C-terminal tagging, transmembrane domain hydrophobicity, and an ER retention motif influence the secretory trafficking of the inner nuclear membrane protein emerin

  1. Jessica Mella
  2. Regan F Volk
  3. Balyn W Zaro
  4. Abigail Buchwalter  Is a corresponding author
  1. Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, United States
  2. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, United States
  3. Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, United States
4 figures and 1 table

Figures

EMD ΔLEM does not traffic in U2OS cells, while the transmembrane domain (TMD) alone does.

(A) U2OS cells expressing mouse EMD-GFP and ΔLEM-GFP were induced with 1 µg/mL doxycycline for 24 hr, treated with 100 nM lysosome blocking agent bafilomycin A1 (BafA1) overnight, and fixed and stained for lysosome marker Lamp1. Scale bar, 10 µm. (B) Summary of EMD domains and truncation mutants. (C) EMD enriches at the inner nuclear membrane (INM) by binding to the nuclear lamina or exits the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) into the secretory pathway. Before reaching the lysosome, EMD transiently accesses the cell surface where lumenal GFP is exposed to anti-GFP antibody. (D) Example FACS plot of mouse WT vs ΔLEM surface labeling; fluorescent anti-IgG secondary antibody included as background control. Antibody signal is divided by total GFP+ signal to yield histograms on the right. (E) Quantification of the antibody:GFP ratio from 4 independent experiments, with error bars representing SD. * indicates adjusted p-value=0.0451 by one-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. (F) U2OS cells expressing mouse TMD-GFP (lumenal tag) or GFP-TMD (cytosolic tag) were treated overnight with BafA1, then fixed and stained with an anti-GFP antibody. (G) Example surface labeling FACS histogram of U2OS cells expressing WT, LEM-TMD-GFP, or TMD-GFP.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Emerin’s trafficking depends on its transmembrane domain (TMD), not on the LEM domain.

(A) Surface anti-GFP antibody:GFP histogram of human WT EMD, ΔLEM, and EMD with mouse cytochrome B5 TMD (EMDCyb5 TMD) chimera. (B) U2OS cells expressing mouse EMD-GFP and EMDCyb5 TMD-GFP were induced with 1 µg/mL doxycycline for 24 hr, treated with 100 nM lysosome blocking drug bafilomycin A1 (BafA1) overnight, and fixed and stained for lysosome marker Lamp1. Scale bars, 10 µm. (C) TMD mutation strategy. The TM alpha helix of human EMD was divided into N-terminal and C-terminal halves, and the aromatic residues in each half were mutated to alanine to generate mutants with similar ΔG-insertion values. For the full TMD mutant, all aromatic residues were mutated to alanine, yielding a predicted ΔG-insertion of –2.299. (D) Surface antibody:GFP FACS histogram and (E) quantification of the mutants diagrammed in (C). N=4 independent experiments. (F) Surface antibody:GFP FACS histogram and (G) quantification of mouse WT EMD, RA, ΔLEM, and ΔLEMΔQRRR truncation surface expression. N=4 independent experiments. (H) Summary of emerin constructs that do or do not traffic. (I) Western blot analysis of emerin constructs induced with 2 µg/mL doxycycline for 48 hr, then washed and incubated for an 18 hr chase. (J) Quantification of western blot band intensity from (I). GFP antibody signal after washout was divided by the respective unwashed condition to yield the fraction GFP remaining after doxycycline washout across three independent replicates. For all panels: *** indicates adjusted p-value<0.0005, * indicates p=0.0104. All p-values were obtained by one-way ANOVA with Šídák’s or Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests.

Figure 2—source data 1

Original files for WB displayed in Figure 2.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/105937/elife-105937-fig2-data1-v1.zip
Figure 2—source data 2

PDF files of uncropped WB displayed in Figure 2, annotated bands and MW markers.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/105937/elife-105937-fig2-data2-v1.zip
Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Emerin contains a long, hydrophobic transmembrane domain and a conserved RXR motif.

