Single-molecule visualization of fast polymerase turnover in the bacterial replisome

  1. Jacob S Lewis
  2. Lisanne M Spenkelink
  3. Slobodan Jergic
  4. Elizabeth A Wood
  5. Enrico Monachino
  6. Nicholas P Horan
  7. Karl E Duderstadt
  8. Michael M Cox
  9. Andrew Robinson
  10. Nicholas E Dixon  Is a corresponding author
  11. Antoine M van Oijen  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Wollongong, Australia
  2. University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
  3. University of Groningen, Netherlands

Abstract

The Escherichia coli DNA replication machinery has been used as a road map to uncover design rules that enable DNA duplication with high efficiency and fidelity. Although the enzymatic activities of the replicative DNA Pol III are well understood, its dynamics within the replisome are not. Here we test the accepted view that the Pol III holoenzyme remains stably associated within the replisome. We use in vitro single-molecule assays with fluorescently labeled polymerases to demonstrate that the Pol III* complex (holoenzyme lacking the β2 sliding clamp), is rapidly exchanged during processive DNA replication. Nevertheless, the replisome is highly resistant to dilution in the absence of Pol III* in solution. We further show similar exchange in live cells containing labeled clamp loader and polymerase. These observations suggest a concentration-dependent exchange mechanism providing a balance between stability and plasticity, facilitating replacement of replisomal components dependent on their availability in the environment.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jacob S Lewis

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Lisanne M Spenkelink

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Slobodan Jergic

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Elizabeth A Wood

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Enrico Monachino

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Nicholas P Horan

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Karl E Duderstadt

    Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Michael M Cox

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Andrew Robinson

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Nicholas E Dixon

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    For correspondence
    nickd@uow.edu.au
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5958-6945
  11. Antoine M van Oijen

    Centre for Medical and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    For correspondence
    vanoijen@uow.edu.au
    Competing interests
    Antoine M van Oijen, Reviewing editor, <i>eLife</i>.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1794-5161

Funding

Australian Research Council (DP150100956)

  • Nicholas E Dixon
  • Antoine M van Oijen

Australian Research Council (FL140100027)

  • Antoine M van Oijen

National Institute of Health (GM32335)

  • Michael M Cox

Fundamenteel onderzoek der materie (12CMCE03)

  • Lisanne M Spenkelink

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Lewis et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,496
    views
  • 742
    downloads
  • 113
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jacob S Lewis
  2. Lisanne M Spenkelink
  3. Slobodan Jergic
  4. Elizabeth A Wood
  5. Enrico Monachino
  6. Nicholas P Horan
  7. Karl E Duderstadt
  8. Michael M Cox
  9. Andrew Robinson
  10. Nicholas E Dixon
  11. Antoine M van Oijen
(2017)
Single-molecule visualization of fast polymerase turnover in the bacterial replisome
eLife 6:e23932.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23932

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23932

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jinsai Shang, Douglas J Kojetin
    Research Advance

    Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is a nuclear receptor transcription factor that regulates gene expression programs in response to ligand binding. Endogenous and synthetic ligands, including covalent antagonist inhibitors GW9662 and T0070907, are thought to compete for the orthosteric pocket in the ligand-binding domain (LBD). However, we previously showed that synthetic PPARγ ligands can cooperatively cobind with and reposition a bound endogenous orthosteric ligand to an alternate site, synergistically regulating PPARγ structure and function (Shang et al., 2018). Here, we reveal the structural mechanism of cobinding between a synthetic covalent antagonist inhibitor with other synthetic ligands. Biochemical and NMR data show that covalent inhibitors weaken—but do not prevent—the binding of other ligands via an allosteric mechanism, rather than direct ligand clashing, by shifting the LBD ensemble toward a transcriptionally repressive conformation, which structurally clashes with orthosteric ligand binding. Crystal structures reveal different cobinding mechanisms including alternate site binding to unexpectedly adopting an orthosteric binding mode by altering the covalent inhibitor binding pose. Our findings highlight the significant flexibility of the PPARγ orthosteric pocket, its ability to accommodate multiple ligands, and demonstrate that GW9662 and T0070907 should not be used as chemical tools to inhibit ligand binding to PPARγ.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.