The RNF168 paralog RNF169 defines a new class of ubiquitylated-histone reader involved in the response to DNA damage

  1. Julianne Kitevski-LeBlanc
  2. Amélie Fradet-Turcotte
  3. Predrag Kukic
  4. Marcus D Wilson
  5. Guillem Portella
  6. Tairan Yuwen
  7. Stephanie Panier
  8. Shili Duan
  9. Marella D Canny
  10. Hugo van Ingen
  11. Cheryl H Arrowsmith
  12. John L Rubinstein
  13. Michele Vendruscolo
  14. Daniel Durocher  Is a corresponding author
  15. Lewis E Kay  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Toronto, Canada
  2. Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada
  3. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  4. The Francis Crick Research Institute, United Kingdom
  5. Leiden University, Netherlands

Abstract

Site-specific histone ubiquitylation plays a central role in orchestrating the response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). DSBs elicit a cascade of events controlled by the ubiquitin ligase RNF168, which promotes the accumulation of repair factors such as 53BP1 and BRCA1 on the chromatin flanking the break site. RNF168 also promotes its own accumulation, and that of its paralog RNF169, but how they recognize ubiquitylated chromatin is unknown. Using methyl-TROSY solution NMR spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulations, we present an atomic resolution model of human RNF169 binding to a ubiquitylated nucleosome, and validate it by electron cryomicroscopy. We establish that RNF169 binds to ubiquitylated H2A-Lys13/Lys15 in a manner that involves its canonical ubiquitin-binding helix and a pair of arginine-rich motifs that interact with the nucleosome acidic patch. This three-pronged interaction mechanism is distinct from that by which 53BP1 binds to ubiquitylated H2A-Lys15 highlighting the diversity in site-specific recognition of ubiquitylated nucleosomes.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Julianne Kitevski-LeBlanc

    Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Amélie Fradet-Turcotte

    The Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Predrag Kukic

    Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Marcus D Wilson

    The Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9551-5514
  5. Guillem Portella

    Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Tairan Yuwen

    Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3504-7995
  7. Stephanie Panier

    The Francis Crick Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Shili Duan

    Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Marella D Canny

    Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Hugo van Ingen

    Macromolecular Biochemistry, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Cheryl H Arrowsmith

    Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. John L Rubinstein

    Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0566-2209
  13. Michele Vendruscolo

    Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3616-1610
  14. Daniel Durocher

    Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    For correspondence
    durocher@lunenfeld.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3863-8635
  15. Lewis E Kay

    Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    For correspondence
    kay@pound.med.utoronto.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4054-4083

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (RN203972 - 310401)

  • Lewis E Kay

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Kitevski-LeBlanc et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,926
    views
  • 872
    downloads
  • 49
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Julianne Kitevski-LeBlanc
  2. Amélie Fradet-Turcotte
  3. Predrag Kukic
  4. Marcus D Wilson
  5. Guillem Portella
  6. Tairan Yuwen
  7. Stephanie Panier
  8. Shili Duan
  9. Marella D Canny
  10. Hugo van Ingen
  11. Cheryl H Arrowsmith
  12. John L Rubinstein
  13. Michele Vendruscolo
  14. Daniel Durocher
  15. Lewis E Kay
(2017)
The RNF168 paralog RNF169 defines a new class of ubiquitylated-histone reader involved in the response to DNA damage
eLife 6:e23872.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23872

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23872

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Chris van Hoorn, Andrew P Carter
    Research Article

    Ciliary rootlets are striated bundles of filaments that connect the base of cilia to internal cellular structures. Rootlets are critical for the sensory and motile functions of cilia. However, the mechanisms underlying these functions remain unknown, in part due to a lack of structural information of rootlet organization. In this study, we obtain 3D reconstructions of membrane-associated and purified rootlets from mouse retina using cryo-electron tomography. We show that flexible protrusions on the rootlet surface, which emanate from the cross-striations, connect to intracellular membranes. In purified rootlets, the striations were classified into amorphous (A)-bands, associated with accumulations on the rootlet surface, and discrete (D)-bands corresponding to punctate lines of density that run through the rootlet. These striations connect a flexible network of longitudinal filaments. Subtomogram averaging suggests the filaments consist of two intertwined coiled coils. The rootlet’s filamentous architecture, with frequent membrane-connecting cross-striations, lends itself well for anchoring large membranes in the cell.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jian Wu, Nisha A Jonniya ... Susan S Taylor
    Research Article

    Although the αC-β4 loop is a stable feature of all protein kinases, the importance of this motif as a conserved element of secondary structure, as well as its links to the hydrophobic architecture of the kinase core, has been underappreciated. We first review the motif and then describe how it is linked to the hydrophobic spine architecture of the kinase core, which we first discovered using a computational tool, local spatial Pattern (LSP) alignment. Based on NMR predictions that a mutation in this motif abolishes the synergistic high-affinity binding of ATP and a pseudo substrate inhibitor, we used LSP to interrogate the F100A mutant. This comparison highlights the importance of the αC-β4 loop and key residues at the interface between the N- and C-lobes. In addition, we delved more deeply into the structure of the apo C-subunit, which lacks ATP. While apo C-subunit showed no significant changes in backbone dynamics of the αC-β4 loop, we found significant differences in the side chain dynamics of K105. The LSP analysis suggests disruption of communication between the N- and C-lobes in the F100A mutant, which would be consistent with the structural changes predicted by the NMR spectroscopy.