The Mac1 ADP-ribosylhydrolase is a therapeutic target for SARS-CoV-2
- Gladstone Institute of Virology, Gladstone Institutes, United States
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California San Francisco, United States
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, United States
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, United States
- Quantitative Biosciences Institute (QBI), University of California San Francisco, United States
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco, United States
- Data Science and Biotechnology Institute, Gladstone Institutes, United States
- Small Molecule Discovery Center, University of California San Francisco, United States
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, United States
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub- San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Figures
Figure 1 with 2 supplements
Iterative structure-based design and optimization of AVI-4206 activity against Mac1.
(A) Evolution of the early lead AVI-219 to AVI-4206 by introducing and optimizing urea functionality as found in AVI-92 to contact Asp22 and introducing geminal dimethyl substitution of the pyrrolidinone ring. Homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF)-based IC50 values from (B) and (C), and PDB codes from (E) are indicated. HTRF-based dose–response curves showing peptide displacement of an ADPr-conjugated peptide from Mac1 by compounds from the urea (B) and the pyrrolidinone ring (C) optimization paths. Data is plotted as % competition mean ± SD of three technical replicates. Data were fitted with a sigmoidal dose–response equation using non-linear regression and the IC50 values are quoted with 95% confidence intervals. (D) Mac1 catalytic activity dose–response curve for indicated compounds. Data is plotted as % inhibition mean ± SD of four technical replicates. IC50 values are quoted with 95% confidence intervals. (E) X-ray structures indicating conserved interactions during the optimization path from AVI-92 and AVI-219 (left) to AVI-4206 (right). Structures of compounds from the urea and the pyrrolidinone ring optimization paths are presented in the top and bottom middle panels, respectively. Multiple ligand conformations were observed for AVI-3367, AVI-3762, and AVI-4636 (labeled A and B). The FO − FC difference electron density map calculated prior to ligand modeling is shown for AVI-4206 (purple mesh contoured at 5 σ). Electron density maps used to model ligand other ligands are shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 1.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
X-ray density for ligand modeling.
Ligands were modeled using either traditional FO − FC electron density maps (AVI-1500, AVI-1501, and AVI-4206) or PanDDA event maps (AVI-4051, AVI-3367, AVI-3763, AVI-3762, AVI-3765, AVI-3764, and AVI-4636). The diffraction resolution and refined occupancy are indicated for each ligand. The occupancy is indicated for each confirmation when multiple ligand poses were modeled.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2
AVI-4206 and AVI-219 inhibition of Mac1 determined using auto-mono-ADP-ribosylated PARP10 as a substrate.
(A) Standard curve of ADP-ribose detected using 100 nM NUDT5 and the AMP-Glo assay kit. Data are presented as mean ± SD for four technical replicates. Data were fitted with a power function in the form y = kxa using non-linear regression (gray line). (B) Titration of Mac1 with auto-mono-ADP-ribosylated PARP10. The concentration of PARP10 was 10 μM based on absorbance at 280 nm, but the titration indicated that the concentration of ADP-ribose released by Mac1 was fivefold lower (~2 μM). Data are presented as mean ± SD for four technical replicates. (C) Counterscreen of compounds against 100 nM NudT5 with 2 μM ADP-ribose as a substrate. No inhibition was detected up to 1 mM compound. Data are presented as mean ± SD for four technical replicates.
Figure 2 with 4 supplements
AVI-4206 engages Mac1 with high potency and selectivity in cells.
