Quantifying intracellular mechanosensitive response upon spatially defined mechano-chemical triggering
- Laboratory of Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Figures
Figure 1 with 2 supplements
FluidFM stimulation combined with FLIM readout for measuring subcellular mechanoresponse upon mechanical stimulation of nuclei.
SEM micrographs of a pyramidal probe (A) and a cylindrical probe (B) before (left) and after FIB-cut (top right). The top view of the cylinder is also shown in panel B. Scale bars represent 1 µm. (C) Lifetime images of HeLa cells stained with molecular tension probe (ER Flipper-TR) before (top), during (middle), and after (bottom) indentation at 100 nN, with pyramidal (left panel) and sharpened cylindrical probes (right panels). Arrows denote the indentation site when either pyramidal or cylindrical probes are used. Dashed lines indicate a representative selection of regions of interest (ROIs), encompassing (1) the ER, (2) nuclear membrane (Nuc-mem), and (3) the area around the indentation site (Indent-site). Scale bar represents 5 µm. (D) Change in lifetime during (top panel, ‘mech’ in C) and after (bottom panel) mechanical stimulus with varied indentation forces at different ROIs: ER, nucleus membrane (Nuc-mem), and incident indentation site (‘Indent-site’) (mean ± SD, N ≥ 2, n ≥ 4, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, reported p-values of 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1, t-test). For mechanical stimulation, pyramidal (‘Pyr’) and cylindrical (‘Cyl’) probes with similar stiffness (2 ± 0.5 Nm−1) were utilized. (E) Lateral view of nucleus before (top panels) and during indentation (bottom panels) (indicated by ‘mech’ in panel C) at 100 nN using pyramidal and cylindrical probes. Nuclei are stained with Hoechst dye (blue) and probes are filled with sulforhodamine dye (SuR, red). Scale bar represents 5 µm. (F) Change in perimeter of nucleus measured from confocal images at varied indentation forces, with pyramidal and sharpened cylindrical probes (mean ± SD, N = 2, n ≥ 3).
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Selection of regions of interest (ROIs) of (1) the ER, (2) nuclear membrane (Nuc-mem), and (3) a spot around the indentation site (Indent-site) using pyramidal (top) and cylindrical (bottom) probes.
Representative lifetime images of a HeLa cell stained with ER Flipper-TR dye are shown. Scale bar represents 5 µm.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2
Co-staining HeLa cells with NucBlue (targeting DNA inside the nucleus) and ER Flipper-TR dye.
The significant overlap signals obtained provide confirmation of the precision of the designated region of interest (ROI) as representing the nuclear membrane in this investigation. Scale bar represent 5 µm.
Figure 2 with 1 supplement
FluidFM-FLIM mechano-chemical stimulation of HeLa cell nuclei using pyramidal and cylindrical probes.
(A) Schematic showing the mechanotransduction at LINC complexes before (top) and after external stimulus: mechanical (middle) or mechano-chemical (bottom) stimulus. ∆P represents the fluidic pressure difference between the probe reservoir and the aperture. When this pressure difference is positive, it indicates that the injection mode of FluidFM is being utilized. (B) Concurrent readout of atomic force microscope (AFM)-measured indentation force, ER Flipper-TR lifetime, and fluidic pressure pulse for injection over time. For assured injection, 150 nN was chosen as the set point for indentation using both probe geometries. Parts i, ii, and iii on the graph in B and the schematic in A represent: (i) before stimulus, (ii) during mechanical stimulus when the probe has reached the set point on the cell without fluidic pressure application, and (iii) during mechano-chemical stimulus when the probe remains in contact with the cell at the set point, and a fluidic pressure pulse is applied for drug (or control) injection. (C) Absolute lifetime values before, during, and after injecting HeLa cells with CytoD with pyramidal (‘Pyr’) and cylindrical (‘Cyl’) probes at indentation site (mean ± SD, N ≥ 3, n ≥ 11). The orange arrow indicates the injection pulse at the specified time in the mechano-chemical triggers. (D) Time-lapse lifetime images of ER Flipper-TR-stained HeLa cells before, upon indentation (‘mech’), after indentation plus injection (‘mech + inj’) of either DMSO (as control) or 50 µM CytoD, and after retracting pyramidal (left) and cylindrical (right) probes. The numbers represent time (min:s), with time 0 corresponding to the indented state (mechanical stimulus, noted as ‘mech’). Inserts represent magnified nuclear membrane at locations specified with arrows. Scale bars in time-lapse images and inserts represent 5 and 1 µm, respectively. (E) Change in lifetime at different regions of interest (ROIs): ER, nucleus membrane (Nuc-mem), and indentation site (‘Indent-site’) when mechano-chemically challenged by either CytoD or Control using pyramidal (top row) and cylindrical (bottom row) probes (mean ± SD, N ≥ 3, n ≥ 11, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, reported p-values of 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1, t-test). Orange arrows indicate the injection pulse at the specified time in the mechano-chemical process. (F) Boxplots showing lifetime change upon retracting probes from the injected cells at different ROIs: ER, Nuc-mem, and indentation site. Mean values are shown with triangles (N ≥ 3, n ≥ 11, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, reported p-values of 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1, ns: not significant, t-test). (G) Schematic represents the tension report of ER Flipper-TR dye inside the membrane of the nucleus and the ER before (left panel) and after mechano-chemical triggering of the nucleus with DMSO (as control, middle panel) or CytoD (right panel). In contrast to control cells, delivery of CytoD induces more accumulated tension (i.e., FLIM data) at the nuclear membrane and the ER because it disrupts load-bearing actin component of cytoskeleton. ONM: outer nuclear membrane, INM: inner nuclear membrane, PNS: perinuclear space, and σ: tension exerted by indenting the nucleus using FluidFM probes.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Lifetime values before, during, and after injecting HeLa cells with DMSO as control group with pyramidal and cylindrical probes at incident point (mean ± SD, N ≥ 3, n ≥ 11).
