Single-molecule visualization of fast polymerase turnover in the bacterial replisome

  1. Jacob S Lewis
  2. Lisanne M Spenkelink
  3. Slobodan Jergic
  4. Elizabeth A Wood
  5. Enrico Monachino
  6. Nicholas P Horan
  7. Karl E Duderstadt
  8. Michael M Cox
  9. Andrew Robinson
  10. Nicholas E Dixon  Is a corresponding author
  11. Antoine M van Oijen  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Wollongong, Australia
  2. University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
  3. University of Groningen, Netherlands

Abstract

The Escherichia coli DNA replication machinery has been used as a road map to uncover design rules that enable DNA duplication with high efficiency and fidelity. Although the enzymatic activities of the replicative DNA Pol III are well understood, its dynamics within the replisome are not. Here we test the accepted view that the Pol III holoenzyme remains stably associated within the replisome. We use in vitro single-molecule assays with fluorescently labeled polymerases to demonstrate that the Pol III* complex (holoenzyme lacking the β2 sliding clamp), is rapidly exchanged during processive DNA replication. Nevertheless, the replisome is highly resistant to dilution in the absence of Pol III* in solution. We further show similar exchange in live cells containing labeled clamp loader and polymerase. These observations suggest a concentration-dependent exchange mechanism providing a balance between stability and plasticity, facilitating replacement of replisomal components dependent on their availability in the environment.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jacob S Lewis

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Lisanne M Spenkelink

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Slobodan Jergic

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Elizabeth A Wood

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Enrico Monachino

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Nicholas P Horan

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Karl E Duderstadt

    Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Michael M Cox

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Andrew Robinson

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Nicholas E Dixon

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    For correspondence
    nickd@uow.edu.au
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5958-6945
  11. Antoine M van Oijen

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    For correspondence
    vanoijen@uow.edu.au
    Competing interests
    Antoine M van Oijen, Reviewing editor, <i>eLife</i>.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1794-5161

Funding

Australian Research Council (DP150100956)

  • Nicholas E Dixon
  • Antoine M van Oijen

Australian Research Council (FL140100027)

  • Antoine M van Oijen

National Institute of Health (GM32335)

  • Michael M Cox

Fundamenteel onderzoek der materie (12CMCE03)

  • Lisanne M Spenkelink

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Taekjip Ha, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States

Version history

  1. Received: December 6, 2016
  2. Accepted: April 20, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 22, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 5, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Lewis et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,377
    views
  • 729
    downloads
  • 111
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jacob S Lewis
  2. Lisanne M Spenkelink
  3. Slobodan Jergic
  4. Elizabeth A Wood
  5. Enrico Monachino
  6. Nicholas P Horan
  7. Karl E Duderstadt
  8. Michael M Cox
  9. Andrew Robinson
  10. Nicholas E Dixon
  11. Antoine M van Oijen
(2017)
Single-molecule visualization of fast polymerase turnover in the bacterial replisome
eLife 6:e23932.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23932

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23932

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Hitendra Negi, Aravind Ravichandran ... Ranabir Das
    Research Article

    The proteasome controls levels of most cellular proteins, and its activity is regulated under stress, quiescence, and inflammation. However, factors determining the proteasomal degradation rate remain poorly understood. Proteasome substrates are conjugated with small proteins (tags) like ubiquitin and Fat10 to target them to the proteasome. It is unclear if the structural plasticity of proteasome-targeting tags can influence substrate degradation. Fat10 is upregulated during inflammation, and its substrates undergo rapid proteasomal degradation. We report that the degradation rate of Fat10 substrates critically depends on the structural plasticity of Fat10. While the ubiquitin tag is recycled at the proteasome, Fat10 is degraded with the substrate. Our results suggest significantly lower thermodynamic stability and faster mechanical unfolding in Fat10 compared to ubiquitin. Long-range salt bridges are absent in the Fat10 structure, creating a plastic protein with partially unstructured regions suitable for proteasome engagement. Fat10 plasticity destabilizes substrates significantly and creates partially unstructured regions in the substrate to enhance degradation. NMR-relaxation-derived order parameters and temperature dependence of chemical shifts identify the Fat10-induced partially unstructured regions in the substrate, which correlated excellently to Fat10-substrate contacts, suggesting that the tag-substrate collision destabilizes the substrate. These results highlight a strong dependence of proteasomal degradation on the structural plasticity and thermodynamic properties of the proteasome-targeting tags.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Amy H Andreotti, Volker Dötsch
    Editorial

    The articles in this special issue highlight how modern cellular, biochemical, biophysical and computational techniques are allowing deeper and more detailed studies of allosteric kinase regulation.