Membrane binding controls the ATPase cycle and localization of MinD in Bacillus subtilis
Figures
Biochemical analysis of B. subtilis MinD ATPase cycle.
(A) Phosphate release plotted against different MinD concentrations, fitted with a simple linear regression (R2=0.97). Phosphate release was measured using the EnzChek phosphate assay kit. Samples contained 0.2 mg ml–1 liposomes and were pre-incubated for 10 min before addition of 2 mM Mg2+-ATP; n≥3. (B) Specific activity of the MinD ATPase from (A) measured as a function of MinD concentration. (C) Specific activity of MinD measured as a function of ATP concentration, determined as in (B) with fixed MinD concentration of 10 µM. Fitting the Michaelis-Menten equation (black lines) gives kcat = 36.27 hr−1, Vmax = 19.50 nmol mg–1 min–1 and KM = 0.173 mM. (D) Specific activity of MinD measured as a function of liposome concentration, determined as in (B) with fixed MinD concentration of 6 µM. Fitting the Michaelis-Menten equation (black lines) gives kcat = 41.01 hr−1, Vmax = 22.05 nmol mg–1 min–1 and KM = 0.0437 mg ml–1.
His-MinD purification analysis.
(A) Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel analysis of purification products of His-MinD (31.7 kDa), stained with Coomassie blue stain. From left to right: Ladder, pellet after lysate, supernatant, Ni-NTA peaks A2, A7, C4 (main peak), concentrated sample, gel filtration peak. Ladder = Color Prestained Protein Standard, Broad Range (New England Biolabs). (B) Western blot of replicate gel from (A) using Penta-His antibody (QIAGEN).
-
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1
Original files for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blot analysis displayed in Figure 1—figure supplement 1.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-fig1-figsupp1-data1-v1.zip
-
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 2
PDF file containing original sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blots for Figure 1—figure supplement 1, indicating the relevant bands.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-fig1-figsupp1-data2-v1.zip
Gel filtration chromatograms of His-MinD and variants.
Gel filtration analysis of purified His-MinD and indicated mutants. Curves were aligned according to the respective void volume after sample injection. Green and red dotted lines mark the calibrated elution volumes corresponding to proteins of 31.69 kDa (His-MinD monomer) and 63.38 kDa (His-MinD dimer), as determined from molecular weight standards.
Biochemical analysis of the effect of His-MinC or His-PDZ on MinD ATPase activity.
(A) Left: Specific activity of MinD measured as a function of ATP concentration. Phosphate release was measured using the EnzChek phosphate assay kit. Samples contained 6 µM His-MinD, 6 µM His-MinC, and 0.2 mg ml–1 liposomes and were pre-incubated for 10 min before addition of 2 mM Mg2+-ATP; n≥3. Fitting the Michaelis-Menten equation (black lines) gives kcat = 15.77 hr−1, Vmax = 8.30 nmol mg–1 min–1 and KM = 0.10 mM. Right: Relative activity of 6 µM His-MinD in the presence of 6 µM His-MinC (blue) compared to an internal control of 6 µM His-MinD (black, relative activity = 1). Whiskers represent SD. Specific activity of only His-MinD was 8.61 [nmol mg–1 min–1] (SD = 0.03, n=2). Relative activity of 6 µM His-MinD in the presence of 6 µM His-MinC was 0.95 with SD = 0.071 (n=3). Significance was assessed by performing Welch’s t-test on the raw data. p<0.05. (B) Left: Specific activity of MinD measured as a function of ATP concentration. Phosphate release was measured using the EnzChek phosphate assay kit. Samples contained 6 µM His-MinD, 5 µM His-PDZ, and 0.2 mg ml–1 liposomes and were pre-incubated for 10 min before addition of 2 mM Mg2+-ATP; n≥3. Fitting the Michaelis-Menten equation (black lines) gives kcat = 12.07 hr−1, Vmax = 6.35 nmol mg–1 min–1 and KM = 0.233 mM. Right: Relative activity of 6 μM His-MinD in the presence of different concentrations of His-PDZ (blue) compared to only 6 μM His-MinD (black, relative activity = 1). Whiskers represent SD. Specific activity of an internal control of His-MinD was 4.60 nmol mg–1 min–1 (SD = 0.03, n=2). Relative activities of His-MinD in the presence of 1 µM, 3 µM, and 5 µM His-PDZ were 1.22, 1.37, and 1.25 with SD = 0.07, 0.13, and 0.03, respectively (n=3 each). Significance was assessed by performing Welch’s t-test on the raw data of all samples vs. control. p<0.05 for all PDZ concentrations.