(A) CETSA-nLuc shows differential Mac1 stabilization after treatment of A549 cells with 10 μM of indicated compounds. Data are presented as mean ± SD of two technical replicates. Data were fitted with a sigmoidal dose–response equation using non-linear regression (gray line) and the Tagg values are quoted with 95% confidence intervals. (B) CETSA-nLuc shows a dose-dependent thermal stabilization of Mac1 after treatment of A549 cells with increasing concentrations of AVI-4206. Data are presented as mean ± SD of two technical replicates. Homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF)-based dose–response curves showing displacement of an ADPr-conjugated peptide from indicated proteins by ADP-ribose (C) or AVI-4206 (D). ADP-ribose was used as a positive control. Data are presented as mean ± SD of three technical replicates. IC50 values are quoted with 95% confidence intervals. (E) Structural modeling of MacroD2 (top, PDB code 4IQY) and Targ1 (bottom, PDB code 4J5S) showing design elements that prevent AVI-4206 cross-reactivity. The atoms of clashing residues (Cys140 in MacroD2, Arg122 in Targ1) are shown with a dot representation. The ADP-ribose present in both human macrodomain structures has been omitted for clarity.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1
AVI-4206 increases thermal stability of Mac1 in cells.
(A) CETSA-WB shows thermal stabilization of FLAG-tagged Mac1 protein after treatment of A549 cells with 10 μM of AVI-4206. (B) Densitometry values were normalized to the lowest temperature for each treatment. Data are presented as a single densitometry measurement. (C) CETSA-nLuc shows differential stabilization of SARS-CoV2, SARS-CoV, and MERS macrodomain proteins in A549 cells treated with 10 μM of AVI-4206. Data are presented as mean ± SD of two technical replicates. Data were fitted with a sigmoidal dose–response equation using non-linear regression (gray line), and the Tagg values are quoted with 95% confidence intervals.
-
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1
Labeled full gel of CETSA-WB shows thermal stabilization of FLAG-tagged Mac1 protein after treatment of A549 cells with 10 μM of AVI-4206.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/103484/elife-103484-fig2-figsupp1-data1-v1.pdf
-
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 2
Unlabeled full gels of CETSA-WB show thermal stabilization of FLAG-tagged Mac1 protein after treatment of A549 cells with 10 μM of AVI-4206.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/103484/elife-103484-fig2-figsupp1-data2-v1.zip
Figure 2—figure supplement 2
Alignment of AVI-4206-bound SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 with diverse macrodomains suggests the origin of AVI-4206 selectivity.
(A) For human and (B) viral macrodomains, AVI-4206 is shown with teal spheres/sticks, SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 is shown with white sticks and the macrodomains being compared are shown with purple sticks. Selected Mac1 residues are labeled with black text, and the most important clashing human/viral residue is labeled and shown with red dots. For the clashing asparagine residue in the viral macrodomains (position equivalent to Phe156 in SARS-CoV-2 Mac1), rotation of the residue around the χ1 dihedral angle (shown with a red arrow) could relieve the clash and allow AVI-4206 binding. The human/viral macrodomain structures compared are bound to ADP-ribose, except for PARP9 MOD1, where no experimental structure is available and the Alphafold 2 model is shown. (C) The SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 sequence was aligned to human/viral macrodomains shown in (A) and (B) for SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 residues within 5 Å of AVI-4206. The SARS-CoV-2 residue numbering and the % identity for each sequence compared to SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 is indicated. (D) Surface view of Mac1 (PDB 9CY0) sliced through a plane containing AVI-4206 (teal sticks) and the site of the Val34Leu mutation (purple spheres).
Figure 2—figure supplement 3
PARP14 macrodomain 1 activity is not inhibited by AVI-4206.
(A) Titration of AVI-4206 shows full inhibition of WT Mac1, but no effect against catalytically active PARP14:MD1-MD2. Negative controls of Mac1 N40D and PARP14: MD2 are included. We note that the IC50 for WT Mac1 here is higher than in our other experiments, which we attribute to differences in the substrate preparation, the higher enzyme concentrations used (50 vs. 10 nM), and the exact timing of the end point measurements. (B) Enzyme activity measurements to verify that WT Mac1 and PARP14:MD1-MD2 are active and that PARP14:MD2 and Mac1 N40D are inactive.
Figure 2—figure supplement 4
Thermal proteome profiling in A549 cellular lysates.
