(a) The AAV-CREB vector contained a GFP reporter. Example of a stitched 40x confocal image of GFP staining in CA1 area. SO – stratum oriens; SP – stratum pyramidale; SR – stratum radiatum. Scale bar …
AAV-CREB encoded the sequence for wild-type rat CREB, expressed from a chicken β-actin promoter with a CMV enhancer. The GFP reporter was downstream from an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES). The …
(a) Performance on visible platform over eight trials (inset), and hidden platform over 4 sessions of training (five trials each session; one session per day) for young animals and aged animals that …
CREB mRNA levels relative to young GFP group in a) CA1, (b) DG, and c) CA3. In both young and aged animals, AAV-CREB injected animals had more CREB mRNA in CA1 (n = 7, 7, 17, 15). This viral …
Upon separating the aged GFP group into AU and AI, CREB mRNA levels were not different between AU and AI animals. Horizontal bars represent mean.
Levels of CREB protein in CA1 of aged GFP animals are correlated with % time spent in target quadrant on a probe trial run 1 hr after the last training session. Aged rats with more basal levels of …
(a) Peak and b) slow AHP were measured in AAV-CREB infected cells (CREB+), AAV-CREB uninfected cells (CREB−), and cells from AAV-GFP injected young animals (n = 9, 17, 13). For both measurements, no …
(a) Performance on visible platform over eight trials (inset), and hidden platform over 4 sessions of training (three trials each session; one session per day) for young animals and aged animals …
Young peak and slow post-burst AHP amplitudes do not differ.
(a) Peak post-burst AHP amplitudes (mV) Aged CREB+ cells have smaller peak AHP’s than CREB- and GFP, but young cell types do not differ from each other. Data represent mean ± SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 compared to aged CREB+. (b) Slow post-burst AHP amplitudes (mV) Aged CREB+ cells have smaller slow AHP’s than CREB- and GFP, but young cell types do not differ from each other. Data represent mean ± SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 compared to aged CREB+.
Resting membrane potential and input resistance do not vary across cell types.
(a) Resting Membrane Potential (mV) Resting membrane potential does not vary across different groups of cells. A two-way ANOVA revealed no significant effect of age (F1, 63 = 0.6078, n.s.) or of cell type (F2, 63 = 0.6122, n.s.). Data represent mean ± SEM. (b) Input Resistance (MΩ) Input resistance does not vary across different groups of cells. A two-way ANOVA revealed no significant effect of age (F1, 63 = 0.8259, n.s.) or of cell type (F2, 63 = 1.608, n.s.). Data represent mean ± SEM.