(A) Lengths and predicted ΔG-insertion values of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) protein cytochrome B5, plasma membrane (PM) protein syntaxin 3, and emerin inner nuclear membrane (INM) proteins emerin and Lap2β. (B) Single-pass human transmembrane proteins from Membranome database plotted by free energy of transfer into a lipid bilayer. Lines represent median; **** indicates p<0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. (C) Transmembrane domain (TMD) length (by amino acid count) of the proteins in (B). ** indicates p=0.0028; **** indicates p<0.0001. (D) Protein sequence alignment of emerin’s LEM domain across species. Conserved LEM domain amino acid class indicated in blue. QRRR motif is conserved in mammals and is exposed in the ΔLEM construct. (E) FACS plots of WT EMD-GFP and TMD mutant expression upon dox induction. Fewer cells express C-TMDm and full TMDm, though topology of constructs that are expressed is not altered (see F). (F) Antibody accessibility upon differential permeabilization of U2OS cells expressing full TMDm. Cells were incubated with digitonin to permeabilize the plasma membrane, Triton X-100 to permeabilize all internal membranes, or left unpermeabilized, then stained with antibodies against emerin (cytosolic epitope) and GFP (lumenal epitope).

Figure 3 with 1 supplement
RXR motif limits transmembrane domain (TMD)-dependent trafficking of emerin and LAP2β without influencing COPI binding.

(A) Surface anti-GFP:GFP histogram and (B) quantification of indicated RA+ TMD mutant combinations. ** indicates p=0.0021. N=3 independent experiments. (C) Diagram of LAP2β domain structure and position of RXR motifs. APEX2 fusion contains no RXR motifs. (D) Antibody:GFP histogram and (E) quantification of the highest 25% GFP-expressing cells diagrammed in (C). RXRmut: LAP2β RXR1 mutated to AAA. * indicates p=0.0173; ** indicates p=0.0072. (F) Spectral counts of COPI proteins immunoprecipitated by WT FLAG-EMD normalized to negative control IP. Spectral counts of the mouse EMD bait and common contaminant filamin A (FLNA) plotted for comparison. N=2 independent experiments. (G) Spectral counts of proteins immunoprecipitated by FLAG-WT and FLAG-RA mouse EMD normalized to each respective bait. Dotted line represents equal co-immunoprecipitation with the two constructs. COPI proteins and endogenous human EMD highlighted in yellow and green, respectively. All p-values were obtained by one-way ANOVA with Šídák’s or Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Controls for LAP2B trafficking and emerin immunoprecipitation experiments.

(A) GFP vs surface anti-GFP FACS plots of negative control anti-IgG, WT LAP2β/RXR1mut, and WT EMD/LAP2β APEX2-TMD. (B) Median anti-GFP antibody:GFP ratio of the highest 25% GFP-expressing cells in (A). (C) Western blot analysis of anti-FLAG immunoprecipitations. U2OS cells expressing no FLAG construct (neg), FLAG-WT mouse EMD, and FLAG-RA mutant were lysed and incubated with anti-FLAG magnetic beads. Equal volume equivalents were separated by SDS-PAGE and blotted with an anti-EMD antibody to visualize tagged and untagged EMD. (D) U2OS cells expressing FLAG-EMD were incubated with lysosome blocker bafilomycin A1 (BafA1) overnight, then fixed and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.02% SDS, 10 mg/mL BSA in PBS. Cells were stained with anti-FLAG antibody to visualize relocalization during BafA1 treatment. Scale bars, 20 µm.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement
Safe harbor expression reveals that C-terminal GFP destabilizes emerin.

(A) Diagram of emerin integration into the AAVS1 locus. Landing pad BFP is exchanged for mCherry-P2A-emerin±GFP via Bxb1 and PhiC31 integrases. Integrases irreversibly recombine landing pad attP and donor attB sites into attR and attL sites. (B) Strategy to compare overexpressed emerin to knockout (KO) rescue. (C) Western blot analysis of WT and EMD KO dual integrase cassette exchange (DICE) hiPSCs expressing N- and C-terminally GFP-tagged emerin. Untagged endogenous EMD and GFP-tagged EMD are detected by the same anti-EMD antibody. (D) Anti-GFP surface labeling histogram and (E) quantification of C-terminally tagged emerin integrants from (BC). Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. N=3 independent experiments. (F) FACS plot and (G) quantification of steady-state GFP abundance. Data were normalized to the GFP-EMD signal in the EMD WT background. N=3 independent experiments. ** indicates p=0.0079 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. (H) DICE landing pad WT, EMD KO, and KO re-integrated with untagged constructs were lifted, fixed, and stained with anti-EMD antibody. Fluorescence was quantified by flow cytometry and normalized to the WT DICE integrant. MFI, median fluorescence intensity of antibody signal. N=5 replicates over 4 independent experiments. **** indicates p<0.0001 by mixed effects analysis.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Differential trafficking behavior of tagged and untagged emerin.