His-MinC purification analysis.
(A) Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel analysis of purification products of His-MinC (27.3 kDa), stained with Coomassie blue stain. From left to right: Ladder, Ni-NTA peak, SEC peak. Ladder = Color Prestained Protein Standard, Broad Range (New England Biolabs). (B) Western blot of replicate gels from (A) using Penta-His antibody (QIAGEN).
-
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1
Original files for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blot analysis displayed in Figure 2—figure supplement 1.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-fig2-figsupp1-data1-v1.zip
-
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 2
PDF file containing original sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blots for Figure 2—figure supplement 1, indicating the relevant bands.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-fig2-figsupp1-data2-v1.zip
His-PDZ purification analysis and rendering of MinJ AlphaFold model.
(A) Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel analysis of purification products of His-PDZ (17.6 kDa), stained with Coomassie blue stain. From left to right: Ladder (L), Ni-NTA main peak. Ladder = Color Prestained Protein Standard, Broad Range (New England Biolabs). (B) Western blot of replicate gel from (A) using Penta-His antibody (QIAGEN). (C) Rendering of AlphaFold3 model of B. subtilis MinJ (gray) (Abramson et al., 2024). The truncation expressed with pET-28a-PDZ, which includes the PDZ domain (blue), is highlighted in pink.
-
Figure 2—figure supplement 2—source data 1
Original files for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blot analysis displayed in Figure 2—figure supplement 2.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-fig2-figsupp2-data1-v1.zip
-
Figure 2—figure supplement 2—source data 2
PDF file containing original sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blots for Figure 2—figure supplement 2, indicating the relevant bands.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-fig2-figsupp2-data2-v1.zip
Cartoon of MinD AlphaFold model with highlighted key amino acids and the effects of their mutagenesis.
(A) Left: Rendering of MinD AlphaFold model with ATP binding region highlighted in light blue, membrane targeting sequence (MTS) in turquoise, and key residues in orange. Box: explanation of mutagenesis effects. Right: Close-up on hydrophobic region of amphipathic helix. (B) Representative wide-field microscopy images of B. subtilis expressing indicated Halo-MinD variants as the only MinD copy from the native locus, stained with TMR ligand. Left: phase contrast; scale bar 5 µm. Right: fluorescence.
His-MinD mutants are catalytically inactive in ATP hydrolysis assay.
(A) Phosphate release plotted against different His-MinD-I260E concentrations and His-MinD as control, fitted with a simple linear regression. Phosphate release was measured using the EnzChek phosphate assay kit. Samples contain 0.2 mg ml–1 liposomes and were pre-incubated for 10 min before the addition of 2 mM Mg2+-ATP. (B) Same as (A) but with different y-axis scaling for better visualization of His-MinD-I260E baseline activity. (C) Same as (B) but comparing His-MinD mutants G12V, K16A, and D40A to His-MinD at 6 µM concentrations, respectively.
His-MinD-I260E purification analysis.
(A) Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel analysis of purification products of His-MinD-I260E (31.7 kDa), stained with Coomassie blue stain. From left to right: Ladder, supernatant after lysis, pellet, Ni-NTA flowthrough, Ni-NTA peaks A10 and C4 (main peak), concentrated sample, gel filtration peak. Ladder = Color Prestained Protein Standard, Broad Range (New England Biolabs). (B) Western blot of replicate gel from (A) using Penta-His antibody (QIAGEN).
