Inhibition of DYRK1A disrupts neural lineage specification in human pluripotent stem cells

  1. Stephanie F Bellmaine
  2. Dmitry A Ovchinnikov
  3. David T Manallack
  4. Claire E Cuddy
  5. Andrew G Elefanty
  6. Edouard G Stanley
  7. Ernst J Wolvetang
  8. Spencer J Williams
  9. Martin Pera  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Melbourne, Australia
  2. University of Queensland, Australia
  3. Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Australia
  4. Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Australia

Abstract

Genetic analysis has revealed that the dual specificity protein kinase DYRK1A has multiple roles in the development of the central nervous system. Increased DYRK1A gene dosage, such as occurs in Down syndrome, affects neural progenitor cell differentiation, while haploinsufficiency of DYRK1A is associated with severe microcephaly. Using a set of known and newly synthesized DYRK1A inhibitors, along with CRISPR-mediated gene activation and shRNA knockdown of DYRK1A, we show that chemical inhibition or genetic knockdown of DYRK1A interferes with neural specification of human pluripotent stem cells, a process equating to the earliest stage of human brain development. DYRK1A inhibition insulates the self-renewing subpopulation of human pluripotent stem cells from powerful signals that drive neural induction. Our results suggest a novel mechanism for the disruptive effects of loss of DYRK1A during early mammalian development, and reveal a requirement for DYRK1A in the acquisition of competence for differentiation in human pluripotent stem cells.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Stephanie F Bellmaine

    School of Chemistry and Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Dmitry A Ovchinnikov

    Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. David T Manallack

    Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Claire E Cuddy

    Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Andrew G Elefanty

    Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Edouard G Stanley

    Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Ernst J Wolvetang

    Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2146-6614
  8. Spencer J Williams

    School of Chemistry and Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Martin Pera

    Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    For correspondence
    mpera@unimelb.edu.au
    Competing interests
    Martin Pera, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6239-0428

Funding

Australian Research Council (Special Research Initiative SR1101002)

  • Dmitry A Ovchinnikov
  • Andrew G Elefanty
  • Edouard G Stanley
  • Ernst J Wolvetang
  • Martin Pera

National Health and Medical Research Council (Senior Research Fellowship)

  • Andrew G Elefanty
  • Edouard G Stanley

University of Melbourne (Strategic APA)

  • Stephanie F Bellmaine
  • Spencer J Williams
  • Martin Pera

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Bellmaine et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,358
    views
  • 479
    downloads
  • 23
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Stephanie F Bellmaine
  2. Dmitry A Ovchinnikov
  3. David T Manallack
  4. Claire E Cuddy
  5. Andrew G Elefanty
  6. Edouard G Stanley
  7. Ernst J Wolvetang
  8. Spencer J Williams
  9. Martin Pera
(2017)
Inhibition of DYRK1A disrupts neural lineage specification in human pluripotent stem cells
eLife 6:e24502.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24502

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24502

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Kara A Nelson, Kari F Lenhart ... Stephen DiNardo
    Research Article

    Niches are often found in specific positions in tissues relative to the stem cells they support. Consistency of niche position suggests that placement is important for niche function. However, the complexity of most niches has precluded a thorough understanding of how their proper placement is established. To address this, we investigated the formation of a genetically tractable niche, the Drosophila Posterior Signaling Center (PSC), the assembly of which had not been previously explored. This niche controls hematopoietic progenitors of the lymph gland (LG). PSC cells were previously shown to be specified laterally in the embryo, but ultimately reside dorsally, at the LG posterior. Here, using live-imaging, we show that PSC cells migrate as a tight collective and associate with multiple tissues during their trajectory to the LG posterior. We find that Slit emanating from two extrinsic sources, visceral mesoderm and cardioblasts, is required for the PSC to remain a collective, and for its attachment to cardioblasts during migration. Without proper Slit-Robo signaling, PSC cells disperse, form aberrant contacts, and ultimately fail to reach their stereotypical position near progenitors. Our work characterizes a novel example of niche formation and identifies an extrinsic signaling relay that controls precise niche positioning.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Paolo Petazzi, Telma Ventura ... Antonella Fidanza
    Tools and Resources

    A major challenge in the stem cell biology field is the ability to produce fully functional cells from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) that are a valuable resource for cell therapy, drug screening, and disease modelling. Here, we developed a novel inducible CRISPR-mediated activation strategy (iCRISPRa) to drive the expression of multiple endogenous transcription factors (TFs) important for in vitro cell fate and differentiation of iPSCs to haematopoietic progenitor cells. This work has identified a key role for IGFBP2 in developing haematopoietic progenitors. We first identified nine candidate TFs that we predicted to be involved in blood cell emergence during development, then generated tagged gRNAs directed to the transcriptional start site of these TFs that could also be detected during single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq). iCRISPRa activation of these endogenous TFs resulted in a significant expansion of arterial-fated endothelial cells expressing high levels of IGFBP2, and our analysis indicated that IGFBP2 is involved in the remodelling of metabolic activity during in vitro endothelial to haematopoietic transition. As well as providing fundamental new insights into the mechanisms of haematopoietic differentiation, the broader applicability of iCRISPRa provides a valuable tool for studying dynamic processes in development and for recapitulating abnormal phenotypes characterised by ectopic activation of specific endogenous gene expression in a wide range of systems.