(A) EMD knockout (KO) dual integrase cassette exchange (DICE) hiPSCs were integrated with GFP-tagged EMD constructs. Cells were treated with vehicle or lysosome blocker bafilomycin A1 (BafA1) overnight, then fixed and stained with anti-LAMP1 antibody. (B) U2OS cells expressing indicated constructs were induced with doxycycline for 4 hr (bottom panels) or left uninduced (top panels). Cells were then shifted to 10°C or continued incubation at 37°C for 2 hr. Cells were then fixed and stained for endogenous emerin (top panel) and Sec31a to mark ERES. (C) Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between endogenous emerin or EMD-GFP and Sec31a. N=31–54 cells over 3 independent experiments. *** indicates p=0.0006 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. (D) EMD KO DICE hiPSCs were integrated with untagged EMD WT, TMD mutant, or RA mutant. Cells were treated overnight with BafA1, then fixed and stained with anti-EMD antibody. Scale bars, 20 µm. (E) We mined a dataset of matched RNAseq and quantitative protein abundances across 29 human tissues to evaluate EMD transcript and protein abundances. EMD protein and transcript abundance are largely uncorrelated (R2~0), while, for comparison, the enzyme spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) has well-correlated protein and RNA levels (R2=0.89).

Tables

Appendix 1—key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Gene (Homo sapiens)EMDNANCBI RefSeq:NM_000117.3
Gene (Homo sapiens)Lap2BNANCBI RefSeq:NM_001032283.3
Gene (Mus musculus)EMDNANCBI RefSeq:NM_007927.4
Gene (Mus musculus)Cyb5aNANCBI RefSeq:NM_025797.4
Cell line (human, female)U2OSUCSF Cell and Genome Engineering CoreATCC:HTB-96
Cell line (human, male)WTC-11 hiPSCBerkeley Stem Cell CenterhPSCreg:UCSFi001-A
Cell line (human, male)AAVS1 DICE landing pad hiPSC+EMD KOThis paperWTC-11 with single-copy landing pad at AAVS1 locus, EMD gene deletion
Cell line (human, male)AAVS1 DICE landing pad hiPSCThis paperWTC-11 with single-copy landing pad at AAVS1 locus
Transfected construct (human, DICE landing pad hiPSC)EMD-GFP DICE donorThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM358Stable single-copy integration of EMD WT (C-terminal tag)
Transfected construct (human, DICE landing pad hiPSC)GFP-EMD DICE donorThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM417Stable single-copy integration of EMD WT (N-terminal tag)
Transfected construct (human, DICE landing pad hiPSC)RA-GFP DICE donorThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM415Stable single-copy integration of EMD mutant residues 44–47→AAAA (C-terminal tag)
Transfected construct (human, DICE landing pad hiPSC)GFP-RA DICE donorThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM418Stable single-copy integration of EMD mutant residues 44–47→AAAA (N-terminal tag)
Transfected construct (human, DICE landing pad hiPSC)TMDm-GFP DICE donorThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM416Stable single-copy integration of EMD mutant W226A, F232A, F235A, F240A, F241A, Y243A (C-terminal tag)
Transfected construct (human, DICE landing pad hiPSC)GFP-TMDm DICE donorThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM419Stable single-copy integration of EMD mutant W226A, F232A, F235A, F240A, F241A, Y243A (N-terminal tag)
Transfected construct (human, DICE landing pad hiPSC)Untagged EMD DICE donorThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM401Stable single-copy integration of EMD WT
Transfected construct (human, DICE landing pad hiPSC)Untagged RA DICE donorThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM411Stable single-copy integration of EMD mutant
Transfected construct (human, DICE landing pad hiPSC)Untagged TMDm DICE donorThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM412Stable single-copy integration of EMD mutant W226A, F232A, F235A, F240A, F241A, Y243A
