  4. Masaya Harada
  5. Tadafumi Kawamoto
  6. Naoki Nishikawa
  7. Andrea Stofkova
  8. Takuto Ohki
  9. Kotaro Higuchi
  10. Yuji Morimoto
  11. Peter Wieghofer
  12. Yuka Okada
  13. Yuki Mori
  14. Saburo Sakoda
  15. Shizuya Saika
  16. Yoshichika Yoshioka
  17. Issei Komuro
  18. Toshihide Yamashita
  19. Toshio Hirano
  20. Marco Prinz
  21. Masaaki Murakami
(2015)
A pain-mediated neural signal induces relapse in murine autoimmune encephalomyelitis, a multiple sclerosis model
eLife 4:e08733.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08733

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08733

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    Xiuyuan Lu, Hiroki Hayashi ... Sho Yamasaki
    Research Article

    SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been used worldwide to combat COVID-19 pandemic. To elucidate the factors that determine the longevity of spike (S)-specific antibodies, we traced the characteristics of S-specific T cell clonotypes together with their epitopes and anti-S antibody titers before and after BNT162b2 vaccination over time. T cell receptor (TCR) αβ sequences and mRNA expression of the S-responded T cells were investigated using single-cell TCR- and RNA-sequencing. Highly expanded 199 TCR clonotypes upon stimulation with S peptide pools were reconstituted into a reporter T cell line for the determination of epitopes and restricting HLAs. Among them, we could determine 78 S epitopes, most of which were conserved in variants of concern (VOCs). After the 2nd vaccination, T cell clonotypes highly responsive to recall S stimulation were polarized to follicular helper T (Tfh)-like cells in donors exhibiting sustained anti-S antibody titers (designated as ‘sustainers’), but not in ‘decliners’. Even before vaccination, S-reactive CD4+ T cell clonotypes did exist, most of which cross-reacted with environmental or symbiotic microbes. However, these clonotypes contracted after vaccination. Conversely, S-reactive clonotypes dominated after vaccination were undetectable in pre-vaccinated T cell pool, suggesting that highly responding S-reactive T cells were established by vaccination from rare clonotypes. These results suggest that de novo acquisition of memory Tfh-like cells upon vaccination may contribute to the longevity of anti-S antibody titers.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Rajan M Thomas, Matthew C Pahl ... Andrew D Wells
    Research Article

    Ikaros is a transcriptional factor required for conventional T cell development, differentiation, and anergy. While the related factors Helios and Eos have defined roles in regulatory T cells (Treg), a role for Ikaros has not been established. To determine the function of Ikaros in the Treg lineage, we generated mice with Treg-specific deletion of the Ikaros gene (Ikzf1). We find that Ikaros cooperates with Foxp3 to establish a major portion of the Treg epigenome and transcriptome. Ikaros-deficient Treg exhibit Th1-like gene expression with abnormal production of IL-2, IFNg, TNFa, and factors involved in Wnt and Notch signaling. While Ikzf1-Treg-cko mice do not develop spontaneous autoimmunity, Ikaros-deficient Treg are unable to control conventional T cell-mediated immune pathology in response to TCR and inflammatory stimuli in models of IBD and organ transplantation. These studies establish Ikaros as a core factor required in Treg for tolerance and the control of inflammatory immune responses.