Super-resolution imaging of a 2.5 kb non-repetitive DNA in situ in the nuclear genome using molecular beacon probes

  1. Yanxiang Ni  Is a corresponding author
  2. Bo Cao
  3. Tszshan Ma
  4. Gang Niu
  5. Yingdong Huo
  6. Jiandong Huang
  7. Danni Chen
  8. Yi Liu
  9. Bin Yu
  10. Michael Qiwei Zhang  Is a corresponding author
  11. Hanben Niu  Is a corresponding author
  1. College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, China
  2. Tsinghua University, China
  3. The University of Hong Kong, China

Abstract

High-resolution visualization of short non-repetitive DNA in situ in the nuclear genome is essential for studying looping interactions and chromatin organization in single cells. Recent advances in fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using Oligopaints probes enabled super-resolution imaging of genomic domains with a resolution limit of 4.9 kb. To target shorter elements, we developed a simple FISH method that uses only molecular beacon (MB) probes to facilitate the probe-target binding, while minimizing non-specific fluorescence. We used three-dimensional stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (3D-STORM) and optimized the imaging conditions to efficiently distinguish sparsely distributed Alexa-647 from background cellular autofluorescence. Utilizing 3D-STORM and 29-34 individual MB probes, we observed 3D fine-scale nanostructures of 2.5 kb integrated or endogenous unique DNA in situ in the human or mouse genome, respectively, demonstrating the capability of MB-based FISH in visualizing a so far shortest and non-repetitive genomic sequence in 3D at super-resolution.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yanxiang Ni

    Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
    For correspondence
    niyanxiang0000@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Bo Cao

    Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Tszshan Ma

    MOE Key laboratory of Bioinformatics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Gang Niu

    Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yingdong Huo

    Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jiandong Huang

    School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Danni Chen

    Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Yi Liu

    Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Bin Yu

    Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Michael Qiwei Zhang

    MOE Key laboratory of Bioinformatics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    michaelzhang@tsinghua.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7408-1830
  11. Hanben Niu

    Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
    For correspondence
    hbniu@szu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (61235012)

  • Hanben Niu

National Natural Science Foundation of China (61335001)

  • Michael Qiwei Zhang

Shenzhen Science and Technology Planning Project (JCYJ20150324141711698)

  • Michael Qiwei Zhang

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31401146)

  • Yanxiang Ni

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31361163004)

  • Michael Qiwei Zhang

National Natural Science Foundation of China (91019016)

  • Michael Qiwei Zhang

the National Basic Research Program of China (2012CB825802)

  • Hanben Niu

the Special-Funded Program on National Key Scientific Instruments and Equipment Development (2012YQ150092)

  • Hanben Niu

the National Key Basic Research Project (2012CB316503)

  • Michael Qiwei Zhang

the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2015CB352005)

  • Hanben Niu

National Natural Science Foundation of China (61178080)

  • Michael Qiwei Zhang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Lothar Schermelleh, University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Version history

  1. Received: September 20, 2016
  2. Accepted: April 24, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 9, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 16, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Ni et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,066
    Page views
  • 947
    Downloads
  • 22
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yanxiang Ni
  2. Bo Cao
  3. Tszshan Ma
  4. Gang Niu
  5. Yingdong Huo
  6. Jiandong Huang
  7. Danni Chen
  8. Yi Liu
  9. Bin Yu
  10. Michael Qiwei Zhang
  11. Hanben Niu
(2017)
Super-resolution imaging of a 2.5 kb non-repetitive DNA in situ in the nuclear genome using molecular beacon probes
eLife 6:e21660.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21660

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21660

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Allison Coté, Aoife O'Farrell ... Arjun Raj
    Research Article

    Splicing is the stepwise molecular process by which introns are removed from pre-mRNA and exons are joined together to form mature mRNA sequences. The ordering and spatial distribution of these steps remain controversial, with opposing models suggesting splicing occurs either during or after transcription. We used single-molecule RNA FISH, expansion microscopy, and live-cell imaging to reveal the spatiotemporal distribution of nascent transcripts in mammalian cells. At super-resolution levels, we found that pre-mRNA formed clouds around the transcription site. These clouds indicate the existence of a transcription-site-proximal zone through which RNA move more slowly than in the nucleoplasm. Full-length pre-mRNA undergo continuous splicing as they move through this zone following transcription, suggesting a model in which splicing can occur post-transcriptionally but still within the proximity of the transcription site, thus seeming co-transcriptional by most assays. These results may unify conflicting reports of co-transcriptional versus post-transcriptional splicing.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Maria L Adelus, Jiacheng Ding ... Casey E Romanoski
    Research Article

    Heterogeneity in endothelial cell (EC) sub-phenotypes is becoming increasingly appreciated in atherosclerosis progression. Still, studies quantifying EC heterogeneity across whole transcriptomes and epigenomes in both in vitro and in vivo models are lacking. Multiomic profiling concurrently measuring transcriptomes and accessible chromatin in the same single cells was performed on six distinct primary cultures of human aortic ECs (HAECs) exposed to activating environments characteristic of the atherosclerotic microenvironment in vitro. Meta-analysis of single-cell transcriptomes across 17 human ex vivo arterial specimens was performed and two computational approaches quantitatively evaluated the similarity in molecular profiles between heterogeneous in vitro and ex vivo cell profiles. HAEC cultures were reproducibly populated by four major clusters with distinct pathway enrichment profiles and modest heterogeneous responses: EC1-angiogenic, EC2-proliferative, EC3-activated/mesenchymal-like, and EC4-mesenchymal. Quantitative comparisons between in vitro and ex vivo transcriptomes confirmed EC1 and EC2 as most canonically EC-like, and EC4 as most mesenchymal with minimal effects elicited by siERG and IL1B. Lastly, accessible chromatin regions unique to EC2 and EC4 were most enriched for coronary artery disease (CAD)-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms from Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS), suggesting that these cell phenotypes harbor CAD-modulating mechanisms. Primary EC cultures contain markedly heterogeneous cell subtypes defined by their molecular profiles. Surprisingly, the perturbations used here only modestly shifted cells between subpopulations, suggesting relatively stable molecular phenotypes in culture. Identifying consistently heterogeneous EC subpopulations between in vitro and ex vivo models should pave the way for improving in vitro systems while enabling the mechanisms governing heterogeneous cell state decisions.