(A) Grooming movements performed by flies in which aJO spGAL4 pairs drove expression of thermally activated dTrpA1. Movements were manually scored from 2 min of recorded video per fly (n ≥ 17 flies …
(A) Percent of total time three GAL4 lines expressing dTrpA1 spent antennal grooming, compared with controls. Box plots, statistics, and experimental conditions are as described in Figure 1A,B (n ≥ …
(A–E) CNS expression patterns of spGAL4 line pairs that displayed increased antennal grooming with dTrpA1. (A′–E′) Native GFP expression (green) in the antennae of corresponding spGAL4 lines shown …
(A, B) Co-expression of JO sensory neurons using aJO-LexA to express GFP (green) and (A) JO4-GAL4 or (B) JO31-GAL4 lines to express tdTomato (magenta). See Figure 4—figure supplement 1 for more …
(A) Overview of the aJO neuron population with AMMC, posterior, and ventral SEZ projections (white, yellow, and red arrows point to each projection respectively). (B–F) Multicolor stochastic …
(A) Grooming movements performed by interneuron spGAL4 pairs expressing thermally activated dTrpA1. Data was obtained and displayed as described in Figure 1A. (B) Percent time flies spent antennal …
(A) Grooming movements performed by GAL4 lines expressing thermally activated dTrpA1. Data was obtained and displayed as described in Figure 1A (n = 10 per line). Note: R11B11-GAL4 did not perform …
(A–I) spGAL4 lines expressing GFP (green) are co-stained with anti-GFP (green) with anti-bruchpilot (magenta). The activation domains (ADs) and DNA binding domains (DBDs) used are shown below each …
(A–D) spGAL4 pairs targeting each neuronal class in the ventral brain: (A) aJO-spGAL4-1, (B) aBN1-spGAL4-1, (C) aBN2-spGAL4-2, and (D) aDN1-spGAL4-1. aDN1 is shown as an example in (D), but there …
(A) Overview of experiments shown in (B, E). Grooming was induced by thermogenetic activation of Johnston's Organ (JO) neurons (dTrpA1) or by imposed displacements of the antennae. Synaptic release …
(A) Percent of total time that LexA lines expressing thermally activated dTrpA1 spent antennal grooming. Box plots, statistics, and experimental conditions are as described in Figure 1A,B (n > 10; …
(A–F) Co-expression of LexA and spGAL4 lines. Left column: spGAL4 expression patterns. Middle column: LexA expression patterns. Right column: Merged expression patterns. (A, B) Co-expression of …
(A–C) Flies were prepared as shown in Figure 4C,D (see ‘Materials and methods’) and tested for their grooming responses when different magnetic field frequencies (A) or voltages (B) were applied to …
(A–H) Co-expression in neuronal pairs using two binary expression systems (LexA and spGAL4) to express tdTomato or GFP in each neuronal class. Processed maximum intensity projections of frontal and …
(A–H) Expression of different GFP halves (spGFP11 and spGFP1-10) in putative connected neuronal pairs. aJO-LexA drove expression of spGFP11 in the JO neurons and spGFP1-10 expression was driven by …
(A–H) Unprocessed maximum intensity projections of co-stained images shown in Figure 5 (see ‘Materials and methods’).
(A–I) Dissected CNSs with different neuronal classes expressing CsChrimson (magenta) were activated with red light while changes in calcium in their putative downstream partners expressing GCaMP6 …
(A) Control experiments for CsChrimson/GCaMP6s activation. LexAop-CsChrimson was crossed with the control LexA driver, and GCaMP6s was expressed with aBN2-spGAL4-1 (top) or aDN2-spGAL4-2 (bottom). …
Raw data for experiments shown in Figure 6. All experiments shown were done in the absence of drugs. Red light intensity was set at 50 μW/mm2. Each column corresponds to the number of light pulses …
Raw data for experiments shown in Figure 6. All experiments shown were done in the absence of drugs. Red light intensity was set betwen 290 to 700 μW/mm2. Each column corresponds to the number of …
(A) The antennal grooming circuit (lateral view of tracings). Specific colors represent each neuron type shown in B. (B) Wiring diagram of the circuit. Lightning bolt represents mechanical …
(A) Stacked ethograms of grooming movements performed by the spGAL4 pairs indicated expressing CsChrimson (10–15 flies shown for each spGAL4 pair). Gray bars indicate when the red light was on. …
Traced and manually aligned neurons are shown in different colors. aJO neurons (blue) project from the second antennal segment into the anterior brain. aBN1 (red) has cell bodies in the dorsal and …
Computationally aligned neurons are shown in different colors. aJO neurons (blue), aBN1 (red), aBN2 (yellow) and aDN1 (green). The neuropil was stained with anti-bruchpilot (grey). See ‘Materials …
The third antennal segments of a control fly were coated with iron powder, and the fly was tethered within the electromagnetic apparatus shown in Figure 4C,D. The infrared light positioned behind …
CsChrimson was expressed in aBN1 using aBN1-spGAL4-1. The infrared light in the bottom right hand corner shows when the red light was on to activate aBN1. Note that grooming persists upon cessation …
CsChrimson was expressed in aDN2 using aDN2-spGAL4-2. The infrared light in the bottom right hand corner shows when the red light was on to activate aDN2. Note that grooming does not persist upon …
CsChrimson was expressed in the aJO using aJO-spGAL4-1. The infrared light in the bottom right hand corner shows when the red light was on to activate the aJO. Note that grooming persists upon …
Enhancer identities used to target different neuronal classes.
Stimulus conditions used for the experiment shown in Figure 6.
Stocks used in this study.
Design plans for the fly electromagnetic stimulation rig.