A dystonia-like movement disorder with brain and spinal neuronal defects is caused by mutation of the mouse laminin β1 subunit, Lamb1

  1. Yi Bessie Liu
  2. Ambika Tewari
  3. Johnny Salameh
  4. Elena Arystarkhova
  5. Thomas G Hampton
  6. Allison Brashear
  7. Laurie J Ozelius
  8. Kamran Khodakhah
  9. Kathleen J Sweadner  Is a corresponding author
  1. Harvard Medical School, United States
  2. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States
  3. University of Massachusetts Medical School, United States
  4. Mouse Specifics Inc., United States
  5. Wake Forest University School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

A new mutant mouse (lamb1t) exhibits intermittent dystonic hindlimb movements and postures when awake, and hyperextension when asleep. Experiments showed co-contraction of opposing muscle groups, and indicated that symptoms depended on the interaction of brain and spinal cord. SNP mapping and exome sequencing identified the dominant causative mutation in the Lamb1 gene. Laminins are extracellular matrix proteins, widely expressed but also known to be important in synapse structure and plasticity. In accordance, awake recording in the cerebellum detected abnormal output from a circuit of two Lamb1-expressing neurons, Purkinje cells and their deep cerebellar nucleus targets, during abnormal postures. We propose that dystonia-like symptoms result from lapses in descending inhibition, exposing excess activity in intrinsic spinal circuits that coordinate muscles. The mouse is a new model for testing how dysfunction in the CNS causes specific abnormal movements and postures.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yi Bessie Liu

    Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Ambika Tewari

    Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Johnny Salameh

    Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Elena Arystarkhova

    Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Thomas G Hampton

    Neuroscience Discovery Core, Mouse Specifics Inc., Framingham, United States
    Competing interests
    Thomas G Hampton, owner of the company that has commercialized the gait analysis instrumentation described.
  6. Allison Brashear

    Department of Neurology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, United States
    Competing interests
    Allison Brashear, performs research at Wake Forest with grants from Allergan, Ipsen, and Merz, and has consulting relationships with Allergan and Concerta. Her conflict of interest is managed by Wake Forest School of Medicine.
  7. Laurie J Ozelius

    Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Kamran Khodakhah

    Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Kathleen J Sweadner

    Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    sweadner@helix.mgh.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal research followed the NRC Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the policies of the Massachusetts General Hospital or Albert Einstein College of Medicine: MGH IACUC approved protocol 2011N000108, and Albert Einstein approved protocol 20130801.

Copyright

© 2015, Liu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,956
    views
  • 406
    downloads
  • 22
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yi Bessie Liu
  2. Ambika Tewari
  3. Johnny Salameh
  4. Elena Arystarkhova
  5. Thomas G Hampton
  6. Allison Brashear
  7. Laurie J Ozelius
  8. Kamran Khodakhah
  9. Kathleen J Sweadner
(2015)
A dystonia-like movement disorder with brain and spinal neuronal defects is caused by mutation of the mouse laminin β1 subunit, Lamb1
eLife 4:e11102.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11102

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11102

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Brian C Ruyle, Sarah Masud ... Jose A Morón
    Research Article

    Millions of Americans suffering from Opioid Use Disorders face a high risk of fatal overdose due to opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD). Fentanyl, a powerful synthetic opioid, is a major contributor to the rising rates of overdose deaths. Reversing fentanyl overdoses has proved challenging due to its high potency and the rapid onset of OIRD. We assessed the contributions of central and peripheral mu opioid receptors (MORs) in mediating fentanyl-induced physiological responses. The peripherally restricted MOR antagonist naloxone methiodide (NLXM) both prevented and reversed OIRD to a degree comparable to that of naloxone (NLX), indicating substantial involvement of peripheral MORs to OIRD. Interestingly, NLXM-mediated OIRD reversal did not produce aversive behaviors observed after NLX. We show that neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract (nTS), the first central synapse of peripheral afferents, exhibit a biphasic activity profile following fentanyl exposure. NLXM pretreatment attenuates this activity, suggesting that these responses are mediated by peripheral MORs. Together, these findings establish a critical role for peripheral MORs, including ascending inputs to the nTS, as sites of dysfunction during OIRD. Furthermore, selective peripheral MOR antagonism could be a promising therapeutic strategy for managing OIRD by sparing CNS-driven acute opioid-associated withdrawal and aversion observed after NLX.

    1. Neuroscience
    David C Williams, Amanda Chu ... Michael A McDannald
    Research Advance Updated

    Recognizing and responding to threat cues is essential to survival. Freezing is a predominant threat behavior in rats. We have recently shown that a threat cue can organize diverse behaviors beyond freezing, including locomotion (Chu et al., 2024). However, that experimental design was complex, required many sessions, and had rats receive many foot shock presentations. Moreover, the findings were descriptive. Here, we gave female and male Long Evans rats cue light illumination paired or unpaired with foot shock (eight total) in a conditioned suppression setting using a range of shock intensities (0.15, 0.25, 0.35, or 0.50 mA). We found that conditioned suppression was only observed at higher foot shock intensities (0.35 mA and 0.50 mA). We constructed comprehensive temporal ethograms by scoring 22,272 frames across 12 behavior categories in 200-ms intervals around cue light illumination. The 0.50 mA and 0.35 mA shock-paired visual cues suppressed reward seeking, rearing, and scaling, as well as light-directed rearing and light-directed scaling. These shock-paired visual cues further elicited locomotion and freezing. Linear discriminant analyses showed that ethogram data could accurately classify rats into paired and unpaired groups. Using complete ethogram data produced superior classification compared to behavior subsets, including an immobility subset featuring freezing. The results demonstrate diverse threat behaviors – in a short and simple procedure – containing sufficient information to distinguish the visual fear conditioning status of individual rats.