Multi-neuron intracellular recording in vivo via interacting autopatching robots

  1. Suhasa B Kodandaramaiah
  2. Francisco J Flores
  3. Gregory L Holst
  4. Annabelle C Singer
  5. Xue Han
  6. Emery N Brown
  7. Edward S Boyden  Is a corresponding author
  8. Craig R Forest  Is a corresponding author
  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
  2. Massachusetts General Hospital, United States
  3. Georgia Institute of Technology, United States
  4. Boston University, United States
  5. University of Minnesota, United States

Abstract

The activities of groups of neurons in a circuit or brain region are important for neuronal computations that contribute to behaviors and disease states. Traditional extracellular recordings have been powerful and scalable, but much less is known about the intracellular processes that lead to spiking activity. We present a robotic system, the multipatcher, capable of automatically obtaining blind whole-cell patch clamp recordings from multiple neurons simultaneously. The multipatcher significantly extends automated patch clamping, or 'autopatching', to guide four interacting electrodes in a coordinated fashion, avoiding mechanical coupling in the brain. We demonstrate its performance in the cortex of anesthetized and awake mice. A multipatcher with four electrodes took an average of 10 min to obtain dual or triple recordings in 29% of trials in anesthetized mice, and in 18% of the trials in awake mice, thus illustrating practical yield and throughput to obtain multiple, simultaneous whole-cell recordings in vivo.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Suhasa B Kodandaramaiah

    Media Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7767-2644
  2. Francisco J Flores

    Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8974-9717
  3. Gregory L Holst

    G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Annabelle C Singer

    Media Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Xue Han

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3896-4609
  6. Emery N Brown

    Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Edward S Boyden

    Media Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    For correspondence
    esb@media.mit.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Craig R Forest

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    For correspondence
    cforest@gatech.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5343-1769

Funding

New York Stem Cell Foundation

  • Edward S Boyden

McGovern Institute Neurotechnology Fund

  • Suhasa B Kodandaramaiah

National Institutes of Health

  • Gregory L Holst

National Science Foundation

  • Edward S Boyden

National Institutes of Health (R01 EY023173)

  • Craig R Forest

National Institutes of Health (R01-GM104948)

  • Emery N Brown

National Institutes of Health (P01-GM118620)

  • Emery N Brown

Massachusetts General Hospital

  • Emery N Brown

Picower Institue for Learning and Memory

  • Emery N Brown

National Institutes of Health (1R21NS103098-01)

  • Suhasa B Kodandaramaiah

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: We conducted all animal work in accordance to federal, state, and local regulations, and following NIH and AAALAC guidelines and standards. The corresponding protocol (#0113-008-16) was approved by the Institutional Committee on Animal Care at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Copyright

© 2018, Kodandaramaiah et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,528
    views
  • 825
    downloads
  • 50
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Suhasa B Kodandaramaiah
  2. Francisco J Flores
  3. Gregory L Holst
  4. Annabelle C Singer
  5. Xue Han
  6. Emery N Brown
  7. Edward S Boyden
  8. Craig R Forest
(2018)
Multi-neuron intracellular recording in vivo via interacting autopatching robots
eLife 7:e24656.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24656

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24656

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    David C Williams, Amanda Chu ... Michael A McDannald
    Research Advance

    Recognizing and responding to threat cues is essential to survival. Freezing is a predominant threat behavior in rats. We have recently shown that a threat cue can organize diverse behaviors beyond freezing, including locomotion (Chu et al., 2024). However, that experimental design was complex, required many sessions, and had rats receive many foot shock presentations. Moreover, the findings were descriptive. Here, we gave female and male Long Evans rats cue light illumination paired or unpaired with foot shock (8 total) in a conditioned suppression setting, using a range of shock intensities (0.15, 0.25, 0.35, or 0.50 mA). We found that conditioned suppression was only observed at higher foot shock intensities (0.35 mA and 0.50 mA). We constructed comprehensive temporal ethograms by scoring 22,272 frames across 12 behavior categories in 200-ms intervals around cue light illumination. The 0.50 mA and 0.35 mA shock-paired visual cues suppressed reward seeking, rearing, and scaling, as well as light-directed rearing and light-directed scaling. The shock-paired visual cue further elicited locomotion and freezing. Linear discriminant analyses showed that ethogram data could accurately classify rats into paired and unpaired groups. Using complete ethogram data produced superior classification compared to behavior subsets, including an Immobility subset featuring freezing. The results demonstrate diverse threat behaviors – in a short and simple procedure – containing sufficient information to distinguish the visual fear conditioning status of individual rats.

    1. Neuroscience
    Agnieszka Glica, Katarzyna Wasilewska ... Katarzyna Jednoróg
    Research Article

    The neural noise hypothesis of dyslexia posits an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory (E/I) brain activity as an underlying mechanism of reading difficulties. This study provides the first direct test of this hypothesis using both electroencephalography (EEG) power spectrum measures in 120 Polish adolescents and young adults (60 with dyslexia, 60 controls) and glutamate (Glu) and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentrations from magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) at 7T MRI scanner in half of the sample. Our results, supported by Bayesian statistics, show no evidence of E/I balance differences between groups, challenging the hypothesis that cortical hyperexcitability underlies dyslexia. These findings suggest that alternative mechanisms must be explored and highlight the need for further research into the E/I balance and its role in neurodevelopmental disorders.