Peripheral optogenetic stimulation induces whisker movement and sensory perception in head-fixed mice

  1. Sunmee Park
  2. Akhil Bandi
  3. Christian R Lee
  4. David J Margolis  Is a corresponding author
  1. Rutgers University, United States

Abstract

We discovered that optical stimulation of the mystacial pad in Emx1-Cre;Ai27D transgenic mice induces whisker movements due to activation of ChR2 expressed in muscles controlling retraction and protraction. Using high-speed videography in anesthetized mice, we characterize the amplitude of whisker protractions evoked by varying the intensity, duration, and frequency of optogenetic stimulation. Recordings from primary somatosensory cortex (S1) in anesthetized mice indicated that optogenetic whisker pad stimulation evokes robust yet longer latency responses than mechanical whisker stimulation. In head-fixed mice trained to report optogenetic whisker pad stimulation, psychometric curves showed similar dependence on stimulus duration as evoked whisker movements and S1 activity. Furthermore, optogenetic stimulation of S1 in expert mice was sufficient to substitute for peripheral stimulation. We conclude that whisker protractions evoked by optogenetic activation of whisker pad muscles results in cortical activity and sensory perception, consistent with the coding of evoked whisker movements by reafferent sensory input.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sunmee Park

    Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Akhil Bandi

    Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Christian R Lee

    Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. David J Margolis

    Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, United States
    For correspondence
    david.margolis@rutgers.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were approved by Rutgers University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC; protocol 13-033).

Copyright

© 2016, Park et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,784
    views
  • 664
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sunmee Park
  2. Akhil Bandi
  3. Christian R Lee
  4. David J Margolis
(2016)
Peripheral optogenetic stimulation induces whisker movement and sensory perception in head-fixed mice
eLife 5:e14140.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14140

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14140

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Masahiro Takigawa, Marta Huelin Gorriz ... Daniel Bendor
    Research Article

    During rest and sleep, memory traces replay in the brain. The dialogue between brain regions during replay is thought to stabilize labile memory traces for long-term storage. However, because replay is an internally-driven, spontaneous phenomenon, it does not have a ground truth - an external reference that can validate whether a memory has truly been replayed. Instead, replay detection is based on the similarity between the sequential neural activity comprising the replay event and the corresponding template of neural activity generated during active locomotion. If the statistical likelihood of observing such a match by chance is sufficiently low, the candidate replay event is inferred to be replaying that specific memory. However, without the ability to evaluate whether replay detection methods are successfully detecting true events and correctly rejecting non-events, the evaluation and comparison of different replay methods is challenging. To circumvent this problem, we present a new framework for evaluating replay, tested using hippocampal neural recordings from rats exploring two novel linear tracks. Using this two-track paradigm, our framework selects replay events based on their temporal fidelity (sequence-based detection), and evaluates the detection performance using each event's track discriminability, where sequenceless decoding across both tracks is used to quantify whether the track replaying is also the most likely track being reactivated.

    1. Neuroscience
    Mohsen Alavash
    Insight

    Combining electrophysiological, anatomical and functional brain maps reveals networks of beta neural activity that align with dopamine uptake.