APP modulates KCC2 expression and function in hippocampal GABAergic inhibition

  1. Ming Chen
  2. Jinzhao Wang
  3. Jinxiang Jiang
  4. Xingzhi Zheng
  5. Nicholas J Justice
  6. Kun Wang
  7. Yi Li
  8. Xiangqian Ran
  9. Qingwei Huo
  10. Jiajia Zhang
  11. Hongmei Li
  12. Nannan Lu
  13. Ying Wang
  14. Hui Zheng
  15. Cheng Long
  16. Li Yang  Is a corresponding author
  1. South China Normal University, China
  2. University of Texas Health Sciences Center, United States
  3. South China Normal University, United States
  4. Baylor College of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Amyloid precursor protein (APP) is enriched at the synapse, but its synaptic function is still poorly understood. We previously showed that GABAergic short-term plasticity is impaired in App knock-out (App-/-) animals, but the precise mechanism by which APP regulates GABAergic synaptic transmission has remained elusive. Using electrophysiological, biochemical, moleculobiological, and pharmacological analysis, here we show that APP can physically interact with KCC2, a neuron-specific K+-Cl- cotransporter that is essential for Cl- homeostasis and fast GABAergic inhibition. APP deficiency results in significant reductions in both total and membrane KCC2 levels, leading to a depolarizing shift in the GABA reversal potential (EGABA). Simultaneous measurement of presynaptic action potentials and inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) in hippocampal neurons reveals impaired unitary IPSC amplitudes attributable to a reduction in α1 subunit levels of GABAAR. Importantly, restoration of normal KCC2 expression and function in App-/- mice rescues EGABA, GABAAR α1 levels and GABAAR mediated phasic inhibition. We show that APP functions to limit tyrosine-phosphorylation and ubiquitination and thus subsequent degradation of KCC2, providing a mechanism by which APP influences KCC2 abundance. Together, these experiments elucidate a novel molecular pathway in which APP regulates, via protein-protein interaction with KCC2, GABAAR mediated inhibition in the hippocampus.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ming Chen

    School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jinzhao Wang

    School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jinxiang Jiang

    School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Xingzhi Zheng

    School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guang Zhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Nicholas J Justice

    Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Kun Wang

    School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Yi Li

    School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Xiangqian Ran

    School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Qingwei Huo

    School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jiajia Zhang

    School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Hongmei Li

    Huffington Center on Aging, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Nannan Lu

    School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Ying Wang

    School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Hui Zheng

    Huffington Center on Aging, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Cheng Long

    School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Li Yang

    School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
    For correspondence
    yang_li@m.scnu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7448-8588

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31171018,31171355)

  • Cheng Long
  • Li Yang

Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2014A030313418,2014A030313440)

  • Cheng Long
  • Li Yang

The Science and Technology Division of Guangdong Province (2013KJCX0054,201607010320)

  • Li Yang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was conducted along the guidelines described in "The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" (Eighth Edition). All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#0312-11) of the South China Normal University. Every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 3,865
    views
  • 810
    downloads
  • 81
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ming Chen
  2. Jinzhao Wang
  3. Jinxiang Jiang
  4. Xingzhi Zheng
  5. Nicholas J Justice
  6. Kun Wang
  7. Yi Li
  8. Xiangqian Ran
  9. Qingwei Huo
  10. Jiajia Zhang
  11. Hongmei Li
  12. Nannan Lu
  13. Ying Wang
  14. Hui Zheng
  15. Cheng Long
  16. Li Yang
(2017)
APP modulates KCC2 expression and function in hippocampal GABAergic inhibition
eLife 6:e20142.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20142

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20142

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Simon Weiler, Manuel Teichert, Troy W Margrie
    Research Article

    The neocortex comprises anatomically discrete yet interconnected areas that are symmetrically located across the two hemispheres. Determining the logic of these macrocircuits is necessary for understanding high level brain function. Here in mice, we have mapped the areal and laminar organization of the ipsi- and contralateral cortical projection onto the primary visual, somatosensory, and motor cortices. We find that although the ipsilateral hemisphere is the primary source of cortical input, there is substantial contralateral symmetry regarding the relative contribution and areal identity of input. Laminar analysis of these input areas show that excitatory Layer 6 corticocortical cells (L6 CCs) are a major projection pathway within and between the two hemispheres. Analysis of the relative contribution of inputs from supra- (feedforward) and infragranular (feedback) layers reveals that contra-hemispheric projections reflect a dominant feedback organization compared to their ipsi-cortical counterpart. The magnitude of the interhemispheric difference in hierarchy was largest for sensory and motor projection areas compared to frontal, medial, or lateral brain areas due to a proportional increase in input from L6 neurons. L6 CCs therefore not only mediate long-range cortical communication but also reflect its inherent feedback organization.

    1. Neuroscience
    Elissa Sutlief, Charlie Walters ... Marshall G Hussain Shuler
    Research Article

    Reward-rate maximization is a prominent normative principle in behavioral ecology, neuroscience, economics, and AI. Here, we identify, compare, and analyze equations to maximize reward rate when assessing whether to initiate a pursuit. In deriving expressions for the value of a pursuit, we show that time’s cost consists of both apportionment and opportunity cost. Reformulating value as a discounting function, we show precisely how a reward-rate-optimal agent’s discounting function (1) combines hyperbolic and linear components reflecting apportionment and opportunity costs, and (2) is dependent not only on the considered pursuit’s properties but also on time spent and rewards obtained outside the pursuit. This analysis reveals how purported signs of suboptimal behavior (hyperbolic discounting, and the Delay, Magnitude, and Sign effects) are in fact consistent with reward-rate maximization. To better account for observed decision-making errors in humans and animals, we then analyze the impact of misestimating reward-rate-maximizing parameters and find that suboptimal decisions likely stem from errors in assessing time’s apportionment—specifically, underweighting time spent outside versus inside a pursuit—which we term the ‘Malapportionment Hypothesis’. This understanding of the true pattern of temporal decision-making errors is essential to deducing the learning algorithms and representational architectures actually used by humans and animals.