Single-molecule visualization of fast polymerase turnover in the bacterial replisome

  1. Jacob S Lewis
  2. Lisanne M Spenkelink
  3. Slobodan Jergic
  4. Elizabeth A Wood
  5. Enrico Monachino
  6. Nicholas P Horan
  7. Karl E Duderstadt
  8. Michael M Cox
  9. Andrew Robinson
  10. Nicholas E Dixon  Is a corresponding author
  11. Antoine M van Oijen  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Wollongong, Australia
  2. University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
  3. University of Groningen, Netherlands

Abstract

The Escherichia coli DNA replication machinery has been used as a road map to uncover design rules that enable DNA duplication with high efficiency and fidelity. Although the enzymatic activities of the replicative DNA Pol III are well understood, its dynamics within the replisome are not. Here we test the accepted view that the Pol III holoenzyme remains stably associated within the replisome. We use in vitro single-molecule assays with fluorescently labeled polymerases to demonstrate that the Pol III* complex (holoenzyme lacking the β2 sliding clamp), is rapidly exchanged during processive DNA replication. Nevertheless, the replisome is highly resistant to dilution in the absence of Pol III* in solution. We further show similar exchange in live cells containing labeled clamp loader and polymerase. These observations suggest a concentration-dependent exchange mechanism providing a balance between stability and plasticity, facilitating replacement of replisomal components dependent on their availability in the environment.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jacob S Lewis

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Lisanne M Spenkelink

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Slobodan Jergic

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Elizabeth A Wood

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Enrico Monachino

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Nicholas P Horan

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Karl E Duderstadt

    Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Michael M Cox

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Andrew Robinson

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Nicholas E Dixon

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    For correspondence
    nickd@uow.edu.au
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5958-6945
  11. Antoine M van Oijen

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    For correspondence
    vanoijen@uow.edu.au
    Competing interests
    Antoine M van Oijen, Reviewing editor, <i>eLife</i>.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1794-5161

Funding

Australian Research Council (DP150100956)

  • Nicholas E Dixon
  • Antoine M van Oijen

Australian Research Council (FL140100027)

  • Antoine M van Oijen

National Institute of Health (GM32335)

  • Michael M Cox

Fundamenteel onderzoek der materie (12CMCE03)

  • Lisanne M Spenkelink

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Lewis et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jacob S Lewis
  2. Lisanne M Spenkelink
  3. Slobodan Jergic
  4. Elizabeth A Wood
  5. Enrico Monachino
  6. Nicholas P Horan
  7. Karl E Duderstadt
  8. Michael M Cox
  9. Andrew Robinson
  10. Nicholas E Dixon
  11. Antoine M van Oijen
(2017)
Single-molecule visualization of fast polymerase turnover in the bacterial replisome
eLife 6:e23932.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23932

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23932

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Gabriel E Jara, Francesco Pontiggia ... Dorothee Kern
    Research Article

    Transition-state (TS) theory has provided the theoretical framework to explain the enormous rate accelerations of chemical reactions by enzymes. Given that proteins display large ensembles of conformations, unique TSs would pose a huge entropic bottleneck for enzyme catalysis. To shed light on this question, we studied the nature of the enzymatic TS for the phosphoryl-transfer step in adenylate kinase by quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics calculations. We find a structurally wide set of energetically equivalent configurations that lie along the reaction coordinate and hence a broad transition-state ensemble (TSE). A conformationally delocalized ensemble, including asymmetric TSs, is rooted in the macroscopic nature of the enzyme. The computational results are buttressed by enzyme kinetics experiments that confirm the decrease of the entropy of activation predicted from such wide TSE. TSEs as a key for efficient enzyme catalysis further boosts a unifying concept for protein folding and conformational transitions underlying protein function.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Joseph Clayton, Aarion Romany ... Jana Shen
    Research Article

    Aberrant signaling of BRAFV600E is a major cancer driver. Current FDA-approved RAF inhibitors selectively inhibit the monomeric BRAFV600E and suffer from tumor resistance. Recently, dimer-selective and equipotent RAF inhibitors have been developed; however, the mechanism of dimer selectivity is poorly understood. Here, we report extensive molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the monomeric and dimeric BRAFV600E in the apo form or in complex with one or two dimer-selective (PHI1) or equipotent (LY3009120) inhibitor(s). The simulations uncovered the unprecedented details of the remarkable allostery in BRAFV600E dimerization and inhibitor binding. Specifically, dimerization retrains and shifts the αC helix inward and increases the flexibility of the DFG motif; dimer compatibility is due to the promotion of the αC-in conformation, which is stabilized by a hydrogen bond formation between the inhibitor and the αC Glu501. A more stable hydrogen bond further restrains and shifts the αC helix inward, which incurs a larger entropic penalty that disfavors monomer binding. This mechanism led us to propose an empirical way based on the co-crystal structure to assess the dimer selectivity of a BRAFV600E inhibitor. Simulations also revealed that the positive cooperativity of PHI1 is due to its ability to preorganize the αC and DFG conformation in the opposite protomer, priming it for binding the second inhibitor. The atomically detailed view of the interplay between BRAF dimerization and inhibitor allostery as well as cooperativity has implications for understanding kinase signaling and contributes to the design of protomer selective RAF inhibitors.