1. Neuroscience
Download icon

The hominoid-specific gene TBC1D3 promotes generation of basal neural progenitors and induces cortical folding in mice

  1. Xiang-Chun Ju
  2. Qiong-Qiong Hou
  3. Ai-Li Sheng Sheng
  4. Kong-Yan Wu
  5. Yang Zhou
  6. Ying Jin
  7. Tieqiao Wen
  8. Zhengang Yang
  9. Xiaoqun Wang
  10. Zhen-Ge Luo  Is a corresponding author
  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
  2. Shanghai University, China
  3. Fudan University, China
  4. CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, China
Research Article
  • Cited 46
  • Views 3,947
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2016;5:e18197 doi: 10.7554/eLife.18197

Abstract

Cortical expansion and folding are often linked to the evolution of higher intelligence, but molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying cortical folding remain poorly understood. The hominoid-specific gene TBC1D3 undergoes segmental duplications during hominoid evolution, but it's role in brain development has not been explored. Here, we found that expression of TBC1D3 in ventricular cortical progenitors of mice via in utero electroporation caused delamination of ventricular radial glia cells (vRGs) and promotes generation of self-renewing basal progenitors with typical morphology of outer radial glia (oRG), which are most abundant in primates. Furthermore, down-regulation of TBC1D3 in cultured human brain slices decreased generation of oRGs. Interestingly, localized oRG proliferation resulting from either in utero electroporation or transgenic expression of TBC1D3, was often found to underlie cortical regions exhibiting folding. Thus, we have identified a hominoid gene that is required for oRG generation in regulating the cortical expansion and folding.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Xiang-Chun Ju

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Qiong-Qiong Hou

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ai-Li Sheng Sheng

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kong-Yan Wu

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yang Zhou

    The Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ying Jin

    The Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Tieqiao Wen

    School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Zhengang Yang

    Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Xiaoqun Wang

    CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Zhen-Ge Luo

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    zgluo@ion.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5037-0542

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2014CB910203)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31330032)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31490591)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31321091)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

National Natural Science Foundation of China (61327902)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB02040003)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health (8th Edition, 2010). All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#NA-008-2016) of the Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences. All surgery was performed under anesthesia with pentobarbital sodium, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Human subjects: Human fetal brain tissue samples were collected at autopsy within 3 hr of spontaneous abortion with the informed consent of the patients following protocols and institutional ethic guidelines approved by ethics committee of Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Approval identifier number: ER-SIBS-221506). Brain tissues were stored in ice-cold Leibowitz-15 medium and transported to the laboratory for further examination and processing.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Joseph G Gleeson, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: May 25, 2016
  2. Accepted: August 8, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 9, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 19, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Ju et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,947
    Page views
  • 1,071
    Downloads
  • 46
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Katalin Skrapits et al.
    Research Article

    Human reproduction is controlled by ~2,000 hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons. Here we report the discovery and characterization of additional ~150,000-200,000 GnRH-synthesizing cells in the human basal ganglia and basal forebrain. Nearly all extrahypothalamic GnRH neurons expressed the cholinergic marker enzyme choline acetyltransferase. Similarly, hypothalamic GnRH neurons were also cholinergic both in embryonic and adult human brains. Whole-transcriptome analysis of cholinergic interneurons and medium spiny projection neurons laser-microdissected from the human putamen showed selective expression of GNRH1 and GNRHR1 autoreceptors in the cholinergic cell population and uncovered the detailed transcriptome profile and molecular connectome of these two cell types. Higher-order non-reproductive functions regulated by GnRH under physiological conditions in the human basal ganglia and basal forebrain require clarification. The role and changes of GnRH/GnRHR1 signaling in neurodegenerative disorders affecting cholinergic neurocircuitries, including Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases, need to be explored.

    1. Neuroscience
    Hanna Keren et al.
    Research Article

    Humans refer to their mood state regularly in day-to-day as well as clinical interactions. Theoretical accounts suggest that when reporting on our mood we integrate over the history of our experiences; yet, the temporal structure of this integration remains unexamined. Here we use a computational approach to quantitatively answer this question and show that early events exert a stronger influence on reported mood compared to recent events. We show that a Primacy model accounts better for mood reports compared to a range of alternative temporal representations across random, consistent or dynamic reward environments, different age groups and in both healthy and depressed participants. Moreover, we find evidence for neural encoding of the Primacy, but not the Recency, model in frontal brain regions related to mood regulation. These findings hold implications for the timing of events in experimental or clinical settings and suggest new directions for individualized mood interventions.