Different sections on the graph represent lifetime measurements before stimulus, during mechanical stimulus when the probe has reached the set point on the cell without fluidic pressure application (‘mech’), and during mechano-chemical stimulus when the probe remains in contact with the cell at the set point, and a fluidic pressure pulse is applied for drug (or here control) injection (‘mech + inj’), and after retraction of probe and removal of the stimulus.
Figure 3
ER and nuclear envelope crosstalk as a response to mechano-chemical triggering of different intracellular components of HeLa cells.
(A) Schematic shows targeting different organelles for mechano-chemical stimulation: nucleus (top), the ER (middle), and cell periphery (bottom). (B) Lifetime images of HeLa cells stained with the ER Flipper-TR before, at mechano-chemical stimulated state (‘mech + inj’), and after stimulation targeting different subcellular compartments: nucleus (top panel), the ER (middle panel), and cell periphery (bottom panel) for indentation and injection of either control (Cont) or CytoD using sharpened cylindrical probes. Arrows indicate where the cylindrical probe penetrates the cell (‘Indent-site’). Scale bar represents 5 µm. Change in lifetime at the ER and nucleus membrane (Nuc-mem) during (C, noted as ‘mech + inj’ in B) and after (D) stimuli imposing injection of DMSO as control (light) or CytoD (dark) at different subcellular compartments: nucleus (top panel), ER (middle panel), and cell periphery (bottom panel) (mean ± SD, N = 2, n ≥ 5, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, t-test). Orange arrows in C indicate the injection pulse at the specified time in the mechano-chemical process. Mean values are shown with triangles in boxplots in D (N = 2, n ≥ 5, *p < 0.05, reported p-values of 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1, ns: not significant, t-test).
Figure 4 with 5 supplements
A-type lamins contribute to elasticity, while B-type lamins may influence viscosity in the nucleus’s viscoelastic behavior under sustained deformation with disrupted actin polymerization.
Lifetime images (A) and boxplots showing the absolute lifetime values (B) of HeLa cells with varied levels of downregulation of lamin proteins: WT-siCtrl (WT), WT-siLMNB (A-KO), LMNA KO-siLMNB (B-KD), and LMNA KO-siLMNB (A-KO/B-KD). Cells were stained with ER Flipper-TR dye. Scale bar in A represents 5 µm. Mean values are shown with triangles in B (N = 2, n ≥ 8, ***p < 0.001, *p < 0.05, reported p-values of 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1, ns: not significant, t-test). (C) Lifetime images of WT, A-KO, B-KD, and A-KO/B-KD cells stained with ER Flipper-TR before, upon indentation (‘mech’), upon indentation + CytoD injection, ‘mech + inj‘, and after stimulation using sharpened cylindrical probes. Note the extended range for lifetime, compared to A, revealing distinguished cell responses to the stimuli, thus indicating the initial tension state for different cell versions in the same color. Scale bar represents 5 µm. (D) Lifetime change at the ER, nucleus membrane (Nuc-mem), and indentation site during mechano-chemical stimuli. All cells were injected with CytoD. In each panel, the tension response of WT cells was compared with either of A-KO, B-KD, and A-KO/B-KD cells. Orange arrows indicate the injection pulse at the specified time in the mechano-chemical process. Time zero corresponds to the indented state (indicated by ‘mech’ in C) which follows by an injection (indicated by ‘mech + inj’ in C) (mean ± SD, N = 3, n ≥ 9). (E, top) Viscoelastic response of cell compartments (left to right: ER, Nuc-mem, and Indent-site) with varied depletion of lamins to the mechano-chemical stimuli composed of lifetime change originating from the instantaneous cell response (Elastic) upon indentation in nucleus (first time points in D) and from the time-dependent response (Creep) due to atomic force microscope (AFM) probe being in contact with the nucleus (at 150 nN) for around 4 min after CytoD injection (last time points in D). Data represent the mean ± SEM (N = 3, n ≥ 9, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, reported p-values of 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1, t-test). (E, bottom) Relaxation behavior of WT, A-KO, B-KD, and A-KO/B-KD cells at varied positions (left to right: ER, Nuc-mem, and Indent-site) after stimuli reported as lifetime change right after probe retraction compared to last time point during stimuli (last time points in D). Mean values are shown with triangles in boxplots (N = 3, n ≥ 9, reported p-values of 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1, ns: not significant, t-test).
Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Western blot analysis verifying the absence of lamin A/C in LMNA KO cells and the successful downregulation of lamins B1 and B2 in both WT and LMNA KO upon treatment with siLMNB.
Three biological replicates were utilized for mechano-chemical triggering assays and FLIM-based tension measurements.
-
Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1
PDF file showing the unprocessed gels used in the presented blots in Figure 4—figure supplement 1.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/107220/elife-107220-fig4-figsupp1-data1-v1.zip
-
Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 2
ZIP file containing the unprocessed gels of the three western blot replicates shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 1.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/107220/elife-107220-fig4-figsupp1-data2-v1.zip
Figure 4—figure supplement 2
Lifetime images (A) and boxplots showing absolute lifetime values at the ER and nuclear membrane (Nuc-mem) (B) of HeLa cells stained with ER Flipper-TR tension reporter molecule.
The lamin A/C level of cells was downregulated with altering methods: WT, LMNA KO, and WT siLMNA. Cells. Scale bar in A represents 5 µm. Mean values are shown with triangles in boxplots in B (N = 2, n ≥ 6, *p < 0.05, ns: not significant, t-test with Holm correction).
Figure 4—figure supplement 3
Relative piezo movement from the contact point until reaching 150 nN setpoint for cells with varied lamina compositions: WT, A-KO, B-KO, and A-KO/B-KD.
Mean values are shown with triangles in boxplots (N = 3, n ≥ 12 cells). No statistically significant differences were observed between any groups (Kruskal–Wallis H-test: H = 1.744, p = 0.627, ns: not significant, Mann–Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction).
Figure 4—figure supplement 4
Michaelis–Menten fit to lifetime response (top) and slope value of fitted curve (bottom) in HeLa cells with and without A- and B-type lamins at the ER, nuclear membrane (Nuc-mem), and indentation site (Indent-site) (mean ± SD, N = 3, n ≥ 9).
Figure 4—figure supplement 5
Relaxation behavior of cell with different levels of lamin proteins: WT, A-KO, B-KO, and A-KO/B-KD at the ER, nuclear membrane (Nuc-mem), and indentation site (Indent-site) after stimulus.
Relaxation is reported as lifetime change 5 min after probe retraction compared to last time point of stimuli. Mean values are shown with triangles in boxplots (N = 3, n ≥ 9, ns: not significant, t-test).
Figure 5 with 1 supplement
Dynamic role of microtubules and actinomyosin in regulating mechanoresponse of nuclei in cells with and without lamin A/C depletion to the external stimulus.
(A) Lifetime images of WT- and LMNA KO-HeLa cells stained with ER Flipper-TR before, upon indentation (‘mech’), upon indentation + injection (‘mech + inj’) of various drugs and after stimulation using sharpened cylindrical probes. For chemical stimulation, interruption of different cytoskeleton components including actin filaments, microtubules, and both actin filaments and microtubules was targeted realized by injection of 50 µM CytoD (left column), 50 µM Noco (middle column), and 50 µM CytoD + 50 µM Noco (right column) dissolved in DMSO. Scale bar represents 5 µm. (B) Lifetime change at ER, nucleus membrane (Nuc-mem), and indentation site during stimuli in WT and LMNA KO cells. Arrows indicate the injection pulse at the specified time in the mechano-chemical process. Time zero corresponds to the indented state (indicated by ‘mech’ in A) which follows by injection, indicated by ‘mech + inj’ in A (mean ± SEM, N = 2, n ≥ 6, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, reported p-values of 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1, t-test with Holm correction). (C) Relaxation behavior of WT and LMNA KO cells at varied positions (left to right: ER, Nuc-mem, and Indent-site) 5 min after mechano-chemical stimuli involving various drugs (CytoD, Noco, and CytoD-Noco). Relaxation is reported as lifetime change at 5 min after probe retraction compared to the last time point of stimuli (last time points in B). Mean values are shown with triangles in boxplots (N = 2, n ≥ 6, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, reported p-values of 0.05 ≤p < 0.1, t-test with Holm correction).
Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Relaxation behavior of WT and LMNA KO cells immediately after mechano-chemical stimuli involving various drugs (CytoD, Noco, and CytoD-Noco), at the ER, nuclear membrane (Nuc-mem), and indentation site (Indent-site).
Relaxation is reported as lifetime change following the retraction of the probe compared to the last time point of stimuli. Mean values are shown with triangles in boxplots (N ≥ 2, n ≥ 6, no significant differences were captured from t-test with Holm correction).
Additional files
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Quantifying intracellular mechanosensitive response upon spatially defined mechano-chemical triggering
eLife 14:RP107220.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.107220.3
