The hominoid-specific gene TBC1D3 promotes generation of basal neural progenitors and induces cortical folding in mice

  1. Xiang-Chun Ju
  2. Qiong-Qiong Hou
  3. Ai-Li Sheng Sheng
  4. Kong-Yan Wu
  5. Yang Zhou
  6. Ying Jin
  7. Tieqiao Wen
  8. Zhengang Yang
  9. Xiaoqun Wang
  10. Zhen-Ge Luo  Is a corresponding author
  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
  2. Shanghai University, China
  3. Fudan University, China
  4. CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, China

Abstract

Cortical expansion and folding are often linked to the evolution of higher intelligence, but molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying cortical folding remain poorly understood. The hominoid-specific gene TBC1D3 undergoes segmental duplications during hominoid evolution, but it's role in brain development has not been explored. Here, we found that expression of TBC1D3 in ventricular cortical progenitors of mice via in utero electroporation caused delamination of ventricular radial glia cells (vRGs) and promotes generation of self-renewing basal progenitors with typical morphology of outer radial glia (oRG), which are most abundant in primates. Furthermore, down-regulation of TBC1D3 in cultured human brain slices decreased generation of oRGs. Interestingly, localized oRG proliferation resulting from either in utero electroporation or transgenic expression of TBC1D3, was often found to underlie cortical regions exhibiting folding. Thus, we have identified a hominoid gene that is required for oRG generation in regulating the cortical expansion and folding.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Xiang-Chun Ju

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Qiong-Qiong Hou

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ai-Li Sheng Sheng

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kong-Yan Wu

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yang Zhou

    The Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ying Jin

    The Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Tieqiao Wen

    School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Zhengang Yang

    Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Xiaoqun Wang

    CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Zhen-Ge Luo

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    zgluo@ion.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5037-0542

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2014CB910203)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31330032)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31490591)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31321091)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

National Natural Science Foundation of China (61327902)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB02040003)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health (8th Edition, 2010). All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#NA-008-2016) of the Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences. All surgery was performed under anesthesia with pentobarbital sodium, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Human subjects: Human fetal brain tissue samples were collected at autopsy within 3 hr of spontaneous abortion with the informed consent of the patients following protocols and institutional ethic guidelines approved by ethics committee of Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Approval identifier number: ER-SIBS-221506). Brain tissues were stored in ice-cold Leibowitz-15 medium and transported to the laboratory for further examination and processing.

Copyright

© 2016, Ju et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,267
    views
  • 1,253
    downloads
  • 142
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Xiang-Chun Ju
  2. Qiong-Qiong Hou
  3. Ai-Li Sheng Sheng
  4. Kong-Yan Wu
  5. Yang Zhou
  6. Ying Jin
  7. Tieqiao Wen
  8. Zhengang Yang
  9. Xiaoqun Wang
  10. Zhen-Ge Luo
(2016)
The hominoid-specific gene TBC1D3 promotes generation of basal neural progenitors and induces cortical folding in mice
eLife 5:e18197.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18197

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18197

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Hans Martin Kjer, Mariam Andersson ... Tim B Dyrby
    Research Article

    We used diffusion MRI and x-ray synchrotron imaging on monkey and mice brains to examine the organisation of fibre pathways in white matter across anatomical scales. We compared the structure in the corpus callosum and crossing fibre regions and investigated the differences in cuprizone-induced demyelination in mouse brains versus healthy controls. Our findings revealed common principles of fibre organisation that apply despite the varying patterns observed across species; small axonal fasciculi and major bundles formed laminar structures with varying angles, according to the characteristics of major pathways. Fasciculi exhibited non-straight paths around obstacles like blood vessels, comparable across the samples of varying fibre complexity and demyelination. Quantifications of fibre orientation distributions were consistent across anatomical length scales and modalities, whereas tissue anisotropy had a more complex relationship, both dependent on the field-of-view. Our study emphasises the need to balance field-of-view and voxel size when characterising white matter features across length scales.

    1. Neuroscience
    Aneri Soni, Michael J Frank
    Research Article

    How and why is working memory (WM) capacity limited? Traditional cognitive accounts focus either on limitations on the number or items that can be stored (slots models), or loss of precision with increasing load (resource models). Here, we show that a neural network model of prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia can learn to reuse the same prefrontal populations to store multiple items, leading to resource-like constraints within a slot-like system, and inducing a trade-off between quantity and precision of information. Such ‘chunking’ strategies are adapted as a function of reinforcement learning and WM task demands, mimicking human performance and normative models. Moreover, adaptive performance requires a dynamic range of dopaminergic signals to adjust striatal gating policies, providing a new interpretation of WM difficulties in patient populations such as Parkinson’s disease, ADHD, and schizophrenia. These simulations also suggest a computational rather than anatomical limit to WM capacity.