Transfected construct (human, U2OS)XLone EMD-GFPThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM225PiggyBac vector for stable expression of hEMD WT
Transfected construct (human, U2OS)XLone RA-GFPThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM271PiggyBac vector for stable expression of EMD 47–50→AAAA
Transfected construct (human, U2OS)XLone ΔLEM-GFPThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM272PiggyBac vector for stable expression of EMD Δ1–43
Transfected construct (mouse, U2OS)XLone TMD-GFPThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM217PiggyBac vector for stable expression of mEMD 212–259
Transfected construct (mouse, U2OS)XLone GFP-TMDThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM222PiggyBac vector for stable expression of mEMD 212–259
Transfected construct (human, U2OS)XLone N-TMDm-GFPThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM328PiggyBac vector for stable expression of EMD W226A, F232A, F235A
Transfected construct (human, U2OS)XLone C-TMDm-GFPThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM330PiggyBac vector for stable expression of EMD F240A, F241A, Y243A
Transfected construct (human, U2OS)XLone TMDm-GFPThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM331PiggyBac vector for stable expression of EMD W226A, F232A, F235A, F240A, F241A, Y243A
Transfected construct (human, U2OS)XLone N-TMDm-GFP+RAThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM355PiggyBac vector for stable expression of EMD W226A, F232A, F235A, and 47-50AAAA
Transfected construct (human, U2OS)XLone C-TMDm-GFP+RAThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM356PiggyBac vector for stable expression of EMD F240A, F241A, Y243A, and 47-50AAAA
Transfected construct (human, U2OS)XLone TMDm-GFP+RAThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM357PiggyBac vector for stable expression of EMD W226A, F232A, F235A, F240A, F241A, Y243A, and 47-50AAAA
Transfected construct (human, U2OS)XLone EMD+Cyb5 TMD-GFPThis paperUniprot ID: P50402; pJM273PiggyBac vector for stable expression
Transfected construct (human, U2OS)XLone LAP2B-GFPThis paperUniprot ID: P42167; pJM326PiggyBac vector for stable expression of LAP2B WT
Transfected construct (human, U2OS)XLone LAP2B RxR1-GFPThis paperUniprot ID: P42167; pJM333PiggyBac vector for stable expression of LAP2B 48–50
→AAA
Transfected construct (human, U2OS)XLone APEX2-LAP2B TMD-GFPThis paperUniprot ID: P42167 (LAP2B); pJM312PiggyBac vector for stable expression of APEX2+LAP2B 281–454
Transfected construct (mouse, U2OS)XLone EMD-GFPThis paperUniprot ID: O08579; AB_E00175PiggyBac vector for stable expression of mEMD WT
Transfected construct (mouse, U2OS)XLone RA-GFPThis paperUniprot ID: O08579; pJM228PiggyBac vector for stable expression of mEMD 47–50 →AAAA
Transfected construct (mouse, U2OS)XLone DLEM-GFPThis paperUniprot ID: O08579; pJM202PiggyBac vector for stable expression of mEMD delta 1–43
Transfected construct (mouse, U2OS)XLone EMD+Cyb5 TMD-GFPThis paperUniprot ID: O08579 (EMD); Uniprot ID:P56395 (Cyb5); pJM214PiggyBac vector for stable expression of mEMD 1–225+Cyb5 95–134
Transfected construct (mouse, U2OS)XLone DLEMDQRRR-GFPThis paperUniprot ID: O08579; pJM227PiggyBac vector for stable expression of mEMD delta 1–47
Transfected construct (mouse, U2OS)CMV-FLAG-EMDThis paperUniprot ID: O08579; pJM244Constitutive stable expression of FLAG-EMD
Transfected construct (mouse, U2OS)CMV-FLAG-RAThis paperUniprot ID: O08579; pJM258Constitutive stable expression of FLAG-mEMD 47-50AAAA
AntibodyAnti-EMD rabbit polyclonalProteinTech10351-1-APWB: 1:2000, IF: 1:250
AntibodyRabbit polyclonal anti-GFPChromoTekPABG1IF: 1:1000 for selective permeabilization assay
