Single-molecule visualization of fast polymerase turnover in the bacterial replisome

  1. Jacob S Lewis
  2. Lisanne M Spenkelink
  3. Slobodan Jergic
  4. Elizabeth A Wood
  5. Enrico Monachino
  6. Nicholas P Horan
  7. Karl E Duderstadt
  8. Michael M Cox
  9. Andrew Robinson
  10. Nicholas E Dixon  Is a corresponding author
  11. Antoine M van Oijen  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Wollongong, Australia
  2. University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
  3. University of Groningen, Netherlands

Abstract

The Escherichia coli DNA replication machinery has been used as a road map to uncover design rules that enable DNA duplication with high efficiency and fidelity. Although the enzymatic activities of the replicative DNA Pol III are well understood, its dynamics within the replisome are not. Here we test the accepted view that the Pol III holoenzyme remains stably associated within the replisome. We use in vitro single-molecule assays with fluorescently labeled polymerases to demonstrate that the Pol III* complex (holoenzyme lacking the β2 sliding clamp), is rapidly exchanged during processive DNA replication. Nevertheless, the replisome is highly resistant to dilution in the absence of Pol III* in solution. We further show similar exchange in live cells containing labeled clamp loader and polymerase. These observations suggest a concentration-dependent exchange mechanism providing a balance between stability and plasticity, facilitating replacement of replisomal components dependent on their availability in the environment.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jacob S Lewis

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Lisanne M Spenkelink

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Slobodan Jergic

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Elizabeth A Wood

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Enrico Monachino

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Nicholas P Horan

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Karl E Duderstadt

    Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Michael M Cox

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Andrew Robinson

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Nicholas E Dixon

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    For correspondence
    nickd@uow.edu.au
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5958-6945
  11. Antoine M van Oijen

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    For correspondence
    vanoijen@uow.edu.au
    Competing interests
    Antoine M van Oijen, Reviewing editor, <i>eLife</i>.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1794-5161

Funding

Australian Research Council (DP150100956)

  • Nicholas E Dixon
  • Antoine M van Oijen

Australian Research Council (FL140100027)

  • Antoine M van Oijen

National Institute of Health (GM32335)

  • Michael M Cox

Fundamenteel onderzoek der materie (12CMCE03)

  • Lisanne M Spenkelink

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Taekjip Ha, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States

Version history

  1. Received: December 6, 2016
  2. Accepted: April 20, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 22, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 5, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Lewis et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,284
    views
  • 721
    downloads
  • 107
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jacob S Lewis
  2. Lisanne M Spenkelink
  3. Slobodan Jergic
  4. Elizabeth A Wood
  5. Enrico Monachino
  6. Nicholas P Horan
  7. Karl E Duderstadt
  8. Michael M Cox
  9. Andrew Robinson
  10. Nicholas E Dixon
  11. Antoine M van Oijen
(2017)
Single-molecule visualization of fast polymerase turnover in the bacterial replisome
eLife 6:e23932.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23932

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23932

Further reading

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Alexander D Cook, Mark Carrington, Matthew K Higgins
    Research Article

    African trypanosomes replicate within infected mammals where they are exposed to the complement system. This system centres around complement C3, which is present in a soluble form in serum but becomes covalently deposited onto the surfaces of pathogens after proteolytic cleavage to C3b. Membrane-associated C3b triggers different complement-mediated effectors which promote pathogen clearance. To counter complement-mediated clearance, African trypanosomes have a cell surface receptor, ISG65, which binds to C3b and which decreases the rate of trypanosome clearance in an infection model. However, the mechanism by which ISG65 reduces C3b function has not been determined. We reveal through cryogenic electron microscopy that ISG65 has two distinct binding sites for C3b, only one of which is available in C3 and C3d. We show that ISG65 does not block the formation of C3b or the function of the C3 convertase which catalyses the surface deposition of C3b. However, we show that ISG65 forms a specific conjugate with C3b, perhaps acting as a decoy. ISG65 also occludes the binding sites for complement receptors 2 and 3, which may disrupt recruitment of immune cells, including B cells, phagocytes, and granulocytes. This suggests that ISG65 protects trypanosomes by combining multiple approaches to dampen the complement cascade.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Thuy TM Ngo, Bailey Liu ... Taekjip Ha
    Research Article

    The organization of nucleosomes into chromatin and their accessibility are shaped by local DNA mechanics. Conversely, nucleosome positions shape genetic variations, which may originate from mismatches during replication and chemical modification of DNA. To investigate how DNA mismatches affect the mechanical stability and the exposure of nucleosomal DNA, we used an optical trap combined with single-molecule FRET and a single-molecule FRET cyclization assay. We found that a single base-pair C-C mismatch enhances DNA bendability and nucleosome mechanical stability for the 601-nucleosome positioning sequence. An increase in force required for DNA unwrapping from the histone core is observed for single base-pair C-C mismatches placed at three tested positions: at the inner turn, at the outer turn, or at the junction of the inner and outer turn of the nucleosome. The results support a model where nucleosomal DNA accessibility is reduced by mismatches, potentially explaining the preferred accumulation of single-nucleotide substitutions in the nucleosome core and serving as the source of genetic variation during evolution and cancer progression. Mechanical stability of an intact nucleosome, that is mismatch-free, is also dependent on the species as we find that yeast nucleosomes are mechanically less stable and more symmetrical in the outer turn unwrapping compared to Xenopus nucleosomes.