-
Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1
Original files for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blot analysis displayed in Figure 4—figure supplement 1.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-fig4-figsupp1-data1-v1.zip
-
Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 2
PDF file containing original sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blots for Figure 4—figure supplement 1, indicating the relevant bands.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-fig4-figsupp1-data2-v1.zip
His-MinD-G12V purification analysis.
(A) Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel analysis of purification products of His-MinD-G12V (31.7 kDa), stained with Coomassie blue stain. From left to right: Ladder, pellet after lysate, supernatant, Ni-NTA flowthrough, Ni-NTA peaks A2, A10, C4 (main peak), concentrated sample, gel filtration peak. Ladder = Color Prestained Protein Standard, Broad Range (New England Biolabs). (B) Western blot of replicate gel from (A) using Penta-His antibody (QIAGEN).
-
Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 1
Original files for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blot analysis displayed in Figure 4—figure supplement 2.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-fig4-figsupp2-data1-v1.zip
-
Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 2
PDF file containing original sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blots for Figure 4—figure supplement 2, indicating the relevant bands.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-fig4-figsupp2-data2-v1.zip
His-MinD-K16A purification analysis.
(A) Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel analysis of purification products of His-MinD-K16A (31.7 kDa), stained with Coomassie blue stain. From left to right: Ladder, pellet after lysate, supernatant, Ni-NTA flowthrough, Ni-NTA peaks A2, A10, C4 (main peak), concentrated sample, gel filtration peak. Ladder = Color Prestained Protein Standard, Broad Range (New England Biolabs). (B) Western blot of replicate gel from (A) using Penta-His antibody (QIAGEN).
-
Figure 4—figure supplement 3—source data 1
Original files for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blot analysis displayed in Figure 4—figure supplement 3.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-fig4-figsupp3-data1-v1.zip
-
Figure 4—figure supplement 3—source data 2
PDF file containing original sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blots for Figure 4—figure supplement 3, indicating the relevant bands.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-fig4-figsupp3-data2-v1.zip
His-MinD-D40A purification analysis.
(A) Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel analysis of purification products of His-MinD-D40A (31.7 kDa), stained with Coomassie blue stain. From left to right: Ladder, supernatant after lysis, pellet, Ni-NTA flowthrough, Ni-NTA peaks A2 and C4 (main peak), concentrated sample, gel filtration peak. Ladder = Color Prestained Protein Standard, Broad Range (New England Biolabs). (B) Western blot of replicate gel from (A) using Penta-His antibody (QIAGEN).
-
Figure 4—figure supplement 4—source data 1
Original files for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blot analysis displayed in Figure 4—figure supplement 4.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-fig4-figsupp4-data1-v1.zip
-
Figure 4—figure supplement 4—source data 2
PDF file containing original sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blots for Figure 4—figure supplement 4, indicating the relevant bands.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-fig4-figsupp4-data2-v1.zip
Bio-layer interferometry (BLI) analysis of His-MinD and different mutants.
(A) Left: Cartoon representation of the different BLI steps, starting with (1) establishing a baseline in protein buffer, (2) binding of liposomes through the biotinylated DSPE-PEG(2000) phospholipid, (3) establishing a new baseline, (4) binding of MinD, and finally (5) dissociation of MinD. Right: Exemplary graph resulting from sensor readouts of steps (1)–(5). (B) MinD binding plotted against time through association and dissociation phases (steps 4–5) at different protein concentrations, including the His-MinD-I260E mutant. (C–E) Same as (B) using the indicated respective mutants of His-MinD (G12V, K16A, and D40A).
Bio-layer interferometry (BLI) analysis of interactions between His-MinD and His-MinC or His-PDZ.
(A) MinD binding (see Figure 5A) plotted against time through association and dissociation phases (steps 4–5) at different indicated His-MinC concentrations, including His-MinD and His-MinC only controls, all in the presence of freshly added ATP [2 mM]. (B) Same as (A) using the indicated respective concentrations of His-PDZ.
Bio-layer interferometry (BLI) analysis of His-MinD without the addition of ATP.
