1. Developmental Biology

Stage-specific effects of Notch activation during skeletal myogenesis

  1. Pengpeng Bi
  2. Feng Yue
  3. Yusuke Sato
  4. Sara Wirbisky
  5. Weiyi Liu
  6. Tizhong Shan
  7. Yefei Wen
  8. Daoguo Zhou
  9. Jennifer Freeman
  10. Shihuan Kuang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Purdue University, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17355
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Pengpeng Bi
  2. Feng Yue
  3. Yusuke Sato
  4. Sara Wirbisky
  5. Weiyi Liu
  6. Tizhong Shan
  7. Yefei Wen
  8. Daoguo Zhou
  9. Jennifer Freeman
  10. Shihuan Kuang
(2016)
Stage-specific effects of Notch activation during skeletal myogenesis
eLife 5:e17355.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17355
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Skeletal myogenesis involves sequential activation, proliferation, self-renewal/differentiation and fusion of myogenic stem cells (satellite cells). Notch signaling is known to be essential for the maintenance of satellite cells, but its function in late-stage myogenesis, i.e. post-differentiation myocytes and post-fusion myotubes, is unknown. Using stage-specific Cre alleles, we uncovered distinct roles of Notch1 in mononucleated myocytes and multinucleated myotubes. Specifically, constitutive Notch1 activation dedifferentiates myocytes into Pax7+ quiescent satellite cells, leading to severe defects in muscle growth and regeneration, and postnatal lethality. By contrast, myotube-specific Notch1 activation improves the regeneration and exercise performance of aged and dystrophic muscles. Mechanistically, Notch1 activation in myotubes upregulates the expression of Notch ligands, which modulate Notch signaling in the adjacent satellite cells to enhance their regenerative capacity. These results highlight context-dependent effects of Notch activation during myogenesis, and demonstrate that Notch1 activity improves myotube's function as a stem cell niche.

Data availability

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Pengpeng Bi

    Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  2. Feng Yue

    Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Yusuke Sato

    Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Sara Wirbisky

    School of Health Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Weiyi Liu

    Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Tizhong Shan

    Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Yefei Wen

    Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2121-7538

  8. Daoguo Zhou

    Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  9. Jennifer Freeman

    School of Health Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  10. Shihuan Kuang

    Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, United States
    For correspondence
    skuang@purdue.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9180-3180

Funding

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR060652)

  • Shihuan Kuang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures involving mice were approved by Purdue University's Animal Care and Use Committee under protocol # 1112000440.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Anne C Ferguson-Smith, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Publication history

  1. Received: May 2, 2016
  2. Accepted: September 17, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 19, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: October 19, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: August 8, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2016, Bi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,733
    Page views
  • 1,163
    Downloads
  • 44
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Pengpeng Bi
  2. Feng Yue
  3. Yusuke Sato
  4. Sara Wirbisky
  5. Weiyi Liu
  6. Tizhong Shan
  7. Yefei Wen
  8. Daoguo Zhou
  9. Jennifer Freeman
  10. Shihuan Kuang
(2016)
Stage-specific effects of Notch activation during skeletal myogenesis
eLife 5:e17355.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17355

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology

    Androglobin, a chimeric mammalian globin, is required for male fertility

    Anna Keppner et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Spermatogenesis is a highly specialized differentiation process driven by a dynamic gene expression program and ending with the production of mature spermatozoa. Whereas hundreds of genes are known to be essential for male germline proliferation and differentiation, the contribution of several genes remains uncharacterized. The predominant expression of the latest globin family member, androglobin (Adgb), in mammalian testis tissue prompted us to assess its physiological function in spermatogenesis. Adgb knockout mice display male infertility, reduced testis weight, impaired maturation of elongating spermatids, abnormal sperm shape, and ultrastructural defects in microtubule and mitochondrial organization. Epididymal sperm from Adgb knockout animals display multiple flagellar malformations including coiled, bifid or shortened flagella, and erratic acrosomal development. Following immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry, we could identify septin 10 (Sept10) as interactor of Adgb. The Sept10-Adgb interaction was confirmed both in vivo using testis lysates and in vitro by reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation experiments. Furthermore, the absence of Adgb leads to mislocalization of Sept10 in sperm, indicating defective manchette and sperm annulus formation. Finally, in vitro data suggest that Adgb contributes to Sept10 proteolysis in a calmodulin-dependent manner. Collectively, our results provide evidence that Adgb is essential for murine spermatogenesis and further suggest that Adgb is required for sperm head shaping via the manchette and proper flagellum formation.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology

    An epithelial signalling centre in sharks supports homology of tooth morphogenesis in vertebrates

    Alexandre P Thiery et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Development of tooth shape is regulated by the enamel knot signalling centre, at least in mammals. Fgf signalling regulates differential proliferation between the enamel knot and adjacent dental epithelia during tooth development, leading to formation of the dental cusp. The presence of an enamel knot in non-mammalian vertebrates is debated given differences in signalling. Here, we show the conservation and restriction of fgf3, fgf10, and shh to the sites of future dental cusps in the shark (Scyliorhinus canicula), whilst also highlighting striking differences between the shark and mouse. We reveal shifts in tooth size, shape, and cusp number following small molecule perturbations of canonical Wnt signalling. Resulting tooth phenotypes mirror observed effects in mammals, where canonical Wnt has been implicated as an upstream regulator of enamel knot signalling. In silico modelling of shark dental morphogenesis demonstrates how subtle changes in activatory and inhibitory signals can alter tooth shape, resembling developmental phenotypes and cusp shapes observed following experimental Wnt perturbation. Our results support the functional conservation of an enamel knot-like signalling centre throughout vertebrates and suggest that varied tooth types from sharks to mammals follow a similar developmental bauplan. Lineage-specific differences in signalling are not sufficient in refuting homology of this signalling centre, which is likely older than teeth themselves.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology

    Tooth Development: What sharks and mammals share

    Sophie Pantalacci
    Insight

    The tooth shape of sharks and mice are regulated by a similar signaling center despite their teeth having very different geometries.