AntibodyAnti-GFP Alexa Fluor 647BioLegendFM264GSurface staining for flow cytometry: 1:20
AntibodyAnti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 647Thermo FisherA27040Anti-IgG surface FACS control: 1:200
AntibodyMouse monoclonal anti-FLAGSigma-AldrichF1804IF (1:1000), WB (1:1000)
AntibodyRabbit polyclonal anti-LAMP1Abcamab24170IF (1:250)
AntibodyMouse monoclonal anti-Sec31ABD612350IF (1:500)
AntibodyMouse monoclonal anti-FLAG beadsSigma-AldrichM882340 µL per immunoprecipitation
Recombinant DNA reagent (plasmid)XloneAddgene96930Gift from Xiaojun Lian
Recombinant DNA reagent (plasmid)DICE landing pad HDR templateThis paperpJM313AAVS1 attP-PGK-TK-P2A-TagBFP-attP
Recombinant DNA reagent (plasmid)Dual integrase expression vectorOtherpEN476CAGGS-BxbI-P2A-PhiC31 gift from Dr. Elphege Nora
Recombinant DNA reagent (plasmid)PiggyBac TransposaseSystem BiosciencesPB200A_1
Sequence-based reagent5' EMD guide RNASynthego11400580ACAGAUUGGCUAGCGGCAGG
Sequence-based reagent3' EMD guide RNASynthego11400580ACAUGGGAGAAAAGCUCCAA
Sequence-based reagentAAVS1 guide RNASynthego11400580accaauccugucccuag
Peptide, recombinant proteinBenzonaseEMD-Millipore70664-10KUN1:1000 in lysis buffer
Peptide, recombinant proteinpyogenes WT Cas9-NLS, purifiedBerkeley QB3 MacroLab2 µg/12.5 pmol per 100 µL reaction
Peptide, recombinant protein3x FLAG peptideMedChem ExpressHY-P0319AFLAG elution during immunoprecipitation
Commercial assay or kitPreOmics iST kitPreOmicsP.O.00027MS sample prep
Commercial assay or kitNEB Site-Directed Mutagenesis KitNew England BiolabsE0554Site-directed mutagenesis
Commercial assay or kitNEB HiFi DNA Assembly KitNew England BiolabsE5520High-efficiency DNA assembly
Commercial assay or kitMMLV reverse transcriptaseNew England BiolabsM0253cDNA generation
Commercial assay or kitZymoPURE II Midiprep KitZymo ResearchD4202High-purity plasmid preparation
Chemical compound, drugBlasticidinResearch Products InternationalB12150-0.15 µg/mL for U2OS selection
Chemical compound, drugG418 (Geneticin)Fisher Scientific501363278400 µg/mL (U2OS selection), 200 µg/mL (U2OS maintenance)
Chemical compound, drugDoxycyclineSigma-AldrichD9891Inducible expression; 1–2 µg/mL
Chemical compound, drugBafilomycin A1Sigma-AldrichB1793Lysosome blocking agent; 100 nM
Chemical compound, drugPuromycinMillipore-Sigma540411-25mg0.25 µg/mL for hiPSC selection
Software, algorithmFijihttps://imagej.netImage and WB analysis
Software, algorithmFlowJohttps://www.flowjo.com/Flow cytometry analysis
Software, algorithmNikon Elementshttps://www.microscope.healthcare.nikon.com/products/software/nis-elementsImage acquisition
Software, algorithmGraphPad Prismhttps://www.graphpad.comStatistical tests
Software, algorithmJupyter Labhttps://jupyter.org/Analysis and plotting of MS data
OtherMcCoy’s 5A MediumThermo Fisher16600082Culture medium for U2OS cells
OthermTeSR+MediumStemCell Technologies85850Culture medium for WTC-11 hiPSCs
OtherReLeSRStemCell Technologies100-0483Clump passaging of hiPSCs
OtherROCK inhibitorSelleck Chemicals101763-96410 µM
OtherAccutaseFisher ScientificNC9464543Single-cell passaging of hiPSCs
OtherMatrigelCorning354277Coating for hiPSC culture vessels
OtherHoechst 33342Tocris Bioscience5117Used at 10 µg/mL
OtherProtease inhibitor cocktailSigma-AldrichP8340
OtherPhosSTOP phosphatase inhibitorRoche4906845001
OtherLipofectamine 2000Invitrogen11668019

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jessica Mella
  2. Regan F Volk
  3. Balyn W Zaro
  4. Abigail Buchwalter
(2025)
C-terminal tagging, transmembrane domain hydrophobicity, and an ER retention motif influence the secretory trafficking of the inner nuclear membrane protein emerin
eLife 14:RP105937.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105937.3