Spatial control of translation repression and polarized growth by conserved NDR kinase Orb6 and RNA-binding protein Sts5

  1. Illyce Nuñez
  2. Marbelys Rodriguez Pino
  3. David J Wiley
  4. Maitreyi E Das
  5. Chuan Chen
  6. Tetsuya Goshima
  7. Kazunori Kume
  8. Dai Hirata
  9. Takashi Toda
  10. Fulvia Verde  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Miami School of Medicine, United States
  2. The University of Tennessee, United States
  3. National Research Institute of Brewing, Japan
  4. Hiroshima University, Japan
  5. The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom

Abstract

RNA-binding proteins contribute to the formation of ribonucleoprotein (RNP) granules by phase transition, but regulatory mechanisms are not fully understood. Conserved fission yeast NDR (Nuclear Dbf2-Related) kinase Orb6 governs cell morphogenesis in part by spatially controlling Cdc42 GTPase. Here we describe a novel, independent function for Orb6 kinase in negatively regulating the recruitment of RNA-binding protein Sts5 into RNPs to promote polarized cell growth. We find that Orb6 kinase inhibits Sts5 recruitment into granules, its association with processing (P) bodies, and degradation of Sts5-bound mRNAs by promoting Sts5 interaction with 14-3-3 protein Rad24. Many Sts5-bound mRNAs encode essential factors for polarized cell growth, and Orb6 kinase spatially and temporally controls the extent of Sts5 granule formation. Disruption of this control system affects cell morphology and alters the pattern of polarized cell growth, revealing a role for Orb6 kinase in the spatial control of translational repression that enables normal cell morphogenesis.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Illyce Nuñez

    Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Marbelys Rodriguez Pino

    Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. David J Wiley

    Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Maitreyi E Das

    Department of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Chuan Chen

    Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Tetsuya Goshima

    National Research Institute of Brewing, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Kazunori Kume

    Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Dai Hirata

    Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Takashi Toda

    The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Fulvia Verde

    Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, United States
    For correspondence
    fverde@miami.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2575-0823

Funding

National Institutes of Health (GM095867)

  • Marbelys Rodriguez Pino
  • David J Wiley
  • Maitreyi E Das
  • Chuan Chen
  • Fulvia Verde

National Science Foundation (745129)

  • Maitreyi E Das
  • Fulvia Verde

Cancer Research UK

  • Takashi Toda

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. J Paul Taylor, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, United States

Version history

  1. Received: January 8, 2016
  2. Accepted: July 28, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 30, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 5, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Nuñez et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,090
    views
  • 439
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Illyce Nuñez
  2. Marbelys Rodriguez Pino
  3. David J Wiley
  4. Maitreyi E Das
  5. Chuan Chen
  6. Tetsuya Goshima
  7. Kazunori Kume
  8. Dai Hirata
  9. Takashi Toda
  10. Fulvia Verde
(2016)
Spatial control of translation repression and polarized growth by conserved NDR kinase Orb6 and RNA-binding protein Sts5
eLife 5:e14216.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14216

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14216

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article Updated

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven cell motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high-MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.

    1. Cell Biology
    Yoko Nakai-Futatsugi, Jianshi Jin ... Masayo Takahashi
    Research Article

    Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells show heterogeneous levels of pigmentation when cultured in vitro. To know whether their color in appearance is correlated with the function of the RPE, we analyzed the color intensities of human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived RPE cells (iPSC-RPE) together with the gene expression profile at the single-cell level. For this purpose, we utilized our recent invention, Automated Live imaging and cell Picking System (ALPS), which enabled photographing each cell before RNA-sequencing analysis to profile the gene expression of each cell. While our iPSC-RPE were categorized into four clusters by gene expression, the color intensity of iPSC-RPE did not project any specific gene expression profiles. We reasoned this by less correlation between the actual color and the gene expressions that directly define the level of pigmentation, from which we hypothesized the color of RPE cells may be a temporal condition not strongly indicating the functional characteristics of the RPE.