1. Neuroscience

The computational nature of memory modification

  1. Samuel J Gershman  Is a corresponding author
  2. Marie-H Monfils
  3. Norman A Kenneth
  4. Yael Niv
  1. Harvard University, United States
  2. University of Texas at Austin, United States
  3. Princeton University, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23763
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Samuel J Gershman
  2. Marie-H Monfils
  3. Norman A Kenneth
  4. Yael Niv
(2017)
The computational nature of memory modification
eLife 6:e23763.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23763
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Retrieving a memory can modify its influence on subsequent behavior. We develop a computational theory of memory modification, according to which modification of a memory trace occurs through classical associative learning, but which memory trace is eligible for modification depends on a structure learning mechanism that discovers the units of association by segmenting the stream of experience into statistically distinct clusters (latent causes). New memories are formed when the structure learning mechanism infers that a new latent cause underlies current sensory observations. By the same token, old memories are modified when old and new sensory observations are inferred to have been generated by the same latent cause. We derive this framework from probabilistic principles, and present a computational implementation. Simulations demonstrate that our model can reproduce the major experimental findings from studies of memory modification in the Pavlovian conditioning literature.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Samuel J Gershman

    Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    For correspondence
    gershman@fas.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6546-3298

  2. Marie-H Monfils

    Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Norman A Kenneth

    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Yael Niv

    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0259-8371

Funding

National Science Foundation (Graduate research fellowship)

  • Samuel J Gershman

Sloan Research Foundation (Sloan Research Fellowship)

  • Yael Niv

National Institutes of Health (R01MH091147)

  • Marie-H Monfils

National Institutes of Health (R21MH086805)

  • Marie-H Monfils

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Gershman et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,937
    views
  • 1,496
    downloads
  • 121
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Samuel J Gershman
  2. Marie-H Monfils
  3. Norman A Kenneth
  4. Yael Niv
(2017)
The computational nature of memory modification
eLife 6:e23763.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23763

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23763

Categories and tags

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience

    A novel method (RIM-Deep) for enhancing imaging depth and resolution stability of deep cleared tissue in inverted confocal microscopy

    Yisi Liu, Pu Wang ... Hongwei Zhou
    Short Report

    The increasing use of tissue clearing techniques underscores the urgent need for cost-effective and simplified deep imaging methods. While traditional inverted confocal microscopes excel in high-resolution imaging of tissue sections and cultured cells, they face limitations in deep imaging of cleared tissues due to refractive index mismatches between the immersion media of objectives and sample container. To overcome these challenges, the RIM-Deep was developed to significantly improve deep imaging capabilities without compromising the normal function of the confocal microscope. This system facilitates deep immunofluorescence imaging of the prefrontal cortex in cleared macaque tissue, extending imaging depth from 2 mm to 5 mm. Applied to an intact and cleared Thy1-EGFP mouse brain, the system allowed for clear axonal visualization at high imaging depth. Moreover, this advancement enables large-scale, deep 3D imaging of intact tissues. In principle, this concept can be extended to any imaging modality, including existing inverted wide-field, confocal, and two-photon microscopy. This would significantly upgrade traditional laboratory configurations and facilitate the study of connectomes in the brain and other tissues.

    1. Neuroscience
    2. Physics of Living Systems

    Annihilation of action potentials induces electrical coupling between neurons

    Moritz Schloetter, Georg U Maret, Christoph J Kleineidam
    Research Article

    Neurons generate and propagate electrical pulses called action potentials which annihilate on arrival at the axon terminal. We measure the extracellular electric field generated by propagating and annihilating action potentials and find that on annihilation, action potentials expel a local discharge. The discharge at the axon terminal generates an inhomogeneous electric field that immediately influences target neurons and thus provokes ephaptic coupling. Our measurements are quantitatively verified by a powerful analytical model which reveals excitation and inhibition in target neurons, depending on position and morphology of the source-target arrangement. Our model is in full agreement with experimental findings on ephaptic coupling at the well-studied Basket cell-Purkinje cell synapse. It is able to predict ephaptic coupling for any other synaptic geometry as illustrated by a few examples.