His-MinD binding to liposome-associated BLI sensor (see Figure 5), plotted against time through association and dissociation phases at different protein concentrations without the addition of Mg2+-ATP.
Single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) analysis of Halo-MinD and mutants expressed in B. subtilis.
Exponentially growing B. subtilis cells expressing Halo-MinD and variants (n≥48 cells, respectively) were stained with TMR ligand and subsequently imaged. Individual protein trajectories were recorded using SMLM and analyzed with Zen Blue (Zeiss), TrackMate, the SMTracker 2.0 software package, and manual scripts in R. Minimum track-length 4 frames of 24 ms, with at least 2596 trajectories per strain. (A) Heatmap representation of intracellular localization of individual molecules of Halo-MinD and variants, respectively, plotted on normalized cells. Brighter colors indicate higher abundance. (B) Barplot of stationary localization analysis (SLA), comparing different track types within the protein population. Tracks were considered static when not leaving a circular area of 97 nm diameter within 5+ frames. Mobile populations were further divided into free and mixed tracks, where mixed tracks displayed a switch between free and confined movement. (C) Plot of the mean-squared displacement of Halo-MinD and variants over time, fitted with a linear fit excluding the last time lag. (D) Bubble plot displaying single-molecule diffusion rates of the indicated MinD fusions. Populations were determined by fitting the probability distributions of the frame-to-frame displacement (jump distance) data of all respective tracks to a three-component model (fast mobile, slow mobile, and confined protein populations). (E) Probability distributions of jump distances of Halo-MinD and variants. Data was fit with a three-component model, indicating confined, slow, and fast tracks.
Single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) analysis of Halo-MinD expressed in B. subtilis wild-type and mutant backgrounds.
Exponentially growing B. subtilis cells expressing Halo-MinD in the indicated genetic backgrounds (n≥115 cells, respectively) were stained with TMR ligand and subsequently imaged. Individual protein trajectories were recorded using SMLM and analyzed with Zen Blue (Zeiss), TrackMate, the SMTracker 2.0 software package, and manual scripts in R. Minimum track-length 4 frames of 24 ms, with at least 2688 trajectories per strain. (A) Heatmap representation of intracellular localization of individual molecules of Halo-MinD in the indicated genetic background, respectively, plotted on normalized cells. Brighter colors indicate higher abundance. (B) Barplot of stationary localization analysis (SLA), comparing different track types within the protein population. Tracks were considered static when not leaving a circular area of 97 nm diameter within 5+ frames. Mobile populations were further divided into free and mixed tracks, where mixed tracks displayed a switch between free and confined movement. (C) Bubble plot displaying single-molecule diffusion rates of Halo-MinD in different genetic backgrounds. Populations were determined by fitting the probability distributions of the frame-to-frame displacement (jump distance) data of all respective tracks to a three-component model (fast mobile, slow mobile, and confined protein populations). (D) Probability distributions of jump distances of Halo-MinD in different genetic backgrounds. Data was fit with a three-component model, indicating confined, slow, and fast tracks.
Tables
Measurements of cell length and minicell formation of B. subtilis strains.
| Strain | Relevant genotype | Length ± SD (µm) | Minicells (%) | No. cells counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168 | Wild type | 3.32±0.91 | 0.20 | 610 |
| BHF077 | ΔminD | 5.80±2.10 | 33.53 | 865 |
| BHF078 | Halo-MinD | 4.06±0.99 | 7.44 | 430 |
| BHF079 | Halo-MinD (G12V) | 6.13±2.13 | 34.54 | 443 |
| BHF080 | Halo-MinD (K16A) | 5.44±1.84 | 38.45 | 489 |
| BHF081 | Halo-MinD (D40A) | 5.67±2.09 | 33.70 | 454 |
| BHF082 | Halo-MinD (I260E) | 5.38±1.68 | 33.01 | 721 |
Kinetic constants of His-MinD and variants obtained via bio-layer interferometry (BLI).
