Inhibition of DYRK1A disrupts neural lineage specification in human pluripotent stem cells

  1. Stephanie F Bellmaine
  2. Dmitry A Ovchinnikov
  3. David T Manallack
  4. Claire E Cuddy
  5. Andrew G Elefanty
  6. Edouard G Stanley
  7. Ernst J Wolvetang
  8. Spencer J Williams
  9. Martin Pera  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Melbourne, Australia
  2. University of Queensland, Australia
  3. Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Australia
  4. Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Australia

Abstract

Genetic analysis has revealed that the dual specificity protein kinase DYRK1A has multiple roles in the development of the central nervous system. Increased DYRK1A gene dosage, such as occurs in Down syndrome, affects neural progenitor cell differentiation, while haploinsufficiency of DYRK1A is associated with severe microcephaly. Using a set of known and newly synthesized DYRK1A inhibitors, along with CRISPR-mediated gene activation and shRNA knockdown of DYRK1A, we show that chemical inhibition or genetic knockdown of DYRK1A interferes with neural specification of human pluripotent stem cells, a process equating to the earliest stage of human brain development. DYRK1A inhibition insulates the self-renewing subpopulation of human pluripotent stem cells from powerful signals that drive neural induction. Our results suggest a novel mechanism for the disruptive effects of loss of DYRK1A during early mammalian development, and reveal a requirement for DYRK1A in the acquisition of competence for differentiation in human pluripotent stem cells.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Stephanie F Bellmaine

    School of Chemistry and Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Dmitry A Ovchinnikov

    Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. David T Manallack

    Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Claire E Cuddy

    Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Andrew G Elefanty

    Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Edouard G Stanley

    Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Ernst J Wolvetang

    Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2146-6614
  8. Spencer J Williams

    School of Chemistry and Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Martin Pera

    Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    For correspondence
    mpera@unimelb.edu.au
    Competing interests
    Martin Pera, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6239-0428

Funding

Australian Research Council (Special Research Initiative SR1101002)

  • Dmitry A Ovchinnikov
  • Andrew G Elefanty
  • Edouard G Stanley
  • Ernst J Wolvetang
  • Martin Pera

National Health and Medical Research Council (Senior Research Fellowship)

  • Andrew G Elefanty
  • Edouard G Stanley

University of Melbourne (Strategic APA)

  • Stephanie F Bellmaine
  • Spencer J Williams
  • Martin Pera

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Bellmaine et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,321
    views
  • 472
    downloads
  • 23
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Stephanie F Bellmaine
  2. Dmitry A Ovchinnikov
  3. David T Manallack
  4. Claire E Cuddy
  5. Andrew G Elefanty
  6. Edouard G Stanley
  7. Ernst J Wolvetang
  8. Spencer J Williams
  9. Martin Pera
(2017)
Inhibition of DYRK1A disrupts neural lineage specification in human pluripotent stem cells
eLife 6:e24502.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24502

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24502

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Nikola Sekulovski, Jenna C Wettstein ... Kenichiro Taniguchi
    Research Article

    Amniogenesis, a process critical for continuation of healthy pregnancy, is triggered in a collection of pluripotent epiblast cells as the human embryo implants. Previous studies have established that bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling is a major driver of this lineage specifying process, but the downstream BMP-dependent transcriptional networks that lead to successful amniogenesis remain to be identified. This is, in part, due to the current lack of a robust and reproducible model system that enables mechanistic investigations exclusively into amniogenesis. Here, we developed an improved model of early amnion specification, using a human pluripotent stem cell-based platform in which the activation of BMP signaling is controlled and synchronous. Uniform amniogenesis is seen within 48 hr after BMP activation, and the resulting cells share transcriptomic characteristics with amnion cells of a gastrulating human embryo. Using detailed time-course transcriptomic analyses, we established a previously uncharacterized BMP-dependent amniotic transcriptional cascade, and identified markers that represent five distinct stages of amnion fate specification; the expression of selected markers was validated in early post-implantation macaque embryos. Moreover, a cohort of factors that could potentially control specific stages of amniogenesis was identified, including the transcription factor TFAP2A. Functionally, we determined that, once amniogenesis is triggered by the BMP pathway, TFAP2A controls the progression of amniogenesis. This work presents a temporally resolved transcriptomic resource for several previously uncharacterized amniogenesis states and demonstrates a critical intermediate role for TFAP2A during amnion fate specification.

    1. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Sarah Duchamp de Chastaigne, Catherine M Sawai
    Insight

    A new mathematical model can estimate the number of precursor cells that contribute to regenerating blood cells in mice.