Demixed principal component analysis of neural population data

  1. Dmitry Kobak  Is a corresponding author
  2. Wieland Brendel
  3. Christos Constantinidis
  4. Claudia E Feierstein
  5. Adam Kepecs
  6. Zachary F Mainen
  7. Ranulfo Romo
  8. Xue-Lian Qi
  9. Naoshige Uchida
  10. Christian K Machens
  1. Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Portugal
  2. Wake Forest University School of Medicine, United States
  3. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, United States
  4. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico
  5. Harvard University, United States

Abstract

Neurons in higher cortical areas, such as the prefrontal cortex, are often tuned to a variety of sensory and motor variables, and are therefore said to display mixed selectivity. This complexity of single neuron responses can obscure what information these areas represent and how it is represented. Here we demonstrate the advantages of a new dimensionality reduction technique, demixed principal component analysis (dPCA), that decomposes population activity into a few components. In addition to systematically capturing the majority of the variance of the data, dPCA also exposes the dependence of the neural representation on task parameters such as stimuli, decisions, or rewards. To illustrate our method we reanalyze population data from four datasets comprising different species, different cortical areas and different experimental tasks. In each case, dPCA provides a concise way of visualizing the data that summarizes the task-dependent features of the population response in a single figure.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Dmitry Kobak

    Champalimaud Neuroscience Program, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
    For correspondence
    dmitry.kobak@neuro.fchampalimaud.org
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Wieland Brendel

    Champalimaud Neuroscience Program, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Christos Constantinidis

    Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Claudia E Feierstein

    Champalimaud Neuroscience Program, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Adam Kepecs

    Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Zachary F Mainen

    Champalimaud Neuroscience Program, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Ranulfo Romo

    Instituto de Fisiología Celular-Neurociencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Xue-Lian Qi

    Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Naoshige Uchida

    Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Naoshige Uchida, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  10. Christian K Machens

    Champalimaud Neuroscience Program, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Mark CW van Rossum, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Version history

  1. Received: August 19, 2015
  2. Accepted: April 7, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 12, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 31, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Kobak et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 35,741
    views
  • 6,367
    downloads
  • 393
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Dmitry Kobak
  2. Wieland Brendel
  3. Christos Constantinidis
  4. Claudia E Feierstein
  5. Adam Kepecs
  6. Zachary F Mainen
  7. Ranulfo Romo
  8. Xue-Lian Qi
  9. Naoshige Uchida
  10. Christian K Machens
(2016)
Demixed principal component analysis of neural population data
eLife 5:e10989.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10989

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10989

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Juan Jose Rodriguez Gotor, Kashif Mahfooz ... John F Wesseling
    Research Article

    Vesicles within presynaptic terminals are thought to be segregated into a variety of readily releasable and reserve pools. The nature of the pools and trafficking between them is not well understood, but pools that are slow to mobilize when synapses are active are often assumed to feed pools that are mobilized more quickly, in a series. However, electrophysiological studies of synaptic transmission have suggested instead a parallel organization where vesicles within slowly and quickly mobilized reserve pools would separately feed independent reluctant- and fast-releasing subdivisions of the readily releasable pool. Here, we use FM-dyes to confirm the existence of multiple reserve pools at hippocampal synapses and a parallel organization that prevents intermixing between the pools, even when stimulation is intense enough to drive exocytosis at the maximum rate. The experiments additionally demonstrate extensive heterogeneity among synapses in the relative sizes of the slowly and quickly mobilized reserve pools, which suggests equivalent heterogeneity in the numbers of reluctant and fast-releasing readily releasable vesicles that may be relevant for understanding information processing and storage.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Daniel Thiel, Luis Alfonso Yañez Guerra ... Gáspár Jékely
    Research Article

    Neuropeptides are ancient signaling molecules in animals but only few peptide receptors are known outside bilaterians. Cnidarians possess a large number of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) – the most common receptors of bilaterian neuropeptides – but most of these remain orphan with no known ligands. We searched for neuropeptides in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis and created a library of 64 peptides derived from 33 precursors. In a large-scale pharmacological screen with these peptides and 161 N. vectensis GPCRs, we identified 31 receptors specifically activated by 1 to 3 of 14 peptides. Mapping GPCR and neuropeptide expression to single-cell sequencing data revealed how cnidarian tissues are extensively connected by multilayer peptidergic networks. Phylogenetic analysis identified no direct orthology to bilaterian peptidergic systems and supports the independent expansion of neuropeptide signaling in cnidarians from a few ancestral peptide-receptor pairs.