Lunatic fringe-mediated Notch signaling regulates adult hippocampal neural stem cell maintenance

  1. Fatih Semerci
  2. William Tin-Shing Choi
  3. Aleksandar Bajic
  4. Aarohi Thakkar
  5. Juan Manuel Encinas
  6. Frederic Depreux
  7. Neil Segil
  8. Andrew K Groves
  9. Mirjana Maletic-Savatic  Is a corresponding author
  1. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  2. Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children's Hospital, United States
  3. Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, United States
  4. University of Southern California, United States

Abstract

Hippocampal neural stem cells (NSCs) integrate inputs from multiple sources to balance quiescence and activation. Notch signaling plays a key role during this process. Here, we report that Lunatic fringe (Lfng), a key modifier of the Notch receptor, is selectively expressed in NSCs, and that Lfng in NSCs along with Notch ligands Delta1 and Jagged1 expressed by their progeny influence NSC recruitment, cell cycle duration and terminal fate. We propose a new model in which Lfng-mediated Notch signaling enables direct communication between a NSC and its descendants, so that progeny can send feedback signals to the "mother" cell to modify its cell cycle status. Lfng-mediated Notch signaling appears to be a key factor governing NSC quiescence, division, and fate.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Fatih Semerci

    Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0512-1827
  2. William Tin-Shing Choi

    Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Aleksandar Bajic

    Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Aarohi Thakkar

    Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Juan Manuel Encinas

    Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Frederic Depreux

    Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Neil Segil

    Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Andrew K Groves

    Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0784-7998
  9. Mirjana Maletic-Savatic

    Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    For correspondence
    maletics@bcm.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6548-4662

Funding

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP130573CPRIT)

  • Mirjana Maletic-Savatic

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U54HD083092)

  • Mirjana Maletic-Savatic

National Center for Research Resources (S10RR024574)

  • Mirjana Maletic-Savatic

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI036211)

  • Mirjana Maletic-Savatic

National Cancer Center (P30CA125123)

  • Mirjana Maletic-Savatic

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Elaine Fuchs, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Mouse studies were approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Version history

  1. Received: December 24, 2016
  2. Accepted: July 11, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 12, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: July 13, 2017 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: July 27, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2017, Semerci et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,557
    views
  • 765
    downloads
  • 40
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Fatih Semerci
  2. William Tin-Shing Choi
  3. Aleksandar Bajic
  4. Aarohi Thakkar
  5. Juan Manuel Encinas
  6. Frederic Depreux
  7. Neil Segil
  8. Andrew K Groves
  9. Mirjana Maletic-Savatic
(2017)
Lunatic fringe-mediated Notch signaling regulates adult hippocampal neural stem cell maintenance
eLife 6:e24660.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24660

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24660

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Amandine Jarysta, Abigail LD Tadenev ... Basile Tarchini
    Research Article

    Inhibitory G alpha (GNAI or Gαi) proteins are critical for the polarized morphogenesis of sensory hair cells and for hearing. The extent and nature of their actual contributions remains unclear, however, as previous studies did not investigate all GNAI proteins and included non-physiological approaches. Pertussis toxin can downregulate functionally redundant GNAI1, GNAI2, GNAI3, and GNAO proteins, but may also induce unrelated defects. Here, we directly and systematically determine the role(s) of each individual GNAI protein in mouse auditory hair cells. GNAI2 and GNAI3 are similarly polarized at the hair cell apex with their binding partner G protein signaling modulator 2 (GPSM2), whereas GNAI1 and GNAO are not detected. In Gnai3 mutants, GNAI2 progressively fails to fully occupy the sub-cellular compartments where GNAI3 is missing. In contrast, GNAI3 can fully compensate for the loss of GNAI2 and is essential for hair bundle morphogenesis and auditory function. Simultaneous inactivation of Gnai2 and Gnai3 recapitulates for the first time two distinct types of defects only observed so far with pertussis toxin: (1) a delay or failure of the basal body to migrate off-center in prospective hair cells, and (2) a reversal in the orientation of some hair cell types. We conclude that GNAI proteins are critical for hair cells to break planar symmetry and to orient properly before GNAI2/3 regulate hair bundle morphogenesis with GPSM2.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Gang Xue, Xiaoyi Zhang ... Zhiyuan Li
    Research Article

    Organisms utilize gene regulatory networks (GRN) to make fate decisions, but the regulatory mechanisms of transcription factors (TF) in GRNs are exceedingly intricate. A longstanding question in this field is how these tangled interactions synergistically contribute to decision-making procedures. To comprehensively understand the role of regulatory logic in cell fate decisions, we constructed a logic-incorporated GRN model and examined its behavior under two distinct driving forces (noise-driven and signal-driven). Under the noise-driven mode, we distilled the relationship among fate bias, regulatory logic, and noise profile. Under the signal-driven mode, we bridged regulatory logic and progression-accuracy trade-off, and uncovered distinctive trajectories of reprogramming influenced by logic motifs. In differentiation, we characterized a special logic-dependent priming stage by the solution landscape. Finally, we applied our findings to decipher three biological instances: hematopoiesis, embryogenesis, and trans-differentiation. Orthogonal to the classical analysis of expression profile, we harnessed noise patterns to construct the GRN corresponding to fate transition. Our work presents a generalizable framework for top-down fate-decision studies and a practical approach to the taxonomy of cell fate decisions.