(A) Melting curve for Mac1 in A549 lysates treated in duplicate with either DMSO or 100 μM of AVI-4206. Data were normalized to the mean intensity at 37°C. Data were fitted with a sigmoidal dose–response equation using non-linear regression (gray line). (B) Volcano plot of the statistical significance and degree of melting temperature shift for all proteins with high-quality melting curves (n = 3446 proteins). Teal circles indicate proteins with a statistically significant shift in melting temperature (adjusted p value <0.05). The highest non-significant proteins are labeled and do not have obvious functional overlap with macrodomains.
Figure 3 with 3 supplements
Vero-TMPRSS2 (A) or A549-ACE2h (B) cells were pretreated with compounds and infected with mNeonGreen reporter SARS-CoV-2.
mNeonGreen expression was measured by the Incucyte system. Graphs represent mean ± SD of % replication normalized to the DMSO control 24 post-infection of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Data were fitted with a sigmoidal dose–response equation using non-linear regression (gray line) and the EC50 values are quoted with 95% confidence intervals. (C) Schematic of the replicon assay to test the efficacy of AVI-4206 in A549 ACE2h cells. (D) Luciferase readout of A549 ACE2h cells infected with WA1 or WA1 Mac1 N40D replicons and treated with or without AVI-4206 and IFN-ɣ at indicated concentrations; *p < 0.05 by two-tailed Student’s t-test relative to the no AVI-4206 and no IFN-ɣ control. Results are plotted as normalized mean ± standard deviation luciferase values of a representative biological experiment containing two technical replicates. (E) Representative images of A549 cells stably expressing Mac1 and Mac1-N40D treated with IFN-γ and/or RBN012759 or AVI-4206. DMSO-treated cells are shown as vehicle control. Poly/mono ADPr signal comes from Poly/Mono-ADP Ribose (D9P7Z) Rabbit mAb (CST, 89190S) staining. (F) Relative mean cytoplasmic poly/mono ADPr intensity of cells from (F). Data shown as mean values ± SD. At least 8000 cells were analyzed in each group, from triplicate wells. Two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to compare ADPr intensity levels of each treatment. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3—figure supplement 1
AVI-4206 has limited antiviral efficacy and no cytotoxicity in cellular models of infection.
Drug cytotoxicity of AVI-4206 in Vero-TMPRSS2 (A) and A549 ACE2h (B) was measured using the CellTiter-Glo viability assay. Graphs represent the mean ± SD of three biological replicates each conducted in triplicate. Luciferase readout of VAT (C) and A549 ACE2h (D) cells infected with WA1 or WA1 Mac1 N40D replicons and treated with or without AVI-4206 and IFN-ɣ at indicated concentrations. Results are plotted as normalized mean ± SD luciferase values of a representative biological experiment containing three technical replicates.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2
Relative mean cytoplasmic poly/mono ADPr intensity of A549 cells stably expressing Mac1 and Mac1-N40D treated with IFN-γ and/or AVI-4206.
DMSO-treated cells are shown as vehicle control. Poly/mono ADPr signal comes from Poly/Mono-ADP Ribose (E6F6A) Rabbit mAb (CST, 83732S) staining. Data shown as mean values ± SD. At least 10,000 cells were analyzed each group, from triplicate wells. Two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to compare ADPr intensity levels of each treatment. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Figure 3—figure supplement 3
ADP-ribosylation profiling during infection by Western Blot.
(A) Immunoblot showing pan-ADP-ribose (panADPr) levels in Calu-3 cells under indicated infection conditions. UI = uninfected cells, WT = cells infected with WA1, N40D = cells infected with WA1 NSP3 Mac1 N40D, with or without 100 μM AVI-4206 treatment. HeLa cells treated with H₂O₂ were included as a positive control for the ADPr signal. Actin serves as a loading control. (B) Densitometric analysis of panADPr levels normalized to actin. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3), with p- values indicated. (C) Immunoblot showing mono-ADP-ribose (monoADPr) levels under the same conditions as (A). (D) Densitometric analysis of monoADPr levels normalized to actin. No statistically significant differences (ns) were observed between conditions. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3).
