A dystonia-like movement disorder with brain and spinal neuronal defects is caused by mutation of the mouse laminin β1 subunit, Lamb1

  1. Yi Bessie Liu
  2. Ambika Tewari
  3. Johnny Salameh
  4. Elena Arystarkhova
  5. Thomas G Hampton
  6. Allison Brashear
  7. Laurie J Ozelius
  8. Kamran Khodakhah
  9. Kathleen J Sweadner  Is a corresponding author
  1. Harvard Medical School, United States
  2. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States
  3. University of Massachusetts Medical School, United States
  4. Mouse Specifics Inc., United States
  5. Wake Forest University School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

A new mutant mouse (lamb1t) exhibits intermittent dystonic hindlimb movements and postures when awake, and hyperextension when asleep. Experiments showed co-contraction of opposing muscle groups, and indicated that symptoms depended on the interaction of brain and spinal cord. SNP mapping and exome sequencing identified the dominant causative mutation in the Lamb1 gene. Laminins are extracellular matrix proteins, widely expressed but also known to be important in synapse structure and plasticity. In accordance, awake recording in the cerebellum detected abnormal output from a circuit of two Lamb1-expressing neurons, Purkinje cells and their deep cerebellar nucleus targets, during abnormal postures. We propose that dystonia-like symptoms result from lapses in descending inhibition, exposing excess activity in intrinsic spinal circuits that coordinate muscles. The mouse is a new model for testing how dysfunction in the CNS causes specific abnormal movements and postures.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yi Bessie Liu

    Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Ambika Tewari

    Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Johnny Salameh

    Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Elena Arystarkhova

    Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Thomas G Hampton

    Neuroscience Discovery Core, Mouse Specifics Inc., Framingham, United States
    Competing interests
    Thomas G Hampton, owner of the company that has commercialized the gait analysis instrumentation described.
  6. Allison Brashear

    Department of Neurology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, United States
    Competing interests
    Allison Brashear, performs research at Wake Forest with grants from Allergan, Ipsen, and Merz, and has consulting relationships with Allergan and Concerta. Her conflict of interest is managed by Wake Forest School of Medicine.
  7. Laurie J Ozelius

    Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Kamran Khodakhah

    Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Kathleen J Sweadner

    Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    sweadner@helix.mgh.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Louis Ptáček, University of California, San Francisco, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal research followed the NRC Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the policies of the Massachusetts General Hospital or Albert Einstein College of Medicine: MGH IACUC approved protocol 2011N000108, and Albert Einstein approved protocol 20130801.

Version history

  1. Received: August 25, 2015
  2. Accepted: December 15, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 24, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 28, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Liu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,813
    views
  • 396
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yi Bessie Liu
  2. Ambika Tewari
  3. Johnny Salameh
  4. Elena Arystarkhova
  5. Thomas G Hampton
  6. Allison Brashear
  7. Laurie J Ozelius
  8. Kamran Khodakhah
  9. Kathleen J Sweadner
(2015)
A dystonia-like movement disorder with brain and spinal neuronal defects is caused by mutation of the mouse laminin β1 subunit, Lamb1
eLife 4:e11102.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11102

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11102

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Kenneth Chiou, Noah Snyder-Mackler
    Insight

    Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the extent to which marmosets carry genetically distinct cells from their siblings.

    1. Neuroscience
    Flavio J Schmidig, Simon Ruch, Katharina Henke
    Research Article

    We are unresponsive during slow-wave sleep but continue monitoring external events for survival. Our brain wakens us when danger is imminent. If events are non-threatening, our brain might store them for later consideration to improve decision-making. To test this hypothesis, we examined whether novel vocabulary consisting of simultaneously played pseudowords and translation words are encoded/stored during sleep, and which neural-electrical events facilitate encoding/storage. An algorithm for brain-state-dependent stimulation selectively targeted word pairs to slow-wave peaks or troughs. Retrieval tests were given 12 and 36 hr later. These tests required decisions regarding the semantic category of previously sleep-played pseudowords. The sleep-played vocabulary influenced awake decision-making 36 hr later, if targeted to troughs. The words’ linguistic processing raised neural complexity. The words’ semantic-associative encoding was supported by increased theta power during the ensuing peak. Fast-spindle power ramped up during a second peak likely aiding consolidation. Hence, new vocabulary played during slow-wave sleep was stored and influenced decision-making days later.