Critical roles of mTOR Complex 1 and 2 for T follicular helper cell differentiation and germinal center responses

  1. Jialong Yang
  2. Xingguang Lin
  3. Yun Pan
  4. Jinli Wang
  5. Pengcheng Chen
  6. Hongxiang Huang
  7. Hai-Hui Xue
  8. Jimin Gao
  9. Xiao-Ping Zhong  Is a corresponding author
  1. Duke University Medical Center, United States
  2. Wenzhou Medical University, China
  3. University of Iowa, United States

Abstract

T Follicular helper T (Tfh) cells play critical roles for germinal center responses and effective humoral immunity. We report here that mTOR in CD4 T cells is essential for Tfh differentiation. In Mtorf/f-Cd4Cre mice, both constitutive and inducible Tfh differentiation is severely impaired, leading to defective germinal center B cell formation and antibody production. Moreover, both mTORC1 and mTORC2 contribute to Tfh and GC B cell development but may do so via distinct mechanisms. mTORC1 mainly promotes CD4 T cell proliferation to reach the cell divisions necessary for Tfh differentiation, while Rictor/mTORC2 regulates Tfh differentiation by promoting Akt activation and TCF1 expression without grossly influencing T cell proliferation. Together, our results reveal crucial but distinct roles for mTORC1 and mTORC2 in CD4 T cells during Tfh differentiation and germinal center responses.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jialong Yang

    Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Xingguang Lin

    Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Yun Pan

    Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jinli Wang

    School of Laboratory Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Pengcheng Chen

    School of Laboratory Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Hongxiang Huang

    Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Hai-Hui Xue

    Department of Microbiology, University of Iowa, Iowa, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jimin Gao

    School of Laboratory Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Xiao-Ping Zhong

    Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States
    For correspondence
    xiaoping.zhong@duke.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4619-8783

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01AI079088)

  • Xiao-Ping Zhong

National Institutes of Health (R01AI101206)

  • Xiao-Ping Zhong

National Institutes of Health (R01AI112579)

  • Hai-Hui Xue

National Institutes of Health (R01AI115149)

  • Hai-Hui Xue

National Institutes of Health (R01AI119160)

  • Hai-Hui Xue

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Satyajit Rath, National Institute of Immunology, India

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols A051-16-03 and A095-13-04) of Duke University.

Version history

  1. Received: May 18, 2016
  2. Accepted: September 28, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 30, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: October 13, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Yang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,667
    views
  • 773
    downloads
  • 85
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jialong Yang
  2. Xingguang Lin
  3. Yun Pan
  4. Jinli Wang
  5. Pengcheng Chen
  6. Hongxiang Huang
  7. Hai-Hui Xue
  8. Jimin Gao
  9. Xiao-Ping Zhong
(2016)
Critical roles of mTOR Complex 1 and 2 for T follicular helper cell differentiation and germinal center responses
eLife 5:e17936.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17936

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17936

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Mark S Lee, Peter J Tuohy ... Michael S Kuhns
    Research Advance

    CD4+ T cell activation is driven by five-module receptor complexes. The T cell receptor (TCR) is the receptor module that binds composite surfaces of peptide antigens embedded within MHCII molecules (pMHCII). It associates with three signaling modules (CD3γε, CD3δε, and CD3ζζ) to form TCR-CD3 complexes. CD4 is the coreceptor module. It reciprocally associates with TCR-CD3-pMHCII assemblies on the outside of a CD4+ T cells and with the Src kinase, LCK, on the inside. Previously, we reported that the CD4 transmembrane GGXXG and cytoplasmic juxtamembrane (C/F)CV+C motifs found in eutherian (placental mammal) CD4 have constituent residues that evolved under purifying selection (Lee et al., 2022). Expressing mutants of these motifs together in T cell hybridomas increased CD4-LCK association but reduced CD3ζ, ZAP70, and PLCγ1 phosphorylation levels, as well as IL-2 production, in response to agonist pMHCII. Because these mutants preferentially localized CD4-LCK pairs to non-raft membrane fractions, one explanation for our results was that they impaired proximal signaling by sequestering LCK away from TCR-CD3. An alternative hypothesis is that the mutations directly impacted signaling because the motifs normally play an LCK-independent role in signaling. The goal of this study was to discriminate between these possibilities. Using T cell hybridomas, our results indicate that: intracellular CD4-LCK interactions are not necessary for pMHCII-specific signal initiation; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs are key determinants of CD4-mediated pMHCII-specific signal amplification; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs exert their functions independently of direct CD4-LCK association. These data provide a mechanistic explanation for why residues within these motifs are under purifying selection in jawed vertebrates. The results are also important to consider for biomimetic engineering of synthetic receptors.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Jean-David Larouche, Céline M Laumont ... Claude Perreault
    Research Article

    Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive sequences representing ~45% of the human and mouse genomes and are highly expressed by medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs). In this study, we investigated the role of TEs on T-cell development in the thymus. We performed multiomic analyses of TEs in human and mouse thymic cells to elucidate their role in T-cell development. We report that TE expression in the human thymus is high and shows extensive age- and cell lineage-related variations. TE expression correlates with multiple transcription factors in all cell types of the human thymus. Two cell types express particularly broad TE repertoires: mTECs and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). In mTECs, transcriptomic data suggest that TEs interact with transcription factors essential for mTEC development and function (e.g., PAX1 and REL), and immunopeptidomic data showed that TEs generate MHC-I-associated peptides implicated in thymocyte education. Notably, AIRE, FEZF2, and CHD4 regulate small yet non-redundant sets of TEs in murine mTECs. Human thymic pDCs homogenously express large numbers of TEs that likely form dsRNA, which can activate innate immune receptors, potentially explaining why thymic pDCs constitutively secrete IFN ɑ/β. This study highlights the diversity of interactions between TEs and the adaptive immune system. TEs are genetic parasites, and the two thymic cell types most affected by TEs (mTEcs and pDCs) are essential to establishing central T-cell tolerance. Therefore, we propose that orchestrating TE expression in thymic cells is critical to prevent autoimmunity in vertebrates.