Suppression of C9orf72 RNA repeat-induced neurotoxicity by the ALS-associated RNA-binding protein Zfp106

Abstract

Expanded GGGGCC repeats in the first intron of the C9orf72 gene represent the most common cause of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), but the mechanisms underlying repeat-induced disease remain incompletely resolved. One proposed gain-of-function mechanism is that repeat-containing RNA forms aggregates that sequester RNA binding proteins, leading to altered RNA metabolism in motor neurons. Here, we identify the zinc finger protein Zfp106 as a specific GGGGCC RNA repeat-binding protein, and using affinity purification-mass spectrometry, we show that Zfp106 interacts with multiple other RNA binding proteins, including the ALS-associated factors TDP-43 and FUS. We also show that Zfp106 knockout mice develop severe motor neuron degeneration, which can be suppressed by transgenic restoration of Zfp106 specifically in motor neurons. Finally, we show that Zfp106 potently suppresses neurotoxicity in a Drosophila model of C9orf72 ALS. Thus, these studies identify Zfp106 as an RNA binding protein with important implications for ALS.

Data availability

The following previously published data sets were used
    1. The UniProt Consortium
    (2015) UniProt: a hub for protein information
    Publicly available at UniProt (Registry identifier MIR:00000005).
    1. The Gene Ontology Consortium
    (2015) Gene Ontology Consortium: going forward
    Publicly available at the Gene Ontology Consortium (Registry identifier MIR:00000022).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Barbara Celona

    Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. John von Dollen

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sarat C Vatsavayai

    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Risa Kashima

    Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jeffrey R Johnson

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Amy A Tang

    Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Akiko Hata

    Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Bruce L Miller

    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Eric J Huang

    Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Nevan J Krogan

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. William W Seeley

    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Brian L Black

    Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    brian.black@ucsf.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6664-8913

Funding

American Heart Association (14POST1862005)

  • Barbara Celona

Sandler Foundation

  • Barbara Celona

National Institutes of Health (HL064658)

  • Brian L Black

National Institutes of Health (HL089707)

  • Brian L Black

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association (17-IIP-358)

  • Brian L Black

National Institutes of Health (P01AG019724)

  • Bruce L Miller
  • William W Seeley

National Institutes of Health (P50AG023501)

  • Bruce L Miller
  • William W Seeley

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments using vertebrate animals were reviewed and approved by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) under protocols AN108111 and AN087046, and all animal research complied with all institutional and federal guidelines.

Copyright

© 2017, Celona et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,932
    views
  • 1,067
    downloads
  • 45
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Barbara Celona
  2. John von Dollen
  3. Sarat C Vatsavayai
  4. Risa Kashima
  5. Jeffrey R Johnson
  6. Amy A Tang
  7. Akiko Hata
  8. Bruce L Miller
  9. Eric J Huang
  10. Nevan J Krogan
  11. William W Seeley
  12. Brian L Black
(2017)
Suppression of C9orf72 RNA repeat-induced neurotoxicity by the ALS-associated RNA-binding protein Zfp106
eLife 6:e19032.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19032

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19032

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Bharath Krishnan, Noah Cowan
    Insight

    Mice can generate a cognitive map of an environment based on self-motion signals when there is a fixed association between their starting point and the location of their goal.

    1. Neuroscience
    Juan Carlos Boffi, Brice Bathellier ... Robert Prevedel
    Research Article

    Sound location coding has been extensively studied at the central nucleus of the mammalian inferior colliculus (CNIC), supporting a population code. However, this population code has not been extensively characterized on the single-trial level with simultaneous recordings or at other anatomical regions like the dorsal cortex of inferior colliculus (DCIC), which is relevant for learning-induced experience dependent plasticity. To address these knowledge gaps, here we made in two complementary ways large-scale recordings of DCIC populations from awake mice in response to sounds delivered from 13 different frontal horizontal locations (azimuths): volumetric two-photon calcium imaging with ~700 cells simultaneously recorded at a relatively low temporal resolution, and high-density single-unit extracellular recordings with ~20 cells simultaneously recorded at a high temporal resolution. Independent of the method, the recorded DCIC population responses revealed substantial trial-to-trial variation (neuronal noise) which was significantly correlated across pairs of neurons (noise correlations) in the passively listening condition. Nevertheless, decoding analysis supported that these noisy response patterns encode sound location on the single-trial basis, reaching errors that match the discrimination ability of mice. The detected noise correlations contributed to minimize the error of the DCIC population code of sound azimuth. Altogether these findings point out that DCIC can encode sound location in a similar format to what has been proposed for CNIC, opening exciting questions about how noise correlations could shape this code in the context of cortico-collicular input and experience-dependent plasticity.