The hominoid-specific gene TBC1D3 promotes generation of basal neural progenitors and induces cortical folding in mice

  1. Xiang-Chun Ju
  2. Qiong-Qiong Hou
  3. Ai-Li Sheng Sheng
  4. Kong-Yan Wu
  5. Yang Zhou
  6. Ying Jin
  7. Tieqiao Wen
  8. Zhengang Yang
  9. Xiaoqun Wang
  10. Zhen-Ge Luo  Is a corresponding author
  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
  2. Shanghai University, China
  3. Fudan University, China
  4. CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, China

Abstract

Cortical expansion and folding are often linked to the evolution of higher intelligence, but molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying cortical folding remain poorly understood. The hominoid-specific gene TBC1D3 undergoes segmental duplications during hominoid evolution, but it's role in brain development has not been explored. Here, we found that expression of TBC1D3 in ventricular cortical progenitors of mice via in utero electroporation caused delamination of ventricular radial glia cells (vRGs) and promotes generation of self-renewing basal progenitors with typical morphology of outer radial glia (oRG), which are most abundant in primates. Furthermore, down-regulation of TBC1D3 in cultured human brain slices decreased generation of oRGs. Interestingly, localized oRG proliferation resulting from either in utero electroporation or transgenic expression of TBC1D3, was often found to underlie cortical regions exhibiting folding. Thus, we have identified a hominoid gene that is required for oRG generation in regulating the cortical expansion and folding.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Xiang-Chun Ju

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Qiong-Qiong Hou

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ai-Li Sheng Sheng

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kong-Yan Wu

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yang Zhou

    The Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ying Jin

    The Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Tieqiao Wen

    School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Zhengang Yang

    Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Xiaoqun Wang

    CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Zhen-Ge Luo

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    zgluo@ion.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5037-0542

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2014CB910203)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31330032)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31490591)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31321091)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

National Natural Science Foundation of China (61327902)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB02040003)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Joseph G Gleeson, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health (8th Edition, 2010). All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#NA-008-2016) of the Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences. All surgery was performed under anesthesia with pentobarbital sodium, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Human subjects: Human fetal brain tissue samples were collected at autopsy within 3 hr of spontaneous abortion with the informed consent of the patients following protocols and institutional ethic guidelines approved by ethics committee of Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Approval identifier number: ER-SIBS-221506). Brain tissues were stored in ice-cold Leibowitz-15 medium and transported to the laboratory for further examination and processing.

Version history

  1. Received: May 25, 2016
  2. Accepted: August 8, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 9, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 19, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Ju et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,106
    views
  • 1,238
    downloads
  • 128
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Xiang-Chun Ju
  2. Qiong-Qiong Hou
  3. Ai-Li Sheng Sheng
  4. Kong-Yan Wu
  5. Yang Zhou
  6. Ying Jin
  7. Tieqiao Wen
  8. Zhengang Yang
  9. Xiaoqun Wang
  10. Zhen-Ge Luo
(2016)
The hominoid-specific gene TBC1D3 promotes generation of basal neural progenitors and induces cortical folding in mice
eLife 5:e18197.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18197

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18197

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Tianhao Chu, Zilong Ji ... Si Wu
    Research Article

    Hippocampal place cells in freely moving rodents display both theta phase precession and procession, which is thought to play important roles in cognition, but the neural mechanism for producing theta phase shift remains largely unknown. Here, we show that firing rate adaptation within a continuous attractor neural network causes the neural activity bump to oscillate around the external input, resembling theta sweeps of decoded position during locomotion. These forward and backward sweeps naturally account for theta phase precession and procession of individual neurons, respectively. By tuning the adaptation strength, our model explains the difference between ‘bimodal cells’ showing interleaved phase precession and procession, and ‘unimodal cells’ in which phase precession predominates. Our model also explains the constant cycling of theta sweeps along different arms in a T-maze environment, the speed modulation of place cells’ firing frequency, and the continued phase shift after transient silencing of the hippocampus. We hope that this study will aid an understanding of the neural mechanism supporting theta phase coding in the brain.

    1. Neuroscience
    Josue M Regalado, Ariadna Corredera Asensio ... Priyamvada Rajasethupathy
    Research Article

    Learning requires the ability to link actions to outcomes. How motivation facilitates learning is not well understood. We designed a behavioral task in which mice self-initiate trials to learn cue-reward contingencies and found that the anterior cingulate region of the prefrontal cortex (ACC) contains motivation-related signals to maximize rewards. In particular, we found that ACC neural activity was consistently tied to trial initiations where mice seek to leave unrewarded cues to reach reward-associated cues. Notably, this neural signal persisted over consecutive unrewarded cues until reward-associated cues were reached, and was required for learning. To determine how ACC inherits this motivational signal we performed projection-specific photometry recordings from several inputs to ACC during learning. In doing so, we identified a ramp in bulk neural activity in orbitofrontal cortex (OFC)-to-ACC projections as mice received unrewarded cues, which continued ramping across consecutive unrewarded cues, and finally peaked upon reaching a reward-associated cue, thus maintaining an extended motivational state. Cellular resolution imaging of OFC confirmed these neural correlates of motivation, and further delineated separate ensembles of neurons that sequentially tiled the ramp. Together, these results identify a mechanism by which OFC maps out task structure to convey an extended motivational state to ACC to facilitate goal-directed learning.