-
Figure 3—figure supplement 3—source data 1
Annotated Iimmunoblot showing pan-ADP-ribose (panADPr) and mono-ADP-ribose (monoADPr) levels in Calu-3 cells under indicated infection conditions.
UI = uninfected cells, WT = cells infected with WA1, N40D = cells infected with WA1 NSP3 Mac1 N40D, with or without 100 μM AVI-4206 treatment. HeLa cells treated with H₂O₂ were included as a positive control for the ADPr signal. Actin serves as a loading control.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/103484/elife-103484-fig3-figsupp3-data1-v1.pdf
-
Figure 3—figure supplement 3—source data 2
Full gels of immunoblot showing pan-ADP-ribose (panADPr) and mono-ADP-ribose (monoADPr) levels in Calu-3 cells under indicated infection conditions.
UI = uninfected cells, WT = cells infected with WA1, N40D = cells infected with WA1 NSP3 Mac1 N40D, with or without 100 μM AVI-4206 treatment. HeLa cells treated with H₂O₂ were included as a positive control for the ADPr signal. Actin serves as a loading control.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/103484/elife-103484-fig3-figsupp3-data2-v1.zip
Figure 4
AVI-4206 displays efficacy in organoids and primary cell models.
(A) Schematic of the human airway organoid (HAO) experiment. (B) Viral particle production was measured by plaque assay at indicated time points and AVI-4206 concentrations. Error bars indicate SEM. **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05 by two-tailed Student’s t-test relative to the vehicle control. (C) Monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) were exposed to SARS-CoV-2, and virus particle production was assessed 24 hr later using a plaque assay. **p < 0.01 by two-tailed Student’s t-test relative to WA1. (D) Plaque assay of MDMs infected with WA1 or WA1 Mac1 N40D viruses and treated with AVI-4206 at indicated concentrations and IFN-γ at 50 ng/ml. *p < 0.05 by two-tailed Student’s t-test compared to the untreated control. (E) MDMs were incubated with AVI-4206 for 24 hr, after which cytotoxicity was assessed using an ATP-based cytotoxicity assay.
Figure 5
AVI-4206 has a favorable pharmacological profile.
(A) Pharmacokinetic properties of AVI-4206. (B) Unbound plasma exposure time course of AVI-4206, corrected for plasma protein binding, following administration by IV, PO, or IP routes in male CD-1 mice at the indicated doses. (C) Free plasma exposure of AVI-4206 and total exposure in lung homogenate following an IP dose of 10 mg/kg in female C57BL/6 mice. (D) Inhibition of CYP isoforms by AVI-4206 at a fixed concentration of 10 μM. Two experiments were performed with CYP3A4 using different positive controls. (E) Heatmap of AVI-4206 activity in an off-target safety panel including receptors, ion channels, and proteases, showing no antagonist response >15% at 10 μM.
Figure 6 with 3 supplements
AVI-4206 reduces viral replication and increases survival and cytokine abundance in vivo.
(A) K18-hACE2 mice were intranasally infected and dosed as indicated with either AVI-4206 (n = 15, intraperitoneally), nirmatrelvir (n = 5, per os), or vehicle (n = 10 for the AVI-4206 group or n = 5 for the nirmatrelvir group). Mice infected with the WA1 N40D mutant, which lacks Mac1 catalytic activity, served as a positive control (n = 10). Lungs were harvested at indicated time points for virus titration by plaque assay. (B) The percent body weight loss for all animals treated with AVI-4206 (100 mg/kg IP) (C) or nirmatrelvir (300 mg/kg PO). The data are presented as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 by two-tailed Student’s t-test relative to the vehicle control at each time point. (D) Survival curve plotted based on the percent weight loss humane endpoint (20%) for AVI-4206 and (E) nirmatrelvir. (F) Viral load in the lungs and brain of infected mice at the indicated time points. The data are shown as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 by Mann–Whitney’s test relative to the vehicle control. (G) Schematics and graphs demonstrating the abundance of indicated cytokines at 4 and 7 days post-infection in the lungs of infected mice. The data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 by two-tailed Student’s t-test relative to the vehicle control at each time point. None of the mice reached the humane endpoint at day 4 post-infection. For mice that reached the humane endpoint before day 7 post-infection, the tissues were collected and analyzed with mice at the 7-day time point.
