Histidine phosphorylation relieves copper inhibition in the mammalian potassium channel KCa3.1

  1. Shekhar Srivastava
  2. Saswati Panda
  3. Zhai Li
  4. Stephen R Fuhs
  5. Tony Hunter
  6. Dennis J Thiele
  7. Stevan R Hubbard  Is a corresponding author
  8. Edward Y Skolnik  Is a corresponding author
  1. Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine at the Skirball Institute, United States
  2. Salk Institute for Biological Studies, United States
  3. Duke University School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

KCa2.1, KCa2.2, KCa2.3, and KCa3.1 constitute a family of mammalian small- to intermediate-conductance potassium channels that are activated by calcium-calmodulin. KCa3.1 is unique among these four channels in that activation requires, in addition to calcium, phosphorylation of a single histidine residue (His358) in the cytoplasmic region, by nucleoside diphosphate kinase-B (NPDK-B). The mechanism by which KCa3.1 is activated by histidine phosphorylation is unknown. Histidine phosphorylation is well characterized in prokaryotes but poorly understood in eukaryotes. Here we demonstrate that phosphorylation of His358 activates KCa3.1 by antagonizing copper-mediated inhibition of the channel. Furthermore, we show that activated CD4+ T cells deficient in intracellular copper exhibit increased KCa3.1 histidine phosphorylation and channel activity, leading to increased calcium flux and cytokine production. These findings reveal a novel regulatory mechanism for a mammalian potassium channel and for T-cell activation, and highlight a unique feature of histidine versus serine/threonine and tyrosine as a regulatory phosphorylation site.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Shekhar Srivastava

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine at the Skirball Institute, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Saswati Panda

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine at the Skirball Institute, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Zhai Li

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine at the Skirball Institute, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Stephen R Fuhs

    Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Tony Hunter

    Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    Tony Hunter, Senior editor, eLife/i.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7691-6993
  6. Dennis J Thiele

    Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Stevan R Hubbard

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine at the Skirball Institute, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    stevan.hubbard@med.nyu.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2707-9383
  8. Edward Y Skolnik

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine at the Skirball Institute, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    edward.skolnik@med.nyu.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R21AI107443)

  • Stevan R Hubbard

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK074192)

  • Dennis J Thiele

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM084195)

  • Edward Y Skolnik

National Cancer Institute (R01CA194584)

  • Tony Hunter

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2016, Srivastava et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,161
    views
  • 444
    downloads
  • 58
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Shekhar Srivastava
  2. Saswati Panda
  3. Zhai Li
  4. Stephen R Fuhs
  5. Tony Hunter
  6. Dennis J Thiele
  7. Stevan R Hubbard
  8. Edward Y Skolnik
(2016)
Histidine phosphorylation relieves copper inhibition in the mammalian potassium channel KCa3.1
eLife 5:e16093.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16093

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16093

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Yajun Zhai, Peiyi Liu ... Gongzheng Hu
    Research Article

    Discovering new strategies to combat the multidrug-resistant bacteria constitutes a major medical challenge of our time. Previously, artesunate (AS) has been reported to exert antibacterial enhancement activity in combination with β-lactam antibiotics via inhibition of the efflux pump AcrB. However, combination of AS and colistin (COL) revealed a weak synergistic effect against a limited number of strains, and few studies have further explored its possible mechanism of synergistic action. In this article, we found that AS and EDTA could strikingly enhance the antibacterial effects of COL against mcr-1- and mcr-1+ Salmonella strains either in vitro or in vivo, when used in triple combination. The excellent bacteriostatic effect was primarily related to the increased cell membrane damage, accumulation of toxic compounds and inhibition of MCR-1. The potential binding sites of AS to MCR-1 (THR283, SER284, and TYR287) were critical for its inhibition of MCR-1 activity. Additionally, we also demonstrated that the CheA of chemosensory system and virulence-related protein SpvD were critical for the bacteriostatic synergistic effects of the triple combination. Selectively targeting CheA, SpvD, or MCR using the natural compound AS could be further investigated as an attractive strategy for the treatment of Salmonella infection. Collectively, our work opens new avenues toward the potentiation of COL and reveals an alternative drug combination strategy to overcome COL-resistant bacterial infections.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Adam D Longhurst, Kyle Wang ... David P Toczyski
    Tools and Resources

    Progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle is the most highly regulated step in cellular division. We employed a chemogenetic approach to discover novel cellular networks that regulate cell cycle progression. This approach uncovered functional clusters of genes that altered sensitivity of cells to inhibitors of the G1/S transition. Mutation of components of the Polycomb Repressor Complex 2 rescued proliferation inhibition caused by the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, but not to inhibitors of S phase or mitosis. In addition to its core catalytic subunits, mutation of the PRC2.1 accessory protein MTF2, but not the PRC2.2 protein JARID2, rendered cells resistant to palbociclib treatment. We found that PRC2.1 (MTF2), but not PRC2.2 (JARID2), was critical for promoting H3K27me3 deposition at CpG islands genome-wide and in promoters. This included the CpG islands in the promoter of the CDK4/6 cyclins CCND1 and CCND2, and loss of MTF2 lead to upregulation of both CCND1 and CCND2. Our results demonstrate a role for PRC2.1, but not PRC2.2, in antagonizing G1 progression in a diversity of cell linages, including chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), breast cancer, and immortalized cell lines.