Lys29-linkage of ASK1 by Skp1−Cullin 1−Fbxo21 ubiquitin ligase complex is required for antiviral innate response

  1. Zhou Yu
  2. Taoyong Chen  Is a corresponding author
  3. Xuelian Li
  4. Mingjin Yang
  5. Songqing Tang
  6. Xuhui Zhu
  7. Yan Gu
  8. Xiaoping Su
  9. Meng Xia
  10. Weihua Li
  11. Xuemin Zhang
  12. Qingqing Wang
  13. Xuetao Cao
  14. Jianli Wang
  1. Institute of Immunology, China
  2. National Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology and Institute of Immunology, China
  3. National Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology and Department of Immunology, China
  4. Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, China
  5. Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China

Abstract

Protein ubiquitination regulated by ubiquitin ligases plays important roles in innate immunity. However, key regulators of ubiquitination during innate response and roles of new types of ubiquitination (apart from Lys48- and Lys63-linkage) in control of innate signaling have not been clearly understood. Here we report that F-box only protein Fbxo21, a functionally unknown component of SCF (Skp1-Cul1-F-box protein) complex, facilitates Lys29-linkage and activation of ASK1 (apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1), and promotes type I interferon production upon viral infection. Fbxo21 deficiency in mice cells impairs virus-induced Lys29-linkage and activation of ASK1, attenuates c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 signaling pathway, and decreases the production of proinflammatory cytokines and type I interferon, resulting in reduced antiviral innate response and enhanced virus replication. Therefore Fbxo21 is required for ASK1 activation via Lys29-linkage of ASK1 during antiviral innate response, providing mechanistic insights into non-proteolytic roles of SCF complex in innate immune response.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zhou Yu

    Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Institute of Immunology, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Taoyong Chen

    Second Military Medical University, National Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology and Institute of Immunology, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    chenty@immunol.org
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Xuelian Li

    Second Military Medical University, National Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology and Institute of Immunology, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Mingjin Yang

    Second Military Medical University, National Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology and Institute of Immunology, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Songqing Tang

    Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Institute of Immunology, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Xuhui Zhu

    Second Military Medical University, National Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology and Institute of Immunology, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Yan Gu

    Second Military Medical University, National Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology and Institute of Immunology, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Xiaoping Su

    Second Military Medical University, National Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology and Institute of Immunology, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Meng Xia

    Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology and Department of Immunology, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Weihua Li

    National Center of Biomedical Analysis, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Xuemin Zhang

    National Center of Biomedical Analysis, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Qingqing Wang

    Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Institute of Immunology, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Xuetao Cao

    National Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology and Institute of Immunology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    Xuetao Cao, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  14. Jianli Wang

    Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Institute of Immunology, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health, and was approved by the Scientific Investigation Board of Second Military Medical University, Shanghai (Case No. SMMU-2015-0067).

Copyright

© 2016, Yu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,584
    views
  • 716
    downloads
  • 51
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14087

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Pavla Nedbalová, Nikola Kaislerova ... Tomáš Doležal
    Research Article

    During parasitoid wasp infection, activated immune cells of Drosophila melanogaster larvae release adenosine to conserve nutrients for immune response. S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) is a methyl group donor for most methylations in the cell and is synthesized from methionine and ATP. After methylation, SAM is converted to S-adenosylhomocysteine, which is further metabolized to adenosine and homocysteine. Here, we show that the SAM transmethylation pathway is up-regulated during immune cell activation and that the adenosine produced by this pathway in immune cells acts as a systemic signal to delay Drosophila larval development and ensure sufficient nutrient supply to the immune system. We further show that the up-regulation of the SAM transmethylation pathway and the efficiency of the immune response also depend on the recycling of adenosine back to ATP by adenosine kinase and adenylate kinase. We therefore hypothesize that adenosine may act as a sensitive sensor of the balance between cell activity, represented by the sum of methylation events in the cell, and nutrient supply. If the supply of nutrients is insufficient for a given activity, adenosine may not be effectively recycled back into ATP and may be pushed out of the cell to serve as a signal to demand more nutrients.

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Ana Cristina Chang-Gonzalez, Aoi Akitsu ... Wonmuk Hwang
    Research Advance

    Increasing evidence suggests that mechanical load on the αβ T-cell receptor (TCR) is crucial for recognizing the antigenic peptide-bound major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) molecule. Our recent all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations revealed that the inter-domain motion of the TCR is responsible for the load-induced catch bond behavior of the TCR-pMHC complex and peptide discrimination (Chang-Gonzalez et al., 2024). To further examine the generality of the mechanism, we perform all-atom MD simulations of the B7 TCR under different conditions for comparison with our previous simulations of the A6 TCR. The two TCRs recognize the same pMHC and have similar interfaces with pMHC in crystal structures. We find that the B7 TCR-pMHC interface stabilizes under ∼15 pN load using a conserved dynamic allostery mechanism that involves the asymmetric motion of the TCR chassis. However, despite forming comparable contacts with pMHC as A6 in the crystal structure, B7 has fewer high-occupancy contacts with pMHC and exhibits higher mechanical compliance during the simulation. These results indicate that the dynamic allostery common to the TCRαβ chassis can amplify slight differences in interfacial contacts into distinctive mechanical responses and nuanced biological outcomes.