| Protein | KD [µM] | kon [M–1 s–1] | kon error | koff [s–1] | koff error | X2 | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MinD | 7.17 | 3.03×103 | 0.13×103 | 21.7×10–3 | 0.33×10–3 | 16.07 | 0.95 |
| MinD-G12V | 75.38 | 0.63×103 | 0.19×103 | 47.8×10–3 | 1.13×10–3 | 13.89 | 0.95 |
| MinD-K16A | 1.36 | 2.03×103 | 0.062×103 | 2.77×10–3 | 0.088×10–3 | 6.97 | 0.95 |
| MinD-D40A | 0.74 | 2.39×103 | 0.053×103 | 1.76×10–3 | 0.069×10–3 | 6.01 | 0.98 |
| MinD-I260E | 74.36 | 0.18×103 | 0.19×103 | 13.45×10–3 | 0.38×10–3 | 3.61 | 0.95 |
-
KD = equilibrium dissociation constant; kon = association rate constant; koff = dissociation rate constant.
Kinetic constants of His-MinD in combination with His-MinC or His-PDZ.
| Protein | KD [µM] | kon [M–1 s–1] | kon error | koff [s–1] | koff error | X2 | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MinD* | 31.7 | 0.27×103 | 0.21×103 | 8.65×10–3 | 0.26×10–3 | 4.10 | 0.957 |
| +MinC | 33.4 | 0.35×103 | 0.084×103 | 11.7×10–3 | 0.16×10–3 | 8.07 | 0.979 |
| MinD* | 51.1 | 0.34×103 | 0.12×103 | 17.5×10–3 | 0.24×10–3 | 2.40 | 0.986 |
| +PDZ | 47.5 | 0.35×103 | 0.14×103 | 16.6×10–3 | 0.25×10–3 | 8.98 | 0.973 |
-
KD = equilibrium dissociation constant; kon = association rate constant; koff = dissociation rate constant.
-
*
His-MinD control appears twice, from independent purifications. Since batches were not directly comparable, controls are only compared to samples containing the same batch. Concentrations: His-MinD 8 µM, His-MinC 1–16 µM [1, 2, 4, 8, 16], His-PDZ 1–16 µM [1, 2, 4, 8, 16], see Figure 5—figure supplement 1.
Diffusion coefficients obtained from non-comparative square displacement (SQD) analysis of Halo-MinD and variants fitted with three populations.
| Strain | Fast diffusive [µm2 s–1] | Slow diffusive [µm2 s–1] | Confined [µm2 s–1] |
|---|---|---|---|
| MinD WT | 0.60 (22.3%) | 0.084 (50.4%) | 0.020 (27.3%) |
| MinD-G12V | 0.68 (28.5%) | 0.10 (47.5%) | 0.026 (24.0%) |
| MinD-K16A | 0.70 (27.3%) | 0.11 (43.9%) | 0.024 (28.8%) |
| MinD-D40A | 0.44 (13.7%) | 0.063 (50.0%) | 0.021 (36.3%) |
| MinD-I260E | 0.76 (73.4%) | 0.095 (20.3%) | 0.022 (6.3%) |
-
Percentages indicate relative population size.
Diffusion coefficients obtained from non-comparative square displacement (SQD) analysis of Halo-MinD in different genetic backgrounds fitted with three populations.
| Strain | Fast diffusive [µm2 s–1] | Slow diffusive [µm2 s–1] | Confined [µm2 s–1] |
|---|---|---|---|
| WT | 0.57 (22.1%) | 0.083 (50.2%) | 0.019 (27.7%) |
| ΔminC | 0.31 (29.3%) | 0.059 (44.3%) | 0.01 (26.4%) |
| ΔminJ | 0.6 (19%) | 0.069 (41.2%) | 0.018 (39.7%) |
-
Percentages indicate relative population size.