Figure 6—figure supplement 1
Lung histology.
We examined determinants of tissue damage by either (A) caspase 3 staining for apoptosis (**", signifies a p value of 0.0013 in a two tailed unpaired T-test analysis) or (B) Masson’s Trichrome stain for collagen deposition and pulmonary fibrosis. In the lungs of AVI-4206 treated animals, apoptosis is significantly reduced compared to the lungs of the vehicle cohort. While collagen deposition in the lungs of AVI-4206 treated animals is trending lower, the result is not significant. There is no difference in pathology between the N40D cohort and vehicle-treated cohort with these markers. This could suggest that AVI-4206 provides an additional mechanism that results in protection.
Figure 6—figure supplement 2
Lower dose AVI-4206 reduces viral replication and increases survival in vivo.
(A) K18-hACE2 mice were intranasally infected with SARS-CoV-2 WA1 or SARS-CoV-2 WA1 Mac1 N40D mutant. Mice were treated as indicated with AVI-4206 (BID, 30 mg/kg) or vehicle. Each group was composed of n = 10 mice (5 mice per time point). (B) The percent body weight loss is presented as mean ± SD. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 by two-tailed Student’s t-test relative to the vehicle control at each time point. (C) Survival curve based on the percent body weight loss humane endpoint. (D) Viral load in the lung at indicated time points is presented as mean ± SEM **, p < 0.01 by Mann –Whitney’s test relative to the vehicle control.
Figure 6—figure supplement 3
AVI-4206 suppresses replication of mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 in wild-type mice.
(A) Wild-type mice were intranasally infected with SARS-CoV-2 and treated with AVI-4206, AVI-6451, or vehicle (n = 10 per group). Mice infected with the WA1 N40D mutant served as a positive control (n = 10). Lung tissues were collected at designated time points for viral titer analysis using a plaque assay. Viral load in the lungs of wild-type mice treated with AVI-4206 (B, day 2; C, day 5). **, p < 0.01 by Mann –Whitney’s test relative to the vehicle control.
Chemical structure 1
1-((8-Amino-9H-pyrimido[4,5-b]indol-4-yl)amino)pyrrolidin-2-one.
Chemical structure 2
1-Amino-5,5-dimethylpyrrolidin-2-one hydrochloride.
Chemical structure 3
AVI-4051.
Chemical structure 4
AVI-1501.
Chemical structure 5
AVI-3367.
Chemical structure 6
AVI-1500.
Chemical structure 7
AVI-3762 and AVI-3763.
Chemical structure 8
AVI-3764 and AVI-3765.
Chemical structure 9
AVI-4636.
Chemical structure 10
AVI-4206.
Additional files
-
Supplementary file 1
X-ray data collection and refinement deposition statistics.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/103484/elife-103484-supp1-v1.xlsx
-
Supplementary file 2
Specificity, PK, and ADMET panels.
(a) Eurofins scanEDGE kinase assay shows no inhibition greater than >35% at 10 μM across a panel of diverse kinases. (b) Pharmacokinetic parameters for AVI-4206 following IV (10 mg/kg), PO (50 mg/kg), and IP (100 mg/kg) doses in male CD1 mice (n = 3 per group). (c) ADMET panel shows no antagonist response greater than >15% at 10 μM.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/103484/elife-103484-supp2-v1.xlsx
-
Supplementary file 3
Macrodomain protein sequences.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/103484/elife-103484-supp3-v1.xlsx
-
MDAR checklist
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/103484/elife-103484-mdarchecklist1-v1.pdf
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
The Mac1 ADP-ribosylhydrolase is a therapeutic target for SARS-CoV-2
eLife 14:RP103484.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.103484.3
