Optimal compensation for neuron loss

  1. David TG Barrett
  2. Sophie Denève
  3. Christian K Machens  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  2. École Normale Supérieure, France
  3. Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Portugal

Abstract

The brain has an impressive ability to withstand neural damage. Diseases that kill neurons can go unnoticed for years, and incomplete brain lesions or silencing of neurons often fail to produce any behavioral effect. How does the brain compensate for such damage, and what are the limits of this compensation? We propose that neural circuits immediately compensate for neuron loss, thereby preserving their function as much as possible. We show that this compensation can explain changes in tuning curves induced by neuron silencing across a variety of systems, including the primary visual cortex. We find that compensatory mechanisms can be implemented through the dynamics of networks with a tight balance of excitation and inhibition, without requiring synaptic plasticity. The limits of this compensatory mechanism are reached when excitation and inhibition become unbalanced, thereby demarcating a recovery boundary, where signal representation fails and where diseases may become symptomatic.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. David TG Barrett

    Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Sophie Denève

    Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Christian K Machens

    Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
    For correspondence
    christian.machens@neuro.fchampalimaud.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1717-1562

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Emmy-Noether)

  • Christian K Machens

Agence Nationale de Recherche (Chaire d'Excellence)

  • Christian K Machens

James McDonnell Foundation

  • Christian K Machens

European Research Council (ERC FP7-PREDSPIKE)

  • Christian K Machens

European Research Council (BIND MECT-CT-20095-024831)

  • Christian K Machens

European Research Council (BACS 796 FP6-IST-027140)

  • Christian K Machens

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Frances K Skinner, University Health Network, Canada

Version history

  1. Received: October 20, 2015
  2. Accepted: December 8, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 9, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 31, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Barrett et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,619
    views
  • 654
    downloads
  • 31
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. David TG Barrett
  2. Sophie Denève
  3. Christian K Machens
(2016)
Optimal compensation for neuron loss
eLife 5:e12454.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12454

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12454

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Sara Ibañez, Nilapratim Sengupta ... Christina M Weaver
    Research Article

    Normal aging leads to myelin alterations in the rhesus monkey dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), which are positively correlated with degree of cognitive impairment. It is hypothesized that remyelination with shorter and thinner myelin sheaths partially compensates for myelin degradation, but computational modeling has not yet explored these two phenomena together systematically. Here, we used a two-pronged modeling approach to determine how age-related myelin changes affect a core cognitive function: spatial working memory. First, we built a multicompartment pyramidal neuron model fit to monkey dlPFC empirical data, with an axon including myelinated segments having paranodes, juxtaparanodes, internodes, and tight junctions. This model was used to quantify conduction velocity (CV) changes and action potential (AP) failures after demyelination and subsequent remyelination. Next, we incorporated the single neuron results into a spiking neural network model of working memory. While complete remyelination nearly recovered axonal transmission and network function to unperturbed levels, our models predict that biologically plausible levels of myelin dystrophy, if uncompensated by other factors, can account for substantial working memory impairment with aging. The present computational study unites empirical data from ultrastructure up to behavior during normal aging, and has broader implications for many demyelinating conditions, such as multiple sclerosis or schizophrenia.

    1. Neuroscience
    Nicholas GW Kennedy, Jessica C Lee ... Nathan M Holmes
    Research Article

    How is new information organized in memory? According to latent state theories, this is determined by the level of surprise, or prediction error, generated by the new information: a small prediction error leads to the updating of existing memory, large prediction error leads to encoding of a new memory. We tested this idea using a protocol in which rats were first conditioned to fear a stimulus paired with shock. The stimulus was then gradually extinguished by progressively reducing the shock intensity until the stimulus was presented alone. Consistent with latent state theories, this gradual extinction protocol (small prediction errors) was better than standard extinction (large prediction errors) in producing long-term suppression of fear responses, and the benefit of gradual extinction was due to updating of the conditioning memory with information about extinction. Thus, prediction error determines how new information is organized in memory, and latent state theories adequately describe the ways in which this occurs.