RNA Polymerase II cluster dynamics predict mRNA output in living cells

Cited 51
Views 6,301
Annotations

Cite this article as: eLife 2016;5:e13617 doi: 10.7554/eLife.13617

Article
Figures and data
Jump to

Abstract

Protein clustering is a hallmark of genome regulation in mammalian cells. However, the dynamic molecular processes involved make it difficult to correlate clustering with functional consequences in vivo. We developed a live-cell super-resolution approach to uncover the correlation between mRNA synthesis and the dynamics of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) clusters at a gene locus. For endogenous β-actin genes in mouse embryonic fibroblasts, we observe that short-lived (~8 s) Pol II clusters correlate with basal mRNA output. During serum stimulation, a stereotyped increase in Pol II cluster lifetime correlates with a proportionate increase in the number of mRNAs synthesized. Our findings suggest that transient clustering of Pol II may constitute a pre-transcriptional regulatory event that predictably modulates nascent mRNA output.

Article and author information

Author details

Won-Ki Cho

Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States

Competing interests
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Namrata Jayanth

Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States

Competing interests
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Brian P English

Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States

Competing interests
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Takuma Inoue

Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States

Competing interests
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
J Owen Andrews

Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States

Competing interests
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
William Conway

Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States

Competing interests
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Jonathan B Grimm

Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States

Competing interests
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Jan-Hendrik Spille

Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States

Competing interests
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Luke D Lavis

Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States

Competing interests
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Timothée Lionnet

Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States

Competing interests
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Ibrahim I Cisse

Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States

For correspondence
icisse@mit.edu

Competing interests
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

Xiaowei Zhuang, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard University, United States

Publication history

Received: December 8, 2015
Accepted: May 2, 2016
Accepted Manuscript published: May 3, 2016 (version 1)
Version of Record published: June 30, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.