A pain-mediated neural signal induces relapse in murine autoimmune encephalomyelitis, a multiple sclerosis model

  1. Yasunobu Arima
  2. Daisuke Kamimura
  3. Toru Atsumi
  4. Masaya Harada
  5. Tadafumi Kawamoto
  6. Naoki Nishikawa
  7. Andrea Stofkova
  8. Takuto Ohki
  9. Kotaro Higuchi
  10. Yuji Morimoto
  11. Peter Wieghofer
  12. Yuka Okada
  13. Yuki Mori
  14. Saburo Sakoda
  15. Shizuya Saika
  16. Yoshichika Yoshioka
  17. Issei Komuro
  18. Toshihide Yamashita
  19. Toshio Hirano
  20. Marco Prinz
  21. Masaaki Murakami  Is a corresponding author
  1. Hokkaido University, Japan
  2. Tsurumi University, Japan
  3. University of Freiburg, Germany
  4. Wakayama Medical University, Japan
  5. Osaka University, Japan
  6. National Hospital Organization Toneyama Hospital, Japan
  7. University of Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

Although pain is a common symptom of various diseases and disorders, its contribution to disease pathogenesis is not well understood. Here we show using murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a model for multiple sclerosis (MS), that pain induces EAE relapse. Mechanistic analysis showed that pain induction activates a sensory-sympathetic signal followed by a chemokine-mediated accumulation of MHC class II+CD11b+ cells that showed antigen-presentation activity at specific ventral vessels in the fifth lumbar cord of EAE-recovered mice. Following this accumulation, various immune cells including pathogenic CD4+ T cells recruited in the spinal cord in a manner dependent on a local chemokine inducer in endothelial cells, resulting in EAE relapse. Our results demonstrate that a pain-mediated neural signal can be transformed into an inflammation reaction at specific vessels to induce disease relapse, thus making this signal a potential therapeutic target.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yasunobu Arima

    Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Daisuke Kamimura

    Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Toru Atsumi

    Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Masaya Harada

    Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Tadafumi Kawamoto

    Department of Dentistry, Tsurumi University, Yokohama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Naoki Nishikawa

    Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Andrea Stofkova

    Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Takuto Ohki

    Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Kotaro Higuchi

    Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Yuji Morimoto

    Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Peter Wieghofer

    Institute of Neuropathology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yuka Okada

    Department of Ophthalmology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Yuki Mori

    Laboratory of Biofunctional Imaging, WPI Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Saburo Sakoda

    Department of Neurology, National Hospital Organization Toneyama Hospital, Osaka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Shizuya Saika

    Department of Ophthalmology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Yoshichika Yoshioka

    Laboratory of Biofunctional Imaging, WPI Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Issei Komuro

    Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Toshihide Yamashita

    Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine, Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Toshio Hirano

    Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Marco Prinz

    BIOSS Centre for Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Masaaki Murakami

    Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    For correspondence
    murakami@igm.hokudai.ac.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Satyajit Rath, National Institute of Immunology, India

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were performed following the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the Institute for Genetic Medicine, the Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University and the Graduate School of Frontier Bioscience and Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University with protocol numbers 2014-0083 and 2014-0026.

Version history

  1. Received: May 14, 2015
  2. Accepted: July 14, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 20, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 11, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Arima et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,829
    views
  • 989
    downloads
  • 55
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yasunobu Arima
  2. Daisuke Kamimura
  3. Toru Atsumi
  4. Masaya Harada
  5. Tadafumi Kawamoto
  6. Naoki Nishikawa
  7. Andrea Stofkova
  8. Takuto Ohki
  9. Kotaro Higuchi
  10. Yuji Morimoto
  11. Peter Wieghofer
  12. Yuka Okada
  13. Yuki Mori
  14. Saburo Sakoda
  15. Shizuya Saika
  16. Yoshichika Yoshioka
  17. Issei Komuro
  18. Toshihide Yamashita
  19. Toshio Hirano
  20. Marco Prinz
  21. Masaaki Murakami
(2015)
A pain-mediated neural signal induces relapse in murine autoimmune encephalomyelitis, a multiple sclerosis model
eLife 4:e08733.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08733

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08733

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Nicholas J Mullen, Surendra K Shukla ... Pankaj K Singh
    Research Article

    Pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis is a druggable metabolic dependency of cancer cells, and chemotherapy agents targeting pyrimidine metabolism are the backbone of treatment for many cancers. Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) is an essential enzyme in the de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway that can be targeted by clinically approved inhibitors. However, despite robust preclinical anticancer efficacy, DHODH inhibitors have shown limited single-agent activity in phase 1 and 2 clinical trials. Therefore, novel combination therapy strategies are necessary to realize the potential of these drugs. To search for therapeutic vulnerabilities induced by DHODH inhibition, we examined gene expression changes in cancer cells treated with the potent and selective DHODH inhibitor brequinar (BQ). This revealed that BQ treatment causes upregulation of antigen presentation pathway genes and cell surface MHC class I expression. Mechanistic studies showed that this effect is (1) strictly dependent on pyrimidine nucleotide depletion, (2) independent of canonical antigen presentation pathway transcriptional regulators, and (3) mediated by RNA polymerase II elongation control by positive transcription elongation factor B (P-TEFb). Furthermore, BQ showed impressive single-agent efficacy in the immunocompetent B16F10 melanoma model, and combination treatment with BQ and dual immune checkpoint blockade (anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1) significantly prolonged mouse survival compared to either therapy alone. Our results have important implications for the clinical development of DHODH inhibitors and provide a rationale for combination therapy with BQ and immune checkpoint blockade.

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    Hyereen Kang, Seong Woo Choi ... Myung-Shik Lee
    Research Article

    We studied lysosomal Ca2+ in inflammasome. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) + palmitic acid (PA) decreased lysosomal Ca2+ ([Ca2+]Lys) and increased [Ca2+]i through mitochondrial ROS, which was suppressed in Trpm2-KO macrophages. Inflammasome activation and metabolic inflammation in adipose tissue of high-fat diet (HFD)-fed mice were ameliorated by Trpm2 KO. ER→lysosome Ca2+ refilling occurred after lysosomal Ca2+ release whose blockade attenuated LPS + PA-induced inflammasome. Subsequently, store-operated Ca2+entry (SOCE) was activated whose inhibition suppressed inflammasome. SOCE was coupled with K+ efflux whose inhibition reduced ER Ca2+ content ([Ca2+]ER) and impaired [Ca2+]Lys recovery. LPS + PA activated KCa3.1 channel, a Ca2+-activated K+ channel. Inhibitors of KCa3.1 channel or Kcnn4 KO reduced [Ca2+]ER, attenuated increase of [Ca2+]i or inflammasome activation by LPS + PA, and ameliorated HFD-induced inflammasome or metabolic inflammation. Lysosomal Ca2+ release induced delayed JNK and ASC phosphorylation through CAMKII-ASK1. These results suggest a novel role of lysosomal Ca2+ release sustained by ERlysosome Ca2+ refilling and K+ efflux through KCa3.1 channel in inflammasome activation and metabolic inflammation.