1. Neuroscience
Download icon

Distinct lateral inhibitory circuits drive parallel processing of sensory information in the mammalian olfactory bulb

  1. Matthew A Geramita
  2. Shawn D Burton
  3. Nathan N Urban  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Pittsburgh, United States
  2. Carnegie Mellon University, United States
Research Article
  • Cited 18
  • Views 1,490
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2016;5:e16039 doi: 10.7554/eLife.16039

Abstract

Splitting sensory information into parallel pathways is a common strategy in sensory systems. Yet, how circuits in these parallel pathways are composed to maintain or even enhance the encoding of specific stimulus features is poorly understood. Here, we have investigated the parallel pathways formed by mitral and tufted cells of the olfactory system in mice and characterized the emergence of feature selectivity in these cell types via distinct lateral inhibitory circuits. We find differences in activity-dependent lateral inhibition between mitral and tufted cells that likely reflect newly described differences in the activation of deep and superficial granule cells. Simulations show that these circuit-level differences allow mitral and tufted cells to best discriminate odors in separate concentration ranges, indicating that segregating information about different ranges of stimulus intensity may be an important function of these parallel sensory pathways.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Matthew A Geramita

    Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Shawn D Burton

    Department of Biology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Nathan N Urban

    Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    For correspondence
    nurban@pitt.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were completed in compliance with the guidelines established by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Carnegie Mellon University.(IACUC # AS15-010) and University of Pittsburgh (IACUC # 15116582).

Reviewing Editor

  1. Naoshige Uchida, Harvard University, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: March 15, 2016
  2. Accepted: June 27, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 28, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 3, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Geramita et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,490
    Page views
  • 486
    Downloads
  • 18
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: PubMed Central, Crossref, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)