| Reagent type (species) or resource | Designation | Source or reference | Identifiers | Additional information |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibody | Penta-His antibody (Mouse monoclonal) | QIAGEN | Cat#: 34660, RRID:AB_2619735 | WB (1:1000) |
| Antibody | Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, AP | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat#: A16081, RRID:AB_2534755 | WB (1:10,000) |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | 168 | Laboratory collection | Strain_ID:168 | Wild type; trpC2 |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | minC::lox71-kanR-lox66 | Addgene | Strain_ID:BKK28000 | B. subtilis BKK Library |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | minJ::tet | Bramkamp et al., 2008 | Strain_ID:RD021 | |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | minD::lox71-kanR-lox66 | Addgene | Strain_ID:BKK27990 | B. subtilis BKK Library |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | minD::lox71-kanR-lox66 | This paper | Strain_ID:BHF077 | BKK27990 gDNA ->168 |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | minD::aad9-Halo-minD | This paper | Strain_ID:BHF078 | EHF054 ->BHF077 |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | minD::aad9-Halo-minD-G12V | This paper | Strain_ID:BHF079 | EHF055 ->BHF077 |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | minD::aad9-Halo-minD-K16A | This paper | Strain_ID:BHF080 | EHF056 ->BHF077 |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | minD::aad9-Halo-minD-D40A | This paper | Strain_ID:BHF081 | EHF057 ->BHF077 |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | minD::aad9-Halo-minD-I260E | This paper | Strain_ID:BHF082 | EHF058 ->BHF077 |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | minD::aad9-Halo-minD, minC::lox71-kanR-lox66 | This paper | Strain_ID:BHF083 | BKK28000 gDNA ->BHF078 |
| Strain, strain background (B. subtilis) | minD::aad9-Halo-minD, minJ::tet | This paper | Strain_ID:BHF084 | RD021 gDNA ->BHF078 |
| Strain, strain background (E. coli) | NEB 5-alpha | New England Biolabs (C2987H) | Strain_ID:NEB 5-alpha | fhuA2Δ(argF-lacZ)U169 phoA glnV44 Φ80Δ(lacZ)M15 gyrA96 recA1 relA1 endA1 thi-1 hsdR17 |
| Strain, strain background (E. coli) | BL21(DE3)pLysS | Promega | Cat#: L1195 | F–, ompT, hsdSB (rB–, mB–), dcm, gal, λ(DE3), pLysS, Cmr |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pUC18 (plasmid) | Norrander et al., 1983 | Plasmid_ID:pUC18 | lacZα, pMB1 ori, bla (ApR) |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pET-28a (+) (plasmid) | Novagen | Plasmid_ID:pET-28a (+) | kanR, T7lac, f1 ori, N-term His-tag/thrombin/T7-Tag |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pET-28a-minC | This paper | Plasmid_ID:NAP012 | MinC amplified from 168 |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pET-28a-minD | This paper | Plasmid_ID:NAP013 | MinD amplified from 168 |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pET-28a-minD-G12V | This paper | Plasmid_ID:EHF045 | Mutagenesis of NAP013 |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pET-28a-minD-K16A | This paper | Plasmid_ID:EHF046 | Mutagenesis of NAP013 |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pET-28a-minD-I260E | This paper | Plasmid_ID:EHF047 | Mutagenesis of NAP013 |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pET-28a-minD-D40A | This paper | Plasmid_ID:EHF052 | Mutagenesis of NAP013 |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pET-28a-PDZ | This paper | Plasmid_ID:CD001 | Truncated MinJ PDZ domain |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pUC18mut-minDNUp-aad9-Halo-minD | Laboratory stock | Plasmid_ID:EHF042 | |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pUC18-minC-aad9-haloTag-minD-minDdown | This paper | Plasmid_ID:EHF054 | NEBuilder HiFi Assembly |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pUC18-minC-aad9-haloTag-minD-G12V-minDdown | This paper | Plasmid_ID:EHF055 | Mutagenesis of EHF054 |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pUC18-minC-aad9-haloTag-minD-K16A-minDdown | This paper | Plasmid_ID:EHF056 | Mutagenesis of EHF054 |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pUC18-minC-aad9-haloTag-minD-D40A-minDdown | This paper | Plasmid_ID:EHF057 | Mutagenesis of EHF054 |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pUC18-minC-aad9-haloTag-minD-I260E-minDdown | This paper | Plasmid_ID:EHF058 | Mutagenesis of EHF054 |
| Sequence-based reagent | MinC-NdeI-F | This paper | Oligo_ID:NA016 | GTCATCATATGGTGAAGACCAAAAAGCAG |
| Sequence-based reagent | MinC-XhoI-R | This paper | Oligo_ID:NA017 | GTCATCTCGAGTCACATTCCTCCCTCAAG |
| Sequence-based reagent | MinD-NdeI-F | This paper | Oligo_ID:NA018 | GTCATCATATGTTGGGTGAGGCTATCGTA |
| Sequence-based reagent | MinD-XhoI-R | This paper | Oligo_ID:NA019 | GTCATCTCGAGTTAAGATCTTACTCCGAA |
| Sequence-based reagent | GC-1-pUC18toMinC-F | This paper | Oligo_ID:HF0245 | GCCTGCAGGTCGACTCTAGAGGATCCCCGGAACAAAGAATGGACTAACATTG |
| Sequence-based reagent | GC-1-MinCtoSpec-R | This paper | Oligo_ID:HF0246 | ACATCCTTTCACCCTTCACATTCCTCCCTCAAG |
| Sequence-based reagent | GC-2-MinCtoSpec-Halo-F | This paper | Oligo_ID:HF0247 | GGGAGGAATGTGAAGGGTGAAAGGATGTACTTAAAC |
| Sequence-based reagent | GC-2-Spec-HalotoMinD-R | This paper | Oligo_ID:HF0248 | ATAGCCTCACCCAACCCATTGGAAATCTCCAGAG |
| Sequence-based reagent | GC-3-HalotoMinD+Down-F | This paper | Oligo_ID:HF0249 | AGATTTCCAATGGGTTGGGTGAGGCTATCGTAATAAC |
| Sequence-based reagent | GC-3-MinDDowntopUC18-R | This paper | Oligo_ID:HF0250 | CATGATTACGAATTCGAGCTCGGTACCCGCCTACTTCAATCTGCTGTTC |
| Sequence-based reagent | MinD-G12V-QC-F | This paper | Oligo_ID:HF0213 | TCGGGAAAAGtCGGAGTAGGT |
| Sequence-based reagent | MinD-G12V-QC-R | This paper | Oligo_ID:HF0214 | AGTTATTACGATAGCCTCAC |
| Sequence-based reagent | MinD-K16A-QC-F | This paper | Oligo_ID:HF0215 | CGGAGTAGGTgcGACAACAACATC |
| Sequence-based reagent | MinD-K16A-QC-R | This paper | Oligo_ID:HF0216 | CCTTTTCCCGAAGTTATTAC |
| Sequence-based reagent | MinD-I260E-QC-F | This paper | Oligo_ID:HF0237 | GATGGCTAAGgaaAAGTCATTTTTCGG |
| Sequence-based reagent | MinD-I260E-QC-R | This paper | Oligo_ID:HF0238 | ATTCCTTTGTTTTGCTCTTC |
| Sequence-based reagent | MinD-D40A-QC-F | This paper | Oligo_ID:HF0239 | AGTAGATACTgcgATAGGACTGC |
| Sequence-based reagent | MinD-D40A-QC-R | This paper | Oligo_ID:HF0240 | AAGCATACGCGCTTC |
| Sequence-based reagent | MinJ-PDZ-28a-BamHI-F | This paper | Oligo_ID:HF0255 | CATGGATCCTTGGAGGTCTTGTTCCAGGGACCGCGTATTTTTCTG |
| Sequence-based reagent | MinJ-PDZ-28a-XhoI-R | This paper | Oligo_ID:HF0256 | CGCCTCGAGTTATTATGATCCCGAAGCGAC |
| Peptide, recombinant protein | Gel filtration standard | Bio-Rad | Cat#: 1511901 | Used for SEC calibration |
| Commercial assay or kit | EnzChek Phosphate Assay Kit | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat#: E6646 | ATP hydrolysis analysis |
| Commercial assay or kit | Q5 Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit | New England Biolabs | Cat#: E0554 | |
| Commercial assay or kit | NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly Cloning Kit | New England Biolabs | Cat#: E2621 | |
| Software, algorithm | AlphaFold2 | Jumper et al., 2021 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; RRID:SCR_025454 | Structural modeling of MinD |
| Software, algorithm | AlphaFold3 | Abramson et al., 2024 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w; RRID:SCR_028034 | Structural modeling of MinJ |
| Software, algorithm | Fiji (ImageJ2) | Schindelin et al., 2012 | https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019; RRID:SCR_002285 | Version 1.53 g |
| Software, algorithm | Oufti | Paintdakhi et al., 2016 | https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13264; RRID:SCR_016244 | Manual cell outlines for SMTracker 2.0 |
| Software, algorithm | SMTracker 2.0 | Oviedo-Bocanegra et al., 2021 | https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab696 | SMLM track analysis |
| Software, algorithm | MicrobeJ | Ducret et al., 2016 | https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.77; RRID:SCR_023914 | Version 5.11c |
| Software, algorithm | TrackMate | Tinevez et al., 2017 | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.016 | Version 6.0.1 |
| Software, algorithm | R Studio | Posit | RRID:SCR_000432 | Version 2023.12.1+402 |
| Software, algorithm | GraphPad Prism 9 | GraphPad Software | RRID:SCR_002798 | Version 9.4.0, data visualization and analysis |
| Software, algorithm | Zen Blue/Zen Black | Zeiss | RRID:SCR_013672 | Image acquisition and SR analysis |
| Software, algorithm | BLItz Pro | Sartorius | Version 1.3.1.3 | Kinetic analysis and fitting |
| Software, algorithm | Tecan i-control | Tecan | Version 2.0 | Control for Infinite 200 Pro |
| Software, algorithm | R (4.2.2) | R Development Core Team, 2022 | https://www.R-project.org/; RRID:SCR_001905 | Version 4.2.2 |
| Other | Streptavidin (SA) Biosensors | Sartorius | Cat#: 18-5019 | Used with BLItz platform |
| Other | HaloTag TMR Ligand | Promega/Zeiss | Cat#: G8251 | HaloTag staining |
| Other | NileRed | Thermo Fisher/Invitrogen | Cat#: N1142 | Cell membrane staining (1 µg ml–1) |
| Other | Ni-NTA column (Protino) | Macherey-Nagel | Cat#: 745400.1 | Protein affinity purification |
| Other | Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 GL | Cytiva | Cat#: 28990944 | Size-exclusion chromatography |
| Other | Nuclepore Track-Etched Membrane | Whatman | Cat#: 10419506 | Polycarbonate membrane (0.1 µm) |
| Other | Gene Frames | Thermo Scientific | Cat#: AB0577 | 1.5×1.6 cm |
| Other | Amicon Ultra filter devices 10 kDa MWCO | Millipore; Merck | Cat#: UFC901008 | Protein concentration |
| Other | E. coli total extract (lipids) | Avanti Research | Cat#: 100500C | Liposome preparation |
| Other | DSPE-PEG(2000)-biotin | Avanti Research | Cat#: 880129 | Liposome preparation |
Additional files
-
Supplementary file 1
Oligonucleotides used in this study.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-supp1-v1.xlsx
-
Supplementary file 2
Plasmids used in this study.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-supp2-v1.xlsx
-
Supplementary file 3
Strains used in this study.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-supp3-v1.xlsx
-
Supplementary file 4
Bio-layer interferometry (BLI) advanced kinetics protocol.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-supp4-v1.xlsx
-
MDAR checklist
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-mdarchecklist1-v1.docx
-
Source data 1
Source data underlying most figures and tables in this paper.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/101517/elife-101517-data1-v1.xlsx